Our Graham looking for some support for his court case on Monday!

"Age Restricted".

I have not been allowed to view the Glinner Update in case I am corrupted by a photo of Greyson Perry dressed as a four year old and wearing a huge leather strap-on dildo. Attending a children's cancer charity event. Hmm.

Don’t forget the weird Companies House appointments.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13957249

Well, is his age on the same document that calls him a woman? And says his name is 'Sophie'?

I know, the grasping at this particular straw is absurd

I didn’t say women were unreasonable.

It wasn’t women who were the unreasonable ones. The tactics of the Transexual activists are vile and despicable. The abuse they post on Twitter and elsewhere against women who dare to object to them is constant and menacing. They do it to some men too. I’m glad someone like Graham Linehan counters that. He gives them back as good as he gets, we had a captured police by the activists and every victory for Graham is a win for women in our battle to keep perverted men out of our safe spaces. Because he brings sunlight. And now he brings legal victories by countering the activists and by showing us what weaklings the police have been. @glinner

Well done on containing to fight, hope your appeal is successful. Do you know Tarquin’s birth given name?

Well if you can identify as a sex, surely you can identify as an age?!

But like the emporer's new clothes, what is it or why do so many collaborate.

Yet another Tarquin X account.

I’ve had a look at some of his other X accounts, seriously unpleasant and with some ‘interesting’ posts directed at people who were in the gallery supporting Glinner (predating the court case).

I wonder what would happen if a “middle class woman of a certain age” identified as an 18 yo?

Unsurprising. But I assume he won't be censured for that.

I'd always assumed he was older but claiming to be under 18 as an extra layer of vulnerability to add to his case. As we know he's happy to lie about his sex, why not his age.

The redditors still claim he was a child, but them they claim he's a she, so there we go.

we have evidence that he's actually 21, which means he perjured himself at my trial and the other guy he got done for the same offence

I did think when he was described as 18 years old, if it was shorthand for over 18 years old. He'd reached his majority, the specific age could be handwaved.

He also seemed to be pretending to be younger than he is, is that right? The alleged 'child' status didn't seem to be brought up towards the end, other than by reddit who are sticking to it, unsurprisingly.

I'm in a group with about eight of his victims. We have a four-hundred page evidence file detailing his harassment. We've already successfully had him arrested once but the police let him go when they realised he was a man pretending to be a woman. Next time we'll make it stick.

Don't worry we'll clear it all up for everyone.

How can you be a major figure in a court case, and still there can be doubt about your age?

If Sophia Brooks is 18, then I'm Fanny Craddock.

Tbf 'opinion' was in tiny letters below the picture. Even being told it was there it took me a minute to find it.

I'd never have found the article or that, rather niche, site in a million years.

You must have missed the line at top of that report stating “Opinion”. It isn’t intended to be impartial.

I don’t find Brooks reasonable either. Neither man is. It doesn’t have to be one or the other.

For anyone not on Twitter, some light relief. A lot of these court cases sound like bad sitcoms, they just contain so many mad moments.

See https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5451126-interesting-interview-of-graham-linehan-by-an-observer-journalist-who-shock-horror

"Linehan Inexplicably Cleared of Harassment, Must Pay for Broken Phone"

good to know impartial reporting is alive and well

Funny how a pro TRA group can report on an incident from their political position and no one criticises, but when posters on FWR comment based on the perspective of women's sex based rights, we get told off.

Or the lame excuse that as the most oppressed group in the whole wide world, is why they are entitled to harrass and intrude on anyone who disagrees with them.

Nobody cares if someone** wants to be trans. Just keep it to themselves and stop inflicting their belief set on everyone else.

** With the exception of underage children being encouraged to belief they can by physically transformed, without being made aware that it doesn't change their sex, and may also be dangerous and not work.

Yes, I'd like to know this too. Tarquin is variously referred to as a "child", "trans woman", "minor".

Whatever he is, he's no shrinking violet and he is the harrasser.