Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Should trans people have fewer rights? ‘Not in our name’, say over 35,000 women

218 replies

BeeSouriante · 27/06/2025 19:56

https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/society/should-trans-people-have-fewer-rights-not-in-our-name-say-over-35000-women/

Actually 36,000 now. Heartening to see in these horrible times. It's always wonderful when you see people come out to stand in solidarity against the manufactured anti-trans panic.

Should trans people have fewer rights? ‘Not in our name’, say over 35,000 women

Women tired of being told that their rights are threatened by trans people are using a petition to stand up for inclusive feminism

https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/society/should-trans-people-have-fewer-rights-not-in-our-name-say-over-35000-women/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:31

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2025 07:27

Yes, they are. Which is inconvenient for trans activists, because we can see their violent and unacceptable conduct.

I don't know what you're on about..like they're just a bunch of women and men ranting about trans people incoherently, but I guess we have different understanding of what is meant by words and stuff.

Did you ever see that clip of KJK approvingly responding to a GC man talking about the genital torture of a trans woman?

OP posts:
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2025 07:27

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:19

Those anti-trans rallies are all there on YT lmao

Anyway, you keep well x

Yes, they are. Which is inconvenient for trans activists, because we can see their violent and unacceptable conduct.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2025 07:24

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:13

I mean I disagree that it's a 'bunch of women' given that 1/2 of them are men, but yes.

Oh, far more than half of the trans activists are men, whatever they call themselves.

A group of mostly men, many of them "identifying as women", showing up with balaclavas and weapons to assault a group of women no more than a tenth of their number, all for wanting to speak about their lives.

Nothing says "I'm a vulnerable and oppressed minority" quite like punching an elderly woman in the head, fracturing her skull and getting off with a rap on the knuckles and legal anonymity, does it?

ShawnsLeftEyebrow · 29/06/2025 07:22

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:13

I mean I disagree that it's a 'bunch of women' given that 1/2 of them are men, but yes.

Half of them are men?

As the kids here would say, did you just assume their gendaaaaah?

ArabellaScott · 29/06/2025 07:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Defamatory.

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:19

FeistyCat · 29/06/2025 07:17

So your example of an 'anti-trans' [sic] rally is a PRO-WOMENS RIGHTS rally.

In other words, you lied.

And no, 90-95% of attendees are female.

Unlike the Mens Rights/Male Supremacist rallies where 95-98% are men.

Those anti-trans rallies are all there on YT lmao

Anyway, you keep well x

OP posts:
Fluffyholeysocks · 29/06/2025 07:19

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:13

I mean I disagree that it's a 'bunch of women' given that 1/2 of them are men, but yes.

Don't you think it's great that men support 'Let Women Speak"? I do.

FeistyCat · 29/06/2025 07:17

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:13

I mean I disagree that it's a 'bunch of women' given that 1/2 of them are men, but yes.

So your example of an 'anti-trans' [sic] rally is a PRO-WOMENS RIGHTS rally.

In other words, you lied.

And no, 90-95% of attendees are female.

Unlike the Mens Rights/Male Supremacist rallies where 95-98% are men.

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:13

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2025 07:10

You mean the "Let Women Speak" events?

A bunch of women, a patch of grass and a microphone?

The same events where trans people were so outraged at the idea of women being allowed to speak that they showed up to intimidate and physically and sexually assault those women?

The events where a police presence was required because the authorities knew the "trans rights" counter protesters would behave in a violent and criminal manner?

Those "anti-trans rallies"?

Edited

I mean I disagree that it's a 'bunch of women' given that 1/2 of them are men, but yes.

OP posts:
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/06/2025 07:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You mean the "Let Women Speak" events?

A bunch of women, a patch of grass and a microphone?

The same events where trans people were so outraged at the idea of women being allowed to speak that they showed up to intimidate and physically and sexually assault those women?

The events where a police presence was required because the authorities knew the "trans rights" counter protesters would behave in a violent and criminal manner?

Those "anti-trans rallies"?

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 07:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Dragonblo · 29/06/2025 07:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Igneococcus · 29/06/2025 06:47

If they are doing it for screenshots of how toxic we are, that's not working out very well for them.
The screenshot also only go to other forums full of users that are convinced we're evil anyway. I'm not sure what they think they achieve with it.

TheOtherRaven · 29/06/2025 06:35

Bored now.

FeistyCat · 29/06/2025 04:43

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 00:33

i don't but given that (cisgender) women are generally less fussed about trans people than men, it's not exactly surprising that 36,000 signed.

For reference, 36K is around 150x the biggest anti-trans rally

Since when has there ever been an anti-trans rally? Can you tell us when this was?

Or did you just make up that lie?

sanluca · 29/06/2025 02:10

I just see 36k of people who will share those gender neutral facilities trans people will now campaign for.

Datun · 29/06/2025 01:39

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 00:33

i don't but given that (cisgender) women are generally less fussed about trans people than men, it's not exactly surprising that 36,000 signed.

For reference, 36K is around 150x the biggest anti-trans rally

Fascinating. I suspect it's because typing your name on a screen isn't generally considered that onerous.

ScathingAngelAgrona · 29/06/2025 00:53

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 00:33

i don't but given that (cisgender) women are generally less fussed about trans people than men, it's not exactly surprising that 36,000 signed.

For reference, 36K is around 150x the biggest anti-trans rally

Proof of this claim from a reliable source? (Wikipedia is not a reliable source.)

Also, no such thing as ‘cis’ for humans. This has been explained to you before.

BeeSouriante · 29/06/2025 00:33

Dwimmer · 28/06/2025 09:54

A tiny minority of women signed a petition

How do you know they were women?

i don't but given that (cisgender) women are generally less fussed about trans people than men, it's not exactly surprising that 36,000 signed.

For reference, 36K is around 150x the biggest anti-trans rally

OP posts:
RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/06/2025 23:58

can a bee smile?

no…that would be a no

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 28/06/2025 23:58

Thats fucking scary 😳

Datun · 28/06/2025 23:40

Cripes

Boiledbeetle · 28/06/2025 23:32

ScathingAngelAgrona · 28/06/2025 22:44

Is my (google) translation correct and the OP adopted the name of ‘smiling bee’?
Can a bee smile?

.

Should trans people have fewer rights? ‘Not in our name’, say over 35,000 women
ScathingAngelAgrona · 28/06/2025 22:44

Is my (google) translation correct and the OP adopted the name of ‘smiling bee’?
Can a bee smile?

MarieDeGournay · 28/06/2025 16:08

Berthatydfil · 28/06/2025 12:45

I expect the OP is following the advice in this Reddit post

https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/s/kAQBJn2yFu

One of the comments says the Yorkshire Bylines article is a Fantastic well researched article.
Never was the absence of -ly more appropriate - it is indeed full of fantasy.

Re banning 'ploppers' - it feels like playing into their hands, poor marginalised censored people that they are🙄
If they are doing it for screenshots of how toxic we are, that's not working out very well for them.

On another thread FeistyCat wrote something I really liked:

I am more than proud to have my posts in your screenshots. Why? Because I have not posted anything anti-trans. Only pro-women. The same as everyone else on this thread. And I wager that all the rest of the women on this thread feel the same way, and feel no shame in anything they posted and would be proud to be in your screenshots. So..... what is it exactly that you think you achieved, other than women explaining to you why women need our hard won human rights? You came away empty-handed.

Well said, FeistyCat, I think it was worth repeating hereSmile

Swipe left for the next trending thread