Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?

440 replies

BeeSouriante · 21/06/2025 00:07

Like I've had three posts removed

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Waitwhat23 · 22/06/2025 16:41

Is the picnic cancelled? Bugger. I'd made a cake (strangely enough with my homemade blackcurrant jam!)

For those with fruit gluts, I make liqueurs - my recipe (slightly modified from Good Food)

600g blackcurrants
750ml red wine
500g sugar
Large glass of gin or vodka.

Tidy up the berries (removing stalks, leaves and insects) and tip into a ceramic bowl. Pour over the wine and mash with a potato masher. Leave to macerate for two days with a tea towel over it, mashing occasionally. Pour through a sieve into a pan and add the sugar. Heat gently until the sugar has dissolved and then simmer for 5 minutes. Leave to cool then add the gin or vodka. Pour into sterilised bottles and keep for up to a year.

For strawberry liqueur, the same as above but with white wine.

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?
Helleofabore · 22/06/2025 16:29

I think that I am suspicious of anyone who writes blanket statements relating to feminists as ‘opposing trans rights’ . While there seems to be one ‘right’ in law regarding changing identification to say a male person is a ‘legal’ woman, I personally would describe much of the over reach that women are discussing with a view to change is guidance and policy. Do legal professionals refer to those policies and guidance points as ‘rights’ or consider them to be privileges or another term.

Either way, we are constantly told, or even had yelled at us in protests, that certain women ‘hate’ trans rights and want to erase all those rights. This is where blanket statements are confusing and they may be incorrect depending on what is meant by the terms.

It is not a statement that I am going to agree with without clarification. And it seems to me that asking for clarification was considered offensive by someone who also had complained that they had reported bullying and it hadn’t been deleted.

Shedmistress · 22/06/2025 16:28

illinivich · 22/06/2025 15:59

I'm assuming the claims about reducing trans rights is about repealing the GRA?

Edited

As the Supreme Court confirmed, a GRC is pretty worthless anyway as nobody can ask to see it, can record it or mention it in any way.

So...

MrsTerryPratchett · 22/06/2025 16:22

FlirtsWithRhinos · 22/06/2025 15:51

Love Peak-nique , or even just Peak-nic

Definitely.

Approved.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 22/06/2025 16:06

BeeSouriante · 21/06/2025 00:11

I've read them but I disagree why do you keep restricting my voice?

It is MNHQ that removes posts, @BeeSouriante - not ordinary posters in the Feminism section, or anywhere else on Mumsnet.

If you are having posts removed, it is because they have breached MNHQ’s Talk guidelines, pure and simple.

If you tell me human beings can actually change sex, I will defend your right to state your opinion. And I will be free to tell you that it is scientifically and medically impossible to change a person’s sex.

DialSquare · 22/06/2025 16:05

DialSquare · 22/06/2025 15:54

Yep that quote annoyed me too. It’s a gross miss presentation of the regular posters here. I would love for someone to tell us what rights trans people don’t have and what rights the posters on this board are against.

Obviously that should have been misrepresentation! Bloody fat fingers!

illinivich · 22/06/2025 15:59

I'm assuming the claims about reducing trans rights is about repealing the GRA?

FlirtsWithRhinos · 22/06/2025 15:57

MrsOvertonsWindow · 22/06/2025 15:52

😂😂
I wondered why this tedious thread was still going - and here you all are - picnicking on the proceeds of all the gardener's best efforts

Amazing what a good dump of manure can do!

DialSquare · 22/06/2025 15:54

WithSilverBells · 22/06/2025 15:41

Going to have to repectively disagree with you there I'm afraid.

The poster doubled-down in their next post:
But there are quite clearly people on this board who are opposed to trans rights and anybody suggesting that there is not is not being honest (perhaps even with themselves).
but repeatedly declined to explain what they meant.

Yep that quote annoyed me too. It’s a gross miss presentation of the regular posters here. I would love for someone to tell us what rights trans people don’t have and what rights the posters on this board are against.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 22/06/2025 15:52

😂😂
I wondered why this tedious thread was still going - and here you all are - picnicking on the proceeds of all the gardener's best efforts

Helleofabore · 22/06/2025 15:51

DrBlackbird · 22/06/2025 14:58

I don’t agree about the something else in the background and see it simply as a bit defensive after her position on moderation was misinterpreted and challenged. Sometimes we do race from one post to the next and/or make posts in haste, threads can move quickly and clarity can be lost.

It was not wholly clear to me whether use of the term ‘trans rights’ was being made in terms of suggesting TW needed more rights than they currently have, but I don’t think that was the intention. Anyhow, this sums up my perspective:

To women, our rights and no less. To transpeople, their rights and no more.

I don’t believe that the position on moderation was necessarily misunderstood. I think,
looking back, people were attempting to establish the intention of the poster’s point around ‘trans rights’.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 22/06/2025 15:51

Love Peak-nique , or even just Peak-nic

ArabellaScott · 22/06/2025 15:50

Boiledbeetle · 22/06/2025 14:24

Sorry, I was having a snooze. And I notice someone nicked the wonderful dessert whilst I snoozed!

Uncanny!

Igneococcus · 22/06/2025 15:49

lady69 · 22/06/2025 15:10

I will soon be overrun with courgettes. I give it a week!

That happened to me last year and then I made this recipe zucchini pickles and now I know how to deal with a glut. So good on a sandwich especially one with cheese.

WithSilverBells · 22/06/2025 15:47

WithSilverBells · 22/06/2025 15:41

Going to have to repectively disagree with you there I'm afraid.

The poster doubled-down in their next post:
But there are quite clearly people on this board who are opposed to trans rights and anybody suggesting that there is not is not being honest (perhaps even with themselves).
but repeatedly declined to explain what they meant.

respectfully, soz

DiamondThrone · 22/06/2025 15:43

MrsTerryPratchett · 22/06/2025 15:11

Is that a picnique?

😄

A cliquenique

Or a peaknique...

Piquenique??

WithSilverBells · 22/06/2025 15:41

DrBlackbird · 22/06/2025 14:58

I don’t agree about the something else in the background and see it simply as a bit defensive after her position on moderation was misinterpreted and challenged. Sometimes we do race from one post to the next and/or make posts in haste, threads can move quickly and clarity can be lost.

It was not wholly clear to me whether use of the term ‘trans rights’ was being made in terms of suggesting TW needed more rights than they currently have, but I don’t think that was the intention. Anyhow, this sums up my perspective:

To women, our rights and no less. To transpeople, their rights and no more.

Going to have to repectively disagree with you there I'm afraid.

The poster doubled-down in their next post:
But there are quite clearly people on this board who are opposed to trans rights and anybody suggesting that there is not is not being honest (perhaps even with themselves).
but repeatedly declined to explain what they meant.

MarieDeGournay · 22/06/2025 15:36

DrBlackbird · 22/06/2025 14:58

I don’t agree about the something else in the background and see it simply as a bit defensive after her position on moderation was misinterpreted and challenged. Sometimes we do race from one post to the next and/or make posts in haste, threads can move quickly and clarity can be lost.

It was not wholly clear to me whether use of the term ‘trans rights’ was being made in terms of suggesting TW needed more rights than they currently have, but I don’t think that was the intention. Anyhow, this sums up my perspective:

To women, our rights and no less. To transpeople, their rights and no more.

I'm glad to see
To women, our rights and no less. To transpeople, their rights and no more.
gaining traction.

In fairness I should say that it's based on a Toronto Men's Group slogan from I think the 1980s - I've never been able to find anything about the group online, but the slogan stuck in my head when I heard someone quoting it from memory ages ago.

Those were the days when Men's Groups were thinking about how to be less oppressive to women than how to be even more oppressive to women. The original slogan was
To men, our rights and no more. To women, their rights and no less.

Shedmistress · 22/06/2025 15:31

Roystonv · 22/06/2025 14:23

Have you thought of making a liqueur with the overabundance of fruit? Obviously not going to be ready early enough for the picnic but if we were all patient? I know for many it is too soon but you could aim for C.....mas. Loving the rhubarb and custard pud. Some very well reasoned comments as always, thank you.

Edited

I've been making wine and liqueurs with overabundance of fruit for 20 odd years!

I went and bought a German fermenting thingy last year for the sloes. Anyway this is 1 of the branches of 1 of the blackberries. If I took a pic of the whole thing they were too small to see. Going to be picking very soon.

Next doors peach is also laden this year. They live 6 hours away so we get whatever fruit their trees produce in return for keeping their grass cut.

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?
MrsTerryPratchett · 22/06/2025 15:11

murasaki · 22/06/2025 13:29

We definitely have everything needed for the finest cliquey picnic ever.

Is that a picnique?

lady69 · 22/06/2025 15:10

I will soon be overrun with courgettes. I give it a week!

DrBlackbird · 22/06/2025 14:58

WithSilverBells · 22/06/2025 12:18

No lawyer would get so riled about being questioned without there being something else going on in the background. I suspect George has a serious case of Cognitive Dissonance. Either that or really bad toothache.

I don’t agree about the something else in the background and see it simply as a bit defensive after her position on moderation was misinterpreted and challenged. Sometimes we do race from one post to the next and/or make posts in haste, threads can move quickly and clarity can be lost.

It was not wholly clear to me whether use of the term ‘trans rights’ was being made in terms of suggesting TW needed more rights than they currently have, but I don’t think that was the intention. Anyhow, this sums up my perspective:

To women, our rights and no less. To transpeople, their rights and no more.

Boiledbeetle · 22/06/2025 14:31

Bannedontherun · 22/06/2025 14:21

<ran from bus stop to silverbells> ate my snowballs at the bus stop

@Boiledbeetle can you bring some plleeeeeease

I'd have brought more but they get very sticky in this heat.

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?
murasaki · 22/06/2025 14:24

Roystonv · 22/06/2025 14:23

Have you thought of making a liqueur with the overabundance of fruit? Obviously not going to be ready early enough for the picnic but if we were all patient? I know for many it is too soon but you could aim for C.....mas. Loving the rhubarb and custard pud. Some very well reasoned comments as always, thank you.

Edited

True, blackberry gin would be nice.

Boiledbeetle · 22/06/2025 14:24

Waitwhat23 · 22/06/2025 12:29

I'm anticipating the AI picture from Beetle of Arabella in a burglar outfit (complete with swag bag) half inching the dessert!

Edited

Sorry, I was having a snooze. And I notice someone nicked the wonderful dessert whilst I snoozed!

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?
Swipe left for the next trending thread