We must arm ourselves, say trans activists

At every single LWS event or similar women-led get together I have been shocked at the contrast between women in jeans and t-shirts singing and talking; vs black-shorted me in balaclavas, hoodies, masks and other similarly deliberately menacing military-esque garb with ersatz weapons and similar threatening accessories and stuff.

I can't believe they don't all crack up laughing at how ridiculous they look lined up like that.

And all of a sudden biological sex is easy to define. It's been quite a ride.

I know right. It just shows how much the trans community hate women. And yes I’m including all of them because not one transperson has condemned the death threats, rape threats and violence and abuse that women recieve from the TRA.

So many attendees and not one told them their signs were offensive. Shocking

What’s a cisgender woman when it’s at home? And why should people not point out threats of violence and death towards women? I didn’t see anyone taking those signs down. Which I presume means that those marching agreed with the sentiments. I take it from your post you agree woman should not have sex based rights. Why not?

The annual thread picking out one placard out of tens of thousands and being presented as representative of a protest of 100,000 people took a bit longer than I’d have expected.

As has the erasure of the thousands of biologically female people - cisgender women, trans men and non binary people - who marched yesterday.

And completely unsurprising.

Because despite the endless whining about victimisation they're in fact pretty much allowed to do what they like

Well well well

How interesting.

Exactly. They seem to think that in a society in anarchy, they would somehow be the winners. I don’t think they understand what anarchy is. It’s like the TRA who claim to be communists cos they think they’ll be able to not work and live fully funded lifestyles. Like I said, they’re adorable lol.

Male violence really screams femininity.

And if anything is going to bite you on the arse, it's anarchy!

They wouldn’t know anarchy if it bit them on their asses.

They proclaim themselves to be anarchists, so what do you expect? It’s not exactly a peaceful ideology, what with the destruction of society as we understand it.

Why are they allowed to march about cities threatening women in this way? The authorities have got to get a grip.

They do bless them. It’s adorable

Just posted on another thread:

Random study I found shared by a detrans bloke:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612424/full
Transgender Identity Is Associated With Bullying Involvement Among Finnish Adolescents

sounds about right if we consider Upton.

Logistic regression revealed that non-binary identity was most strongly associated with involvement in bullying, followed by opposite sex identity and cisgender identity. Transgender identities were also more strongly associated with perpetration of bullying than subjection to bullying.

At a time when the Supreme Court is making sweeping decisions about trans people without consulting a single trans person or organisation, and when a small, well-funded lobby of anti-trans campaigners continues to dominate headlines and waste public resources, our community came together to show what real strength, solidarity and care looks like.

Do they mean us? 😀

I mean, they made a comment about how lesbians are attracted to other women, not men with gender recognition certificates. That was definitely outside the scope of the question!

I suspect if they went into more detail than was needed (I can't speak to that), it was to make sure every 'i' was dotted and every 't' crossed, to justify their ruling to the enth degree in a futile bid to satisfy the unsatisfiable.

And probably to reduce the risk of a nutter on a rooftop with a long range rifle outside their house.

This really makes me think how vulnerable trans women seem.

My personal opinion is that they went into more detail than they strictly needed to for the purposes of the question being asked, and probably wouldn't have done if they didn't agree with it.

Surely it's men trying to erase non conforming men by pretending they're women rather than men in dresses? They can have them back!

But aren't they always wanging on that they're at high risk of suicide and have the severest MH problems of anyone anywhere ever? So why would they think anyone in their right mind would let them have weapons?!

I don't understand all this vitriol directed towards the Supreme Court judges who clarified the law on the EQ (or maybe I do, because TRAs are fucking insane).

The judgement didn't say that any of the judges AGREED with the Equality Act's definition of sex. Those judges could be paid up members of every rainbow PRIDE group the length and breadth of the UK, for all anyone knows. They simply came to a decision, "this is what the law says". That's all. They weren't asked to rule on whether or not they agreed with it.