Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

TW who supports the SC ruling - AMA

407 replies

VanishingVision · 16/05/2025 22:55

Hello! I was thinking of doing this post for a little while now as the previous posts doing this by the rather wonderful trans men here were really interesting but I didnt want to take up too much space here or take any attention away from much more important things here than what I have to say.

But I figured to just go for it before I have a big old break from the Internet for a while.

So like the title says, I'm a transwoman who accepts the SC ruling: ask me anything if you'd like to and I'll do my best to answer.

OP posts:
ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:59

VanishingVision · 17/05/2025 16:36

I think there are different kinds of gender dysphoria, the kind a trans person has that requires transition is one, plus SA/rape survivors can also experience a form of GD and I think there's a kind of dysphoria that comes from not feeling like you fit into the social expectations of your sex/gender. Those last two would clearly not require medical transition would they? That would likely be therapy and teaching people to accept they don't have to conform to stereotypes.
Also you just said your friend has dysphoria and is taking hormones to change her sex characteristics. That is a form of medically transitioning is it not? If she's happy I wish her all the peace in the world, good for her. I wouldn't tell somebody they are/aren't trans because they didn't want a surgery, no surgery should be undertaken lightly and I would never tell somebody to go through one just because somebody else thinks you should, it should only be done for your own personal reasons. Do I think its a bit weird to not at least WANT GRS if you wish to be the opposite sex, but my experience is not everyone's and I would never claim to speak for everyone. Not everyone has the resources and availability for the same things. I have a close friend who is a trans man who hasnt started hormones yet, is likely some time away from it and I have literally zero problem with using their pronouns, etc. Everything is a personal choice in your own life.
As for your NB they're transgender by the mainstream definition of it but they aren't a transsexual, I wouldn't misgender them and I accept their experience but I wouldn't be able to relate to it much like every NB person I've met, their struggle is entirely different to TS people.

And there's a reason I make the distinction: your NB friend can go back at any time to their former life, change their clothes, grow their hair back (or cut it) etc etc. I can't go back EVER. Your TW friend can't. The part of the trans community affected by everything that's going on in the trans rights debacle the most is binary trans women and men. Is your NB friend affected if they ban medical transition (something a few people here are in favour of, obviously I am not)? No, but we are. Are they affected by what spaces trans people now have to use? I suspect they use the ones for their bio sex. Are they affected by documents being forcibly changed back potentially? I suspect not.
That's why I think the distinction is important, surely if you want to fight for trans rights you should be able to clearly define what it is. Most trans people can't actually explain themselves because they're armed with the magickal and vague language with by TRAs and the mainstream community.
I'm not some totalitarian keeper of the keys to the transsexual empire, I dont spend my time thinking about who and who isn't trans and telling people what to do online it's their business not mine. But i am allowed an opinion on the things that are beginning to directly affect me now.

I'm sorry but where have I misgendered somebody? I don't walk into trans spaces misgendering people, I'd be a hypocrite if I did that. I have a different viewpoint on trans issues, that's why I struggle with them but I do have some trans friends who don't see totally eye to eye with me but we agree and relate on some level.

As per the SC ruling I accept the reasons they came to it and everything thats lead to it, I think it's necessary to try and reset the clock and bring balance back again but that is probably me being naive. I don't know how I feel about how its going to play out in full at this point, honesrly it's still very fresh isn't it? There's still a thousand interpretations of everything out there.

Edited

I see, so we're in agreement about most kinds of GD being a signifier to others that a person is trans, where we disagree is on the last two. I don't think what you are describing is dysphoria and I don't think, at least in my experience, that trans people take the decision to transition just because of social pressure. It's a complex decision and many factors lead one to that decision. I think we should err on the side of not medical gatekeeping because it's not cut and dry for most trans people.

I'm also in agreement with you that it is weird - like I can't understand what it's like to not experience crippling bottom dysphoria. But I would also definitely consider her trans because her gender identity doesn't match her ASAB. Same with your trans masc friend. I think we're on the same page that people are trans when they make the decision that they are and should be treated in accordance with that decision. A newly cracked egg is no less trans for having just started their journey.

I also agree that my enby friend isn't a transsexual, and I think they'd probably baulk at that if I did say they were. I am not transsexual either despite our trans journeys looking from the outside to be similar. But I don't agree with the notion that the struggle my enby friend has isn't the same as yours or mine. Like they are affected by a system that says that there are two sexes only and you are legally treated as the one you were born as. Their identity is entirely erased by this ruling as the system offers no space for enby identities to exist. Practically speaking, they might be less affected - but when it comes to things like markers on passports, they are just as affected by not being able to get one that confirms who they are as I am. I am not suggesting you aren't allowed to have an opinion on the ruling - the reason I'm even having this conversation with you is because I want to understand it given it is very different from mine and suggests a very different experience in society.

You misgendered @TransSister's sister by referring to her with male pronouns. I assumed that was because she also used the incorrect ones and you were following suit, but wanted to point out that this might be a reason you struggle to engage with other trans people where it's really important not to make that kind of mistake in one of the few spaces we can be safe. All trans people relate on the obvious level that our experiences are shared in a lot of ways, but I think that there's a strong difference between sharing an identity with Blaire White and saying that she should be able to freely engage within trans spaces without pushback.

I think your last paragraph speaks to the fundamental disagreement we have - what are we resetting back too and how are we doing that? Because from my perspective, a bunch of us just had our existence in society restricted out of nowhere and it's not like the debate got less hot as a result. I'd argue that we were doing a lot better when our lives weren't being treated as a political football by hack politicians who can't actually improve things so instead need to scapegoat, but I don't think that genie can be let out of the bottle.

VanishingVision · 17/05/2025 16:57

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:50

@VanishingVision

"surely if you want to fight for trans rights you should be able to clearly define what it is"

That's such an important point! You can't fight for a group's rights if you can't define what that group is. That was the entire point all along: that the term "woman" needed to be defined in order to properly defend women's rights. And now it's time for trans activists to properly define what "trans" means - that is, if they truly want to defend trans people.

This is what I think but they won't go this way, sadly.

OP posts:
Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:57

@VanishingVision I was for many years a professional in sexual and domestic abuse working mostly with women and girls.

With my counselling hat on, (not a therapist) i would say from your descriptions of your experiences, that, rejecting your physical form, and transitioning was a form of disassociation, from the violence, abuse and emotional neglect that you have experienced.

That you were able to reflect on and find peace in your new self “actualisation” is interesting to me.

You are only young yet and i picked up that you found nothing to associate your dysphoria with your experiences.

But as most victims of violence can attest to you will have ongoing needs for support as life unfolds for you, and other memories are visited upon you.

Our brains are amazing things and can protect us from memories that can cause us to be unable to function.

Please make sure you look after your mental health and yourself, and that you get support when needed. Dipping in and out of therapy as you go along so to speak is a good thing.

VanishingVision · 17/05/2025 16:56

Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:14

@ChirpyFinch well there you have it thinly disguised hostility because OP does not drum out the same twaddle, as you obviously believe.

OP cannot be a “TERF”, simply because in order to qualify for that insult one MUST be a biological woman.

The “TERF” club here, has a variety of views on the whole issue but don't cast people out or abuse them because there opinions vary.

Hey, at least that's one slur I'm free from. I've certainly had a few chucked my way in my years.

Can I at least be a 'TERF inclusive radical trans person' ? 🤣

OP posts:
VanishingVision · 17/05/2025 16:51

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:25

🙄the trans women are having a conversation honey, maybe don't decide for us whether there is hostility. I'm making a point that @VanishingVision's experience with the trans community is likely very different because of the way she engages about other people. I think it's notable that she doesn't want to be considered a TERF, because otherwise why openly tell me that they haven't gone full TERF?

It's an open forum, people are allowed to comment and join in.

And I said that because I consider myself to be in the middle. I care very deeply about the women in my life, I care very deeply about the trans peope in my life and yes I care about myself. I also care about the safety of women and children in general and I care about about trans people in general too, despite what you may think. I feel in the middle because I want to get to a place of safety for everyone that can and HAS been affected by the trans rights debate.

OP posts:
Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:50

@VanishingVision

"surely if you want to fight for trans rights you should be able to clearly define what it is"

That's such an important point! You can't fight for a group's rights if you can't define what that group is. That was the entire point all along: that the term "woman" needed to be defined in order to properly defend women's rights. And now it's time for trans activists to properly define what "trans" means - that is, if they truly want to defend trans people.

tripleginandtonic · 17/05/2025 16:43

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:35

I assuming that what you're actually asking me is whether I think a trans woman should be sent to a female prison. Yes, I think that she should be. I also think that it's probably sensible to treat a rapist as a rapist while they are in prison and take precautions to prevent further crimes and abuse.

I think you can, and should, treat her like any other rapist or abuser in prison - whether that is isolation, or putting them in a higher security facility. I'd say the same about a cis woman who had committed similar crimes, or do you think that she shouldn't be in a women's prison?

A woman cannot commit rape. Hth.

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:41

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:35

I assuming that what you're actually asking me is whether I think a trans woman should be sent to a female prison. Yes, I think that she should be. I also think that it's probably sensible to treat a rapist as a rapist while they are in prison and take precautions to prevent further crimes and abuse.

I think you can, and should, treat her like any other rapist or abuser in prison - whether that is isolation, or putting them in a higher security facility. I'd say the same about a cis woman who had committed similar crimes, or do you think that she shouldn't be in a women's prison?

"I think you can, and should, treat her like any other rapist or abuser in prison"

Other rapists and abusers are put in the prisons corresponding to their sex. So what you're saying is that she should be put into a men's prison.

"I'd say the same about a cis woman who had committed similar crimes, or do you think that she shouldn't be in a women's prison?"

Non-trans women are female, so of course they belong in women's prisons. But trans women are male, so they don't belong. That's the entire point.

VanishingVision · 17/05/2025 16:36

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 15:22

Right, then I guess what I am trying to understand is what in your mind does "dysphoria that doesn't require medical transition" look like? Take my friend, for example. She is transgender, is happy having socially transitioned and taking hormones but does not want to undergo GRS because she doesn't experience bottom dysphoria but does experience dysphoria because of other parts of her body feeling wrong. Is her dysphoria enough to consider her trans? What about an ex of mine who is non-binary and experiences dysphoria because their body is gendered, so does not want to take feminising hormones or undergo a surgery because that would just alter their body into a different gendered one? Their dysphoria presumably doesn't require medical transition to address but it would be baffling to me to say they aren't trans.

Ok so are you saying that you disagree with the decision reached but accept that it's the way a court decided on it, or are you going further and saying that you agree with the reasons they made the decision? If it's the latter, why? Regarding whether I believe you've gone full TERF or not, I don't think that's related to your opinion on the SC ruling. I think that the reason you might be struggling to have trans friends or get pushed out of trans spaces has less to do with your opinions on the SC and more because, as this thread has shown, you are willing to misgender other trans women. Other trans people may feel like I do, that you can't really be trusted to clear the minimum bar of recognising other people's gender expression as valid and treat it with respect and that's the reason you aren't made to feel welcome in that space.

Edited

I think there are different kinds of gender dysphoria, the kind a trans person has that requires transition is one, plus SA/rape survivors can also experience a form of GD and I think there's a kind of dysphoria that comes from not feeling like you fit into the social expectations of your sex/gender. Those last two would clearly not require medical transition would they? That would likely be therapy and teaching people to accept they don't have to conform to stereotypes.
Also you just said your friend has dysphoria and is taking hormones to change her sex characteristics. That is a form of medically transitioning is it not? If she's happy I wish her all the peace in the world, good for her. I wouldn't tell somebody they are/aren't trans because they didn't want a surgery, no surgery should be undertaken lightly and I would never tell somebody to go through one just because somebody else thinks you should, it should only be done for your own personal reasons. Do I think its a bit weird to not at least WANT GRS if you wish to be the opposite sex, but my experience is not everyone's and I would never claim to speak for everyone. Not everyone has the resources and availability for the same things. I have a close friend who is a trans man who hasnt started hormones yet, is likely some time away from it and I have literally zero problem with using their pronouns, etc. Everything is a personal choice in your own life.
As for your NB they're transgender by the mainstream definition of it but they aren't a transsexual, I wouldn't misgender them and I accept their experience but I wouldn't be able to relate to it much like every NB person I've met, their struggle is entirely different to TS people.

And there's a reason I make the distinction: your NB friend can go back at any time to their former life, change their clothes, grow their hair back (or cut it) etc etc. I can't go back EVER. Your TW friend can't. The part of the trans community affected by everything that's going on in the trans rights debacle the most is binary trans women and men. Is your NB friend affected if they ban medical transition (something a few people here are in favour of, obviously I am not)? No, but we are. Are they affected by what spaces trans people now have to use? I suspect they use the ones for their bio sex. Are they affected by documents being forcibly changed back potentially? I suspect not.
That's why I think the distinction is important, surely if you want to fight for trans rights you should be able to clearly define what it is. Most trans people can't actually explain themselves because they're armed with the magickal and vague language with by TRAs and the mainstream community.
I'm not some totalitarian keeper of the keys to the transsexual empire, I dont spend my time thinking about who and who isn't trans and telling people what to do online it's their business not mine. But i am allowed an opinion on the things that are beginning to directly affect me now.

I'm sorry but where have I misgendered somebody? I don't walk into trans spaces misgendering people, I'd be a hypocrite if I did that. I have a different viewpoint on trans issues, that's why I struggle with them but I do have some trans friends who don't see totally eye to eye with me but we agree and relate on some level.

As per the SC ruling I accept the reasons they came to it and everything thats lead to it, I think it's necessary to try and reset the clock and bring balance back again but that is probably me being naive. I don't know how I feel about how its going to play out in full at this point, honesrly it's still very fresh isn't it? There's still a thousand interpretations of everything out there.

OP posts:
ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:35

I assuming that what you're actually asking me is whether I think a trans woman should be sent to a female prison. Yes, I think that she should be. I also think that it's probably sensible to treat a rapist as a rapist while they are in prison and take precautions to prevent further crimes and abuse.

I think you can, and should, treat her like any other rapist or abuser in prison - whether that is isolation, or putting them in a higher security facility. I'd say the same about a cis woman who had committed similar crimes, or do you think that she shouldn't be in a women's prison?

Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:34

Chirpy is doing a derail best ignored now.

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:33

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:31

How so? You asked me whether I think a male (so presumably someone who identifies as a man) should be put in a women's prison. No, obviously.

No, I asked you whether an abusive male who identifies as a woman should be put into a women's prison. Should he?

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:31

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:28

Then you realise that you too are transphobic, right?

How so? You asked me whether I think a male (so presumably someone who identifies as a man) should be put in a women's prison. No, obviously.

Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:31

@ChirpyFinch <honey> ? What an awful way to respond. Show a bit of respect, an apology will suffice

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:30

MelodyMalone · 17/05/2025 16:25

But @TransSister and the rest of the family matter, too. It's not all about the feelings of the trans sibling.

I mean, matter in what way? @TransSister and her family is clearly of the opinion that it would be cruel to misgender her sister to her face (so are already willing to accept whatever harm comes from them doing that - though I am not sure what it would be?), so what exactly changes when her sister is out of the room? It's also very clearly affecting the relationship between the sister and the family, which I think is pretty sad.

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:28

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:26

No, because they're a male. I think that would go without saying.

Then you realise that you too are transphobic, right?

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:27

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:25

🙄the trans women are having a conversation honey, maybe don't decide for us whether there is hostility. I'm making a point that @VanishingVision's experience with the trans community is likely very different because of the way she engages about other people. I think it's notable that she doesn't want to be considered a TERF, because otherwise why openly tell me that they haven't gone full TERF?

"the trans women are having a conversation honey, maybe don't decide for us whether there is hostility."

Spoken like the aggressive type of trans women indeed.

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:26

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:24

I'm not talking about which pronouns to use; that's almost anecdotic at this point. I'm talking about which prison to send them to. Should a male abuser be sent to a women's prison, full of female inmates and staffed by female people?

No, because they're a male. I think that would go without saying.

MelodyMalone · 17/05/2025 16:25

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:05

I dunno which approach I'd like less. Like on the one hand it'd be nice to have some acknowledgment and validation from my family, on the other I'd probably be much more hurt if I knew that it was totally insincere because of how I'm talked about behind my back. I wonder if she'd prefer the situation I find myself in. The behaviour you're describing from your sister is really similar to a lot of trans friends I had that ended up not interacting with their family anymore because they eventually decided their energy was better spent on people that actually love and care for them. I hope for the sake of your relationship with your sister that that doesn't happen to you but I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

But @TransSister and the rest of the family matter, too. It's not all about the feelings of the trans sibling.

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:25

Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:14

@ChirpyFinch well there you have it thinly disguised hostility because OP does not drum out the same twaddle, as you obviously believe.

OP cannot be a “TERF”, simply because in order to qualify for that insult one MUST be a biological woman.

The “TERF” club here, has a variety of views on the whole issue but don't cast people out or abuse them because there opinions vary.

🙄the trans women are having a conversation honey, maybe don't decide for us whether there is hostility. I'm making a point that @VanishingVision's experience with the trans community is likely very different because of the way she engages about other people. I think it's notable that she doesn't want to be considered a TERF, because otherwise why openly tell me that they haven't gone full TERF?

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:24

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:21

I think it's pretty simple - I don't think that the crime of abuse happens because of the way someone identifies. I think they commit abuse because they are abusers. I have no problem with using preferred pronouns that they choose to have and still sending them to prison, or isolating them in prison if they pose a danger to others. I don't understand why I have to pick between using a different pronoun and still treating them like a criminal for having committed a crime? Why do you think that choice has to be made?

I'm not talking about which pronouns to use; that's almost anecdotic at this point. I'm talking about which prison to send them to. Should a male abuser be sent to a women's prison, full of female inmates and staffed by female people?

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:21

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:11

@ChirpyFinch

I wonder: how far do you go to "recognise other people's gender expression as valid and treat it with respect"? Does that cover, for example, the abusers of women and girls who declare themselves trans women in order to be put into women's prisons? If not, then where do you draw the line?

I think it's pretty simple - I don't think that the crime of abuse happens because of the way someone identifies. I think they commit abuse because they are abusers. I have no problem with using preferred pronouns that they choose to have and still sending them to prison, or isolating them in prison if they pose a danger to others. I don't understand why I have to pick between using a different pronoun and still treating them like a criminal for having committed a crime? Why do you think that choice has to be made?

Bannedontherun · 17/05/2025 16:14

@ChirpyFinch well there you have it thinly disguised hostility because OP does not drum out the same twaddle, as you obviously believe.

OP cannot be a “TERF”, simply because in order to qualify for that insult one MUST be a biological woman.

The “TERF” club here, has a variety of views on the whole issue but don't cast people out or abuse them because there opinions vary.

Seethlaw · 17/05/2025 16:11

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 15:22

Right, then I guess what I am trying to understand is what in your mind does "dysphoria that doesn't require medical transition" look like? Take my friend, for example. She is transgender, is happy having socially transitioned and taking hormones but does not want to undergo GRS because she doesn't experience bottom dysphoria but does experience dysphoria because of other parts of her body feeling wrong. Is her dysphoria enough to consider her trans? What about an ex of mine who is non-binary and experiences dysphoria because their body is gendered, so does not want to take feminising hormones or undergo a surgery because that would just alter their body into a different gendered one? Their dysphoria presumably doesn't require medical transition to address but it would be baffling to me to say they aren't trans.

Ok so are you saying that you disagree with the decision reached but accept that it's the way a court decided on it, or are you going further and saying that you agree with the reasons they made the decision? If it's the latter, why? Regarding whether I believe you've gone full TERF or not, I don't think that's related to your opinion on the SC ruling. I think that the reason you might be struggling to have trans friends or get pushed out of trans spaces has less to do with your opinions on the SC and more because, as this thread has shown, you are willing to misgender other trans women. Other trans people may feel like I do, that you can't really be trusted to clear the minimum bar of recognising other people's gender expression as valid and treat it with respect and that's the reason you aren't made to feel welcome in that space.

Edited

@ChirpyFinch

I wonder: how far do you go to "recognise other people's gender expression as valid and treat it with respect"? Does that cover, for example, the abusers of women and girls who declare themselves trans women in order to be put into women's prisons? If not, then where do you draw the line?

ChirpyFinch · 17/05/2025 16:05

TransSister · 17/05/2025 15:48

My sibling was born and lived as a biological man for nearly 50 years. If we are talking together or he is present we all use his preferred new name and pronouns. It makes him happy, it's what he wants and it's important to him. And I would do that for another individual to.
If he'd changed religion, political affiliation or taken up a new hobby we'd also listen politely, show an interest, ask a few questions. But I don't think he'd expect us to affirm his new thing to the same degree as trans. I wouldn't expected to believe in a new god or take up cycling. I won't do the whole TWAW. I also think that it undermines the experience of trans people, I'm a hetro woman I've lived that life. Not the life of my gay friends in homophobic '70s family homes or teenagers in lockdown. I'm interested, thanks for the ama, but I can't join you.
If a friend behaved as my sibling has over the years, we'd have lost contact a long time ago. My sibling crops up every now and then, on their terms and is welcomed, positive memories shared, no obligations insisted on and then they disappear again. He calls in times of stress never to celebrate. He's often mean about things we achieve or value. Seems pretty unconditional compared to most of my friendships.

I dunno which approach I'd like less. Like on the one hand it'd be nice to have some acknowledgment and validation from my family, on the other I'd probably be much more hurt if I knew that it was totally insincere because of how I'm talked about behind my back. I wonder if she'd prefer the situation I find myself in. The behaviour you're describing from your sister is really similar to a lot of trans friends I had that ended up not interacting with their family anymore because they eventually decided their energy was better spent on people that actually love and care for them. I hope for the sake of your relationship with your sister that that doesn't happen to you but I wouldn't be surprised if it did.