Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Get the violins out - Stonewall is "in crisis"

413 replies

IwantToRetire · 24/04/2025 02:17

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse? LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

Stonewall, Britain’s largest LGBT organisation, is in crisis. It’s plummeting financially, with rounds of redundancies as funding cuts hit. And its credibility and influence is plunging amid a national and global backlash against LGBT rights.

This matters. If someone asked you to name the first LGBT organisation that comes to mind, I would bet my cat you’d say Stonewall. Since it was founded more than 35 years ago, the charity has become entwined in our country’s psyche, Parliament, schools, sporting and business sectors. But for how much longer?

However you feel about Stonewall, we need a conversation about the state of the biggest charity defending LGBT people. And we need to ask ourselves a question as the opponents of all kinds of human rights lie in wait: are we just going to let it die?
...
To highlight one recent example of Stonewall’s seemingly waning influence, I asked the Government several times recently whether it has consulted with Stonewall over a proposed ban on conversion therapy since taking office. A spokesperson from the Cabinet Office declined to confirm whether it has even had any meetings with the charity about it, instead offering vaguely: “We will engage further with a broad range of stakeholders.” I asked Stonewall three times, but they did not provide a response.

Perhaps both sides are being coy or don’t want the public to know that they’ve met. But either way, this is as bizarre as it is concerning. Stonewall was once the charity that lobbied every MP in the country to help pass the same-sex marriage law in 2013. Now, it is unclear whether they’ve even had a meeting with the new Government over the psychological torture of LGBT people
...
Should it die, many will dance on Stonewall’s grave. But then many would happily see the rights of LGBT people revoked too – thereby exposing how much a strong, influential organisation for this community is still needed.

If you think it should return to only representing lesbian, bisexual and gay people, then you’re ignoring not only the plight of trans people but also how intertwined all these rights are and how many government’s incarcerate people for laws that oppress every letter in the acronym – or pass laws like the Equality Act that protect everyone (until that is chipped away).
...

Complete article at https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337
Can also be read in full at https://archive.is/yGTYs

(If LGB people can set up their own Alliance, why cant trans people do the same?)

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse?

LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
aylis · 26/04/2025 11:10

I really like the rainbow as a symbol of diversity. The progress flag can fuck all the way off. An absolute tragedy of a thing.

Sskka · 26/04/2025 11:07

mrshoho · 25/04/2025 15:28

So if Stonewall does go down the toilet who could this ideology possibly latch onto next? I agree I can't see them having anywhere near the same success as a stand alone of which there are already a handful.

This sounds odd, but my money would be on it getting its hooks into islam. It's difficult to imagine when we've grown used to seeing a militant version of islam everywhere – but if that's largely blown itself out now (eg Saudi appears to be liberalising fast), and the west is tipping hard rightwards, then by omnicause logic those two things (plus other rainbow causes) will somehow start converging.

No idea what that might look like—mass conversions and hybrid ghettoisation in our urban centres? emergence of a eunuch caste? large-scale migration towards the gulf?—and I can't imagine actual muslims consciously welcoming the idea, but Houellebecq's vision (in submission) of a complacent, licentious islam seemed compelling enough to me.

MarieDeGournay · 25/04/2025 20:05

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 13:13

symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why).

Yes, I've read my Jung & Campbell :-)

I agree with you about these choices often being made on a subconscious imperative.

The Nazis flipped the swastika around, and I sometimes wonder if there was a subconscious awareness that they were planning the opposite of peace and balance (well, they knew they were, so to that extent it wasn't subconscious). (The esoterica/arcana/occult side of Nazi philosophy isn't studied so much these days which is a dereliction of an important academic avenue, imho. It wasn't that important to Hitler but it was to the early founders of the movement and I think places important context on the philosophy underpinning some of their later actions.)

With the rainbow, I don't actually know who picked it for Pride. I do sometimes find myself wondering if it was a subconscious desire to minimise the core aspect of homosexuality (which is ultimately about sex), de-sex gay rights and therefore help make gay rights more palatable to 'normies'.

I do absolutely think that the trans colours - baby blue, light pink - were chosen to appeal to children and families.

I think the rainbow 'became' - I don't think it was chosen by a committee or anythingSmile - the flag of the lesbian and gay community because it is a symbol of unity: all the colours are contained in it (except black and white because they are sort-of not-colours). It represents everyone, unlike national flags.
[Hence the annoyingness of the Progress flag, adding bits to something that already represented everyone].

Before that, it was widely used by the environmental movement.

I believe the trans flag is based on the baby blankets used in hospitals in the USA, which have blue and white stripes - gender neutral because for all the babies!

Get the violins out - Stonewall is "in crisis"
IwantToRetire · 25/04/2025 19:46

ErrolTheDragon · 25/04/2025 19:21

not seen a real rainbow @IwantToRetire? They don’t control the weather, you know! 😄 Real rainbows, fortunately, continue to be a reminder that the natural world is full of beauty.
#electromagneticradiationisaspectrum

Yes I know.

So am really sad that the fake rainbows seem to be every where but I dont see real rainbows.

Well not for while.

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 25/04/2025 19:21

not seen a real rainbow @IwantToRetire? They don’t control the weather, you know! 😄 Real rainbows, fortunately, continue to be a reminder that the natural world is full of beauty.
#electromagneticradiationisaspectrum

IwantToRetire · 25/04/2025 19:17

Yes, lets start a campaign.

Reclaim the Rainbow.

Not only is it itself worthy of respect(!) but has been used to promote far more worthy causes.

OP posts:
Chersfrozenface · 25/04/2025 19:11

The term "Rainbow nation" was coined by Archbishop Desmond Tutu for South Africa in 1994 - a nation of all colours with the end of apartheid, and a symbol of hope (an archbishop would be keenly aware of the Christian symbolism)

northwestgirl · 25/04/2025 19:05

otoh, I remember rainbows being a popular symbol in the peace movement of the 80s
and during covid it was used in posters people made thanking the NHS

Stonewall don't own rainbows!

IwantToRetire · 25/04/2025 17:54

I think the Rainbow as a symbol was part of the marketing campaign, ie the Rainbow Umbrella under which many identities and who ever else might generate income could be said to belong together.

The allocating of colours to represent some thing or another was a later refinement - an "in depth" explanation to bamboozle the credulous that it was all part of some set of beliefs that already existed in these numerous communities.

Although part of me that is only too aware of the increasingly overt targetting of children, that the rainbow would be an easy symbol to sell.

And agree with others that if I see the rainbow on anything now I am immediately have a negative response. Which for those who have previously used the rainbow prior to it being colonised by Stonewall and others, in an innocent, apolitical way must be really galling.

After thought. I haven't seen a real rainbow for years. Have they decided they cant display themselves because no doubt someone will captured their image and repurpose it. Sad

OP posts:
Janie143 · 25/04/2025 17:18

mumda · 25/04/2025 16:01

https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/3992465/accounts-and-annual-returns

Their accounts are public.

Their first objective is interesting

  1. to promote human rights (as set out in the universal declaration of human rights and subsequent united nations conventions and declarations) throughout the world by all or any of the following means o (a) monitoring abuses of human rights o (b) research into human rights abuses o (c) educating the public about human rights o (d) providing advice to government and others on human rights matters o (e) contributing to the sound administration of human rights law o (f) commenting on proposed human rights legislation o (g) raising awareness of human rights issues o (h) promoting public support for human rights o (i) promoting respect for human rights among individuals and corporations o (j) international advocacy of human rights o (k) eliminating infringements of human rights in furtherance of that object, but not otherwise, the trustees shall have power to engage in political activity provide that the trustees are satisfied that the proposed activities will further the purposes of the charity to an extent justified by the resources committed and the activity is not the dominant means by which the charity carries out its objects.

🤔 So fuck all to do with LGBTQZYZ then. What a load of flapdoodle.

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 16:36

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 25/04/2025 15:36

We’re totally on the same page then ;-).

I actually think the study of esoteric and occult concepts is much understudied in relation to many historical eras and is actually a very important strand in understanding the full picture - it’s always been around, in the west but has been kept hidden by Christianity.

Interestingly, many of the various esoteric and occult communities today have quite a high membership of trans and trans supporters.

As you probably know Thelema and the OTO - Aleister Crowley’s “religion/philosophy” had a major issue a few years ago with the trans community when stating who could and could not be Priest and Priestess. Many people left. Mary Greer, who most famously wrote about the Women of the Golden Dawn- women who were pioneers of feminism, involved in suffrage and the germ of the Labour Party is a very staunch supporter of trans rights. I would say the two are pretty interlinked at this point.

I know it sounds like a side track but I think we need to be very aware of some of the uses of symbols in this community, given their very powerful effect on people’s subconscious - yes I agree the baby blue/baby pink is undoubtedly meant to trigger a “oh so innocent, looks very child like and unthreatening” subconscious response.

I actually think the study of esoteric and occult concepts is much understudied in relation to many historical eras and is actually a very important strand in understanding the full picture - it’s always been around, in the west but has been kept hidden by Christianity.

I don't know about that, the Knights Hospitallers and especially the Templars made very heavy use of esoteric symbology and Christianity absolutely appropriated and tailored loads of pre Christian symbology to its own use, most obviously the cross/tree of life/death/resurrection. Other contemporaneous competitors to Christianity (eg Gnosticism) did too but Christianity did it best imho, the early funders and supporters of Christianity (many of whom were highly educated and financially independent women) had a great eye for design and aesthetic.

Back on topic....I think the trans colours were deliberately selected because they put us in mind of babies - the pink and the blue are the colours you see in pics of gender reveal parties. I think they were selected to create a picture of innocence but also to emphasise the idea of 'being born in the wrong body', that specious conceit without which there is no logic for medicalising children, which is, I believe, what the trans community is most turned on byinterested in.

mumda · 25/04/2025 16:01

Janie143 · 24/04/2025 07:13

How come they've got no money? They didn't spend millions in Goverment grant, donor and Corporate scheme income on sevices for the LGBTQ blah blah people. So where did it go?

https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/3992465/accounts-and-annual-returns

Their accounts are public.

Their first objective is interesting

  1. to promote human rights (as set out in the universal declaration of human rights and subsequent united nations conventions and declarations) throughout the world by all or any of the following means o (a) monitoring abuses of human rights o (b) research into human rights abuses o (c) educating the public about human rights o (d) providing advice to government and others on human rights matters o (e) contributing to the sound administration of human rights law o (f) commenting on proposed human rights legislation o (g) raising awareness of human rights issues o (h) promoting public support for human rights o (i) promoting respect for human rights among individuals and corporations o (j) international advocacy of human rights o (k) eliminating infringements of human rights in furtherance of that object, but not otherwise, the trustees shall have power to engage in political activity provide that the trustees are satisfied that the proposed activities will further the purposes of the charity to an extent justified by the resources committed and the activity is not the dominant means by which the charity carries out its objects.
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/04/2025 15:57

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 13:13

symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why).

Yes, I've read my Jung & Campbell :-)

I agree with you about these choices often being made on a subconscious imperative.

The Nazis flipped the swastika around, and I sometimes wonder if there was a subconscious awareness that they were planning the opposite of peace and balance (well, they knew they were, so to that extent it wasn't subconscious). (The esoterica/arcana/occult side of Nazi philosophy isn't studied so much these days which is a dereliction of an important academic avenue, imho. It wasn't that important to Hitler but it was to the early founders of the movement and I think places important context on the philosophy underpinning some of their later actions.)

With the rainbow, I don't actually know who picked it for Pride. I do sometimes find myself wondering if it was a subconscious desire to minimise the core aspect of homosexuality (which is ultimately about sex), de-sex gay rights and therefore help make gay rights more palatable to 'normies'.

I do absolutely think that the trans colours - baby blue, light pink - were chosen to appeal to children and families.

https://www.sftravel.com/article/brief-history-rainbow-flag The original design was eight colours with hot pink to represent sex.

The pink and blue appealing to families and kids makes more sense when you consider that some AGPs dress up as little girls. David Challenor and "Stefonknee" Wolscht spring to mind.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3356084/I-ve-gone-child-Husband-father-seven-52-leaves-wife-kids-live-transgender-SIX-YEAR-OLD-girl-named-Stefonknee.html and https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/stefonknee-wolschtt-transgender-father-leaves-family-in-toronto-to-start-new-life-as-a-sixyearold-girl-a6769051.html document the latter individual.

SionnachRuadh · 25/04/2025 15:52

Of course the Dianic Wiccans were one of the first groups the TRAs came for, because of their insistence on being a woman only (old definition) group.

I think a lot of the esoteric groups are dominated by people rebelling against their conservative Christian upbringing, and that matters to them more than the actual thing they're supposed to believe in.

I have a theory, based on Wiccans I've known, that I can tell which of them are ex-Catholic and which are ex-Protestant. There are women from Catholic backgrounds who are really into the art and symbolism of ritual, and who you can imagine that if the Catholic Church ordained women, that would have been their vocation. And then there are the ex-evangelicals who are very anti-Christian and buy into a lot of the pseudohistory.

They've got quite a high proportion of trans and trans supporters, which is a bit weird to me because in theological terms they're a fertility religion based in the polarity of the sexes, but I suppose they have quite a 'be kind' ethos so reimagining sexual polarity as a spectrum of gendered souls would work for them.

I'm not close to the OTO, but based on the members I've met I can imagine them being more old school.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/04/2025 15:52

Tomatotater · 25/04/2025 06:28

That's soooo booooring! Who's going to be able to go on a March and deface statues and abuse women by putting out a boring old travel guide to stop gay people being humiliated on holiday or ask David Beckham about his views on sportswashing and Gay rights?

ask David Beckham about his views on sportswashing and Gay rights?

Also, can you imagine how well a call to boycott the World Cup if it's hosted in a homophobic country would go down? That would involve men en masse giving up something they value to take a stand, and we know that that's never going to happen in a patriarchy.

So much easier just to shit on women instead.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/04/2025 15:49

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 07:58

I disagree: Del Boy, when you look beyond the petty crime and self-aggrandisement, is fundamentally a good-hearted character who cares deeply about his friends and family, and won't hesitate to put them first when the chips are down.

Stonewall on the other hand has become a cruel, disingenuous, wasteful behemoth squatting on public life, hiding its cynicism behind a facade of sweetness and light.

A better fictional character to compare Stonewall to would be Delores Umbridge.

They threw lesbians to the wolves and for that reason alone (though there are many others) they need disbanded, like, yesterday.

Del Boy took a beating on behalf of Rodney, who he was mistaken for. As you say, he wasn't honest with the world but he prioritised his family to the point of enduring physical battery to protect them.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns5h9wU-bYI

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 25/04/2025 15:36

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 13:13

symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why).

Yes, I've read my Jung & Campbell :-)

I agree with you about these choices often being made on a subconscious imperative.

The Nazis flipped the swastika around, and I sometimes wonder if there was a subconscious awareness that they were planning the opposite of peace and balance (well, they knew they were, so to that extent it wasn't subconscious). (The esoterica/arcana/occult side of Nazi philosophy isn't studied so much these days which is a dereliction of an important academic avenue, imho. It wasn't that important to Hitler but it was to the early founders of the movement and I think places important context on the philosophy underpinning some of their later actions.)

With the rainbow, I don't actually know who picked it for Pride. I do sometimes find myself wondering if it was a subconscious desire to minimise the core aspect of homosexuality (which is ultimately about sex), de-sex gay rights and therefore help make gay rights more palatable to 'normies'.

I do absolutely think that the trans colours - baby blue, light pink - were chosen to appeal to children and families.

We’re totally on the same page then ;-).

I actually think the study of esoteric and occult concepts is much understudied in relation to many historical eras and is actually a very important strand in understanding the full picture - it’s always been around, in the west but has been kept hidden by Christianity.

Interestingly, many of the various esoteric and occult communities today have quite a high membership of trans and trans supporters.

As you probably know Thelema and the OTO - Aleister Crowley’s “religion/philosophy” had a major issue a few years ago with the trans community when stating who could and could not be Priest and Priestess. Many people left. Mary Greer, who most famously wrote about the Women of the Golden Dawn- women who were pioneers of feminism, involved in suffrage and the germ of the Labour Party is a very staunch supporter of trans rights. I would say the two are pretty interlinked at this point.

I know it sounds like a side track but I think we need to be very aware of some of the uses of symbols in this community, given their very powerful effect on people’s subconscious - yes I agree the baby blue/baby pink is undoubtedly meant to trigger a “oh so innocent, looks very child like and unthreatening” subconscious response.

mrshoho · 25/04/2025 15:28

So if Stonewall does go down the toilet who could this ideology possibly latch onto next? I agree I can't see them having anywhere near the same success as a stand alone of which there are already a handful.

SerafinasGoose · 25/04/2025 15:19

SionnachRuadh · 25/04/2025 15:11

Time to revisit this classic

Put the fucking lotion in the basket!

SionnachRuadh · 25/04/2025 15:11

Time to revisit this classic

Get the violins out - Stonewall is "in crisis"
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/04/2025 14:41

SerafinasGoose · 24/04/2025 21:49

Ultimately, they hollowed out their host and it looks like it may not survive.

Entirely and absolutely this. Which begs the question. Why isn't the spent host furious over having been chewed up and spat out in such a way? Or did the vast bulk of the LGB abandon the whole mess to the TQ, but some stayed quiet on pain of being lambasted as a 'hate group' along with the LGBA?

They torpedoed their own organisation, and their own 'rights' (or incorrect perception of what those rights entailed). Talk about shitting on your own doorstep.

Really clever parasites alter how their hosts behave to maximise the chance of the parasite surviving and reproducing. Cat tapeworms have a lifecycle that also involves mice. An infected mouse stops avoiding cat urine, maximising the chance of the cat eating the mouse. Phasmarhabditis californica make their hosts (gastropod land molluscs) bury themselves under the soil so that they don't get eaten by birds and hedgehogs.

The trans extremists who parasitised Stonewall did the same with their "no debate" and "most marginalised" rhetoric, and most of all with TWAW and "cis", the first of which allowed a straight man to claim to be a lesbian, and the second to position himself as more oppressed than actual lesbians.

GiveMeSpanakopita · 25/04/2025 13:13

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 25/04/2025 12:41

It’s an age old method, the adoption of existing symbols and repurposing - symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why). The most well known example is the swastika or fylfot cross found across multiple cultures, often linked to peace and balance -of course it now carries different connotations - again, so much so it’s lost much of its original meanings, even when used for its original purposes it now brings controversy. Less well known examples include the Celtic cross, other equal arms crosses. The cross of humility, now largely associated with Satanism, the pentagram - for many years associated with Christ (the 5 wounds) now has more dark occult symbolism in people’s minds.

People don’t pick symbols accidentally-the religious significance of the rainbow will not have been accidental- although might have been subconscious

symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why).

Yes, I've read my Jung & Campbell :-)

I agree with you about these choices often being made on a subconscious imperative.

The Nazis flipped the swastika around, and I sometimes wonder if there was a subconscious awareness that they were planning the opposite of peace and balance (well, they knew they were, so to that extent it wasn't subconscious). (The esoterica/arcana/occult side of Nazi philosophy isn't studied so much these days which is a dereliction of an important academic avenue, imho. It wasn't that important to Hitler but it was to the early founders of the movement and I think places important context on the philosophy underpinning some of their later actions.)

With the rainbow, I don't actually know who picked it for Pride. I do sometimes find myself wondering if it was a subconscious desire to minimise the core aspect of homosexuality (which is ultimately about sex), de-sex gay rights and therefore help make gay rights more palatable to 'normies'.

I do absolutely think that the trans colours - baby blue, light pink - were chosen to appeal to children and families.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 25/04/2025 12:41

It’s an age old method, the adoption of existing symbols and repurposing - symbolism often works on a subconscious level (there are various explanations why). The most well known example is the swastika or fylfot cross found across multiple cultures, often linked to peace and balance -of course it now carries different connotations - again, so much so it’s lost much of its original meanings, even when used for its original purposes it now brings controversy. Less well known examples include the Celtic cross, other equal arms crosses. The cross of humility, now largely associated with Satanism, the pentagram - for many years associated with Christ (the 5 wounds) now has more dark occult symbolism in people’s minds.

People don’t pick symbols accidentally-the religious significance of the rainbow will not have been accidental- although might have been subconscious

CyclingSam · 25/04/2025 12:18

Anyone remember Riley Dennis explaining that if a woman was a bit traumatised then she had a little while to get over this (so generous) before she had to crack on with getting her body out for a man's use.

Yes - he helped peak me quickish, though I was near the peak from the beginning...

(Can we say peak now? Guess I'll find out. I don't think we used to be able to.)

EmpressaurusKitty · 25/04/2025 12:15

Same for me. The rainbow flag used to be something warm & accepting & now it’s a homophobic threat.