Good Law Project suing the EHRC and Bridget Phillipson - letter before action

The fury of women having protections in law being so very openly voiced by this movement, the contempt for women, the belief that women should not be allowed dignity, privacy, a voice, a right to choose their own sexual preferences, their own language or anything not controlled and ruled by men, that their role is unconditional submission and silence, the threats of sexual violence so prevalent for any woman protesting this,

and two out of three daughters who identify as boys, as mentioned in that article.

I wonder why it could feel a better option to be a boy?

Labour Pains blog link
This blog by Richard Dunstan gives a fairly comprehensive lowdown on how and why JoMo got himself into this mess. It includes links to the interview with the elder daughter (Grin) saying her sister is also trans, Grin was also included in a Guardian article about children who have been given puberty blockers & hormones. I'll see if I can find it.
I'm not surprised he looks unhinged in that video, he's got himself in a proper Chinese finger trap. He's never publicly acknowledged his personal reasons for his crusade and is careful to never directly link the GLP to his daughter's campaign group, but as more people become aware of it he's looking even less credible. He still gets positive interaction on bluesky & insta but every trans related post on twitter is thoroughly mocked. No serious people want to be publicly associated with this grifting nonsense.

JM's video on X now has a glorious community note.

Readers added context
Sending a letter before action is not "starting legal proceedings". The very point of a Pre-Action Protocol LBA is to "try to settle the dispute without [legal] proceedings". The Good Law Project have previously had to apologise for misleading statements such as this.

Yes, except it wastes our time and money, too.

Given the cost of living crisis, food banks, the NHS struggling, etc, quite a lot of taxpayers may be understandably pissed off at the time wasting eejits.

And if I were in the legal sphere, I'd be losing patience with someone making the profession look so absurd and pointless.

Exactly my response. It's all bullshit, everyone knows its bullshit, everyone knows it won't succeed. But everyone has to plod through the unbelievably tedious motions anyway. Thirty pages of bullshit. And taxpayers will have to cover the time, effort, and expense of carefully and laboriously explaining each point as if to children.

It's a version of 'the process is the punishment', only for this lot it also appears to have made them an enormous amount of money, just to waste everyone's time.

I have to admit I can't even be arsed to read it.

Nothing to see yet but JK has a LOT of popcorn in

<toddles off to twitter>

Is is possible to see who has donated to the crowdfunder, ie any large donations from shady organisations? This is what FWS were accused of after all.

Hoardasurass · Yesterday 22:06

I'm sure he's had advice from the likes of rmw whom as we all know (atleast those who heard his women's hour interview) is a "expert" in these matters 🤪

Did you mean egg spurt?

Grifters, Losers and Prats?

TL, DR: Why do people keep being conned out of their money by this fraud?

Stop giving Jo money and hopefully he’ll go away.

Exactly. I thought “they just wanted to pee”? Surely they can do that in the gents. What a lot of absolute nonsense. I really am losing patience rapidly with these ludicrous tantrums.

🤣🤣🤣

I’m surprised the TRAs don’t want to be strip searched by men, wouldn’t that be part of the sissy humiliation routine? I can’t believe I’m typing that but sadly my brain knows too much about this area these days.

There was a snippet of an interview with two of the kids posted on X, that’s where it was suggested that they were both trans. They were discussing the different attitudes of eg their school between one transitioning and the other transitioning a few years later.

Yes after hearing that today I thought it would be best if the GRA was not repealed. It is apparently what made the SC ruling on the EA possible and it will remain in itself a useful law.

Yes! I could tell something felt weird and disturbing about the video (other than the content!) but couldn't put my finger on what it was.

I'm sure he's had advice from the likes of rmw whom as we all know (atleast those who heard his women's hour interview) is a "expert" in these matters 🤪

Nope, it’s a limited company. The website claims it’s a ‘non profit.’ Presumably Jolyon pays himself some kind of salary. He’s not wandering around wearing sackcloth, for sure.

Interestingly, according to Companies House, JM is no longer a director at the Good Law Project, but he is the only director of the Good Law Practice. 🤔 But they both have the same correspondence address.

I'm guessing that a crowd-funded-law-practice does not have a whole lot of setup costs (a couple of computers, work from home etc.) so perhaps almost all of the donations will go on 'salaries'?

Is it a charity? Any financial declarations?

No, yes, lots, yes.

IIRC he was initially crowdfunding £10k for him to look at the judgement. The judgement is available for free on the internet. I've looked at it several times myself.

Imma spamming this now. Hat tip @greenup who set up another thread on this. The LSE Law School dissecting the implications of the Supreme Court ruling. 2 hours.

Sarah Vine KC who specialises in vulnerable defendants cases v interesting. Also at the end they note that the Gender Recognition Act meant this ruling seemed to flow naturally from the relevant legislation. In Australia and other countries that don't have that, it would actually be far harder to distinguish for single sex service etc

Because it’s ultimately about forcing women to submit to them, that’s the kink, the fetish, the power trip. In general, they’re not going to get the reaction they want from men, it’s only women they want to dominate.

How about Greed Flaw Project?

Are these the same KC’s that told him FWS definitely wouldn’t win? Do you think they’re in the room with him now?! 😂