House of Commons apologises after RMW permitted to use ladies' loos

It's solely because they've heard women pointing out the male supremacism underlying the thinking that men's feelings, safety, wishes, dignity and privacy is important but not those of women.

Two seconds reflection would suggest that men's needs for those things can easily be met by third spaces. They have no intention of meeting those women's needs with anything more than derision, abuse and exclusion. And that would be the fundamental belief that men matter and women don't, and it's the job of women to serve men. Women don't want to be served by men with trans identities, they don't want dominance, they just want to be left alone.

So as usual it's a lot of crazy nonsense because it sounds good, and is not comprehended beyond Mummy Says It. You can feed certain online sections of this movement a word and count the days before you see it pop up. It has been done. The word 'coy' was a game played in just that way, and whoops there it was very quickly. I often repress the urge to do it with a made up word and wait to see it appear.

Being pro-women is not bigotry, nobody's stopping anyone one from pissing, we're just asking for people to piss in the right facility, men in the men's and women in the women's. It really is that simples.

He is fully able to use the mens or the gender neutral toilets. Nobody is stopping him pissing.

No one is stopping people from pissing. They’re stopping them using the wrong toilets to do their pissing in. Dear me.

The thread there on RMW in the HoC is quite entertaining though. So many of them are clearly delusional.

Gotcha. Damn that’s really made me smile . Well done Kate and Heather and the fragrant RMW can’t say he’s never been challenged now. Keeping toilets safe for women one day at a time.

Trans people can still piss.

So : ever shifting aims, goals and definitions. Because these people want what they want. And that can be demonstrated to not be what they say they want.

(See also: Brexit).

Unsurprisingly, stopping people from pissing doesn't stop rape. It's just pure bigotry and trying to dress it up as protecting women isn't working when most of the anti-trans crowd are women hating men, like Trump, Elon and Robert.

FFS 🤦🏻

I made the mistake of straying onto r/transgender UK the other day, and found threads recommending use of the term "cis supremacist". That's us, apparently.

So when toilets are segregated by sex men wil say they are transmen and go into the womens

Or

Toilets are segregated by gender and men wil say they are transwomen and go into the womens

Here's a thought: teach men to behave and respect womens boundaries by ensuring no male person can use the womens and it is clear they can and will be challenged.

I don't think it has anything to do with being "unsafe". It's just that in RMW head, he should be received like Bernard Bresslaw in drag in a "Carry On ..." caper and have all the men go "Phwooor ...." as they swoon at this vision of beauty that has wafted in.

However, disappointingly, that has never happened. And far from being a threat, men doubled up in laughter can't hurt anyone.

Obviously no one is going to laugh in the ladies. #bekind and all that bollocks.

The batshit crazy thought terminating bullshit line that males who are predators will just pretend to be trans men now has been debunked so many times now that it's lame people are still using it. We DO know the difference between a male and a female, and even females identifying as men still are small with shorter hands, limbs etc.

Your pitiful 'argument' does not work to anyone with an IQ above 50 and who possesses critical thinking skills.

Why would RMW feel unsafe in mens toilets? He is a biological man. Why would RMW think women feel safe with a biological man in the Women's toilets?

It is not Women's problem to make RMW feel safe at the cost of their own safety

Yes because that's absolutely not a lot of made up nonsense.

You're into men destroying women's rights. Got it.

Female toilets are intended for the female sex, not the male sex. The purpose of female only single sex toilets is to give women and girls safety, privacy and dignity away from the male gaze. The purpose is the keep males out.
No one is forcing women (using c*s is banned on this forum if I recall correctly) into the mens. I don't know where you get your misinformation from.

Funnily enough, after spending 10 years seeking clarity in women’s rights policy sex realism is doing quite well. Trans activism, when it keeps trying to twist terms and obscure meanings so it can gaslight women out of their rights, is struggling.

It might be a good time for RMW to consider a change of tactics.

There is no “Gender Critical Ideology Movement”. It’s such gaslighting nonsense. The truth is that brave women have simply stood up for the rights of women and children. If the GI movement had never transgressed women and children’s boundaries none of us would even be talking about gender as a concept.

The Supreme Court judgement states that trans identifying females who appear male to the extent that they may cause distress to other women should use the men’s, or gender neutral facilities.

I know TRA’s aren’t known for their evidence/receipts but also, evidence/receipts?

Any male using the women's facilities is acting like a predator. His gender identity makes no difference as he knows he shouldn't be there and that he's going to cause harm.

Meanwhile cis men who are predators just pretend to be trans men now, who have to use women's bathrooms 🤷

Then you force cis women to use men's and pretend you're helping 🙄

Go team 🎉

Shhhh the grown ups are talking

The women’s loo’s intended purpose is, astoundingly enough, to provide a space for the exclusive use of women.
RMW is male, so doesn’t belong there.
It really is so simple a three year old could grasp it. A three year old without an agenda, that is.

He was using it for validation and to make a point. Which is not what it was intended for.