Virgin active have complied with the Supreme Court ruling.

Let’s keep in mind that the human rights that spaces used by the public only need to be segregated by sex to comply with human rights expectations. For instance, no male person should expect to have privacy from another male person while using a public space in particular instances (ie communal changing rooms). However, privacy is a reasonable expectation between people of the opposite sex.

It is important to keep in mind how twisted this has become. Because privacy has been used as leverage to support some male people receiving special treatment so they can convince service providers to either allow them to access female single sex spaces or demand a separate space because they reject the space provided for them to use. Based on their philosophical belief about themselves.

Despite having asked many many times, no one has ever replied with a comparable group who has been given this special treatment. All based on a philosophical belief about themselves and their ‘understanding’ of themselves which doesn’t reflect material reality.

"...will just means trans people driven from these gyms.", which would be their choice, because they could just use the changing rooms they're suppose to, nobody's driving them away OJ, get your facts right. He's a loon. 🤯

operationalise what the fuck kind of word is that?

Anyway, good news and not before time, however, the last paragraph with the operationlise bit in it says they are awaiting further guidance - what for? They admit that it is the law, why do they need further guidance.

i was just reading this.

Anya’s reply to Jones’s post was straight to the point. That there were spaces for everyone available.

I think that Jones didn’t seem to be able to read things that don’t exactly fit his own perception of the situation.

Well done virgin though. Took too long but got there at last.