Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose

993 replies

fromorbit · 28/08/2025 09:10

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:

Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times. They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Sarah Phillimore

Because I don’t tweet as a public body, an employer or provider of goods or services. I am not subject to the Equality Act. I tweet as a private individual and I will say again. You can’t change sex. A man cannot be a woman. I cannot be compelled to call a man a woman.

A trans identifying man such as ‘Kate’ who frequently takes to the public stage to urge violence against women and declare his intent to enter women’s spaces, is a dangerous man and one who will attract public comment.

Follow the fun on X
https://x.com/SVPhillimore

Here we are now: Entertain us

I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us

OP posts:
Thread gallery
75
DrBlackbird · 30/08/2025 23:16

MyAmpleSheep · 30/08/2025 10:49

I think if you look you’ll see a “/s” at the end of the caption to that photo, indicating that sarcasm was intended. So the intended meaning was “no women’s rights have been trashed by my using the women’s toilet”.

Which is of course incorrect.

But I still think @DuesToTheDirt has a point in that whilst the caption was intended as sarcasm, no actual woman would a) post a photo of themselves in a public loo and b) reference destroying women’s rights. It just wouldn’t occur to us to do so. To my mind, this still shows a real awareness of his transgression against women.

RedToothBrush · 30/08/2025 23:00

There's another photo doing the rounds which makes the point about how you should be careful about who you let take photos of you and that it's possibly not a good idea to post them on the internet.

You need brain bleach.

I wonder if our friend will send a cease and desist to Glinner now?

DuesToTheDirt · 30/08/2025 19:03

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 17:47

A thought occurs re the defamation issue. If maugham refuses to delete and apologise, this could end up in court. So would Maugham have to produce Sophie Molly as a witness to support the defence of the statements he made.

That would be gold, for us, but i think pretty awful for Sophie Molly who i cant imagine would fair well under cross examination

Sophie Molly has been a political candidate (never been voted in anywhere as far as I know?) Political representatives need to be able to stand up to questioning, and if he can't do that, well he should give up now.

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 18:56

RedToothBrush · 30/08/2025 18:31

I think putting Molly on the stand would be more than fair given his harassment of Sarah and the expectation that she might have to stand up in court.

Quite. The most difficult part would be narrowing down the selection of Mollys tweets Sarah's team might want to raise in court.

RedToothBrush · 30/08/2025 18:31

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 17:47

A thought occurs re the defamation issue. If maugham refuses to delete and apologise, this could end up in court. So would Maugham have to produce Sophie Molly as a witness to support the defence of the statements he made.

That would be gold, for us, but i think pretty awful for Sophie Molly who i cant imagine would fair well under cross examination

I think putting Molly on the stand would be more than fair given his harassment of Sarah and the expectation that she might have to stand up in court.

SabrinaThwaite · 30/08/2025 18:27

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 17:47

A thought occurs re the defamation issue. If maugham refuses to delete and apologise, this could end up in court. So would Maugham have to produce Sophie Molly as a witness to support the defence of the statements he made.

That would be gold, for us, but i think pretty awful for Sophie Molly who i cant imagine would fair well under cross examination

A lot of what Sophie Molly does himself could land him in court.

SecretNameforMN · 30/08/2025 17:53

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 17:47

A thought occurs re the defamation issue. If maugham refuses to delete and apologise, this could end up in court. So would Maugham have to produce Sophie Molly as a witness to support the defence of the statements he made.

That would be gold, for us, but i think pretty awful for Sophie Molly who i cant imagine would fair well under cross examination

Would probably yell though a megaphone about his persecution and be dragged out for contempt of court.

SecretNameforMN · 30/08/2025 17:52

Sarah is another of Fate's precious gifts to our movement.

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 17:47

A thought occurs re the defamation issue. If maugham refuses to delete and apologise, this could end up in court. So would Maugham have to produce Sophie Molly as a witness to support the defence of the statements he made.

That would be gold, for us, but i think pretty awful for Sophie Molly who i cant imagine would fair well under cross examination

Imperativvv · 30/08/2025 15:47

maltravers · 30/08/2025 13:36

JKR seems to have been ignoring the enticement to sue, why give him the attention he so clearly craves?

Because Jolyon and his GLP are going to Sarah's regulator and trying to fuck with her ability to earn a living. She does actually have to do something about that, not only this particular attempt but to prevent them trying it again in the future.

It's not the same as JKR who not only has enough money never to work again but also doesn't have a professional standards board to answer to if she wants to keep going in her job.

PronounssheRa · 30/08/2025 15:46

ArabellaScott · 30/08/2025 14:57

There's been increasing scrutiny of the GLP's set up. This from 2022:

https://thecritic.co.uk/bad-law-project/

'There is an urgent need for better discipline around those who seek to exploit emotional responses to raise money for legal cases of dubious quality, underpinned by regulation if necessary. Be honest upfront about what you want and your chances of success – or at least be honest about what happens after you lose. These are significant sums raised from the desire of individuals to ‘make a difference’ and there is a responsibility on such organisations to recognise this.
Because it’s not just money received from crowdfunders that enriches the Good Law Project As the Labour Pains blog notes, the GLP “receives substantial sums in regular and one-off donations”. According to statements filed with Companies House in April 2021, “the GLP received £1,136,155 in such direct donations, and another £225,504 in grants”. '

The author of this piece was one Sarah Phillimore. I'm sure it's sheer coincidence that they're now going after a woman who has asked questions about their finances.

What a curious coincidence............

Maaate · 30/08/2025 15:12

Her requests are very reasonable. However if Maugham complies they will be utterly humiliated. Lets see what GLP do now.

Prediction

He will back down (has no option not too really) but it will be framed as big bully JKR using her wealth to fund hatred and harassment of trans people and their allies. Please give us more money anyway, Kthxbye.

ArabellaScott · 30/08/2025 14:57

There's been increasing scrutiny of the GLP's set up. This from 2022:

https://thecritic.co.uk/bad-law-project/

'There is an urgent need for better discipline around those who seek to exploit emotional responses to raise money for legal cases of dubious quality, underpinned by regulation if necessary. Be honest upfront about what you want and your chances of success – or at least be honest about what happens after you lose. These are significant sums raised from the desire of individuals to ‘make a difference’ and there is a responsibility on such organisations to recognise this.
Because it’s not just money received from crowdfunders that enriches the Good Law Project As the Labour Pains blog notes, the GLP “receives substantial sums in regular and one-off donations”. According to statements filed with Companies House in April 2021, “the GLP received £1,136,155 in such direct donations, and another £225,504 in grants”. '

The author of this piece was one Sarah Phillimore. I'm sure it's sheer coincidence that they're now going after a woman who has asked questions about their finances.

ArabellaScott · 30/08/2025 14:49

'We are also grateful for support from Avaaz, Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, Lund Trust, a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin, Necessity, 38 Degrees, and Dale Vince, CEO of Ecotricity.'

'Our executive director is not paid more than a backbench MP in the UK. Our highest salary is never more than three times our lowest. Our current pay ratio is 2.78.'

https://goodlawproject.org/about/governance-and-funding/

'The basic annual salary for an MP from 1 April 2025 is £93,904.'

https://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/members/pay-mps/

So a wee modest mere £93k salary for Mr Maugham, I expect?

SabrinaThwaite · 30/08/2025 14:02

And still very proud of those pictures - which had been happily shared on his public SM accounts.

From Feb 2025 (I have marked it as sensitive image for those not wanting to reach for the brain bleach again).

Sensitive content
GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 30/08/2025 13:59

FofB · 29/08/2025 23:25

Ah Sophie- the fragrant lady who very helpfully decided to help us other ladiesz by testing some washing pegs for us. She kindly tested durability and clip strength by clipping them to her own nipples and posted the pictures for us. I certainly feel happy that those pegs would be useful keeping a duvet on my washing line during a slight storm and fine rain. I'm grateful for her product testing and will be sure to take her recommendations on other household products.

Grin Grin Grin

Charabanc · 30/08/2025 13:52

SionnachRuadh · 30/08/2025 13:51

The thing is, they're spending so little of the money they've raised on litigation and so much on their bloated salary bill, they have to keep in the public eye to keep the donations flowing in. It's pure Ponzi scheme logic. I'm sure Jolyon thinks that if JKR sues him, that will be the biggest crowdfunder of all time.

And luckily she is far too canny to fall for his pathetic attempts at manipulation 😄

SionnachRuadh · 30/08/2025 13:51

maltravers · 30/08/2025 13:34

He’s obviously been trying to get JKR to sue him for months. I imagine he thinks he’s a hero and figurehead of trans rights and the fact that the GLP will be minting it in any case is just a convenient byproduct…

The thing is, they're spending so little of the money they've raised on litigation and so much on their bloated salary bill, they have to keep in the public eye to keep the donations flowing in. It's pure Ponzi scheme logic. I'm sure Jolyon thinks that if JKR sues him, that will be the biggest crowdfunder of all time.

maltravers · 30/08/2025 13:36

JKR seems to have been ignoring the enticement to sue, why give him the attention he so clearly craves?

maltravers · 30/08/2025 13:34

DrudgeJedd · 30/08/2025 13:23

What happens if he doesn't back down? Can he engage the legal services of his own ltd company to defend him and fundraise for the costs involved (while keeping 10% of those funds as the GLP always does)?
This seems incestous and ethically questionable

He’s obviously been trying to get JKR to sue him for months. I imagine he thinks he’s a hero and figurehead of trans rights and the fact that the GLP will be minting it in any case is just a convenient byproduct…

DrudgeJedd · 30/08/2025 13:23

fromorbit · 30/08/2025 12:34

Sarah Philmore has made her application to the JKR fund to sue for defamation.

https://x.com/SVPhillimore/status/1961721842802028829

I am always utterly transparent in all my dealings. I am willing to compromise any legal action in this way. What matters is that Maugham retracts his false and harmful statement and women are shown he cannot libel us with impunity and our rights to speak are protected.

Her requests are very reasonable. However if Maugham complies they will be utterly humiliated. Lets see what GLP do now.

It seems by being incredibly dumb they may have doomed themselves. Not the first time the TAs have managed this.

What happens if he doesn't back down? Can he engage the legal services of his own ltd company to defend him and fundraise for the costs involved (while keeping 10% of those funds as the GLP always does)?
This seems incestous and ethically questionable

Signalbox · 30/08/2025 13:00

I still can't quite believe Sophie Molly isn't a parody person / account. He just seems so fake. I keep expecting him to come clean.

Iamnotalemming · 30/08/2025 12:42

MyAmpleSheep · 30/08/2025 10:55

Pretty sure they do face the same rules; however as a non practicing barrister JM can’t have his income affected by BSB action against him. A practice restriction won’t affect him, but he dan still be disbarred, at which point he can no longer title himself as a barrister or KC, as “barrister” is a protected title.

I think this is correct.
If SP gets a sucessful defamation judgment against him that would certainly be something the BSB would be interested in.

fromorbit · 30/08/2025 12:34

Sarah Philmore has made her application to the JKR fund to sue for defamation.

https://x.com/SVPhillimore/status/1961721842802028829

I am always utterly transparent in all my dealings. I am willing to compromise any legal action in this way. What matters is that Maugham retracts his false and harmful statement and women are shown he cannot libel us with impunity and our rights to speak are protected.

Her requests are very reasonable. However if Maugham complies they will be utterly humiliated. Lets see what GLP do now.

It seems by being incredibly dumb they may have doomed themselves. Not the first time the TAs have managed this.

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose
OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread