Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The disgraceful RCN and Nurse Jennifer Melle

317 replies

ArabellaScott · 03/08/2025 22:42

The Darlington Nurses Union has now formally intervened to ask the RCN to step up and do its actual job:

'Suspended nurse Jennifer Melle says her gender row with the NHS has left her abandoned, vulnerable and alone.
The medic claims she has been cast into the wilderness and feeling like a pariah over her unshakable and religiously-held beliefs on biological sex.
She has been suspended from work for four months for breaching patient confidentiality after “misgendering” a convicted sex offender.
Single mum Ms Melle, 40, now faces being struck off but says the silence from those with a duty of care towards her has left her broken. '
...
'Ms Melle was hauled before a disciplinary hearing after an incident in May last year during which she refused to use female pronouns for a patient under her care.
She remains unable to work after Patient X, who was born male but identifies as a woman, was taken to St Helier Hospital in Carshalton, Surrey, from a male prison for treatment for a urinary condition.
Ms Melle was called a n*** multiple times after the inmate overheard her using biologically accurate pronouns during a phone call with a senior doctor.
She was suspended by the trust on April 2 for breaching patient confidentiality after speaking about the racial abuse and referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council.'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2090368/gender-biological-sex-trans-NHS-nurse

'A paying RCN member for 12 years, Jennifer says that when the incident happened the union dismissed her case as not “meritorious” and told her to complete a “reflection” exercise to avoid future ‘misgendering’. She received no support despite the RCN recognising the abuse she experienced.
The Darlington Nursing Union (DNU), which represents Jennifer, has now formally appealed to the RCN to intervene.'

https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/christian-nurse-in-trans-paedophile-misgendering-case-says-royal-college-of-nursing-abandoned-her/

Suspended nurse left 'feeling like a pariah' after trans patient sex row

EXCLUSIVE: Committed Christian and single mother Jennifer Melle says she has been abandoned and alone after the Royal College of Nursing turned its back on her for 'misgendering' a paedophile prisoner in her care

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2090368/gender-biological-sex-trans-NHS-nurse

OP posts:
ScholesPanda · 04/08/2025 13:10

Respectfully, I have to disagree.

Whilst I may support this nurse and I absolutely support using correct pronouns usage in a clinical context, I couldn't agree with a nurse taking a family aside after a death and repeatedly using he instead of she even when that caused further distress to the family for e.g.

Sometimes, you just have to crack on with the job regardless of your own views.

I guess I'm not as much of an absolutist as some though.

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 13:06

mrshoho · 04/08/2025 13:04

A question for @BeLemonNow . Do you think it is safe and acceptable for an entire medical team to refer to an inpatient who is biologically male, as she/a woman/a female patient and have them on a female ward? What about their hospital notes that all staff record and refer to? Are you not concerned that errors in prescribing or requesting of tests could occur due to misunderstanding. Have you been an inpatient in a busy hospital where you could be cared for by 30 or more different professionals during your stay. I can't fathom the idea that the person's true biological sex must not be spoken of. It is delusional and dangerous.

It's clear that this poster is only concerned about the feelings of males. There is zero acknowledgement or consideration of the wellbeing or fairness for women, or staff, or anyone other than males who claim a special 'gender identity'.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 13:05

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 13:01

No I'm literally following your argument about not supporting patient's "delusions" in a medical setting.

For that to hold, it has to include all "delusions" that aren't supported by science including religion.

You compared using someone's preferred pronouns to agreeing that an anorexic is fat. That's a bad argument. Obviously the latter is directly harmful and may even be fatal.

I said: 'It's not helpful to support delusions.'

You said: 'Okay, no supporting delusions of any kind by your view'.

Which is not what I said.

I'm not wasting any more time on this.

OP posts:
mrshoho · 04/08/2025 13:04

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:53

Yes, again that doesn't kill them and they have that choice to take surgery risks. Anorexia kills.

R.e. the God delusion, fetching someone a priest might lead to them refusing medical care so what's the difference with that delusion?

It also seems different in a medical profession than in i.e. private family where the former there's a need to respect beliefs.

Do you really think using correct sex pronouns in an unrelated medical clinic is likely to change their mind about them wanting surgery?

If anything I imagine it would make it more likely to get physical intervention to "pass".

A question for @BeLemonNow . Do you think it is safe and acceptable for an entire medical team to refer to an inpatient who is biologically male, as she/a woman/a female patient and have them on a female ward? What about their hospital notes that all staff record and refer to? Are you not concerned that errors in prescribing or requesting of tests could occur due to misunderstanding. Have you been an inpatient in a busy hospital where you could be cared for by 30 or more different professionals during your stay. I can't fathom the idea that the person's true biological sex must not be spoken of. It is delusional and dangerous.

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 13:01

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:38

No, you're exaggerating and creating strawmen for effect.

No I'm literally following your argument about not supporting patient's "delusions" in a medical setting.

For that to hold, it has to include all "delusions" that aren't supported by science including religion.

You compared using someone's preferred pronouns to agreeing that an anorexic is fat. That's a bad argument. Obviously the latter is directly harmful and may even be fatal.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/08/2025 12:58

Exactly. It’s a power play. Any thought to how a black nurse might feel being forced to go along with the coercive play acting of an abusive and racist sex offender?

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:58

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11063965/

'Individuals who underwent gender-affirming surgery had a 12.12-fold higher suicide attempt risk than those who did not...
Conclusion
Patients who have undergone gender-affirming surgery are associated with a significantly elevated risk of suicide, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support.'

Risk of Suicide and Self-Harm Following Gender-Affirmation Surgery - PMC

Introduction With the growing acceptance of transgender individuals, the number of gender affirmation surgeries has increased. Transgender individuals face elevated depression rates, leading to an increase in suicide ideation and attempts. This ...

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11063965/

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:56

We know that suicidality worsens after 'gender affirming' surgery, so the point about the risks of 'affirmation' is arguable.

But anyway, I don't think anyone should be censured for using any sort of pronoun. One could waffle on endlessly with invented scenarios - the basic point is that this nurse is a good nurse, and was caring for a man despite his racist attack, yet she may lose her job for calling a man 'he'. That's wrong.

OP posts:
childofthe607080s · 04/08/2025 12:56

Benefits of using correct pronouns - reminder to everyone of the persons sex so that they get the correct treatment for the immediate problem?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/08/2025 12:54

I don’t think people should ever be able to expect that others will conceal their sex as if it’s some kind of privileged information and I find some of your expectations unreasonable. And so I support people being able to conscientiously object to using wrong sex pronouns in all cases, personally.

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:53

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:39

Yes. Going along with someone's gender incongruence can lead to them wanting to remove body parts.

Yes, again that doesn't kill them and they have that choice to take surgery risks. Anorexia kills.

R.e. the God delusion, fetching someone a priest might lead to them refusing medical care so what's the difference with that delusion?

It also seems different in a medical profession than in i.e. private family where the former there's a need to respect beliefs.

Do you really think using correct sex pronouns in an unrelated medical clinic is likely to change their mind about them wanting surgery?

If anything I imagine it would make it more likely to get physical intervention to "pass".

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:46

R.e. downsides of medical professionals using correct sex and/or not using preferred pronouns:

  • causing substantial distress to transgender individuals including at their most vulnerable/ sick / dying
  • preventing transgender from seeking medical care until dire / an emergency
  • potentially "outing" transgender status to others who may not be aware adding to the above issues.

I would note in the case of the Christian nurse this would include refusing to use non binary pronouns to a female feminist who wants a less gendered society.

As mentioned there's a distinction between medicine where the first responsibility is to the patient and elsewhere.

I.e. I might call someone fat but I wouldn't expect a nurse to use that word to describe a relative however true it is! As it's offensive and uncaring.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/08/2025 12:40

People are free to prop up other people’s delusions and beliefs. They shouldn’t be compelled to, and others are free to disapprove of either choice.

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:39

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:37

@FlirtsWithRhinos Because going along with someone's anorexia can kill them. That's where that leads.

Yes. Going along with someone's gender incongruence can lead to them wanting to remove body parts.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/08/2025 12:38

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:37

@FlirtsWithRhinos Because going along with someone's anorexia can kill them. That's where that leads.

So could pretending someone was the opposite sex in some circumstances.

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:38

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:33

Okay, no supporting delusions of any kind by your view. So someone on their deathbed requesting a priest for last rites should be told there's no biological basis for life after death?

Someone dying who sees a loved one should be told about the biological basis of near death hallucinations and that it doesn't mean that they will still be with them?

No, you're exaggerating and creating strawmen for effect.

OP posts:
Redrosesposies · 04/08/2025 12:38

Shocking story. The man was in hospital for a urinary problem, so it was essential to share his biological sex with the doctor. The anatomy of the urinary tracts in men and women are different and prostate enlargement and resultant retention are a consideration for men.

Well yeah.. he's got a dick

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:37

@FlirtsWithRhinos Because going along with someone's anorexia can kill them. That's where that leads.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 04/08/2025 12:34

@BeLemonNow

I'm uncomfortable with the idea that using someone's preferred pronouns is analogous with i.e. agreeing an anorexia looks fat.

Why?

"Preferred pronouns" is a euphemism for "sexist beliefs".

Women should not be expected to condone sexist beliefs that are socially harmful to us.

It's not just trans people who matter in society.

LittlePigRobinson · 04/08/2025 12:34

mrshoho · 04/08/2025 00:00

Fucking disgrace. She was overheard 'misgendering' him on the phone with a Dr. Can you imagine how confusing it would have been to refer to him as a she when discussing his medical condition. Isn't it more essential that he was treated appropriately. If the dr thought he was a she maybe they'd have wrongly asked for a pregnancy test or uterus scan. And then she had to put up with vile racist abuse. It is pure madness and the RCN need to get their act together.

Absolutely agree. The sexism and possibly racism against SN Melle is shocking. I really hope the RCN gets dragged over the coals for this and all the other gender woo nonsense they've supported )eg Sandie Peggie, Darlington nurses).

How on earth are Drs and nurse supposed to do their jobs correctly and safely, if they can't use clear, biologically accurate language to describe patients and their health issues?

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:33

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:30

I'm uncomfortable with the idea that using someone's preferred pronouns is analogous with i.e. agreeing an anorexia looks fat.

It's not helpful to support delusions.

Okay, no supporting delusions of any kind by your view. So someone on their deathbed requesting a priest for last rites should be told there's no biological basis for life after death?

Someone dying who sees a loved one should be told about the biological basis of near death hallucinations and that it doesn't mean that they will still be with them?

ArabellaScott · 04/08/2025 12:30

I'm uncomfortable with the idea that using someone's preferred pronouns is analogous with i.e. agreeing an anorexia looks fat.

It's not helpful to support delusions.

OP posts:
JellySaurus · 04/08/2025 12:29

BeLemonNow · 03/08/2025 23:01

It says she was suspended for breaching patient confidentiality - not for being GC. What exactly did she say to the press/ did she include the patient's name originally?

She spread nothing to the press. She is being punished for using medically accurate language when discussing a patient with a doctor.

Medically accurate language, including accurate sex descriptors, is critically important because parameters such as kidney function vary between the sexes.

But using medically accurate language in this context is being described as 'outing' the trans-identifying man and this beating GDPR.

More evidence that the GRA is not fit for purpose and Hans the very individuals it was designed to serve.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 04/08/2025 12:28

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 11:39

@ArabellaScott thanks for the clear answer.

Do you think this is the case as well supposing the nurse knows someone is transgender and others a friend/colleague may not?

If it may be "outing" them so to speak?

Is it relevant how distressing the person may find it?

A trans person who lives openly as both the sex they are and the gender they feel has no fear of "outing".

The reality is that trans "women" are no closer to being women than any other men.

It is onlt those trans people who do not live openly as trans who could be "outed", so it is their own choice to misrepresent themselves that created this "outing" risk.

If someone chooses to live their life deceiving others that it up to them.

But their choice to lie to people who trust them does not create a moral obligation that others must also lie, perhaps about something they feel strongly about, perhaps even though to condone it damages them, and it should not create a legal one.

BeLemonNow · 04/08/2025 12:25

@ArabellaScott having had serious mental illness, I'm uncomfortable with the idea that using someone's preferred pronouns is analogous with i.e. agreeing an anorexia looks fat.

Anorexia is often fatal and any pro-anorexic from a nurse would be in clear breach of their responsibility for patient care. Similar with your comparisons to psychosis.

Accurate information about their biology or sex is one thing, but their sex or biology may not be relevant to their complaint or they may be talking to the patients family or friends. Or writing a report copied to the patient etc. etc.