Reflections on Trans Arguments

Anyone remember the thread when there was clearly a cabal of idiots working together and they dropped the ball when they fucked up and replied with the wrong username.

That was a funny one!

(Forgive me, it's 32.5 degrees in here...)

There once was a poster called LimeFinch
Who thought it would be a cinch
To educate wims
With lists of things
That he obviously read with his eyes scrinch(ed)

Or did he crash the servers, due to an over extended word count?

Lime not managed to stay within site guidelines?

behold my shocked face

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16W9ApfA2a/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Very good point @Waitingfordoggo

I think we had to expect shit like this.

The cult is crashing and burning in real time, and its members are not going to go down without a ‘fight’. It’s just a bit humiliating for them that this ‘fight’ consists of regurgitating ‘points’ that have already been disproved, multiple times over a number of years, and in court. And regurgitating these points at a group of women who probably know more about the history and intricacies of this issue than almost anyone else I can think of. Women whose professional and personal lives have given them decades of experience and wisdom. Who have patiently (and sometimes not so patiently, understandably) argued against the OP’s ‘points’ again and again and again on these boards. Thank you amazing and wonderful women of MN.

Let’s just smile and wave as their ship goes down. Yes it feels a bit awkward having to witness the rantings of humiliated men, but we will bear it- we’ve been through much worse. Most of us have experience of managing the behaviour of raging toddlers and this is no different. So I’m going to leave them to it and enjoy the sunlight, in both senses. ☀️

I assumed the OP is a trans-identified man, with noooooo idea about what life as a woman is really like. But he wants to tell us all about it, becoz - y'know, we is just little women who know nuthin'

Suspiciously similar posters have boasted about it before, see screenshot in this relevant thread. And heed the advice about dodgy links.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/site_stuff/5336710-google-docs-in-troll-posts?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=app_share

Who are the 'we' and 'us' in your previous post?

🖐️ Please can I answer?

They’re the Reddit crew …

Their homework was to pick a topic - we know the only topic is themselves.
Think of a question. - same as always. No original thought.
Attach random articles without oversight as evidenced by the articles presented.

and submit it to the Master…

0/10 Really must do better.
Research, research, research!

Haha 🤣

You forgot the girly pillowfight sleepovers and really swishy dresses. Not just swishy dresses but really, held up by giggling magic pixies flying around holding the hem, swishy dresses.
My preferred word for pouty tilty heads in this context is cockettish please.

Not sure brave would be the adjective I would use

"Dried up" is a bit rich coming from people whose neo vaginas don't self lubricate.

Yes, we're all terrified that all those "cute" (it's always "cute" they call themselves in their selfies) transwomen will take our menfolk away.

The OP hasn't included the main "anti trans" argument- and that's the sad fact that we are all embittered dried-up hags with unshaven legs and sensible shoes; desperately fearful that transwomen will steal our men with their vastly superior pouty and tilty version of womanhood. It's what the Supreme Court judges were really discussing.

I’m pretty sure now that this is performance art. This is my mental image of the OP:

Why did you support a claim about NHS surgical provision with a piece about US figures?

Please don't ask sensible intelligent questions. The OP will only have to ignore them.

I have questions @LimeFinch

Why did you support a claim about NHS surgical provision with a piece about US figures?

Why do you not appear to understand that many of the links you provided, as detailed through this thread, didn't say what you appeared to think they said?

Why did you completely ignore any reply that provided direct evidence of the inaccuracy of your 'points' e.g. "No trans woman claims to be biologically female"

Who are the 'we' and 'us' in your previous post?

So is taking a shit, tbf.

I'm off to make some cookies. A much more productive use of a person's time.

Who cares?

I recognise the pompous, pseudo-intellectual-yet-chatty, self-satisfied tone of LimeFinch's posts, and the quite niche use of 'any fule kno'...

Could it be our favourite performative knitter and extreme porn advocate?

Are you not going to answer any of replies to your tedious list of links?

Or, to put it in pretentious words you might prefer, Are you declining to opine on previous salient points?