Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Get the violins out - Stonewall is "in crisis"

413 replies

IwantToRetire · 24/04/2025 02:17

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse? LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

Stonewall, Britain’s largest LGBT organisation, is in crisis. It’s plummeting financially, with rounds of redundancies as funding cuts hit. And its credibility and influence is plunging amid a national and global backlash against LGBT rights.

This matters. If someone asked you to name the first LGBT organisation that comes to mind, I would bet my cat you’d say Stonewall. Since it was founded more than 35 years ago, the charity has become entwined in our country’s psyche, Parliament, schools, sporting and business sectors. But for how much longer?

However you feel about Stonewall, we need a conversation about the state of the biggest charity defending LGBT people. And we need to ask ourselves a question as the opponents of all kinds of human rights lie in wait: are we just going to let it die?
...
To highlight one recent example of Stonewall’s seemingly waning influence, I asked the Government several times recently whether it has consulted with Stonewall over a proposed ban on conversion therapy since taking office. A spokesperson from the Cabinet Office declined to confirm whether it has even had any meetings with the charity about it, instead offering vaguely: “We will engage further with a broad range of stakeholders.” I asked Stonewall three times, but they did not provide a response.

Perhaps both sides are being coy or don’t want the public to know that they’ve met. But either way, this is as bizarre as it is concerning. Stonewall was once the charity that lobbied every MP in the country to help pass the same-sex marriage law in 2013. Now, it is unclear whether they’ve even had a meeting with the new Government over the psychological torture of LGBT people
...
Should it die, many will dance on Stonewall’s grave. But then many would happily see the rights of LGBT people revoked too – thereby exposing how much a strong, influential organisation for this community is still needed.

If you think it should return to only representing lesbian, bisexual and gay people, then you’re ignoring not only the plight of trans people but also how intertwined all these rights are and how many government’s incarcerate people for laws that oppress every letter in the acronym – or pass laws like the Equality Act that protect everyone (until that is chipped away).
...

Complete article at https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337
Can also be read in full at https://archive.is/yGTYs

(If LGB people can set up their own Alliance, why cant trans people do the same?)

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse?

LGBT people need armour; an organisation like Stonewall to act as a first line of defence

https://inews.co.uk/opinion/biggest-lgbt-charity-crisis-stonewall-3645337

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
EasternStandard · 24/04/2025 09:45

They shouldn’t have lobbied against women.

user1471538275 · 24/04/2025 09:44

I think Stonewall's time in the sun is done.

There are LGB organisations to move forward.

I'm not sure the T is a cohesive group at all - I think it's quite a mix of different things and that is why it would be hard to have an umbrella organisation that represented them all.

From Az Hakeem's work it seems that providing better services for individuals with Autism and mental health issues, particularly for young people would provide the best outcomes.

Instructions · 24/04/2025 09:41

I don't think of Stonewall as an LGBT organisation, I think of it as a TQIA+++ organisation.

needmoresheep · 24/04/2025 09:41

ArtificialFlower · 24/04/2025 06:11

I love that Stonewall now has a disclaimer prominently on many pages on its website, in all caps:

STONEWALL IS PROUD TO PROVIDE INFORMATION, SUPPORT AND GUIDANCE ON LGBTQ+ INCLUSION, WORKING TOWARDS A WORLD WHERE WE'RE ALL FREE TO BE. THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL COUNSEL ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER

That ship had sailed long before SC ruling. Stonewall thought it could put the female population in its place and scare us by saying we were all bigots etc They said horrible things about female groups, calling lesbians who didn’t want to partner with trans women as transphobic racists

WomensSports · 24/04/2025 09:40

“Once we read and fully digest the judgement, we will work with stakeholders across all sectors to provide as much clarity as possible.
How does this not directly conflict with their "THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE" bit?? They still can't get their story straight in their death throes.

CwmYoy · 24/04/2025 09:39

Good. I used to be a supporter until they hated women.

user1471538275 · 24/04/2025 09:37

"You do it to yourself, you do ..and that's what really hurts"

floormops · 24/04/2025 09:37

BelfastBard · 24/04/2025 08:38

JK Rowling donated £70k towards a legal battle that cost around £400k… donations came primarily in the form of small donations from individuals, mostly women. I believe I saw Susan saying they looked at donations and the average amount was £37.
So to insinuate that JK funded the legal challenge isn’t accurate, and it’s something that does disservice to the thousands of women who supported the crowdfund because they knew how absolutely important it was.

This. The lies that are still being propagated on MSM are shocking. Some of the interviews being done on BBC, ITV and channel 4 are very misleading.

Tomatotater · 24/04/2025 09:36

ArtificialFlower · 24/04/2025 06:11

I love that Stonewall now has a disclaimer prominently on many pages on its website, in all caps:

STONEWALL IS PROUD TO PROVIDE INFORMATION, SUPPORT AND GUIDANCE ON LGBTQ+ INCLUSION, WORKING TOWARDS A WORLD WHERE WE'RE ALL FREE TO BE. THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL COUNSEL ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER

They made an absolute fortune saying the absolute opposite. Taxpayers have not only had to pay the fees for public sector bodies to pay into this scheme but also the compensation and court fees resulting from those bodies losing case after case. Yes, it is the NHS etc's fault too, but they were completely cheerled by Stonewall. They deserve to be 'in crisis'. I hope they get sued for breach of contract too, just to finish them off.

2021x · 24/04/2025 09:35

Kinsters · 24/04/2025 07:38

Stonewall's "some people are gay, get over it" is/was brilliant - succinct, accurate, memorable and really just cut to the heart of the issue. They've tried to do the same thing with trans but it's a whole different beast that people will probably never be able to just "get over". It's too complicated.

This is how I feel about it.

Civil rights/human rights including gay rights were all based on objective reality. Trans rights are based on individual subjective internal experiences, which meant other people had to go against their objective reality to agree with.

When it was people with a severe and persistent dysphoria that made sense, but they included too many different groups and now it’s too complicated.

Mmmnotsure · 24/04/2025 09:34

Below is the message on the Stonewall site re the SC judgment. If anyone can find a reference to lesbians and what it means for them, please say.

However if you go to the site today, the home page is a nice flag and a message proclaiming that this is Lesbian Visibility Week... Amusingly, the only click-through that doesn't work for me is the section on '6 campaigns for lesbian equality you should know about'. Presumably Stonewall couldn't find them.

Responding to today’s Supreme Court ruling, Stonewall CEO, Simon Blake OBE said:

“Stonewall shares the deep concern at the widespread implications for today’s ruling from the Supreme Court. It will be incredibly worrying for the trans community and all of us who support them.
“It’s important to be reminded the Court strongly and clearly re-affirmed the Equality Act protects all trans people against discrimination, based on Gender Reassignment, and will continue to do so.

“Once we read and fully digest the judgement, we will work with stakeholders across all sectors to provide as much clarity as possible.

“Stonewall will continue its work with the Government and parliamentarians to achieve equal rights under the law for LGBTQ+ people.”

needmoresheep · 24/04/2025 09:30

Cant they see that their approach to trans activism at the expense of women’s rights has caused the damage? Lesbian groups are fearful of Stonewall and its male privilege approach.

And we are all bloody tired of these people and the media and the politicians telling the female population to shut up and be kind. Has Stonewall not seen the horrible terminology of TERF and cis-women? Have they not seen some of the violent behaviour of TRAs at demonstrations? Have they not read some of the horrible comments on social media?

Stonewall needs to get back to basics to re-gain support. The erasure of women and the introduction of all the cervix-haver, womb-carrier, chest feeder terminology needs to stop as the majority of the population is thinking WTF!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/04/2025 09:30

GlomOfNit · 24/04/2025 09:23

See, I really DON'T want to dance on Stonewall's grave. They're an important institution, they played a really important part in getting parity and fairness and recognition for gay, lesbian and bisexual people in the UK. I think that the old Stonewall should be proud of their legacy - they achieved so much.

And then they buggered it all up by opening the umbrella over the T and the Q! Privileging the comfort and rights of fetishists and spicy straights over gays and lesbians who still needed representation and protection at work, etc. Silly idiots. I'm assuming partly out of a need to remain 'relevant' in a world that - in the UK at least - was increasingly accommodating and tolerant of LGB people and lives, and partly because of funding. T and Q are a cash cow and a button to press with the virtue-signalling. Their Stonewall Champions scheme was a money-maker, no more, no less.

So if they fold I'll be genuinely sad. I want there to be a recognisable charity and lobby group fighting for the rights and interests of gay people in the UK, it's still really important. I see it as a sort of trades union. But to do this they're going to have to scale right back on promoting the risible queer crap - the queer story hour at children's libraries, the parade of bedroom fetishwear at Pride marches, the insistence that men in dresses are the MOST oppressed minority ever, the constant erasure of lesbians and same-sex attraction, the relentless lying and flouting of provable science. In short, they have to remake themselves entirely in order to survive. Evolve or extinction, guys.

There are over 300 LGBT rights charities in the UK, none of which apparently recognise the definition of LGB as being based in same sex attraction.

The only LGB charity in existence is the LGB Alliance, which trans activists have tried very hard to have stripped of its charitable status.

I fully agree that it's important to have organisations righting for equal rights for same sex attracted people in the UK. (And for trans people, come to that.)

But I honestly think that the sector is completely flooded with these organisations, most of which seem to be achieving very little, and it all needs scaling back to a reasonable number of organisations which actually serve a legitimate purpose.

GlomOfNit · 24/04/2025 09:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NumberTheory · 24/04/2025 09:27

I know why people are glad about this, but I can’t help feeling sad.

I was a huge supporter of Stonewall back in the day. They were epic over gay marriage. The UK would have been worse off without them then. What has happened to them is terrible - beginning with them looking for a new “big fight” and then selling out women and using their connections and status to backdoor policy change without debate. Now potentially ending with them closing completely. I had always hoped they’d turn, find their senses and start representing LGB people again.

GlomOfNit · 24/04/2025 09:23

See, I really DON'T want to dance on Stonewall's grave. They're an important institution, they played a really important part in getting parity and fairness and recognition for gay, lesbian and bisexual people in the UK. I think that the old Stonewall should be proud of their legacy - they achieved so much.

And then they buggered it all up by opening the umbrella over the T and the Q! Privileging the comfort and rights of fetishists and spicy straights over gays and lesbians who still needed representation and protection at work, etc. Silly idiots. I'm assuming partly out of a need to remain 'relevant' in a world that - in the UK at least - was increasingly accommodating and tolerant of LGB people and lives, and partly because of funding. T and Q are a cash cow and a button to press with the virtue-signalling. Their Stonewall Champions scheme was a money-maker, no more, no less.

So if they fold I'll be genuinely sad. I want there to be a recognisable charity and lobby group fighting for the rights and interests of gay people in the UK, it's still really important. I see it as a sort of trades union. But to do this they're going to have to scale right back on promoting the risible queer crap - the queer story hour at children's libraries, the parade of bedroom fetishwear at Pride marches, the insistence that men in dresses are the MOST oppressed minority ever, the constant erasure of lesbians and same-sex attraction, the relentless lying and flouting of provable science. In short, they have to remake themselves entirely in order to survive. Evolve or extinction, guys.

Giggorata · 24/04/2025 09:22

teawamutu · 24/04/2025 08:32

Our biggest LGBT charity is in crisis. Are we just going to let it collapse?

Personally, no I don't want it to collapse. I want it sued and pulled down, brick by brick, and the leaders never to hold power again.

And then replaced by an organisation that gives a shit about LGB people and doesn't want to force lesbians to do dick or mutilate confused kids or put rapists in women's prisons.

The L, G and B, and supporters, allying in the name of fairness, if you will. I'm sure someone will come up with something suitable.

This exactly.

Stonewall used to be great but became a distorted, grifting monster.
It is irredeemably tainted and it needs to be dissolved.

Rightsraptor · 24/04/2025 09:22

Stonewall is now a toxic brand and needs to go.

Hermiaxx · 24/04/2025 09:16

Due to its stance on lesbians I think of Stonewall as a homophobic organisation!

Gettingmadderallthetime · 24/04/2025 09:15

Well I agree it's hard to define the T. But surely defining the Q+ bit is even more challenging. And the 'I' part arguably has no relevance as it's not about sexual attraction.

Edit: cross-posted with @OvaHere and totally agree

OvaHere · 24/04/2025 09:12

The problem is that the tail wags the dog in any sort of organisation aiming to support the TQ+ (this could be said for other types of activism too). In the case of the TQ+ the tail is for the most part, batshit.

In the online age of social media, years of graft, mediation and consensus building are passé. How can you have a stable, future proof organisation based on insane hyperbole and untruths?

I think Stonewall is beyond saving.

They've cost the government and other orgs at lot of money due to their legal fictions and left them with egg on their face so no surprise if they're unofficially blacklisted in many places.

The LGB that have been on our side of the fence will never go back to trusting them.

They will never again be able to be extreme enough to keep the support of the LGBTQ+ crowd who demand they maintain the 'women have penises' mindset.

So where does that leave them?

Witchymadwoman · 24/04/2025 09:08

NeedToChangeName · 24/04/2025 07:49

Stonewall played an absolute blinder. How many other lobby groups have the savvy to frame themselves as expertsin the field, resulting in institutions falling over themselves to be accredited "on the good guys list" and paying ££ for the privilege?

And, there's a place for a pro trans organisation. For many, it must be v hard to be trans

But, Stonewall over reached, misleading society about the law and inciting hatred against people who disagreed

I said all along (quietly) that it was "emperor's new clothes". We all know fine well what a woman is. Finally, the scales have fallen, people have more confidence to speak freely, MPs see voters leaving, and Stonewall are left naked

They have such a bad reputation now, I imagine institutions are quietly coming off the accredited list. Therefore, less money and oxygen

No sympathy for Stonewall in this house, although I respect their historic work for LGB community

One concern I have....... For Women Scotland were unsuccessful in Court of Session. I believe we only have the Supreme Court ruling thanks to JK Rowling funding their appeal. So, it occurs to me that, if she had chosen to support the trans lobby, then we'd be in a very different place. I find that quite chilling

Susan Smith addressed this question on Womans Hour yesterday. The total cost of the appeal was £400,000. JKR contributed £70,000. Many others donated with an average amount of £37.

The episode is on BBC sounds if you haven't heard it.

I'm not not minimising the amazing support of JKR by saying this, just sharing what I heard about the funding

BlueEyedBogWitch · 24/04/2025 09:04

To paraphrase Stonewall itself:

CHARITIES FAIL - GET OVER IT

Rightsraptor · 24/04/2025 09:02

If trans are only a tiny percentage of the population why do they need a specific support group? Why can't they both meet up in the pub?

OuchyEars · 24/04/2025 08:58

They'd do well to do their collapsing before the big court cases come along for loss and damage as a result of their actions. Particularly as a result of advice that companies and charities paid them for.
The big rats have already jumped off the ship leaving the rest to carry the can.
Excuse the mixed metaphores.