Labour MPs in denial about Supreme Court ruling

54 replies

Apollo441 · 03/08/2025 22:24

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c8efd6fd-3ecf-4436-ae60-7cff6393c493?shareToken=c585ace670fbb41d062acb8487e0d33d

More hogwash from some MPs.

Josh Newbury, the MP for Cannock Chase, said in a letter it was “clear in my view that trans women are women and that trans men are men”. He said the Supreme Court ruling did not contradict that but that “the misinterpretation of, and fallout from, the ruling has wrongly brought this into question”.

Can these idiots read?

Labour MPs resist ‘backsliding’ Supreme Court trans judgment

Responses to constituents from Labour MPs cast doubt over guidance being produced by the EHRC, Times analysis finds, and may risk leaving the public confused

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c8efd6fd-3ecf-4436-ae60-7cff6393c493?shareToken=c585ace670fbb41d062acb8487e0d33d

OP posts:

Browniesforbreakfast · 04/08/2025 07:42

I suspect many MPs surround themselves with activists who actively block any contrary messages from reaching the MP. The MPs are to blame as it should be clear to them their staff are activists.

Justme56 · 04/08/2025 01:21

Josh sounds as thick as mince. Single sex (the clues in the words) means the space is designated based on a person’s sex. It’s not designated based on gender, because if it were it would be called something different. Single sex means one sex, Josh. When both sexes use it, it’s not single sex is it - so utterly pointless referring to it as single sex.

InterrobangsArePureBias · 03/08/2025 23:08

Apollo441 · 03/08/2025 22:24

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c8efd6fd-3ecf-4436-ae60-7cff6393c493?shareToken=c585ace670fbb41d062acb8487e0d33d

More hogwash from some MPs.

Can these idiots read?