Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Thank You from a Trans Lurker

560 replies

Seethlaw · 01/05/2025 16:42

I want to thank you all wonderful people for fighting the good fight despite everything that's been thrown at you. I was an intermittent lurker for years before your arguments finally made it through my barriers. I'm in awe of your courage and tenacity and impossible patience!

I'm a trans man from another European country. I used to be extremely baffled by you GC people. I couldn't help but wonder what on Earth possessed you to go after trans people. I couldn't understand how anyone could think that trans people, that minuscule minority, was any kind of threat to anyone. I was devastated when I learned that one of my favourite authors (not JKR) had "gone TERF".

Again and again, I went back to what I thought were the basics: there is nothing wrong with being trans, and we just want to live our lives in peace.

But stuff happened over the years, some in real life and some on MN where I would lurk once in a while. Coincidentally, it was on the day of the UKSC ruling that I found myself here again, and I was absolutely horrified, and I finally accepted the unacceptable: it was never the TERFs going after the trans. It was the trans going after women's places and even the very definition of the word "woman".

Since then, I've watched the fallout of the SC decision. And my stomach has been sinking as trans person after trans person has come here, trotted out the same old, long-debunked arguments, and hurled abuse and disrespect in the name of "Me, me, me!" And the thing is, I can't even fool myself that they are not "real" trans people.

Back when I transitioned, more than a decade ago, in my country, I searched for trans support groups, and I encountered that very phenomenon of trans people (mostly trans women, though by no means all of them) demanding that the world twist around them. I told myself then that they were not representative of trans people, but the thing is: they are the loudest ones, and the most demanding ones - and as such, the most visible ones. I don't know yet what I can or will do about that, but at least now I'm aware that when people talk about trans people, they might be thinking of such individuals.

Thank you to anyone who read that far, and thank you again for everything you've done. You people rock 👍 !!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
MyLostUsername · 03/05/2025 15:49

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:20

I don't validate anything; I just feel/sense or not. So I can see with my eyes and touch with my hands that my body is female, and I can sense with my sense of proprioception that I'm male. So from there, I have to choose which senses I'm going to favour (maybe that's what you meant by validating?) And I choose the proprioception because that one is constant. I'm not constantly looking at or touching my body, but I am constantly sensing it internally. So if one set of sensations has to align on the other to reduce the feeling of dissonance, I'm going to favour proprioception over seeing and touching.

"Did you ever explore accepting your body in its unaltered form and celebrating and honoring it for what it naturally was, physically?"

I think so? I spent many years superficially convinced I was a woman, and living as such, complete with dating a man, getting married, getting pregnant and giving birth. I don't think I could do much more?

Sorry, but this does not sit right with me

So I can see with my eyes and touch with my hands that my body is female, and I can sense with my sense of proprioception that I'm male. So from there, I have to choose which senses I'm going to favour (maybe that's what you meant by validating?) And I choose the proprioception because that one is constant.

This is exactly how I felt when I was anorexic. In my head, (*) I was fat.

(*) I would not call it proprioception. Same in your case, even if the theory sounds appealing.

I spent many years superficially convinced I was a woman.

But you were, and are, a woman!

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 15:48

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:36

I think the child made comments about the teacher which alerted the parent. It's not actually clear whether the teacher actually is is a trans man or woman. But regardless I don't think the fact they used Mx was wrong, it could mean anything. If the teacher is trans it will probably become apparent, not because they use Mx. I think trans people probably just want to get on with their lives but in this instance if there are enough complaints then they wouldn't be able to.

I never said it was wrong to use Mx. I only said that the moment you use Mx, you draw attention to yourself - which is what happened.

If they are a trans person who wants to go stealth, then that was an ill-thought move. The first rule of going stealth is, by definition, "Don't draw attention to yourself."

If they are a trans person who did want to draw attention to themselves... Well, they did?

OP posts:
PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:39

Or perhaps they intentionally drew attention to themselves so in that case weren't actually 'tricking' people.

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:36

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 15:16

The thing is, you can't have your cake and eat it too. That person called the attention of everyone onto themselves by choosing to be called "Mx". They didn't have to do that, but once they do, it's only logical that people look at them twice and wonder.

Too many trans people want society to shape themselves around them but at the same time they want everyone in society to pretend to ignore them entirely. I'm sorry, but that's neither fair nor possible. Other people are not extras in the movie of our life. They have their own life, and if we ask them to modify some parameter in that life to accommodate us, they have the right to express an opinion or ask questions about it.

I think the child made comments about the teacher which alerted the parent. It's not actually clear whether the teacher actually is is a trans man or woman. But regardless I don't think the fact they used Mx was wrong, it could mean anything. If the teacher is trans it will probably become apparent, not because they use Mx. I think trans people probably just want to get on with their lives but in this instance if there are enough complaints then they wouldn't be able to.

Feelingmuchbetter · 03/05/2025 15:30

Thank you for such a measured and thoughtful post. Your situation has been hijacked by some very aggressive activists that have a campaign rooted in hate, but I have always been aware there are real people caught in the cross hairs, that didn’t carry this view.

I echo others that there is no need to devalue or dilute, or remove anyone’s identity or human rights - and a third way was and is always possible.

I wish you every happiness.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 15:16

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:03

For example there's a thread on here from a parent about a teacher who may be trans and a lot of comments frame it as 'tricking' people into believing they are the opposite sex. Which logically you could say is true. The person would need to come out and state what they are and then see if it's acceptable to parents

The thing is, you can't have your cake and eat it too. That person called the attention of everyone onto themselves by choosing to be called "Mx". They didn't have to do that, but once they do, it's only logical that people look at them twice and wonder.

Too many trans people want society to shape themselves around them but at the same time they want everyone in society to pretend to ignore them entirely. I'm sorry, but that's neither fair nor possible. Other people are not extras in the movie of our life. They have their own life, and if we ask them to modify some parameter in that life to accommodate us, they have the right to express an opinion or ask questions about it.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 15:08

Well, 'sex by deception' is a crime in the UK. So there is an element of deception in trying to 'pass' as the opposite sex. Most of the time this doesn't really matter, but in some instances it does.

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/prosecutors-publish-updated-deception-sex-guidance

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 15:07

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:57

I meant more in the way that attitudes towards trans people could change in a much more negative way and in that way make life harder. I'm not saying they will, just thinking out loud

That might happen, though I doubt it because discrimination against gender reassignment is illegal, and people wouldn't risk being sued just to express a bit of annoyance.

But honestly, in my experience, the vast majority of people just want to live their lives, and don't care one bit about trans people. They won't suddenly turn into open transphobes for no reason.

OP posts:
PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:06

So I do think in many areas of life, not necessarily covered by the ruling trans people will find life a lot harder. Some would say that's a good thing, some would say it's not.

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 15:03

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:34

If I were in the UK, yes, the recent ruling would make my life is a little bit harder, mostly in that I would have to use the women's loos, and I don't feel comfortable doing that because I'm always worried a woman will think I'm a man at first glance and feel anxious about my presence. Other than that, I don't think it would change much?

In fact, I'd argue it might make some other things easier. For example, the ruling explicitely states that where the presence of a trans man might cause trouble for women, other accomodations should be provided. Would that mean that I could go to a gynae's office and not have to sit in the waiting room with the women and girls, making everyone nervous about what the hell I'm doing here? I'd like that!

For example there's a thread on here from a parent about a teacher who may be trans and a lot of comments frame it as 'tricking' people into believing they are the opposite sex. Which logically you could say is true. The person would need to come out and state what they are and then see if it's acceptable to parents

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:57

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:34

If I were in the UK, yes, the recent ruling would make my life is a little bit harder, mostly in that I would have to use the women's loos, and I don't feel comfortable doing that because I'm always worried a woman will think I'm a man at first glance and feel anxious about my presence. Other than that, I don't think it would change much?

In fact, I'd argue it might make some other things easier. For example, the ruling explicitely states that where the presence of a trans man might cause trouble for women, other accomodations should be provided. Would that mean that I could go to a gynae's office and not have to sit in the waiting room with the women and girls, making everyone nervous about what the hell I'm doing here? I'd like that!

I meant more in the way that attitudes towards trans people could change in a much more negative way and in that way make life harder. I'm not saying they will, just thinking out loud

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:54

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 14:41

Trans men have maternity protections certainty post SC ruling. The Scotgov argued they'd lose that. Thats no small thing!

Yes, that's great. I think I was thinking more of a shift in attitudes to trans people, as in being dismissed more easily, becoming more unacceptable in society now the law has been clarified. The rights for women being affirmed by it is obviously a good thing.

SleepyDormouse59 · 03/05/2025 14:47

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:26

Oooh, good point! It would make sense, really. Either they pass and then they get treated as women, ie. lower on the social hierarchy than what they are used to. Or they don't pass, and then they get treated like men who pretend to be women, which is once again lower on the social hierarchy. Either way, they lose in privilege - and thus feel victimised.

Yes, exactly

dlob · 03/05/2025 14:44

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 13:09

As far as believing in souls go, then yes. That's exactly how I described myself to a believing friend: a male soul in a female body.

Gendered brains, however... That's a much more complicated matter.

I do believe that brains are somewhat plastic, so can be moulded to a point by external influences. So for example, I believe that socialisation may possibly lead to differences in how male and female brains end up functioning.

I also believe, for having experienced it myself, in the power of hormones, so I believe that brains flooded by male or female hormones may possibly end up functioning differently.

But I also believe that those differences, if they exist, may very well be negligeable.

" ... a male soul in a female body ..."

I wonder if you have any idea(s) about how your soul interacts with your (female), body, if it does?

I know this is an obvious problem for all believers in (non-Aristotelian-type) souls. You seem a thoughtful and well-balanced sort of person, though, and this does seem particularly pressing for those who see their soul as somehow mismatching their body.

Oh, and what makes a soul male or female? (We know what makes a body male or female, but ...)

I do wonder how people who believe in souls deal with such questions. ... Just ignore them? ... Think of them as ill-posed in some sense? ... Answer them somehow? ... Or what?

Thanks.

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 14:41

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:26

It's not just going to be on this board though is it. As this change to everyone being determined by their biological sex, not their preferred sex it is obviously going to affect much more areas of your life. I imagine being a trans man will get harder for you.

Trans men have maternity protections certainty post SC ruling. The Scotgov argued they'd lose that. Thats no small thing!

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 14:40

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 13:53

I think the bottom line is OP that you're accepted here specifically because you're a woman and not because of your identity as a trans man. Which is fine and understandable but it's still denying something you feel is your inner and outer being. I just wonder how that feels to you? I know there are no easy answers to all this.

Partly, but it is also behaviour based. Anyone who comes on and acts like an arse or makes thoughtless posts is likely to get short shrift. As many of us found out quite quickly. It's practically sacred ritual by now.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:34

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:26

It's not just going to be on this board though is it. As this change to everyone being determined by their biological sex, not their preferred sex it is obviously going to affect much more areas of your life. I imagine being a trans man will get harder for you.

If I were in the UK, yes, the recent ruling would make my life is a little bit harder, mostly in that I would have to use the women's loos, and I don't feel comfortable doing that because I'm always worried a woman will think I'm a man at first glance and feel anxious about my presence. Other than that, I don't think it would change much?

In fact, I'd argue it might make some other things easier. For example, the ruling explicitely states that where the presence of a trans man might cause trouble for women, other accomodations should be provided. Would that mean that I could go to a gynae's office and not have to sit in the waiting room with the women and girls, making everyone nervous about what the hell I'm doing here? I'd like that!

OP posts:
GreenFriedTomato · 03/05/2025 14:31

@PhoebesPony as the OP is not in the UK, the recent changes aren't going to affect them as I understand it

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 14:26

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:12

The thing is, being a woman is an essential part of being a trans man. You can't separate the two. I couldn't be a trans man if I weren't a woman. So when I come into a space where the sex of the participants is paramount, such as a GC women's board, it makes total sense to me to be treated on the basis of my sex. My sex is my sex; it doesn't change, and sometimes it's more important than my gender.

It's not just going to be on this board though is it. As this change to everyone being determined by their biological sex, not their preferred sex it is obviously going to affect much more areas of your life. I imagine being a trans man will get harder for you.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:26

SleepyDormouse59 · 03/05/2025 14:14

This post interests me. It seems that as trans men, you feel you are taken more seriously- as men very often are.

I do wonder whether trans women, used to male privilege, struggle with being treated as women often are - ie lesser, and thus feel that they are being victimised, when actually they are simply being treated like the women they wish they were.

Oooh, good point! It would make sense, really. Either they pass and then they get treated as women, ie. lower on the social hierarchy than what they are used to. Or they don't pass, and then they get treated like men who pretend to be women, which is once again lower on the social hierarchy. Either way, they lose in privilege - and thus feel victimised.

OP posts:
Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:20

WinterFoxes · 03/05/2025 13:57

I'm interested in why you validate your internal map of your body more than your actual physique.

Did you ever explore accepting your body in its unaltered form and celebrating and honoring it for what it naturally was, physically?

I don't validate anything; I just feel/sense or not. So I can see with my eyes and touch with my hands that my body is female, and I can sense with my sense of proprioception that I'm male. So from there, I have to choose which senses I'm going to favour (maybe that's what you meant by validating?) And I choose the proprioception because that one is constant. I'm not constantly looking at or touching my body, but I am constantly sensing it internally. So if one set of sensations has to align on the other to reduce the feeling of dissonance, I'm going to favour proprioception over seeing and touching.

"Did you ever explore accepting your body in its unaltered form and celebrating and honoring it for what it naturally was, physically?"

I think so? I spent many years superficially convinced I was a woman, and living as such, complete with dating a man, getting married, getting pregnant and giving birth. I don't think I could do much more?

OP posts:
SleepyDormouse59 · 03/05/2025 14:14

Seethlaw · 02/05/2025 13:35

@potpourree

"I wonder how often in your life is being (or being seen as ) a man/woman actually pertinent, and has this changed since transitioning?"

Honestly, in my every day life, the most relevant bit is what I'm called: Ma'am or Sir.

"For example, walking down the street, getting on the bus, doing supermarket shopping... I wouldn't expect my experience to be affected by my gender particularly"

Heh. There IS something but it's hardly quantifiable. And it's not just me: other trans men I talked to mentioned it too*. It's a sense of being more... valid? Of taking more space? Like, we're not ignored as easily in conversations. We're not dismissed as easily. People, both men and women, step around us a bit more (including literally in the street!) Our opinions are treated with more consideration. Stuff like that.

( * Of course, it could just be us projecting our new self-confidence around...)

This post interests me. It seems that as trans men, you feel you are taken more seriously- as men very often are.

I do wonder whether trans women, used to male privilege, struggle with being treated as women often are - ie lesser, and thus feel that they are being victimised, when actually they are simply being treated like the women they wish they were.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:12

PhoebesPony · 03/05/2025 13:53

I think the bottom line is OP that you're accepted here specifically because you're a woman and not because of your identity as a trans man. Which is fine and understandable but it's still denying something you feel is your inner and outer being. I just wonder how that feels to you? I know there are no easy answers to all this.

The thing is, being a woman is an essential part of being a trans man. You can't separate the two. I couldn't be a trans man if I weren't a woman. So when I come into a space where the sex of the participants is paramount, such as a GC women's board, it makes total sense to me to be treated on the basis of my sex. My sex is my sex; it doesn't change, and sometimes it's more important than my gender.

OP posts:
Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:09

MyLostUsername · 03/05/2025 13:46

Apologies for the slight derail - talking about plasticity and how good the brain is at fooling itself - has anyone tried the 'rubber hand illusion'?
A few years ago I used to spend time trying different settings for this, and it is very spooky how quickly your brain incorporates external parts as your own body (even objects which are obvioulsy not!).

@Seethlaw - I've just found this about lateralaty which might apply for you in particular: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1273940

Just reading the description of the rubber hand illusion experiment, I know I would fall for it extremely quickly. I need to rely on visual cues to know where my body parts are, so I'd be toast :D

Thanks for the link!

"In contrast to our hypotheses we show a similar experience of ownership for all groups, which may indicate no hemispheric specialization for the illusion. In addition, plasticity of ownership and body ownership are similar for the left hand and right hand in all participants, which suggests similar representations for both hands in the brain. This might be useful to maintain a coherent sense of the body in space."

This seems to indicate that my being left-handed would have no influence on my faulty mental maps, right?

OP posts:
Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 14:03

PeachCrow · 03/05/2025 13:35

Great to hear from you OP.

Over the years I have ventured on here occasionally under different user names to attempt to put the trans man point of view. Always been eaten alive so tread carefully!

My son and I have coexisted very happily for 11 years with him as a trans man and me as staunchly gender critical. He's 23 now and there's absolutely no doubt it's the right thing for him albeit I would have wished him an easier life.

We ventured ventured into support groups early on but it wasn't right for either of us. I was horrified by the parents (I went from clueless to gender critical practically on the spot) and he wasn't interested in being a poster child or a campaigner.

I hope that you and he are able to continue living your lives away from the noise and the judgement.

I want to ask what kind of experiences you had in the support groups, but I understand if you don't feel like talking about it.

Thank you for the well wishes, and good luck and happiness to you and your son :)

OP posts: