Charity rejects disabled child for mother's GC views

Some people just shouldn't be taken seriously.

Our visitors Mask has slipped hasn't it

Our visitors Mask has slipped hasn't it

Baroness Nicholson isn't a 'politician', do you even understand what the House of Lords is?

I've posted up thread the WRN report on rapes and sexual assaults in hospitals, over 2000 reported rapes on hospital property - what are the chances that some factors (which? You haven't said) are common between different assaults?

You should probably be careful in libelling a Member of the House of Lords btw, and saying 'she obviously made it up' about a statement she made to the House is libel.

I've interacted with Baroness Nicholson. She asked for evidence of what I was contacting her about, she didn't just take my word for it.

Baroness Nicholson isn't a 'politician', do you even understand what the House of Lords is?

I've posted up thread the WRN report on rapes and sexual assaults in hospitals, over 2000 reported rapes on hospital property - what are the chances that some factors (which? You haven't said) are common between different assaults?

You should probably be careful in libelling a Member of the House of Lords btw, and saying 'she obviously made it up' about a statement she made to the House is libel.

I've interacted with Baroness Nicholson. She asked for evidence of what I was contacting her about, she didn't just take my word for it.

Not because skeptics told me so, but because the reported case and what the politician presented have many of the same facts. When pushed to answer some of the questions about what exactly occurred, the politician could not answer them despite it not revealing anything additional about the victim. She obviously made it up to make a point. People do it all the time.

Never said that. I said children shoukd be told the sex of other people. If you are going to start lying, I will stop talking to you. Are you going to start lying? Yes or no?

Not because skeptics told me so, but because the reported case and what the politician presented have many of the same facts. When pushed to answer some of the questions about what exactly occurred, the politician could not answer them despite it not revealing anything additional about the victim. She obviously made it up to make a point. People do it all the time.

It's recorded in Hansard. Baroness Nicholson spoke to the woman and knows all the details of the case. Obviously these details cannot be made public.

Health and Care Bill - Hansard - UK Parliament

This is the relevant part of her speech.

However, a rather wonderful lady—I cannot say who she is—was raped in hospital by a man about a year ago. There is only one definition of rape in Britain and that is male on female; you cannot rape if you do not have the structure of a male. She was raped and she naturally reported it to the police. The police spoke to the hospital, which informed them that there was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened. They forgot that there was CCTV, nurses and observers. None the less, it has taken nearly a year for the hospital to agree that there was a male on the ward and, yes, this rape happened. It is on record—I know where the case happened, who the police are and where the hospital is. I know everything about it because she gave me the full case to make sure I knew that what she was saying was true.

During that year she has almost come to the edge of a nervous breakdown, because being disbelieved about being raped in hospital has been such an appalling shock. The hospital, with all its CCTV, has had to admit that the rape happened and that it was committed by a man.

Ok. I get that it can be hard to admit it to yourself.

Yes because all the facts align except for the ones the politician fabricated to make her point.

And yet you are still saying children should be lied to about the sex of other children to entrench this gendered system further in their minds.

Yes Namey! Because the Skeptics told them so! Therefore it must be true....

It is super obvious. You literally see the trans people and their parents saying that the kid is a boy because they never liked dolls. And as I say, you still see people talking about their sex preferences for their children because they ultimately believe that sex determines personality and interests and that they'd be a better parent to a child or children of a particular gender based on stereotypes. We are pretty entrenched in these beliefs.

It poisons the children and that's the homes that trans kids come from.

It is super obvious. You literally see the trans people and their parents saying that the kid is a boy because they never liked dolls. And as I say, you still see people talking about their sex preferences for their children because they ultimately believe that sex determines personality and interests and that they'd be a better parent to a child or children of a particular gender based on stereotypes. We are pretty entrenched in these beliefs.

It poisons the children and that's the homes that trans kids come from.

And you are projecting your very limited observation and experience onto all parents of trans children. This fits with your insistence that an incident which took place on a female ward is the same as one which occurred in A&E. Speaking with certainty from a place of ignorance.

I think if there was any genuine connection between household gender expectations and children identifying as trans it would be super super obvious; and we wouldn’t now have an epidemic of such children in the last fifteen years, since prior generations were far more rigid in gendered thinking than the present.

Personally I see it similar to the anorexia - and other eating disorders - epidemic which I recall my contemporaries suffering through adolescence, that is, as a social phenomenon amplified by peer pressures.

I have to say, this is the biggest load of tosh I’ve ever read.

Based on what I’ve seen, obviously.

I have to say, this is the biggest load of tosh I’ve ever read.

Based on what I’ve seen, obviously.

They only start to vocalise this once their child "comes out" as a way to barter. If they held those views from the time the child was a baby, they wouldn't be where they are. That's my opinion based on what Ive seen.