The National (Scottish newspaper)

What's big Steph P up to these days? Still a magical gender entity who thinks he doesn't conform to the binary because he's a bloke with an inch of hair?

You forgot to complete your points:
1)Trans people don't exist it's just dysphoria
2) Trans people don't exist but bad men exist and will say anything to access women and children
3) Trans people don't exist but Big Pharma looks for lifelong cash - kerrching!
Bruce can call himself Brenda at home when he wears his wife's underwear but don't expect Brenda to pander to it.

That's great to know. Thank you!

Tell that to all your Bruce friends then.

Some of the newspaper comments are terrifying! They equate sex realists (my definition) with flat earthers (the irony almost hurts!)..

Then we have gems like this..

You speak for me Dina. LOUDER FOR PEOPLE IN THE BACK.

Thanks for the Netter link.

My fav comment from Dina Shakti:

"Since when did women and girls sign up to be the validation prop, safety shield and fetish fodder for mentally disturbed predatory crossdressing MEN who are sexually aroused in female attire?
ScotNational are an anti women gutter press that advocate for unhinged men cosplaying being women and girls.
You can take your sanctimonious woke bullshit and shove it where the sun don't shine and I hope defamation legal cases are brought against your shit paper."

Don't hold back Dina. 😍

So you recognise that it's about men pretending to be women.

Surely you can see that men pretending to be women and trying to force themselves into women's spaces and women's sports is a women's rights issue.

Love the comments. But oh my, a circulation of 3k or so and presumably declining because they’re pushing increasingly unpopular views on a population that is far more sensible than they are.

Males

Males

Males

It has nothing to do with 'trans' people. But MALES.

And it goes both ways; Who needs to worry about poverty or a potential WW3 upon us when we've got Bruces calling themselves Brendas demanding they are called by female pronouns and having a breakdown if they're not? First World problems!!

The issues of males in female spaces, sports and having male crimes attributed to females are very much important and front page feminist issues.

Not run by the same people, no.

Perhaps you could check facts before posting?

We can care about the erosion of women’s rights and global warming, WW3 etc. This is a feminist board, so discusses things to do with women’s rights.

But you know that. It’s not a serious talking point, is it? More just along the lines of “shut up women shut up women shut up women”

Is this an admission that Sex Matters and FWS (aren't they both run by the same people anyway?) are single-issue focused?

Giving big "All you harpy, hysterical women look the same anyway" vibes there mate! And the single issue is the rights of women, the regaining and retention of women's rights. How very dare they put women first.

If you go to the link, open it, then replace “x.com” with “nitter.net” and hit enter, that should take you there

Is this an admission that Sex Matters and FWS (aren't they both run by the same people anyway?) are single-issue focused?

Glad that's cleared up. Then it's accurate for the media to call them anti-trans since they are focused only on being anti-trans (that and complaining about pride flags during pride month).

Got it. Who needs to worry about poverty or a potential WW3 upon us when we've got Bruces calling themselves Brendas to focus all our energy on.

A women's rights group focusing on women's rights. How very dare they? Don't they realise they should be turning their attention towards important, manly stuff?

And isn't it weird how people like Chris don't go round scolding other single-issue organisations like the RSPCA or NSPCC or Cancer Relief? It's almost as if Chris is motivated purely by his hatred of women talking about things that affect them.

It must be gutting to be a TRA and look around to find a credible group that represents your rights and stands up for you, no matter what. One that you can really throw your support behind who is clear about their mission, can articulate their aims and is run by people who got off their backsides and actually took action instead of sitting there whining.

There
Is
Nothing

• Trans people
• Trans people
• Trans people

Got it. Who needs to worry about poverty or a potential WW3 upon us when we've got Bruces calling themselves Brendas to focus all our energy on.

Doesn't Owen Jones write for the National sometimes? That alone would be enough to put me off.

That criticism of Sex Matters is ridiculous. They are very clear about their objectives:

• promote human rights where they relate to sex
• advance education about sex and the law
• promote the sound administration of the law in relation to sex and equality in the law

Yous wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face like a wet kipper

Surely that should be an Arbroath Smokie not a kipper, this is Scotland!

Many thanks nauticant

https://nitter.net/LauraEWebsterr/status/1935742255282671848

JKR would likely love to pull this apart but I expect is busy with having a life, work and supporting vulnerable and exploited people.