"ChatGPT, create an image of a transwomen and a natal woman sharing a happy moment together."

ChatGPT showing it totally gets it 😆😎😆

Maybe it does "think" after all.

It is curious that they all look like David Walliams.

I am going to say in all seriousness that they "trained" this crock of shit on the entire series of "Little Britain".

Somewhere upthread a poster was subtly lecturing me on how "AI" works.

I leave all posters to review the evidence thus far.

Do you know, until I read your post & looked at the first image again, I hadn't noticed the [fake] breasts at all. I'd detected the man by the shape & nature of his face ...

Nor gender ....

Well, it's quite clear that ChatGPT has made a picture of a natal man and a natal woman. The man has long hair but I have short hair and am a woman. So hair length is not an indicator of sex.

Meanwhile, what was that Clash album called ?

"Thinking", "knowing", and "deciding" see to me like useful and accurate terms to me to describe what's going on.

If you like.

I have some bridges I may want to sell.

Changed to transgender identified woman

"create an image of a transgender-identified woman and a woman sharing a happy moment together"

Co pilots offering for "create an image of a transgender-identified man and a woman sharing a happy moment together."

I think that confused it.

What does it show if you ask it "ChatGPT, create an image of a transgender-identified man and a woman sharing a happy moment together"?

"Thinking", "knowing", and "deciding" see to me like useful and accurate terms to me to describe what's going on. Of course we know that under the hood it's all just a bunch of matrix multiplications, but then again human intelligence is also emergent from a rather simple substrate. I don't see any principled basis to distinguish between my cat "knowing" where the cat food is kept, and an AI assistant "knowing" what the capital of France is.

It's certainly very different from human intelligence, with rather different strengths and weaknesses. It's also not at the level of flexibility and generality of a typical human, although it's better at many specific cognitive tasks, and has in some respects a far broader range than any individual human, for example in terms of the number of different languages it can understand.

There is a powerful cognitive illusion caused by their linguistic fluency that leads people to impute things like agency or moral standpoints to AI assistants. Those are definitely not there!

FYI:

https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/26/top_ai_models_parrot_chinese/

Mine was asked to portray a trans and natal woman enjoying a fun activity together.

It's describing a totally different picture!

The clothes, poses and features are almost all wrong. The woman doesn't have curly hair or hoop earings and isn't holding a water bottle, the transwoman doesn't have hands clasped in front, the man has stubble but you couldn't call it a beard and he's not wearing glasses or a sweater, the transman's facial hair is not a goatee.... About the only points that are correct are the man's trousers and the neutral background.

I think my vacuum cleaner may have absorbed my sense of humour though.

It's not genuis-level stuff, but the assistant here has correctly decided

Point of order. "AI" does't know. It doesn't think. And it doesn't decide.

In fact you could probably rewrite the quote from terminator to express that, for irony (which "AI" also doesn't do).

Remember you are seeing an imitation of intelligence. Like a lot of people, it only looks intelligent on the surface

This is interesting, the transman’s facial appearance is very accurate, but the body proportions are male-looking, with a very long body and lower crotch. Conversely the TW has a short waist and long legs which is very unusual for males. Suggesting it’s done the heads and bodies as separate searches.

"Depict a gender critical feminist sharing a happy moment with a transwoman"

Co Pilot was perhaps worried I wouldn't know which was which and it's obviously sick of me asking it to tell me which is which.

It's interesting that there's such variation when generating images from the same instructions.

In 2/3 of the images the GC feminist has short hair although that may also be because they perceive it to be a slightly older demographic in general and those hairstyles are more common in middle aged women.

In my image the TW looks distinctly male but in your two they look 100% female.

This is a transwoman as they perceive themself standing next to the same person as perceived by a gender critical feminist. Or not.

Grok had no problem drawing an actual man that looked like a man, but its women and transwomen look identical, even when asked to focus on physical accuracy. Its “programming” is clearly TWAW and so it creates that, obliterating the sex differences that we all can see in real life because we are programmed to sex people accurately.

So, allegedly, are these two. When I asked who was who I was told it was not possible to tell.

Apparently this is a gender critical feminist sharing a happy moment with a transwoman!

Co Pilot will even let you attach a photo and it will do whatever you want with it.

Photo of me this evening turned into a beetle and a photo of the cat sat by the cat flap turned into a hand drawn sketch

Chat GPT, copilot etc can generate and process graphics‽ I thought they were limited to text.

Otherwise he’d just look like a (male) member of a 90s grunge band.