Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Our Graham looking for some support for his court case on Monday!

232 replies

NotmeMother · 10/05/2025 11:38

This is Stephanie Hayden, a man with a long and unpleasant criminal history, alerting his followers to my case on Monday. If you're in London and agree with anything I have to say, please join me around 2pm to outnumber whatever crazies turn up

https://x.com/Glinner/status/1920924918037815335

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
FuckityFux · 09/09/2025 08:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ThrawnBeastie · 09/09/2025 00:14

Good luck Graham. I've been following you via various sources (including substack) for a very long time. It probably seems like forever to you. Can't thank you enough for all you've done. So sorry you've suffered so much for doing no more than speaking the truth. You're a brave man.

Abhannmor · 15/05/2025 20:17

musicalfrog · 12/05/2025 20:14

Oh @Glinner how lovely that you can see all the support for you on here ❤️ I actually started listening to your book today, really enjoying it so far!

Tough Crowd is a great read isn't it? There's another book waiting to be written , Graham.

TriesNotToBeCynical · 13/05/2025 22:19

Spacek · 12/05/2025 18:01

But, if filming is illegal on this private property, who is recording the video we are watching?

Depends entirely on what the owner/manager of the private property wants to allow.

SorenLorensonsInvisibleFriend · 13/05/2025 21:53

Also really glad to see you here, Graham. Big fans of you in our house for both your creative genius and determination to protect women and girls. 🥂

SternJoyousBee · 13/05/2025 21:51

There was speculation that the “ decapitate TERFS” bloke was Cameron Allen who was convicted of rape and murder. Lots of opinions on a MN thread even links to X suggesting the sign was being carried by a woman.

Link here

ThatCyanCat · 13/05/2025 21:48

I didn't realise you were here, Graham! But I'm really glad you are.

SabrinaThwaite · 13/05/2025 21:40

There’s a proper cliff hanger. Please let there a tunnel of goats involved too.

Glinner · 13/05/2025 18:15

Can't talk about it. Wait till September 4th, the date of the trial! All will be revealed!

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 14:41

Glinner · 13/05/2025 14:24

Not same person no

Thanks for confirming - did the police investigate and rule them out?

moto748e · 13/05/2025 14:31

I remember threads a while back where people were trying to identify the 'decapitate terfs' guy. But as I recall, that came back wrong/inconclusive?

Glinner · 13/05/2025 14:24

Not same person no

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 14:24

Maaate · 13/05/2025 07:28

Is that the same person that held up the 'decapitate terfs' sign?

How on earth did you spot that?!

IcyPlumOtter · 13/05/2025 10:45

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 10:08

Not relevant to this case, but Police Scotland might be interested?

This reminds me of the members of the public who identified the russian poisoners in Salisbury - crowd sourcing information...

Edited

Yes.

It would be great if this guy was arrested (if same person) for the threatening sign because he deserves to be, but also as it would help with public perceptions for Graham's case.

Forgot to mention the chin / jaw line is similar, as are eyebrows and brow ridge. I really do think it is the same person.

Lark1ane · 13/05/2025 10:28

Sophia Abigail Brooks

Not at all surprised that Glinner has elected to go for trial. I've only had a wee wander on t'internet. Sunlight.

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 10:08

NoBinturongsHereMate · 13/05/2025 09:46

Don't see how it would be relevant. His behaviour at the event itself, at the time of the incident, may be; what he may or may not have done previously, somewhere else, isn't.

Not relevant to this case, but Police Scotland might be interested?

This reminds me of the members of the public who identified the russian poisoners in Salisbury - crowd sourcing information...

floormops · 13/05/2025 09:48

Yes. Look at the nose and mouth. Very distinctive.

Lark1ane · 13/05/2025 09:46

That's the same person in both photographs for sure.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 13/05/2025 09:46

IcyPlumOtter · 13/05/2025 09:19

Would the police still be interested? It certainly seems like it could be the same person.

weight loss and age could account for differences. The nose and mouth and the distance between features are similar.

if Graham’s lawyer could get a licensed Super Recogniser they could help.

Don't see how it would be relevant. His behaviour at the event itself, at the time of the incident, may be; what he may or may not have done previously, somewhere else, isn't.

lcakethereforeIam · 13/05/2025 09:42

Is it a private prosecution then? I thought Graham was subject to action following a complaint to the police?

IcyPlumOtter · 13/05/2025 09:19

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 09:00

Here Are the two pics side by side… not sure… anyone know the dates of each pic?

Would the police still be interested? It certainly seems like it could be the same person.

weight loss and age could account for differences. The nose and mouth and the distance between features are similar.

if Graham’s lawyer could get a licensed Super Recogniser they could help.

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 09:00

Maaate · 13/05/2025 07:28

Is that the same person that held up the 'decapitate terfs' sign?

Here Are the two pics side by side… not sure… anyone know the dates of each pic?

Our Graham looking for some support for his court case on Monday!
RoyalCorgi · 13/05/2025 08:53

Maaate · 13/05/2025 07:28

Is that the same person that held up the 'decapitate terfs' sign?

They look very similar, don't they?

I hope Graham and his lawyers are able to gather evidence of this person's long record of aggression, intimidation and harassment of women ahead of the court case.

KnottyAuty · 13/05/2025 08:47

Spacek · 12/05/2025 18:01

But, if filming is illegal on this private property, who is recording the video we are watching?

Quite! That had also occurred to me - although the observers were filming someone to evidence wrong doing. It was also at a respectful distance. So its nature was different - but yes there were lots of problems with the filming across the board. Maybe that conference is considered by law as a public space? I’d like to get to the bottom of it - the articles and notes I’ve seen online mainly talk about doorbells or CCTV with sight of someone else’s property which isn’t really applicable. Can anyone here advise?

StellaAndCrow · 13/05/2025 08:10

JKRismyPatronus · 13/05/2025 07:59

That is unhinged. The hypocrisy of taking Glinner to court when his own behaviour is much much worse.

Yes, and how protected these men must be (or feel) to think that it'll all go their way.

Swipe left for the next trending thread