Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Get the violins out - Stonewall is "in crisis"

413 replies

IwantToRetire · 24/04/2025 02:17

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse? LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

Stonewall, Britain’s largest LGBT organisation, is in crisis. It’s plummeting financially, with rounds of redundancies as funding cuts hit. And its credibility and influence is plunging amid a national and global backlash against LGBT rights.

This matters. If someone asked you to name the first LGBT organisation that comes to mind, I would bet my cat you’d say Stonewall. Since it was founded more than 35 years ago, the charity has become entwined in our country’s psyche, Parliament, schools, sporting and business sectors. But for how much longer?

However you feel about Stonewall, we need a conversation about the state of the biggest charity defending LGBT people. And we need to ask ourselves a question as the opponents of all kinds of human rights lie in wait: are we just going to let it die?
...
To highlight one recent example of Stonewall’s seemingly waning influence, I asked the Government several times recently whether it has consulted with Stonewall over a proposed ban on conversion therapy since taking office. A spokesperson from the Cabinet Office declined to confirm whether it has even had any meetings with the charity about it, instead offering vaguely: “We will engage further with a broad range of stakeholders.” I asked Stonewall three times, but they did not provide a response.

Perhaps both sides are being coy or don’t want the public to know that they’ve met. But either way, this is as bizarre as it is concerning. Stonewall was once the charity that lobbied every MP in the country to help pass the same-sex marriage law in 2013. Now, it is unclear whether they’ve even had a meeting with the new Government over the psychological torture of LGBT people
...
Should it die, many will dance on Stonewall’s grave. But then many would happily see the rights of LGBT people revoked too – thereby exposing how much a strong, influential organisation for this community is still needed.

If you think it should return to only representing lesbian, bisexual and gay people, then you’re ignoring not only the plight of trans people but also how intertwined all these rights are and how many government’s incarcerate people for laws that oppress every letter in the acronym – or pass laws like the Equality Act that protect everyone (until that is chipped away).
...

Complete article at https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337
Can also be read in full at https://archive.is/yGTYs

(If LGB people can set up their own Alliance, why cant trans people do the same?)

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse?

LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Slothtoes · 24/04/2025 19:04

thirdfiddle · 24/04/2025 18:26

Perhaps they can re-purpose as a T group, leave LGBA to deal with the LGB issues and DSD Families to deal with the I issues and the police to deal with the horrors that keep sneaking in under +.

I think it’s pretty unlikely Stonewall would rebrand as a trans charity under its current team anyway. CEO Simon Blake is a gay man with no gender pronouns that I’ve seen out there anyway. Stonewall would need to have a trans CEO etc to be a trans charity and I suspect that the whole thing was more about opportunistically finding new charity income streams for Stonewall. rather than protecting and promoting trans people’s interests.

Because if they’d really cared, for example Stonewall would never have accepted the untested experimentation on young kids that has been going on. Stonewall often talked about ‘trans’ kids. Stonewall never questioned that in general safeguarding suddenly completely melted away for the groups of kids who were called ‘trans’.

IwantToRetire · 24/04/2025 18:38

Not much to add to the great posts on here.

But as I said in the OP

If LGB people can set up their own Alliance, why cant trans people do the same?

I meant of course LGB Alliance, where people who had been part of Stonewall not only said you aren't representing same sex attracted people and left, but went on to set up one that did.

And this is what I dont understand. There must be many (some?) people who identify as trans, whether under the medical diagnosis of gender disphoria, or as (in a sense) rebelling against gender stereotypes, straight jackets.

And some older people who have transed have spoken about how alienated by Stonewall's behaviour.

So why cant they set up their own group.

Create an organisations that allows open discussion between what could be quite a wide ranging group.

But in allowing it to be wide ranging it could not only provide support for those who want to take the medical process have an honest discussion about what that really means, but also for those who feel alienated from gender stereotyping etc..

Just so long as they stick to supporting each other, and maybe writing about it. But NOT thinking their purpose is to impose on everyone else what is in the end the personal experience of individual people.

But the fact this doesn't happen begins to make it feel that the T isn't actually about being that, but a platform for TRAs to launch their anti woman obsession.

And if some think I am being hostile. I am not.

I am reflecting what I and many other women experienced.

OP posts:
thirdfiddle · 24/04/2025 18:26

Perhaps they can re-purpose as a T group, leave LGBA to deal with the LGB issues and DSD Families to deal with the I issues and the police to deal with the horrors that keep sneaking in under +.

TheOtherRaven · 24/04/2025 18:17

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 24/04/2025 18:08

How do you think any other group has managed to get this though?

It's through grass roots action and hard graft. No one gives it out on a plate.

If trans people need an organisation to support their interests, they need to organise and set one up, not whine that nobody else has handed it to them on a platter.

I'm sorry but I'm all out of fucks to give re the 'most oppressed group ever' narrative.

As pp have said, any useful group or charity would have to define exactly whose interests they are promoting and do do that from within the law and current good practice eg Cass Review. The trouble is, the trans umbrella is now so wide and disparate that the groups it covers have very little in common with each other.

Wholly agree. And at this point, the kids, and the ones 'quietly trying to live their lives' are really not helped in any way by the rent a mob pissing everywhere and threatening to rape and kill everyone.

Slothtoes · 24/04/2025 18:13

LonginesPrime · 24/04/2025 11:49

They can be sued by any of us under s111(5)(b) of the EA 2010 for instructing other organisations to discriminate against us (for being GC, lesbians, women, etc), a la Allison Bailey’s case against them.

Even if Bailey’s case fails on the particular facts of her case, it doesn’t mean other people won’t be successful, as the provision exists (albeit untested) in the law.

Any tax payer funded body especially- but also any other charity or business- that has spent good money on being given made up legal advice, or ‘training’ that includes this should be seeking redress too.

northwestgirl · 24/04/2025 18:09

well if he does there is PLENTY of material, all very well documented

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 24/04/2025 18:08

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 15:35

Transgender people are discriminated against and targeted for being transgender though. I think that every group who is marginalised should have people to speak on their behalf and lobby for their interests.

How do you think any other group has managed to get this though?

It's through grass roots action and hard graft. No one gives it out on a plate.

If trans people need an organisation to support their interests, they need to organise and set one up, not whine that nobody else has handed it to them on a platter.

I'm sorry but I'm all out of fucks to give re the 'most oppressed group ever' narrative.

As pp have said, any useful group or charity would have to define exactly whose interests they are promoting and do do that from within the law and current good practice eg Cass Review. The trouble is, the trans umbrella is now so wide and disparate that the groups it covers have very little in common with each other.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 24/04/2025 17:58

StressedLP1 · 24/04/2025 17:53

This is right up Nick Wallis’ street. Stonewall’s ’no debate’ is rather reminiscent of the post office’s attitude.

Nick Wallis peaked a few months ago, I sincerely hope he’s planning a post office stylee expose

StressedLP1 · 24/04/2025 17:53

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 24/04/2025 14:17

Now is the time for real investigative journalism to come forward. It’s one of the biggest scandals of our time!

This is right up Nick Wallis’ street. Stonewall’s ’no debate’ is rather reminiscent of the post office’s attitude.

Vinvertebrate · 24/04/2025 17:51

My employer is still on that list. I hope the whole edifice comes crashing down, and it cannot happen soon enough.

I have been trying to work out who has been giving them legal advice. They have nobody in-house and although plenty of law firms are “Champions” 🙄 none have ponied up any responsibility for the, shall we say, purposive way they have applied the law. (I’m a solicitor and reader of legal feminist so it interests me).

Freda69 · 24/04/2025 17:51

ergosd · 24/04/2025 13:44

this is fascinating. Many huge organisations have left, but many remain:

https://sex-matters.org/about-us/what-we-are-up-against/keeping-track-of-stonewall/

I haven’t seen that list before - it’s unbelievable that so many reputable firms and organisations could have been taken in by all the woo.

VickyEadieofThigh · 24/04/2025 17:46

northwestgirl · 24/04/2025 17:36

in time there are going to be many documentaries followed by inquiries followed by reports ...all saying, how did this happen? why did no one speak out? how can we compensate the victims? who shall be punished?

You missed po-faced politicians solemnly stating "Lessons will be learnt so that this never happens again."

northwestgirl · 24/04/2025 17:36

in time there are going to be many documentaries followed by inquiries followed by reports ...all saying, how did this happen? why did no one speak out? how can we compensate the victims? who shall be punished?

cocoromo · 24/04/2025 17:29

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 24/04/2025 14:17

Now is the time for real investigative journalism to come forward. It’s one of the biggest scandals of our time!

I was thinking the same thing. It’s time for some answers and I hope some journalists take this up and expose how this was allowed.

cocoromo · 24/04/2025 17:25

ergosd · 24/04/2025 13:44

this is fascinating. Many huge organisations have left, but many remain:

https://sex-matters.org/about-us/what-we-are-up-against/keeping-track-of-stonewall/

It’s scary to see that list and how many organisations were influenced by Stonewall. I hope it’s torn down brick by brick and the leadership sued. Terrible how far removed they became from their roots.

PerkyBlinder · 24/04/2025 17:19

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 15:35

Transgender people are discriminated against and targeted for being transgender though. I think that every group who is marginalised should have people to speak on their behalf and lobby for their interests.

I think first they need to define properly the transgender people they are representing. I can definitely see a case to support those who suffer severe dysphoria. This charity would need though to fully support the CASS review and to genuinely work in trans people's best interests rather than in the interests of those who wish to exploit those suffering the dysphoria for their own ends.

There are those who seek to transition minors because they don't like them being gay (see the founder of Mermaids). There are those who seek to transition minors because they have a sexual preference for prepubescent boys (thankfully we have stopped puberty blockers for teenagers). There are those who seek to transition people because they create a lifelong income stream for the drugs and hormone treatments required. Any trans charity is going to need to be acting in a way which only seeks to fully support those with dysphoria even if it means talking therapies (currently Stonewall wants to stop those under the misdirection of calling it conversion therapy when some are dysphoric due to sexual abuse and trauma).

So with all the above in mind, yes there is a space for a charity to support trans people but it's going to have to turn its back on the AGP males and predatory men.

MariadeiMiracoli · 24/04/2025 16:54

Datun · 24/04/2025 15:42

Which ones? The 13-year-old girls who object to being sexualised and want to opt out of womanhood? Or the middle-aged men who have a sexual fetish and want to wear fishnets to work? Or the autistic children who feel they don't belong anywhere, and are told that transitioning is the solution?

I certainly don't think the second cohort need any representation.

And for the other two, identifying as trans is a solution to two entirely different problems.

Great post, would recommend.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 24/04/2025 16:49

Gettingmadderallthetime · 24/04/2025 09:15

Well I agree it's hard to define the T. But surely defining the Q+ bit is even more challenging. And the 'I' part arguably has no relevance as it's not about sexual attraction.

Edit: cross-posted with @OvaHere and totally agree

Edited

Stonewall dropped the "I" after lobbying by people with DSDs. The word "Intersex" is not used scientifically any more & those with DSDs find it offensive as they are all either male with a DSD or female with a DSD. Intersex does not exist in humans.

TheOtherRaven · 24/04/2025 16:47

Back in the dark ages when it cared about lesbians I helped fundraise. Now thank God for the LGBA.

I defer to Sgt Major Williams.

Sad Care GIF by Pixel Bandits
mrshoho · 24/04/2025 16:06

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 24/04/2025 15:55

Well, maybe they should, but then an organisation that insists there's no difference between transwomen and women isn't likely to act in trans people's best interests, or anyone else's for that matter.

And any organisation who pushes for puberty blockers and trans ideology towards children poses a serious safeguarding concern. I haven't seen any of the trans charities or any individual trans person or ally give support to the Cass report. Until they agree to keep away from children how can they be considered as a worthy cause.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 24/04/2025 15:55

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 15:35

Transgender people are discriminated against and targeted for being transgender though. I think that every group who is marginalised should have people to speak on their behalf and lobby for their interests.

Well, maybe they should, but then an organisation that insists there's no difference between transwomen and women isn't likely to act in trans people's best interests, or anyone else's for that matter.

SquirrelSoShiny · 24/04/2025 15:50

Datun · 24/04/2025 15:42

Which ones? The 13-year-old girls who object to being sexualised and want to opt out of womanhood? Or the middle-aged men who have a sexual fetish and want to wear fishnets to work? Or the autistic children who feel they don't belong anywhere, and are told that transitioning is the solution?

I certainly don't think the second cohort need any representation.

And for the other two, identifying as trans is a solution to two entirely different problems.

💯

Datun · 24/04/2025 15:42

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 15:35

Transgender people are discriminated against and targeted for being transgender though. I think that every group who is marginalised should have people to speak on their behalf and lobby for their interests.

Which ones? The 13-year-old girls who object to being sexualised and want to opt out of womanhood? Or the middle-aged men who have a sexual fetish and want to wear fishnets to work? Or the autistic children who feel they don't belong anywhere, and are told that transitioning is the solution?

I certainly don't think the second cohort need any representation.

And for the other two, identifying as trans is a solution to two entirely different problems.

MarieDeGournay · 24/04/2025 15:40

backslashruby · 24/04/2025 13:40

Thank you @MariadeiMiracoli and @MarieDeGournay. Have donated via Paypal. Unfortunately it doesn't let a message be added but hopefully the timing will be a big clue.

They'll know from my email that donations made around now are likely to be from usSmile

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 15:35

Zebedee999 · 24/04/2025 14:38

I don't see why they need anyone to represent them.
Like most people I just treat them as people. I have known a few and in fact employed two trans men in my business and my podiastrist is also a trans woman. I treat them like anyone else so why do they need representing?
It's when they got representation from the likes of Stonewall that all their troubles started in my view culminating in p1331ng on the statues of venerated people.

Transgender people are discriminated against and targeted for being transgender though. I think that every group who is marginalised should have people to speak on their behalf and lobby for their interests.