Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A trans woman is on the sort list to represent Unison’s female disabled members on their executive committee

35 replies

ScrollingLeaves · 18/05/2025 21:30

It is only so far being reported in GB News, The Telegraph, and The Daily Mail.

Maybe the man in question will not be chosen in the end but Unison is evidently not a good union for women if they are pursuing this approach in spite of the recent ruling that Women in the Equality Act are a sex not an identity.

Waple has vowed to take her seat if elected, telling the Telegraph: 'The biggest threat to women’s rights is not trans people, but rather the one per cent of super-powerful rich, clinging to their wealth and denying real funding for housing, domestic violence services and women’s services.
'The undemocratic and unaccountable Supreme Court ruling plays to the false narrative and agenda that trans people are a threat to women and will only serve to create a climate of fear among trans people.

Unison said it was an internal electoral issue that is consistent with its long-standing rules,
(Daily Mail)

The fact that Unison/Waple thinks it is ok to take the place of an actual woman on this short list of disabled ‘women’, only goes to prove the narrative that men identifying as women are a problem for women.

OP posts:
DoodlesMam · 18/05/2025 23:50

ScrollingLeaves · 18/05/2025 21:30

It is only so far being reported in GB News, The Telegraph, and The Daily Mail.

Maybe the man in question will not be chosen in the end but Unison is evidently not a good union for women if they are pursuing this approach in spite of the recent ruling that Women in the Equality Act are a sex not an identity.

Waple has vowed to take her seat if elected, telling the Telegraph: 'The biggest threat to women’s rights is not trans people, but rather the one per cent of super-powerful rich, clinging to their wealth and denying real funding for housing, domestic violence services and women’s services.
'The undemocratic and unaccountable Supreme Court ruling plays to the false narrative and agenda that trans people are a threat to women and will only serve to create a climate of fear among trans people.

Unison said it was an internal electoral issue that is consistent with its long-standing rules,
(Daily Mail)

The fact that Unison/Waple thinks it is ok to take the place of an actual woman on this short list of disabled ‘women’, only goes to prove the narrative that men identifying as women are a problem for women.

A man dressed as a woman.

Toseland · 18/05/2025 23:48

Well we can tell they are not a woman 'cos they like trains. That's how we tell in toddlers apparently, so why not in adults?

DuesToTheDirt · 18/05/2025 23:07

Patently, and blatantly, illegal. Is it not being challenged?

KnottyAuty · 18/05/2025 22:18

Wow. So they are now open for sex discrimination cases. Presumably from any woman who missed out on a place on the ballot. Or if he wins, any of the other women on the shortlist. Who are these women? And are any GC?

ETA At this point any GC women need to leave unison and go elsewhere.

Vargas · 18/05/2025 22:18

Unison are misogynistic idiots.

ScrollingLeaves · 18/05/2025 22:04

It seems Unison wants to make a point of showing that for them
‘trans women are women’.

OP posts:
orangegato · 18/05/2025 21:42

Why are women paying their subs? Teach them a lesson FFS.

They won’t represent you anyway if you were to get in the shit, they will always side with men.

myplace · 18/05/2025 21:38

Bloody hell.

Helleofabore · 18/05/2025 21:38

So female people don’t deserve same sex representation? That seems like a really responsive union to belong to.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 18/05/2025 21:34

Unison continue to really hate women