Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
34
anyolddinosaur · 24/05/2025 16:30

Advice on freedom of information requests - https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-information-request/organisations-you-can-ask-for-information

JKR can either ignore or tell them to go away. 😃

TheOtherRaven · 24/05/2025 16:30

FuckityFux · 24/05/2025 16:05

Ah, you again with more of your made up nonsense.

You do realise that an awful lot of Lesbians and gay Men are sick to death of Trans activists taking over their space and are now sadly having to distance themselves from the Rainbow banners?

One right here! <puts hand up>

I'm apparently the wrong kind of lesbian though.

The Rainbow LGBT+ is now an exclusive club for anyone holding gender ideological beliefs, that's the only characteristic they have in common. They'll tell you that lesbian and gay men who don't believe someone is whatever sex they identify as and date/have sex accordingly are not part of their movement and aren't wanted.

They still make good use though of saying they 'represent the gay community that's left after all the defiantly homosexual ones were thrown out' as it's quite good political power and leverage. I snort every time I hear it. I find rainbow badges an active sign of hostility to lesbian and gay people: it represents a political view that is actively homophobic.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 24/05/2025 16:26

teawamutu · 24/05/2025 15:15

Patronising prick.

She's much, much smarter than you, Jolyon. I'd like to hear her confirm she'd asked for your advice about anything.

He’ll only lose again won’t he? Pathetic little man.

Waitwhat23 · 24/05/2025 16:26

Do you think that the TRA's thought this was a documentary featuring JKR?

(Edited to change to a link that worked)

Theeyeballsinthesky · 24/05/2025 16:20

I bloody love JKR 😆

JK Rowling - Women’s Fund
FuckityFux · 24/05/2025 16:05

Christinapple · 23/05/2025 23:51

Sure. JK Rowling has been trash talking Stonewall (a gay rights charity I donate to) for yonks and another figure in the gender critical community spend a million(?) on 2 failed attempts to sue them.

Ah, you again with more of your made up nonsense.

You do realise that an awful lot of Lesbians and gay Men are sick to death of Trans activists taking over their space and are now sadly having to distance themselves from the Rainbow banners?

LastTrainsEast · 24/05/2025 15:55

Christinapple · 24/05/2025 12:12

We'll see.

I look forward to seeing a repeat of Alison Bailey over and over.

Guess I could get some popcorn and roasted marshmallows (an overused joke Rowling likes to make a lot) to watch all the failed cases from gender critical activists now with a lot of money take up lawsuits against anyone they just dislike.

Well then you have nothing to worry about and can relax...

You don't look very relaxed though.

SionnachRuadh · 24/05/2025 15:53

rebmacesrevda · 24/05/2025 15:50

Even weirder than that. He said "subject access requests". A SAR would be to request the personal data the organisation holds about him. Em, I'm guessing none Jolyon. I don't think he even knows what a SAR is.

I don't like to say that Jolyon is one of those barristers who's very expert in a narrow field of law, and whose arrogance blinds him to the fact that he's clueless outside that field. But he isn't doing much to dispel that view.

Also noting his absolute fury when a woman says or does something he disapproves of. No wonder his daughters want to identify out of womanhood.

WarriorN · 24/05/2025 15:52

Very true

JK Rowling - Women’s Fund
rebmacesrevda · 24/05/2025 15:52

moggly · 24/05/2025 15:51

What's he on about here:

I'm looking forward to making some subject access requests of her - and you might well be too.

So he's going to fill out the form on the website, then send an email asking what data the JKRWF holds on him? Surely they'll just paste back whatever he filled in.

And if he sends a request having not done that, they'll correctly state they have no data on him.

What a waste of effort for Britain's finest legal mind to be indulging in.

I know! What a weirdo 😂

moggly · 24/05/2025 15:51

What's he on about here:

I'm looking forward to making some subject access requests of her - and you might well be too.

So he's going to fill out the form on the website, then send an email asking what data the JKRWF holds on him? Surely they'll just paste back whatever he filled in.

And if he sends a request having not done that, they'll correctly state they have no data on him.

What a waste of effort for Britain's finest legal mind to be indulging in.

Cismyfatarse · 24/05/2025 15:51

Ialway think of him as Jogon. But Jolygone works too.

OP posts:
rebmacesrevda · 24/05/2025 15:50

murasaki · 24/05/2025 15:44

Does JoJo actually get to submit an FOI request to an individual with big pockets given it's not a charity?

Even weirder than that. He said "subject access requests". A SAR would be to request the personal data the organisation holds about him. Em, I'm guessing none Jolyon. I don't think he even knows what a SAR is.

CapitalAtRisk · 24/05/2025 15:47

Theeyeballsinthesky · 24/05/2025 15:45

😆yep!! It must infuriate him that he’s (in his own mind) such a clever important legal jaynius and yet an actual woman has out thought him (again)

Zackly.

I took the time to look up who administers the fund. You can see the Ltd company at the bottom of her website, then look it up on Companies House. They're a load of Scottish lawyers. Try and get round them with your grifting nonsense, Jolygone!

SionnachRuadh · 24/05/2025 15:47

murasaki · 24/05/2025 15:44

Does JoJo actually get to submit an FOI request to an individual with big pockets given it's not a charity?

I refer him to the ICO's guidance, and ask whether it's wise to broadcast that he intends to use data protection to play silly buggers.
When can we refuse to comply with a request? | ICO

When can we refuse to comply with a request?

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/right-of-access/when-can-we-refuse-to-comply-with-a-request/

Memoryhole · 24/05/2025 15:46

JKR can spend her money in any legal way she chooses. She earned it.

it is interesting that transwomen like Emily bridges feel they can dictate how a woman can spend her cash.

how surprising. Not.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 24/05/2025 15:45

CapitalAtRisk · 24/05/2025 15:33

He is FURIOUS that her fund hasn't been set up as a charidee or a trust, because he can't then get at it with lawfare

https://bsky.app/profile/goodlawproject.org/post/3lpvugqdfl22p

😆yep!! It must infuriate him that he’s (in his own mind) such a clever important legal jaynius and yet an actual woman has out thought him (again)

FlakyCritic · 24/05/2025 15:45

Christinapple · 23/05/2025 23:55

I'm not a man.

Anyway I wonder how much of this fund will be wasted to the wind in failed attempts to sue anyone and anything that says anything in support of trans people.

A woman would not advocate for Male Supremacy. Nor does a woman go to our foremother feminist graves, Chris, and drop their trousers and take a dump all over their headstones.

Again, it's not 'trans people'.

It's to stop MALES violating FEMALE hard won rights and boundaries. In the eternal battle of the sexes, it's an honourable, respected and worthy thing to do.

murasaki · 24/05/2025 15:44

Does JoJo actually get to submit an FOI request to an individual with big pockets given it's not a charity?

moto748e · 24/05/2025 15:43

Nobody here buys your shit, Chris. We've heard it all before.

CapitalAtRisk · 24/05/2025 15:43

FlakyCritic · 24/05/2025 15:42

Stonewall ceased being a gay rights charity around 10 years ago. They now actively fight against gay rights. In fact, they believe same sex attraction is sexual racism. You're pretty slow getting the memo.

Yeah, once same-sex marriage was accepted, Stonewall had to figure out how to keep the grift going.

CaravaggiosCat · 24/05/2025 15:43

I just tried to add the link on my homescreen so I could just gaze upon it from time to time. It installed it as an app and I had an ahh moment like sinking into a warm bath at the end of a long day 😁 .

FlakyCritic · 24/05/2025 15:42

Christinapple · 23/05/2025 23:51

Sure. JK Rowling has been trash talking Stonewall (a gay rights charity I donate to) for yonks and another figure in the gender critical community spend a million(?) on 2 failed attempts to sue them.

Stonewall ceased being a gay rights charity around 10 years ago. They now actively fight against gay rights. In fact, they believe same sex attraction is sexual racism. You're pretty slow getting the memo.

FlakyCritic · 24/05/2025 15:41

Christinapple · 23/05/2025 23:45

Let me guess. Despite what the theory behind this is, because of the SC ruling JK Rowling wants to encourage lawsuits against any org that supports trans rights?

Are we going to see a tonne of gay bars and gay rights orgs shut down now because most of the gay community is supportive of trans rights?

The gender critical community pretend they are supportive of gay rights but they don't realise (or maybe conveniently ignore) by attacking anyone who supports trans rights they are also hurting the gay community.

It's against those who support MALE Supremacy. Nothing to do with 'trans' or trans 'rights'.

Anyone who supports the rights of males to violate female only boundaries is nothing but scum.

Waitwhat23 · 24/05/2025 15:41

SidewaysOtter · 24/05/2025 15:24

Yes, on the first day the new law was in place she posted a thread on TwiX saying various transwomen were men etc. Reports to the police happened about hurted feelings etc - following some awkward foot shuffling - the rozzers decided they weren’t going to pursue it.

So JKR said that if they weren’t going to come after her for saying those things they’d better not go after anyone else either. If they did, she said she’d repeat the words herself and then they could both be prosecuted together, thus guaranteeing that no such prosecution of anyone would happen. Genius Grin

Forgot I had this!

JK Rowling - Women’s Fund