Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Where do people think the transvestites have gone?

236 replies

ItsCoolForCats · 27/08/2025 13:17

I remember a time when a distinction was made between transexuals and transvestites, and there was a recognition that the latter category often cross dressed for fetishistic reasons.

But now everyone is just trans. So regarding those who advocate for any man who says he is trans to access women's single sex spaces, where do they think all the transvestites have gone?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
deadpan · 27/08/2025 17:15

Using one word was very clever of who made the decision to do it, because it lumps the ordinary trans people in with the fetishists and men who want to be able to take advantage of the situation. It made it easier to add on to the end of LGB, until the seemingly straight but unsatisfied with being ordinary people decided they were "queer".

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 17:11

Janie143 · 27/08/2025 17:01

100% this My XH is one but he"s now getting free electrolysis, a book job and facial feminiastion surgery for free on.the NHS. Nice of the tax payer to fund him getting his rocks off.

How on earth is he getting that free on the nhs?

theilltemperedmaggotintheheartofthelaw · 27/08/2025 17:05

ItsCoolForCats · 27/08/2025 16:28

Has your friend said why he is transitioning at this stage in his life? In the past, there seemed to have been an acceptance that some men cross dress for sexual reasons, but whatever they got up to in the privacy of their own homes or with other consenting adults was their own business. But now more of these men seem to be leaning into the gender ideology narrative that they are actually women. I think Kathleen Stock talks about it in her book, that if there was less shame and stigma attached to cross dressing, maybe these men wouldn't feel the need to take refuge under the trans umbrella. It's been a while since I've read it, so I can't remember exactly how she phrased it.

I honestly find it hard to wrap my head around some of the paraphilias that men have, but I think the important thing is that they are managed in a way that doesn't involve bringing non-consenting participants into it. And women having the boundary of a single sex space is really important for that reason.

He's extremely vague about it, and I'm not going to ask him probing questions! It's a pity there isn't still someone like Blanchard around doing the research.

In a sense, it doesn't matter, because it doesn't affect the question of who should use women's single-sex services etc. But there are many here who are offended by any man dressing as a woman in public, because at least some of them will be enjoying it sexually.

On previous threads about what GC campaigners' ultimate objectives should be, this question - what to do about public cross-dressing - was always the hardest to answer. After all, if you're a gender critical libertarian, you should be happy for everyone to wear what they want.

Of course certain standards of decency can be imposed by the law, or by a venue, or by employers. But I have it on good authority that it's possible to get an erotic charge from dressing like Miss Marple (Joan Hickson, obvs). It's the fact that they're women's clothes that makes it sexy.

Men are weird, and no mistake.

Janie143 · 27/08/2025 17:01

SionnachRuadh · 27/08/2025 13:58

Isn't it amazing how transvestism has just disappeared? Even ten years ago it would not have been controversial to say that some men cross-dress for erotic purposes. Now that's considered Hitler-level bigotry.

In actual fact it's one of the most common male fetishes. And it starts early. There's no such thing as a man who discovers cross-dressing in middle age - show me one and I will show you a man who was wanking in his mother's or sister's knickers as a boy. So it's probably one of those things that can't be got rid of, but also it's not something you want society to encourage.

This may be painful for Chris to admit, but fetishistic transvestites massively outnumber transsexuals with dysphoria, and including them under the "trans umbrella" might not have worked out as well for transsexuals as Stonewall and their ilk might have thought.

100% this My XH is one but he"s now getting free electrolysis, a book job and facial feminiastion surgery for free on.the NHS. Nice of the tax payer to fund him getting his rocks off.

Doyoumind · 27/08/2025 16:56

I often think this too. I don't think younger people realise today that everyone used to know about transvestites and what they were into and that even the transvestites themselves openly admitted it was a fetish. Everyone knew it was a fetish. No one thought they were women or wanted to be women for a second.

And then suddenly, they all became part of the rainbow community and just as much women as everyone born female.

ItsCoolForCats · 27/08/2025 16:28

theilltemperedmaggotintheheartofthelaw · 27/08/2025 15:59

Since you mention it, erotic cross-dressing did seem to be regarded more with amused tolerance in the 70s.

I think they're still around, doing their thing, and if they haven't become drag artists or 'transitioned' (like David Hayton), they're doing it in private, or on the Internet, and if they go out (like Grayson Perry does) people assume they're trans. Which probably spoils the buzz, because it's not transgressive enough.

I have a friend who's an erotic cross-dresser and is thinking about transitioning (in his 70s🙄), so he's been talking to people about it (as in, therapists: not Jeremy Vine's radio phone-in). He's getting a lot of push-back, particularly from post-op TWs, who are very dubious about the purity of his motivation.

Having said that, David Hayton describes his paraphilia as so agonising that it was a relief when genital surgery finally both sated it, and brought it to an end.

Has your friend said why he is transitioning at this stage in his life? In the past, there seemed to have been an acceptance that some men cross dress for sexual reasons, but whatever they got up to in the privacy of their own homes or with other consenting adults was their own business. But now more of these men seem to be leaning into the gender ideology narrative that they are actually women. I think Kathleen Stock talks about it in her book, that if there was less shame and stigma attached to cross dressing, maybe these men wouldn't feel the need to take refuge under the trans umbrella. It's been a while since I've read it, so I can't remember exactly how she phrased it.

I honestly find it hard to wrap my head around some of the paraphilias that men have, but I think the important thing is that they are managed in a way that doesn't involve bringing non-consenting participants into it. And women having the boundary of a single sex space is really important for that reason.

OP posts:
flopsyuk · 27/08/2025 15:59

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 15:12

Men don’t only cross dress for fetish some do some don’t. There will be men out there that wear woman’s clothing and don’t identify as a woman. They haven’t just vanished. May seem that way because the transvestites could be more private and over shadowed by all the trans people. But then again I’ve never walked up to someone I’ve thought is trans and asked them if their trans or just like woman’s clothing

Who are the men who like to cross dress but it's not a fetish? (Apart from the group who would like to be women or are gay).

(Looking back i can only see men who eventually came out as gay or those who got a sexual kick in my life experience)

theilltemperedmaggotintheheartofthelaw · 27/08/2025 15:59

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · 27/08/2025 15:33

I would assume that they had gone to Transylvania, or is that where they come from?🤷

Since you mention it, erotic cross-dressing did seem to be regarded more with amused tolerance in the 70s.

I think they're still around, doing their thing, and if they haven't become drag artists or 'transitioned' (like David Hayton), they're doing it in private, or on the Internet, and if they go out (like Grayson Perry does) people assume they're trans. Which probably spoils the buzz, because it's not transgressive enough.

I have a friend who's an erotic cross-dresser and is thinking about transitioning (in his 70s🙄), so he's been talking to people about it (as in, therapists: not Jeremy Vine's radio phone-in). He's getting a lot of push-back, particularly from post-op TWs, who are very dubious about the purity of his motivation.

Having said that, David Hayton describes his paraphilia as so agonising that it was a relief when genital surgery finally both sated it, and brought it to an end.

FitatFifty · 27/08/2025 15:54

My friends uncle was a transvestite since the 70s. He moved to a city as there were clubs he could go to where he could dress up. Totally separate from the rest of his life, everyone knew and didn’t speak about it.

2 years ago he declares he is actually a woman. After 2 incidents of him coming to family meals/meet ups and being aggressive, particularly towards the younger female members of the family, he’s been banned .
I imagine the transvestites have all been told now they are women.

ginasevern · 27/08/2025 15:52

It's an excellent question OP and one I've pondered on myself. Are cross dressing men now all to be classed as "transwomen"? Are there cross dressers out there that really don't want to be categorised as some form of real woman? There certainly used to be but you never hear anything about them now.

AliasGrace47 · 27/08/2025 15:51

Shortshriftandlethal · 27/08/2025 14:04

Organisations such as the Beaumont Society, which was set upin the 1960's to provide social activities for transvestites and their wives, have now re-branded themselves as full on transgender organisations. Tranvestites have been subsumed under the trans umbrella.

How do we stop boys from developing this fetish? Or other ones, for that matter? Is it impossible?

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 27/08/2025 15:47

Christinapple · 27/08/2025 13:27

Offensive and derogatory for you to imply transvestites are dressing "for fetish reasons"

Drag has been a form of entertainment going back thousands of years in fact. It isn't something that just appeared.

"But now everyone is trans"

How ridiculous.

Performative outrage to try to close down a conversation you don’t like. Bravo

I mean it doesn’t work on the women here and shows you’re a bit behind the times (2018 called and would like it’s strategies to control the narrative back), but <chef’s kiss> for a top notch example of the technique

TwoLeftSocksWithHoles · 27/08/2025 15:33

I would assume that they had gone to Transylvania, or is that where they come from?🤷

Merrymouse · 27/08/2025 15:29

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 15:23

I’m confused by the question then. We know they’re out there, does it matter where they are?

I think the question is why their existence isn't acknowledged.

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 15:23

SingingintheRadiator · 27/08/2025 15:20

I know they haven't just vanished. That's rather the point.

I’m confused by the question then. We know they’re out there, does it matter where they are?

SingingintheRadiator · 27/08/2025 15:20

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 15:12

Men don’t only cross dress for fetish some do some don’t. There will be men out there that wear woman’s clothing and don’t identify as a woman. They haven’t just vanished. May seem that way because the transvestites could be more private and over shadowed by all the trans people. But then again I’ve never walked up to someone I’ve thought is trans and asked them if their trans or just like woman’s clothing

I know they haven't just vanished. That's rather the point.

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 15:12

SingingintheRadiator · 27/08/2025 14:47

But we're told constantly that no man would dress as a woman for a mere fetish, nor would they then access single-sex spaces dressed as women, given half the chance. So, they must have all vanished!

Men don’t only cross dress for fetish some do some don’t. There will be men out there that wear woman’s clothing and don’t identify as a woman. They haven’t just vanished. May seem that way because the transvestites could be more private and over shadowed by all the trans people. But then again I’ve never walked up to someone I’ve thought is trans and asked them if their trans or just like woman’s clothing

ErrolTheDragon · 27/08/2025 15:11

Merrymouse · 27/08/2025 15:00

We knew in our hearts at that time that policymakers and judges weren’t yet sophisticated enough in their understanding to contemplate rights for people whose difference appeared self-identified or impermanent or maybe even optional.

Does sophisticated here mean stupid?

they were insufficiently susceptible to sophistry, maybe?

LittleGreenDuck · 27/08/2025 15:08

@Shortshriftandlethal Those quotes are predictably awful. I'm particularly rolly-eyed at the chap proclaiming that feminists are feminising wrong 🙄

Hephzibah64 · 27/08/2025 15:03

I used to think that transvestites were men who occasionally liked to dress as women. I had no idea about the fetish side of it.
But then I admired Eddie Izzard when he said he was ‘just a bloke who liked wearing dresses’ 😀

Merrymouse · 27/08/2025 15:00

EmpressaurusKitty · 27/08/2025 14:39

That’s what I was thinking of. Thanks @OldCrone.

We knew in our hearts at that time that policymakers and judges weren’t yet sophisticated enough in their understanding to contemplate rights for people whose difference appeared self-identified or impermanent or maybe even optional.

Does sophisticated here mean stupid?

SingingintheRadiator · 27/08/2025 14:47

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 14:44

They’ve not disappeared, the label has but transvestites haven’t.

But we're told constantly that no man would dress as a woman for a mere fetish, nor would they then access single-sex spaces dressed as women, given half the chance. So, they must have all vanished!

Coconutter24 · 27/08/2025 14:44

They’ve not disappeared, the label has but transvestites haven’t.

JeremiahBullfrog · 27/08/2025 14:41

I wonder if they've convinced themselves that transvestites being fetishists is just an outdated bigoted stereotype, like gay men being paedophiles or whatever. Or that the poor trans people only stole underwear in the past because they had no other way to get it. Or that they are so few in number and wouldn't cross-dress publicly anyway, unlike "real" trans people (just as we're told no man would ever pretend to be trans just to get into a female prison, so the ones who do must be genuine).

EmpressaurusKitty · 27/08/2025 14:39

OldCrone · 27/08/2025 14:34

It was always the plan of organisations like Press for Change and Stonewall to make no distinction between transvestites and transsexuals.

This is what Christine Burns of Press for Change had to say about it:

‘Until human rights campaigners like us came along, talking about umbrella concepts, this diverse community had got along with a relatively stable lexicon for many years. There were ‘transvestites’ and ‘transsexuals’ – TVs and TS’s in the community shorthand – and that was more or less the only language you needed to know for more than a generation since Harry Benjamin had coined the latter term in his book ‘The Transsexual Phenomenon’ in 1966.

‘Our successes as a campaign were grounded in progress made for people who fitted the clinical definition of transsexual. At the heart of this was a tacit understanding that people in positions of power might be persuaded to change laws for people with some kind of clinically underwritten status – something they couldn’t help being. This is why ‘Transsexualism – The Medical Viewpoint’ was seen as strategically important and why all the key court cases had rehearsed the developing scientific understanding of a basis for us being born or developing this way. It was also why the government would expect to include a medical definition of ‘transsexual’ in the forthcoming employment protections they planned to consult upon.

‘We knew in our hearts at that time that policymakers and judges weren’t yet sophisticated enough in their understanding to contemplate rights for people whose difference appeared self-identified or impermanent or maybe even optional. That didn’t mean we weren’t going to try where possible. There was a valid freedom of expression case to be made for people to be able to present in whatever way they wish. But we were also pragmatists, careful not to frighten the horses at this early stage.

The Trans Umbrella Is Older Than You Think – Women Speak Scotland

The intention was always for the transsexuals to be the Trojan horse which let in the fetishistic crossdressers, because policymakers weren't 'sophisticated' enough to realise that fetishistic crossdressers belonged in the women's toilets.

That’s what I was thinking of. Thanks @OldCrone.