Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

WEC to question the EHRC Chair and Chief Executive 11 June 2025 2:20pm

236 replies

IwantToRetire · 09/06/2025 18:13

The Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) will question the Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Baroness Falkner of Margravine in Parliament on Wednesday, 11 June during its annual scrutiny session of the EHRC.

Venue: The Thatcher Room, Portcullis House
Watch live: Visit parliamentlive.tv Women and Equalities Committee

The Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) will question the Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Baroness Falkner of Margravine in Parliament on Wednesday, 11 June during its annual scrutiny session of the EHRC.

MPs on the cross-party committee, chaired by Labour MP Sarah Owen, will discuss the EHRC’s work and resources and wider equalities policy, including the implications of the For Women Scotland Supreme Court judgment and the EHRC’s subsequent consultation on the Code of Practice.

The Committee will hear from the EHRC’s Chief Executive, John Kirkpatrick, alongside Baroness Falkner.

Witnesses
Starting at 2.20pm
Baroness Kishwer Falkner of Margravine, Chair, Equality and Human Rights Commission
John Kirkpatrick, Chief Executive, Equality and Human Rights Commission

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/news/207403/wec-to-question-the-ehrc-chair-and-chief-executive/

(I came across this by chance whilst looking for a date for the WEC interview with Mary-Ann Stephenson but could find nothing - anybody know when it will be.)

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:45

The chair is smug, arrogant and clueless. Why are the WESC always so awful?

Cailleach1 · 11/06/2025 15:43

Blinkin’ heck! The chair said that the question about sports wasn’t relevant as the SC case was about places on Boards. So, she said Rebecca’s question about sports wasn’t relevant. Then Rebecca had to come back and say it was about the definition of sex in the Equality Act and does indeed cover sports.

Rosie wonderfully and ironically then had a question about misinformation. Imagine that! The Chair of the Committee saying that women’s sports was not relevant to the SC decision. Thank goodness she was immediately corrected.
(bit of paraphrasing)

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:43

It’s not an “interim judgment” facepalm

wantmorenow · 11/06/2025 15:40

Thank you. Just watching from start. The chair is fucking rude and hostile from the off. 🤬

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:38

They haven’t “lost the right” to use women’s spaces. Men were never legally given a right to use women’s spaces.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:35

Do we call people hermaphrodites when they have DSDs now?

TheOtherRaven · 11/06/2025 15:32

It is now beyond apparent that the only 'women' the committee care about are men who identify as women.

This brief must now be split. The pushing of men's rights is not compatible with holding the brief for women's rights, the two things are now obviously in direct conflict, and the committee is not even pretending to care about women's rights or interests now. Their sole declared interest is in the destruction of women's rights to enable men.

Sex Matters, can we have a letter, a petition? This is appalling. They actually want the legal protections and equalities for women and homosexuals to be destroyed so that men can use women as they wish.

Cailleach1 · 11/06/2025 15:32

I’m glad Rosie Duffield has someone who thinks women should have rights beside her. It is obviously very hostile against women’s rights at this Committee. It should be renamed ‘The Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples and the propagation of blokes trampling over women’s rights faith’.

I’m actually gobsmacked how awful they are about women’s rights. All are women who are prioritising the desires of men to erode that.

IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 15:31

Cant recognise Chair from images here https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/328/women-and-equalities-committee/membership/

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:30

I don’t know what she looks like. “Can you tell I’m a cisgender woman” yes we can tell what sex you are 🙄

GCAcademic · 11/06/2025 15:29

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:28

Is it Sarah Owen as the original post says?

Thank you. I missed that, sorry.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:28

Is it Sarah Owen as the original post says?

IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 15:27

GCAcademic · 11/06/2025 15:23

Who is the Chair?

Joined late so dont know.

Talk about manipulation.

The EHRC covers more than just making TW feel they are the centre of the world.

This Committee is actually undermining the value of the function it should serve.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:25

IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 15:20

Chair is extremely hostile.

Rosie Duffield opened up the threat from TRAs and asked Falkner to talk about it. She did a bit tearful.

Chair stopped her from continuing.

Just outrageous.

Can one complain about the conduct of the Chair of a Committee?

I think it was discussed before here with Nokes who was equally poor, and Maria Miller. They are always so awful. I think the conclusion was the Parliamentary Standards Committee is the one which would cover it.

GCAcademic · 11/06/2025 15:23

Who is the Chair?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:22

The Chair is awful, pretty rude so far.

Cailleach1 · 11/06/2025 15:20

On foot of the SC saying women and girls have sex protections, this Committee seems to be devastated that men can’t so easily trample over them. Rather than thinking it good that women and girls have sex protections, they are all about how can blokes desires override those protections.

IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 15:20

Chair is extremely hostile.

Rosie Duffield opened up the threat from TRAs and asked Falkner to talk about it. She did a bit tearful.

Chair stopped her from continuing.

Just outrageous.

Can one complain about the conduct of the Chair of a Committee?

OP posts:
Cailleach1 · 11/06/2025 15:15

This committee is amazing. I presume they have never heard any women on their campaign doorstep, or receive communications, on the erosion of women’s rights to dignity, safety and opportunities by blokes claiming to be women. When we know that is not true in general by women saying they raised it, or emailed their representatives.

Yet, they allege to have reams of examples from blokes claiming to be women who are terrified. Terrified apparently.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:14

Can see Maya and Fiona McAnena in the audience.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/06/2025 15:12

Also watching now but I’m at the beginning

IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 15:03

Well as we expected and as Baroness Falkner has now had to say she feels the WEC are shooting the messenger rather than the source.

So far all questioners are about how terrible it is for trans people.

Although interestingly (as though they may have argeed this approach) all asked her if she thinks the only way it will be resolved is if Parliament takes action to clarify / change the EA.

And i doubt that would be in favour of biological women and the protected characteristic of sex.

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 11/06/2025 14:59

Imnobody4 · 11/06/2025 11:48

Just a reminder about the EHRC consultation. Sex Matters have done a crib sheet to use.
https://sex-matters.org/take-action/respond-to-the-ehrc-consultation-now/

Do NOT follow Sex Matters advice to cut and paste.

You response will be binned.

Just a reminder as this is a known issue with consultations.

OP posts:
SionnachRuadh · 10/06/2025 19:17

There's a recent example of a hearing here: Parliamentlive.tv - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

It would be rare for sparks to fly at one of these meetings. It's not unknown for a committee to produce a negative report, but it's rare.

Parliamentlive.tv

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/7ffe216e-6627-4b4d-aaf4-cd1a6c21f2e1