Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

I find this disappointing from Lady Hale

92 replies

theDudesmummy · 22/05/2025 19:55

Part-way down the piece: “I was with some doctors last week who said there is no such thing as biological sex,” she said.

What in earth is that supposed to mean? Sex is a biological descriptor. Does she believe this nonsense? Surely not? Am I misunderstanding something?

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/may/22/court-ruling-legal-definition-of-a-woman-misinterpreted-lady-hale?CMP=share_btn_url

Court ruling on legal definition of a woman ‘misinterpreted’, Lady Hale says

Speaking at book festival in east Sussex, former supreme court president says reaction to judgment ‘very binary’

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/may/22/court-ruling-legal-definition-of-a-woman-misinterpreted-lady-hale?CMP=share_btn_url

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
littlbrowndog · 23/05/2025 22:32

Just a woman with privilege and money

the grooming gangs had no problem knowing who to target

but the Lady Hale and her daughter will never have to encounter this

but hey. Biological sex. Such a mad idea

nauticant · 23/05/2025 21:21

DontStopMe · 23/05/2025 09:21

Lots of really, really clever people are only really, really clever in their own area, but think their cleverness applies everywhere.

The Germans (of course) have a word for it:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/submission/1182/fachidiot

JanesLittleGirl · 23/05/2025 21:14

In theory there is no difference between Theory and Practice. In practice there is.

Arran2024 · 23/05/2025 20:58

DontStopMe · 23/05/2025 09:21

Lots of really, really clever people are only really, really clever in their own area, but think their cleverness applies everywhere.

"Sure it works in practice but does it work in theory?" is a famous quote - you can get it on the shirts. I understand it is popular at Harvard!

ArabellaScott · 23/05/2025 19:24

IllustratedDictionaryOfTheDoldrums · 23/05/2025 11:41

I was in Costa Coffee earlier today when I read that from Lady Hale and I immediately thought if I had her beside me I'd ask her if she genuinely couldn't know the biological sex of every single person in the coffee shop with us.
We all know. It's like someone obstinately insisting that there's no such thing as dogs because cats also have fur and tails.
It's so exceedingly stupid, it's hard to find words for it.

It is the most astonishing example of the emperor's new clothes.

ArabellaScott · 23/05/2025 19:22

theDudesmummy · 23/05/2025 14:36

This issue has made me dismayed and disappointed in so many people/organisations over the past few years that I had a pretty good opinion of before. (e.g. Izzard, The Guardian, the BMA, the Labour Party, now Lady Hale). I suppose it's good to know who is what.

Its not. It's not good. These aren't bad people, they aren't stupid, and I'm utterly dismayed at how they can end up making such bewilderingly fucking stupid statements. Biological sex doesn't exist? I mean, listen to yourself! For God's sake.

illinivich · 23/05/2025 18:52

I do think the most committed TRA know what sex is and knows its about reproductive roles, lots talk about sperm and egg storage, and surrogacy. Even the bbc, who seem to be having a mini breakdown over the ruling, never treat TM given birth as a miracle, and make too big a deal of TW 'breastfeeding' for TM to be male and TW to be female.

They just have the ability to park that knowledge and then talk of sex as something else. I think its because they have convinced themselves that trans ideology is real and are having to find reasons to justify it.

Peregrina · 23/05/2025 18:49

So socially, TW fit into the WI because their social experience matches that of women in the group.

How, exactly?

HPFA · 23/05/2025 18:13

Nobody who pretends not to know what sex is would ever put a male and a female rabbit in the same cage.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 23/05/2025 18:08

Panterusblackish · 23/05/2025 16:41

If they were genuinely so very sensitive of feeling, they would be heartbroken for women being raped in prisons, in hospitals and at far higher risk in unisex facilities.

They only care about appearing caring. As a previous poster put it so well, luxury views.

I hope her or her daughter end up in a situation where they have need a pressing need for single sex facilities. Might teach them a lesson.

Well quite!

Xenia · 23/05/2025 17:24

She taught me at university in the 1980s and is pretty good but even then (and now) our politics are worlds apart. I am sure she has always tried in her judgments in court simply to apply the law but she has always had a feel of "oke left" about her (mind you I was in the Federation of Young Conservatives as it then was in the 1980s and today vote Tory so she and I are very unlikely to be on the same page on many issues).

Continualloop · 23/05/2025 17:22

nauticant · 23/05/2025 08:46

An old one (that's always being wheeled out) but a good one:

There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them. -George Orwell.

People like Lady Hale actually remind me of that John Bird quote:

' Sometimes I think I would like to be a liberal - they are the nicest people. But I couldn't be that gullible and their ideas are stupid.'

NotNowFGS · 23/05/2025 17:17

Coatsoff42 · 22/05/2025 23:47

Only now, when men want something from women, is biological sex unclear. For thousands of years, where women were treated as property, unable to vote, or own property, or get an education, it was very clear, as it is very clear in parts of the world today like Afghanistan. There’s no head scratching there about does sex exist or is it just a vibe you feel.
It infuriates me that men think taking some hormones and getting a boob job means they understand what it is like to be in a body that would have left you cornered and powerless for most of history, regardless of any ‘male energy’.

❤️❤️❤️

Panterusblackish · 23/05/2025 16:41

MistyGreenAndBlue · 22/05/2025 21:16

Heartbreaking? Really? I hear this all the time from bekinders. I doubt they are truly -crying themselves to sleep-barely eating a bite-staring listlessly at the ceiling heartbroken.

But words don't mean what they mean anymore, do they?
Really ticks me off though.
Heartbroken my arse!

If they were genuinely so very sensitive of feeling, they would be heartbroken for women being raped in prisons, in hospitals and at far higher risk in unisex facilities.

They only care about appearing caring. As a previous poster put it so well, luxury views.

I hope her or her daughter end up in a situation where they have need a pressing need for single sex facilities. Might teach them a lesson.

theDudesmummy · 23/05/2025 14:36

This issue has made me dismayed and disappointed in so many people/organisations over the past few years that I had a pretty good opinion of before. (e.g. Izzard, The Guardian, the BMA, the Labour Party, now Lady Hale). I suppose it's good to know who is what.

OP posts:
ThatCyanCat · 23/05/2025 11:42

The social experience is limited to hair, clothes and entering female spaces, none of which they can experience as women anyway. It's never taking the dog to the vet, caring for elderly parents, night wakings with kids and sorting out the car insurance. And any woman who doesn't do those things is still a woman.

IllustratedDictionaryOfTheDoldrums · 23/05/2025 11:41

I was in Costa Coffee earlier today when I read that from Lady Hale and I immediately thought if I had her beside me I'd ask her if she genuinely couldn't know the biological sex of every single person in the coffee shop with us.
We all know. It's like someone obstinately insisting that there's no such thing as dogs because cats also have fur and tails.
It's so exceedingly stupid, it's hard to find words for it.

Merrymouse · 23/05/2025 11:32

So socially, TW fit into the WI because their social experience matches that of women in the group. The medical pathway says that if science can allow an infertile women to conceive and give birth, its only a matter of time before TW can too. Therefore sex doesnt exist, even if at this time the idea of a man giving birth is theoretical.

Apparently forgetting that e.g. IVF is not free, and that this theoretical treatment for men would be sex specific.

illinivich · 23/05/2025 11:17

Trans ideology has two ways to get to TWAW. One way being that woman is a social role linked, but not mapped exactly, to sex, the other way is more transhuman - that sex can be altered through surgery and drugs.

So socially, TW fit into the WI because their social experience matches that of women in the group. The medical pathway says that if science can allow an infertile women to conceive and give birth, its only a matter of time before TW can too. Therefore sex doesnt exist, even if at this time the idea of a man giving birth is theoretical.

I think activists claim that TW will be excluded from society - employment, housing, healthcare, on boards, because we are ignoring these social and medical pathways, forcing TW to hide from society?

Peregrina · 23/05/2025 10:27

A board could still be made up entirely of trans people.

Imagine, a board of ten, five transwomen and five transmen, with the TWs being called she and the TMs he. A recipe for total confusion, I think.

MarieDeGournay · 23/05/2025 10:17

DontStopMe · 23/05/2025 08:58

I'm also disappointed that the spider brooch she wore when giving judgment on Boris Johnson's attempt to prorogue parliament wasn't actually a reference to The Who's Boris the Spider.

I wonder what kind of brooch would be a reference to The Who's song I'm A Boy (1966)
I'm a boy, I'm a boy
But my ma won't admit it
I'm a boy, I'm a boy
But if I say I am, I get it

which was going to be part of a concept album about a dystopian future where parents could choose the gender of their children, and in this case they were 'mis-sold' a male child so they 'transed' him.

The Who abandoned the idea, but unfortunately society didn't...

YellowPostIts · 23/05/2025 10:12

ItsCoolForCats · 22/05/2025 20:12

The article says this about her daughter:

When asked by an audience member whether trans women should count towards gender quotas on company boards, she said: “The idea that the trigger for all of this case was whether trans women should represent women in the representation of women on boards, I find heartbreaking.” She said she would love to have “a talented trans woman sitting on a board of mine”.

I suspect her daughter's views are having an influence.

And of course she’s entirely missing the point. A talented transwoman might indeed be an excellent addition to her board.

But that transwoman will still be counted as a male board member in the reported figures.

Would she really think her board was balanced fairly if it consisted hypothetically of half men and half transwomen?

BundleBoogie · 23/05/2025 10:07

OldCrone · 22/05/2025 20:30

Speaking at the Charleston literary festival in East Sussex, the first female president of the supreme court...

How can she be the first female president, if biological sex doesn't exist?

Good question. She’s just A.N. Other president in the case. I wish someone would point that out to her.

I can’t believe she had such power yet is so dim.

Merrymouse · 23/05/2025 10:05

ThatCyanCat · 23/05/2025 09:38

I can understand why people think they're being nice to trans people. I can't understand why they don't care about also being nice to women and children who have been demonstrably harmed by this. I don't understand why they are OK with not being nice to women who will be excluded from certain spheres of life if they can't have single sex spaces and why a woman is wrong if she doesn't want to change alongside a man.

I really can't understand that.

It's not at all clear why anyone would think that the SC ruling would prevent trans people being on boards.

A board could still be made up entirely of trans people.

Peregrina · 23/05/2025 09:58

Surely if Lady Hale wants to appoint someone to ‘her board’ there’s no law to stop her - just don’t let a man pretending to be a woman take an actual woman’s place just one from the men! Surely there’s nothing wrong with that!

I was going to say exactly the same.

Unless she's been misreported and she has actually said something which is entirely different, it shows that experts when talking about things outside their own field can be as ignorant as the rest of us. She is not a medical Dr to my knowledge. Even if she were, there are many Drs who don't belong to the Beth Upton school of medicine.