Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Police Minister says placards calling for burning of JKR and Death to TERFs didn’t happen Saturday

35 replies

CrocsNotDocs · 23/04/2025 09:01

https://x.com/timesradio/status/1914942269238497777?s=61&t=NHDSDk1MaF98_GOtcuLi0Q

What kind of fucking morons does she think we are?

https://x.com/timesradio/status/1914942269238497777?s=61&t=NHDSDk1MaF98_GOtcuLi0Q

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/04/2025 16:38

murasaki · 23/04/2025 15:32

Surely the metadata would show that they were taken at a specific time?

But you’d have to actually examine the metadata to find that out wouldn’t you? Which they obviously have absolutely no intention of doing.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/04/2025 16:37

CrocsNotDocs · 23/04/2025 09:01

So what she’s saying is that signs of that nature were definitely used at previous protests, which they did f*ck all about as well?! Does she actually have a functioning brain? 🤦‍♀️

TumbledTussocks · 23/04/2025 16:36

AmandaHoldensLips · 23/04/2025 09:27

The police have no appetite for facing up to the reality of these violent thugs, their threats against women, and the hatred shown by this men's rights movement.

It's easier to blame women for daring to defend their hard-won sex-based rights.

Is a demonstrable passion for VAWG practically a prerequisite for joining the force?

SerafinasGoose · 23/04/2025 16:03

Jo Grady posted that image?

Well. Of all the fucking idiots.

murasaki · 23/04/2025 15:32

Surely the metadata would show that they were taken at a specific time?

DragonRunor · 23/04/2025 15:30

I think that anyone with pictures of this kind of placard, whenever they were taken, should go to the police local to where it happened, make a complaint, and copy it both to the police minister and the shadow police minister. That way, HM opposition can do their job of holding the government to account to hold the police to account, to get this type of behaviour dealt with. Maybe this will also help address the ‘both sides’ narrative.

Longwinded, but…

TheOtherRaven · 23/04/2025 15:20

Datun · 23/04/2025 15:18

Good to know, though, that any crime committed, say, a few weeks ago, won't be investigated because it wasn't committed that day.

Gawd, it would be funny if it wasn't so bloody tragic.

Datun · 23/04/2025 15:18

Good to know, though, that any crime committed, say, a few weeks ago, won't be investigated because it wasn't committed that day.

TheOtherRaven · 23/04/2025 15:13

Well now that the general public has helpfully provided the police minister with the evidence she and all her department couldn't manage to find by themselves, perhaps she'd like to let us know what action she now plans to take? Or does she need the general public to help her out with that too?

Sunshineandblueskysalltheway · 23/04/2025 15:10

Jo Grady sucking up to men?!

Get off your knees Jo, you pathetic enabler.

BiscuitTins · 23/04/2025 15:04

JellySaurus · 23/04/2025 10:09

So it's when these placards were used that is important, not that they were calling for violence against women?

Yes, how is that these placards were acceptable before the ruling, and should only be investigated if from the most recent protest
Where ever they were you see they are unacceptable

FlowchartRequired · 23/04/2025 13:07

HaddyAbrams · 23/04/2025 09:27

Of course they can, and they will and I'll miss them. But I didn't see any signs at the weekend wishing "death to queers". Seeing as no laws changed I'm not sure why they think it's suddenly so dangerous here.

The Reddit/Bluesky hugbox has been a very bad thing for a lot of people, and this includes the many trans identified people who have been erroneously told that people want to 'erase' them. It's unforgivable really.

nauticant · 23/04/2025 10:47

From my time as a Civil Servant, if I'd given misinformation to a government Minister and as a result they'd been caught out on air not telling the truth, I can't imagine the bollocking I'd have got.

I wonder if the Policing Minister will be following this up in a similar way.

seXX · 23/04/2025 10:42

If she thought the images were old, surely she could easily confirm what investigation was done at the time and provide the outcome...

EasternStandard · 23/04/2025 10:40

It’s good the interviewer was on it and up to speed.

More than can be said for the Labour MP speaking who would have been spreading more lies if not called out on it.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/04/2025 10:27

As pp said, Jo Grady literally did an SNP and stood in front of one to be photographed 🤪

JellySaurus · 23/04/2025 10:09

So it's when these placards were used that is important, not that they were calling for violence against women?

Tomatotater · 23/04/2025 09:41

TheOtherRaven · 23/04/2025 09:29

Quite. If women having rights too and having to respect other people as a two way street is so absolutely petrifying then I wish them luck in finding a country they feel happier in.

Iran is great for trans people apparently. They even get government funded treatment. Not at all coincidentally, homosexuality is punishable by death. As an added bonus, the Iranian government isn't all that fond of women speaking their minds.

Retiredfromthere · 23/04/2025 09:39

Do you get a feeling that the 'lying to people to get them on our side' tactics by TRAs and allies may be being called out? (Would not like to be the person who lied to this MP in response to a specific question - which she doubtless asked because she was being interviewed on this topic).

EasternStandard · 23/04/2025 09:37

wtf

MrsOvertonsWindow · 23/04/2025 09:37

Good to hear her nonsense being challenged by the presenter who pointed out that the image you shared above was from Jo Grady (UCU) actually at the march ( showcasing a poster promoting death by hanging for women).

The lack of due diligence by the Met & the minister is quite something to behold. Although given the Met's involvement & funding given to extreme transactivists and anti women organisations, their minimising of threats against women isn't a surprise.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5292186-m-newman-v-met-police-employment-tribunal

M Newman V Met Police Employment Tribunal | Mumsnet

Just wondering if anyone is following this on TT. It’s quite bizarre. The first witness attended the Trans Training session which I gather is where th...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5292186-m-newman-v-met-police-employment-tribunal

TheOtherRaven · 23/04/2025 09:33

Women? Not only having really naughty, sad-making rights but putting up stickers about them?

buster keaton cops GIF by Maudit
countrysidedeficit · 23/04/2025 09:32

CrocsNotDocs · 23/04/2025 09:01

All anyone has to do is a reverse image search and they can easily see whether a photo has appeared online before.

Kucinghitam · 23/04/2025 09:31

NotbloodyGivingupYet · 23/04/2025 09:25

Apparently the Police initially claimed that there was nothing to investigate but have changed their position following evidence provided to them by the Daily Telegraph.

If only they showed such prudent reticence when rushing to arrest people for dangerous stickers or evil Tweets, eh?

TheOtherRaven · 23/04/2025 09:29

Quite. If women having rights too and having to respect other people as a two way street is so absolutely petrifying then I wish them luck in finding a country they feel happier in.