Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Regulating Access to Single Sex Provision in the Workplace

33 replies

Brainworm · 08/08/2025 12:42

We have heard a lot from TRAs about the futility of trying to prevent transwomen from accessing female only provision. I am sharing a case study that I have been involved in that provides evidence that this isn’t the case:

  1. They reviewed their facilities and made changes to ensure adequate single sex and mixed sex provision was available
  2. Clear communication was provided across the organisation that there are 3 types of bathroom and changing facilities – male, female and unisex and these should be used in line with biological sex (female/male) or preference (unisex)
  3. They are in the process of delivering mandatory training for staff to understand the legal definition of sex and gender and to explained the legal framework upon which the decision to provide 3 types of provision is based. The training also directs people to who to raise concerns with should the policy and practice concern them. The deadline for all staff having completed this training is nearing.
  4. All managers have been provided training to help them handle any arising upset, frustration, or anger. This includes directing upset team members, where appropriate, to the organisation’s employee assistant programme where they can access counselling and legal advice.
  5. The HR team are aware of their duties to monitor compliance and have published the auditing process that they will follow.
  6. Protocols have been developed for managing non-compliance (e.g. reminders/ clarification, formal warning, dismissal) and for legally verifying sex, should that be needed.
Senior representatives from the organisation’s Pride Network were required members of the working party that developed the above strategy. They didn’t want to participate at first but were directed to do so. In being part of the working party, they witnessed the commitment the organisation had to respecting rights and dignity of all staff and they did end up making useful contributions that will benefit their network. Some Pride Network members have left the network, in protest, but have not yet resigned. The organisation has good terms and conditions within the sector, which probably accounts for the lack of resignations!
OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 08/08/2025 13:39

It's very difficult to be a twat if third party provision is provided and part of single sex provision.

If you do, you instantly mark your cards as a problem who wants to use the women not use the toilets. Hello red flag.

If you don't want to raise a red flag and you want to show you respect women, there's a simple solution.

This isn't hard.

JamieCannister · 08/08/2025 13:32

Brainworm · 08/08/2025 13:01

I think it’s easier /easiest in the workplace. I think there are more moving parts with public facilities.

I think the company concerned are appalling.

The evidence suggests that women are less safe in mixed sex toilets, therefore any organisation who provides them is basically saying "some of our female staff may be stupid or vulnerable or terrified-of-being-shamed, woke, virtue-signallers, but we would rather validate a man's desire not to use the men's with the other men, than do everything we can to ensure women are safe".

MarieDeGournay · 08/08/2025 13:23

That's an encouraging case study, thank you Brainworm.

I'd like to see a statement that the accessible facilities are specifically for the use of people with disabilities - there was an example on another thread of a 99% acceptable statement about access to single sex facilities in a local authority-run venue, but then it offered up the disabled toilets as an alternative!🙁

In cases where there is no gender-neutral toilet there may be pressure to re-badge a women's toilet or the accessible toilet as 'unisex'.

If there is no fourth space i.e. a unisex/gender-neutral toilet, males have to use the men's and females have to use the women's, and the disabled toilet should not be offered up to placate 'uncomfortable' transfolx.

Beowulfa · 08/08/2025 13:09

Makes a difference when grown-ups are in charge, doesn't it?

Original poster
Brainworm · 08/08/2025 13:01

I think it’s easier /easiest in the workplace. I think there are more moving parts with public facilities.

OP posts:
murasaki · 08/08/2025 12:56

Thats how to do it. Impressive.

deadpan · 08/08/2025 12:53

That all sounds really thorough, just as it should be. Great to see the insistence of requiring the pride network to be part of it and also that there will be repercussions if the guidance is breached. With it being such a complete approach I'd doubt there would be any breaches. Although there will always be one or two who want to make themselves a martyr.

CassOle · 08/08/2025 12:53

Thanks for that BW.

I think that the TRAs try to forget that decent people (whether they have a trans identity or not) will follow the law. With the correct guidance and unisex options available, this means that most people with trans identities will follow the law.