I think it is not a single ideology, and the term 'wokeism' would really only be used by people who disagree with it.
the starting point is the idea that there are systematic biases in society - bias against people from certain races / groups, and biases against women and against disabled people. these come out both in explicit behaviour (racism, misogyny etc) but also in implicit decision making (manager hires a white male without considering the better candidate who is a black female, but doesn't realize he is being biased). The final claim is that if people are aware of these biases, then we are better able to counteract them and work towards a fairer society.
All those ideas have a solid evidence base in economics / psychology / sociology with plenty of evidence to show that these biases exist and impact on real world outcomes (hiring people etc).
However, there are some challenging ideas which arise, particularly when crappy 'training companies' start coming in to try to train people to be less biased but do it in a dumb way that can make people more resentful and more biased. there can also be a tendency to focus only on certain groups and ignore other groups who are also disadvantaged. This again makes people feel things are unfair. For example, in the UK, social class has historically had a very strong influence on social outcomes and it could be argued that working-class people face systematic biases and should also be supported.
I don't think your claim that 'feeling trump logic' has anything to do with it - in fact, the logical careful choice is to work to reduce bias in decision making.
and the idea that 'identity trumps merit' again should never come into it, but i can see why things sometimes look that way.
can I ask - why are you trying to define 'wokeism'? - it is not one thing, and that term is often not a helpful one.