Another perverted woman

I think that would go against the SC clarification of the EA. Perhaps the coppers, the courts and the press are waiting for the guidance?

Unbelievable that drastic medical procedures have been carried out on innocent children and yet there is such debate about taking any kind of action against male sex offenders

I would support a petition. It also puts the public at risk. If the judiciary and media are lying about a criminal’s identity, it makes him less identifiable as a risk in the future. We saw the outcome of that in Canada when reports first surfaced of ‘a woman in a dress’ – a male criminal’s demands were put before the safety of schoolchildren.

#NotOurCrimes

Thank you. That is what I would advocate, and it would require implanted medication, otherwise they won't take it. In fact, some, especially child offenders, have in the past despairingly requested some form of chemical remedy, wanting to have no desires at all, because any desires quickly focus on criminality. Amazingly, they have not been allowed such help, because "that hasn't been the routine way we have always done things, therefore it can never be tried".

That is the same reason violent men are not given medication by implant while in prison: They attack staff, and although there is provision for them to be held down by numerous strong guards, to enable a prison doctor to forcibly inject, both they and the doctors prefer not to do anything against the wishes of the 'customer'. If medication is needed repeatedly, there wouldn't even be enough staff. So, use slow-release implants: Just a single forcible restraint would sort the problem for months, or even years, if it works like the contraceptive implant.

There is a medical reason to suggest implants are better for patients, avoiding accidental over dosing or underdosing, and requiring a miniscule amount of the active ingredient, because going into the bloodstream is a sure way, while going through the digestive system is haphazard, so comparatively large doses are used.

Oooo he's an ugly bird ain't he🤮🤮

Putting people in prison or in mental hospitals costs a minimum of a thousand pounds a week. The same as a care home bed, and they are closing for lack of funds. So are hospices.

It seems more sensible to use modern methods of behaviour control: Put people in a single cell secure medical centre until the appropriate medication has been established.

Then implant them with long lasting doses of what is required to pacify and calm them to a point where they are apathetic, in simulated situations of what once made them a danger to themselves or others.

Long lasting contraceptive implants have been proved to work for women. Violent men are allowed to be released with essential mental health medication in the form of pills which they can choose not to take.

Let men have long lasting implants of whatever reduces testosterone plus whatever calms mental disturbance plus whatever makes them too apathetic to be bothered with fetishes or previous obsessions.

Again, women have tried weight loss drugs and have led the way in finding that it is possible to become indifferent to what was once of interest.

Body-worn recorders are now able to show if, for example, alcohol has been obtained. The old style of ankle tag could be cut off, but even a miniature tracker could be implanted if necessary. CCTV would ensure an instant alert to the nearest police patrol car, if the person left the house, or if a non-permitted individual entered. The person could in effect be under 24 hour watch, all by technology, so there would be no strain on police or probation or health staff.

The entertainment and communication available could be just as limited as in prison, so there would be no option to mix with other offenders or with potential victims, nor to use sites feeding the perversions.

Men could be under house arrest for life, or under whatever terms the court decided. It would be far cheaper, and would be more effective than putting them in prisons or mental homes together with others who could give them tips on how to plan the next offence.

There are some who are so violent they have to have several guards with them at all times. If they are not currently under a prison sentence, they are sometimes put in special accommodation, with a right to go out in public, but with a need to be accompanied. This too is absurdly unaffordable. If they are never going to be safe to the public, they must stay under house arrest for life. But if medication calms them, to a point they could be allowed out, it must be implanted, not to be voluntarily consumed or refused . And, a tracker and compulsory body-worn camera must be feeding their activities and location to an A,I. monitor.

We cannot continue pretending A.I. does not exist. Nor, pretending that prison works.

No wonder “women’s ” crime is going up. They don’t even bother to have a shave or put a dress on anymore the term woman is just becoming other.

BBC News - South Shields obsessive jailed for 'grotesque' nappy bin breach - BBC News
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy27ngp40mo

I see the fragrant Abbie has been up to his tricks again. At least the article doesn't use female pronouns.

I do think he should be in a secure psychiatric unit rather than prison.

Disgusting pervert

I am absolutely disgusted. This is a man, not a woman. His crimes are inexcusable and could escalate to much more serious offences. Just look at the Sarah Everard case!

I am in full support of a petition — why the culture secretary though? Due to the reporting? I think the justice secretary and minister for women and equality need writing to - this is skewing stats and isn’t right. This is a man identifying as a woman which is trans. This is not a female crime.

I’m a bit ignorant of the process but is there a way we could start a petition to put to the culture secretary? We could list all of the examples of the BBC doing this and hopefully shame them into making changes to their style guide. I’m not sure how to do this - does anyone know?

IPSO are completely in thrall to TWAW

I just can’t believe that the press aren’t made to report crimes accurately 🤷🏻‍♀️

But haven't we all enjoyed a girly day out rubbing excrement on things and climbing into bins? A staple of experience of womanhood, surely?

I complained to IPSO about the Mirror article stating it was inaccurate as the crime was committed by a man not a woman. I have eventually had an email back. It very politely tells me to get stuffed.

Suspended sentence despite all that previous offending and breaching court orders? What a joke.

I wish we could go straight to Ofcom rather than BBC complaints. Referring to this man with a particularly unpleasant fetish as 'she' really is laughable. I will never understand how the BBC can't see how much damage it does to their reputation. We need some other way to approach this, BBC complaints doesn't seem to have any effect at all.

This repulsive man is a pervert and I believe his behaviour is likely to escalate if he is allowed to roam free. Trying to excuse his fetish is pathetic and shows just how far society has been “queered”. I don’t think this man is safe to be anywhere near children.

The media do not have to refer to him as a woman in their reporting. They have chosen to do so. The fact that they are happy to she/her the sicko shows just how entrenched in misogyny they have become. It is dishonest reporting, and extremely insulting to real women.

So he's been doing this for years, been caught and punished for it but was still persisting with it. We've not heard the last of this guy.

Oh, and 'Nick Lane said Taylor's motivations were not sexual but regressing into childhood behaviour was a "coping mechanism"'? I know the defence has to do the best for their clients but I didn't believe they were allowed to lie. I don't know of any children who were left to play with soiled nappies so wtf was this guy regressing to? If Nick Lane truly believed what he was saying then I've got some shares in a treacle mine to sell him.

I suspect Abbi's childhood was a horror story. Although if so it's only alluded to, not expressly reported and would be weird that he'd want to regress there. I therefore have my doubts.

He's a deviant and a fucking nutter. It's also blatantly obvious he's a man and we know why he was naked from the waist down; to expose his penis. If I was a judge, I absolutely would not allow men like this to be referred to as she. We all know it's part of the kink making people refer to them as women.

Years ago he'd have been locked up. Either in prison or a psychiatric hospital.

Agree Ronald. These need to be correctly reported using both sex and gender identity. Back in the day, Police officers were taught that TW were an increased risk for committing crimes. Now it isn’t acceptable for that to be said and the Police actively collude in concealing these crimes.

The problem with putting men’s crimes in the women column is that it skews all manner of things from funding, to research to most importantly public perception of women. Not everyone will see these photographs and might hear a radio story for instance. For them this grotesque crimes have been committed by a woman. In the future when this is looked at without context it will seem a woman did this and on and on.
I genuinely hate this

In mitigation, Nick Lane said Taylor's motivations were not sexual but regressing into childhood behaviour was a "coping mechanism" for stress and a "comfort" to address childhood trauma.

fuck off