Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Why is this subforum so intent on removing voices that dont' agree?

440 replies

BeeSouriante · 21/06/2025 00:07

Like I've had three posts removed

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Absentmindedsmile · 21/06/2025 12:10

BeeSouriante · 21/06/2025 00:11

I've read them but I disagree why do you keep restricting my voice?

Haven’t you got anything better to do? 🥱

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 21/06/2025 12:08

JellySaurus · 21/06/2025 11:29

I don't entirely disagree with you about how posters could phrase their opinions. All too often, however, assertive women are described as shrill, hysterical, or plain nasty, because they are breaking with the feminine stereotype and expressing themselves in line with a masculine stereotype that is looked upon positively in men. There is a societal demand placed upon women to express themselves only in ways that do not upset others. But sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.

Agreed. Though just occasionally some of the fine women here prefer to call a spade a bloody shovel.

SternJoyousBee · 21/06/2025 12:02

TheOtherRaven · 21/06/2025 10:03

I do enjoy it when someone with the evidence before them, tries the magical thinking approach of just announcing they cannot see it, so it does not exist, and the problem is with those insisting maliciously that it does for nefarious reasons.

Personal realities. This is all about personal realities, and the attempts to blame, shame, coerce, control, persuade, argue etc etc for people to invest in another person's personal reality against their own perceptions.

We don't live in anyone's subjective personal reality, we have one shared, objective one.

Men have tried to control women through shame since the beginning of time. It’s getting a tad boring now.

ArabellaScott · 21/06/2025 11:57

Some people seem to want and expect the right to repeatedly insult women without us having the right to respond.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 21/06/2025 11:57

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2025 11:55

I think most of us let posts stand because of Operation Let Them Speak. It means that everyone can see what's being said and can comment or challenge it. If such posts stand then the poster can't hide behind 'I said something completely innocuous and was deleted for it for no reason!!' (which is essentially the basis of this thread) - it's there for all to see.

Yes, I almost never report anything on this subforum for exactly this reason.

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2025 11:55

Haulage · 21/06/2025 11:46

I remember when there was a general consensus amongst FWR regulars not to report MRA posts so that they would stand as a record of the malevolent shite sort of things being posted. I don’t know if that remains but it always seemed a pretty good idea to me - I prefer to be able to form my own opinion about people based on their own words.

I think most of us let posts stand because of Operation Let Them Speak. It means that everyone can see what's being said and can comment or challenge it. If such posts stand then the poster can't hide behind 'I said something completely innocuous and was deleted for it for no reason!!' (which is essentially the basis of this thread) - it's there for all to see.

JellySaurus · 21/06/2025 11:55
  • Women would be listened-to if they expressed themselves nicely.
  • It's kind to use wrong-sex pronouns if somebody wants you to.

Yeah, "I feel there's a lot of naiveté in your post" could be an appropriate response.

OTOH

  • Teenage girls stood be allowed to have elective mastectomies because clownfish/it's kind/adult women get breast-reductions.
  • Trans-identified men should be allowed to use women's toilets because it's men who rape, not the special sacred caste of men.
  • Men should be prioritised over post-mastectomy women for breast implants, because the women's lives have been saved from cancer but the men are very upset.

"You are very ignorant" is an excessively polite and understated reply.

JustSawJohnny · 21/06/2025 11:55

BeeSouriante · 21/06/2025 00:11

I've read them but I disagree why do you keep restricting my voice?

The fact that you have replied to a commenter asking 'why YOU are restricting my voice' suggests you don't know how the forum works.

If you want to challenge a removal, you need to ask admin, not us!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 21/06/2025 11:51

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2025 11:33

Agreed. Every so often there are requests (demands sometimes) that Mumsnet adds Reddit type features - downvoting or blocking the posts of posters you don't like/disagree with for example. There is a deletion to report posts here but there are proper moderators and actual guidelines instead of the Challoner wild west of Reddit.

That's because this is an actual discussion forum where you might see posts you disagree with and if you say something unsubstantiated or sweepingly without merit (i.e I disagree with the 'prevailing view' on here without actually explaining why you don't believe that women have the legal right to single sex spaces and services) then you will be called out on it and you can't just block/downvote/no replies them.

And some people really don't like that.

Specifically, people who believe that they have the right to be safe from other people's opinions but not that women have the right to be safe from men don't like that.

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2025 11:50

Theeyeballsinthesky · 21/06/2025 11:33

I think that’s true but Tbf we’re also only human and when we get the eleventy billionth person coming here to scold the silly mummies with “what about intersex???” & “my lovely TW friend” I don’t think it’s surprising responses get robust

And also, I've seen far more robust posts on other boards (AIBU being the infamous example) but it's only here that women are told that they are mean when faced with yet another diatribe of 'you're all anti trans bigots!!!' from someone whose critical thought processes go no further than 'TWAW. No debate'.

Haulage · 21/06/2025 11:49

moggly · 21/06/2025 11:42

I thought the poster who started this might be a child but his Reddit history suggests he's an older middle-aged man who started pretending to be a woman around a decade ago.

It was bound to be one or the other 😬

There’s been a definite influx though

Helleofabore · 21/06/2025 11:48

Supima · 21/06/2025 11:45

If you want to pretend you have naively wandered here and are posting in wide-eyed good faith, it helps not to use words like sub-forum which rather give you away. HTH.

It is quite interesting how that has appeared in posts censuring women’s discussion by new posters over the past few days.

Haulage · 21/06/2025 11:46

I remember when there was a general consensus amongst FWR regulars not to report MRA posts so that they would stand as a record of the malevolent shite sort of things being posted. I don’t know if that remains but it always seemed a pretty good idea to me - I prefer to be able to form my own opinion about people based on their own words.

Helleofabore · 21/06/2025 11:46

moggly · 21/06/2025 11:42

I thought the poster who started this might be a child but his Reddit history suggests he's an older middle-aged man who started pretending to be a woman around a decade ago.

So a male poster who wants women to take notice of their entry into spaces where women can talk, while admonishing women for rejecting the premise that male people can ever be women?

I think that was obvious.

JustSawJohnny · 21/06/2025 11:45

100% depends on what you're saying and how you're saying it.

3 removals suggests you're breaking talk guidelines.

Supima · 21/06/2025 11:45

If you want to pretend you have naively wandered here and are posting in wide-eyed good faith, it helps not to use words like sub-forum which rather give you away. HTH.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 21/06/2025 11:43

Good idea. I should

how did you think posts would be deleted if you didn’t report them?

moggly · 21/06/2025 11:42

Haulage · 21/06/2025 11:35

GCSEs finished this week

I thought the poster who started this might be a child but his Reddit history suggests he's an older middle-aged man who started pretending to be a woman around a decade ago.

saraclara · 21/06/2025 11:37

Shedmistress · 21/06/2025 11:05

Do you report them?

Good idea. I should.

I'm GC but that doesn't mean I should just scroll past hypocritical breaches of the Ts&Cs

Haulage · 21/06/2025 11:35

Bannedontherun · 21/06/2025 11:30

What is going on why are we getting a sudden rash of TRA’s on here?

is it because they think they can round us up to agree with them with their well constructed arguments?

Are we all going to rush around and create a lobby group for men should be able to use women’s spaces?

Or are they just venting at us because of course it is our fault that the judges determined the law re biological sex?

GCSEs finished this week

Theeyeballsinthesky · 21/06/2025 11:33

JellySaurus · 21/06/2025 11:29

I don't entirely disagree with you about how posters could phrase their opinions. All too often, however, assertive women are described as shrill, hysterical, or plain nasty, because they are breaking with the feminine stereotype and expressing themselves in line with a masculine stereotype that is looked upon positively in men. There is a societal demand placed upon women to express themselves only in ways that do not upset others. But sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.

I think that’s true but Tbf we’re also only human and when we get the eleventy billionth person coming here to scold the silly mummies with “what about intersex???” & “my lovely TW friend” I don’t think it’s surprising responses get robust

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2025 11:33

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 21/06/2025 11:20

Nail on head.

They are so used to environments where people with opposing views are simply banned, that they have no idea how to talk to people with opposing views.

Then they come somewhere like Mumsnet, where they get frustrated because they don't have any compelling arguments to counter opposing views (having never had to do so before), and so they resort to insults.

And then they think their posts are being deleted for their opposing views themselves rather than because the way they are expressing them contravenes the site rules.

Agreed. Every so often there are requests (demands sometimes) that Mumsnet adds Reddit type features - downvoting or blocking the posts of posters you don't like/disagree with for example. There is a deletion to report posts here but there are proper moderators and actual guidelines instead of the Challoner wild west of Reddit.

That's because this is an actual discussion forum where you might see posts you disagree with and if you say something unsubstantiated or sweepingly without merit (i.e I disagree with the 'prevailing view' on here without actually explaining why you don't believe that women have the legal right to single sex spaces and services) then you will be called out on it and you can't just block/downvote/no replies them.

And some people really don't like that.

DialSquare · 21/06/2025 11:31

I also think that the regular posters on here rarely report posts as we want the posts to stay up so everyone can see what the opposing view posters say. I’ve never reported a post.

Bannedontherun · 21/06/2025 11:30

What is going on why are we getting a sudden rash of TRA’s on here?

is it because they think they can round us up to agree with them with their well constructed arguments?

Are we all going to rush around and create a lobby group for men should be able to use women’s spaces?

Or are they just venting at us because of course it is our fault that the judges determined the law re biological sex?

JellySaurus · 21/06/2025 11:29

I don't entirely disagree with you about how posters could phrase their opinions. All too often, however, assertive women are described as shrill, hysterical, or plain nasty, because they are breaking with the feminine stereotype and expressing themselves in line with a masculine stereotype that is looked upon positively in men. There is a societal demand placed upon women to express themselves only in ways that do not upset others. But sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.