Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose

993 replies

fromorbit · 28/08/2025 09:10

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:

Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times. They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Sarah Phillimore

Because I don’t tweet as a public body, an employer or provider of goods or services. I am not subject to the Equality Act. I tweet as a private individual and I will say again. You can’t change sex. A man cannot be a woman. I cannot be compelled to call a man a woman.

A trans identifying man such as ‘Kate’ who frequently takes to the public stage to urge violence against women and declare his intent to enter women’s spaces, is a dangerous man and one who will attract public comment.

Follow the fun on X
https://x.com/SVPhillimore

Here we are now: Entertain us

I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us

OP posts:
Thread gallery
75
AnSolas · 10/09/2025 13:02

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:37

Pic.

Ha ha haaaaa haaaaaa...

Sorry but thats such a MN thread

Thinking that the property your long term partner purchased as their home is you home is kind of normal if you live with them.

Had Farage have come to MN and discussed the house purchase and the financial bits of a long term not married/civil partnership he would have been advised to get his name on the deed.

She would have been advised not to put his name on the deed.

MPs dont need to own property in their constituency so why would NF gaf about what someone posts on SM

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:49

/I guess if you pick figures that tend to get a lot of social media traction and then make some bravado-laden posts about sueing them, it may win you more exposure and thus keep the donations rolling in? By gosh, it might just work!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/09/2025 12:41

He really has lost it, hasn’t he?

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:38

I haven't seen anything to suggest Farage has any interest in what Maugham says, let alone that he has any inclination to sue him. FWIW.

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:37

Pic.

GLP are going after Sarah Philmore and are going to lose
Tallisker · 10/09/2025 12:35

Is he quite well?

SionnachRuadh · 10/09/2025 12:33

Jolyon has very cleverly set up the GLP to be basically unregulated - it isn't a charity and he's no longer registered as a barrister - but if he's going to defame people under his own name, he can't very well insist that they sue GLP and not him individually.

I know the lines between him and GLP are blurred, but as a tax lawyer he should know there are advantages to having some lines between them. If he basically says "I am the GLP" that could leave him even exposed.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/09/2025 12:24

When has Farage ever cared what anyone said about him? What does Maugham expect him to sue him over exactly?

RedToothBrush · 10/09/2025 12:18

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:12

Maugham.is now encouraging Nigel Farage to sue him via the GLP. Is this a continuation of blurring the boundaries between the GLP and Maugham as an individual?

They want to 'prove' far rightism and not WORAIDS.

That's the aim. That's the new goal, because they think it will reopen the case in the SC re Forstater

It will fail.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 10/09/2025 12:13

Why would Farage sue him? Has he said something like that?

ArabellaScott · 10/09/2025 12:12

Maugham.is now encouraging Nigel Farage to sue him via the GLP. Is this a continuation of blurring the boundaries between the GLP and Maugham as an individual?

fromorbit · 09/09/2025 23:45

The fund is now at 8,940 after six and half hours.

Lots of support.

Richard Dunstan

5h
It's time to hold Jolyon Maugham KC to account.

Effectively unregulated and accountable to no one, he grifts £ millions from the fearful and ill-informed, to harass and bully those he dislikes.

But by defaming SVPhillimore, he's overreached himself.

Richard Dunstan

Replying to
@SVPhillimore

It is not in any way a waste of money, for the reasons I set out in May. Maugham needs to be held to account, and we simply don't have the luxury of choosing the means by which that is achieved.

I have done so because I have long considered Maugham to be a toxic demagogue and a public menace. Having become wealthy – but bored – by helping other wealthy people pay less tax, he had wet dreams of using undemocratic lawfare to frustrate Brexit, and then to bring down the appalling but democratically-elected Johnson government that overrode those efforts. As Private Eye noted recently, he set up the GLP (in March 2017) to “take legal action against those he disapproves of”, and that has since included public bodies such as the Charity Commission, Ofcom and the Equality and Human Rights Commission, as well as charities advocating for LGB rights and women’s rights.

On social media and through his lawfare, Maugham sows hate, fear and division, and undermines public trust in the legal and political systems. Effectively unregulated, utterly convinced of his own moral rectitude, and accountable to no one, he is a semen stain on the reputation of the legal profession, an industrial-scale grifter, and a conman, extracting vast sums from the fearful and the ill-informed to spend on his personal and ideological hobby-horses as he – and only he – sees fit.

Indeed, to my mind, Maugham’s idiosyncratic, scattergun lawfare is an offence to our parliamentary democracy, while the GLP’s exploitative crowdfunding is sometimes almost indistinguishable from the criminal offence of obtaining money by deception. And £27.1 million is a lot of (other people’s) money.

https://labourpainsblog.com/2025/05/27/lost-cause-the-crowdfunded-lawfare-of-jolyon-maugham-kc/

ON JKR

Sarah Phillimore
Maugham certainly thinks JKR is funding and that explains his peculiar videos last week. I have made an application to the fund: it’s up to the fund what it does. But the only thing that seems to get through to Maugham is a rich woman. I am not a rich woman. But that’s the beauty of crowdfunding. It allows those of us for whom the courts are out of reach to gain access. If the fund does help I will tell you. I appreciate it’s asking a lot for people to give money to actions like this.

The case

Protection against defamation
by Sarah Victoria Phillimore

Who am I?

I am Sarah Phillimore a family law barrister and member of Fair Cop. I have been speaking out on issues of sex versus gender since 2018. I do not believe it is possible to change sex, and women have a right to single sex female spaces.

Summary

I would like to raise money to take legal action in defamation against Jolyon Maugham KC, the director of the Good Law Project. On 29th August 2025 Mr Maugham posted on both his 'X' and Bluesky accounts the following: A barrister, Sarah Phillimore, led a campaign of harassment of a trans woman so wicked that she sought to take her own life'. This is not true. Mr Maugham has no reasonable grounds to believe it is true.

The background to these posts is that the Good Law Project has been assisting a trans identifying man to make a complaint about me to my regulator. If you want more detail about that I have written about it here Response to the complaint of Mr Weddell and the Good Law Project

Mr Maugham has 411.2K followers on his 'X' account and the post was seen, as of September 5th 2025, 159K times.

On 30th August 2025 I emailed Mr Maugham to ask that he delete the posts, apologise and pay £5k to the campaigning group For Women Scotland. On 4th September Mr Maugham posted a video to the Good Law Project's Instagram, Bluesky, 'X' and Tiktok accounts. He did not name me but repeated the allegation and said he would not apologise.

Call to action

I would like to raise money to instruct solicitors and specialist defamation barristers to advise me on how best to pursue my case against Mr Maugham. I am willing to settle at any time with deletion of the posts and videos, a public apology and a donation to For Women Scotland.

What am I trying to achieve?

I am a proud defender of freedom of speech, but it is not an absolute right. Mr Maugham is entitled to disagree with my opinions and use strong, even abusive language or mockery to do so. But one important limit to freedom of speech is that we do not have the right to tell harmful lies about others to thousands of people.

Mr Maugham posts as King's Counsel and must intend for that status to give his false assertions credibility.

I think there is clearly a risk of significant harm to my reputation or even my physical safety, given the vitriolic nature of some of the comments on the posts and videos. I have already had anonymous complaints sent to my place of work, demanding that I am punished for my transphobia.

I am also worried there is a risk of much wider harm. Mr Maugham does not agree with my views on sex and gender identity and is sending a chilling message to other women who share my views about how he will use his power and influence to silence us.

There is recent evidence in the public domain about organised attempts to discredit those with 'gender critical' views and I am concerned about the role Mr Maugham and the Good Law Project are playing.

What is the next step in the case?

I would like to instruct solicitors and specialist defamation barristers to advise me on the strength of my case and the next steps. If Mr Maugham continues to refuse to apologise, I would like to take action in court.

How much am I raising and why?

I am afraid it is difficult to be precise about how much I will need. Defamation is tricky and expensive. I am starting with a £50K target which may need to stretch.

None of the money raised will go to me. If I win any damages from Mr Maugham I will give these to For Women Scotland.

If there is any money left in the fund, this will be dealt with according to CrowdJustice's Unused Funds process and I will ask that this money goes to either an existing or new 'gender critical' case on CrowdJustice.

I cannot guarantee I will be successful, or even get to court. Please don't give any money you can't afford to lose. If you can't or don't want to give me money, please consider sharing the crowdfunder link with those you know.

Thank you very much.

Response to the complaint of Mr Weddell and the Good Law Project

Having now exhaustively replied to the complaint, I will make no further comment, and will await the decision of the BSB. If they decide to accept the complaint, this will be my response.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/response-to-the-complaint-of-mr-weddell

OP posts:
Charabanc · 09/09/2025 18:54

ArabellaScott · 09/09/2025 18:50

didn't JKR offer to fund her case?

No, she pointed to her fund but people have to apply to that, and to have lawyers already.

ArabellaScott · 09/09/2025 18:50

didn't JKR offer to fund her case?

DrudgeJedd · 09/09/2025 18:48

Sarah's crowdfunder is live now, I know MN doesn't like direct links but you can find it on the Crowdjustice site by searching for Sarah Victoria Phillimore.
Bonus illustration of JoMo and his windmill 😁

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/09/2025 07:59

“Rinse and go” 😂

Taytoface · 09/09/2025 07:53

@MarieDeGournay I would ordinarily agree. I don't like the cruel comments we sometimes see about damaged men in bad wigs and too bright lipstick.

Buy the Fox Killer? I think he is fair game on all fronts. The man is a grifting fool, and deserves all the ridicule that comes his way.

Also Rinse and Go in genius

SigourneyHoward · 09/09/2025 07:13

SionnachRuadh · 06/09/2025 21:45

"I used to be a mere tax lawyer helping Gary Barlow to minimise his liabilities, but then I discovered GLP Wash & Go"

“Rinse and go” surely?

fromorbit · 09/09/2025 00:36

Sarah Phillimore

I shared the photograph of Euan Weddell with clothes pegs on his nipples because I reasonably objected to his depiction of ‘womanhood’ as offensive and insulting. He chose to put those pictures in the public domain. I have a right to republish and comment. If that causes him misery then maybe he rethink about what he puts in the public domain.

Sarah Phillimore

The chances of trans identifying men finding pictures of me with clothes pegs on my nipples is zero. Because I don’t engage in that kind of behaviour. Again. Mr Weddell wasn’t doxed. He chose to publish; he relishes the attention.

Sarah Phillimore

No. The aim of sharing was to show reality to those who continue to think trans identifying men are simply oppressed ‘dolls’. Some of them are men with a sexual fetish who are a positive risk to women. We are entitled to talk about this, and to illustrate our fears.

https://x.com/SVPhillimore

OP posts:
murasaki · 07/09/2025 14:39

MarieDeGournay · 07/09/2025 14:31

'I bow to no-one', said she pompously, in my despisal of JM's actions, but I don't like comments on his personal appearance.
I suppose hair-dos could be considered fair game because they are discretionary, but apart from that...Hmm

Agree, there's plenty about his character and actions to condemn and mock.

MarieDeGournay · 07/09/2025 14:31

'I bow to no-one', said she pompously, in my despisal of JM's actions, but I don't like comments on his personal appearance.
I suppose hair-dos could be considered fair game because they are discretionary, but apart from that...Hmm

DrudgeJedd · 07/09/2025 10:39

Ereshkigalangcleg · 06/09/2025 09:41

Is “we” the Royal We? Pretty sure the lawsuit will be against him personally.

It's been mooted that posting this on the GLP social media channels is an attempt by Jolyon to goad Sarah into including the GLP in her claim so he then has access to GLP funds and resources, they have about £4 million in the bank according to their latest accounts. If it goes to court with just JoMo on the ticket then he'll have to stump up the cash for fees and damages from his own pocket (although I'm sure a crowdfunder will be launched). As much as I'd like to see the whole Good Grift Project hit the buffers I'd rather see JoMo's wings clipped first, I'm sure the collapse of the GLP would happen quite soon after.

moto748e · 06/09/2025 23:29

The Fonz would never have made those gross errors.

Delphigirl · 06/09/2025 23:23

SionnachRuadh · 06/09/2025 22:46

I mean I'm not opposed to a middle aged man experimenting with a new look, particularly if he expects to be doing lots of media, but Jolyon seems to be gradually transforming into The Fonz

That’s very rude…

to the Fonz. I love the Fonz.

CriticalCondition · 06/09/2025 23:00

Maaate · 06/09/2025 22:49

Has he had fillers or Botox? He's looking very inflated round the face

I'm more puzzled by the lump on his chin. Is it a boil?

Swipe left for the next trending thread