Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Some strange contradictory arguments from the TRA side

214 replies

transdimensional · 22/04/2025 16:50

Claim 1: That it's unfair for TW to go in men's toilets because they're less safe there.

It's probably true that they're less safe there, but how does the conclusion follow? What about a gender-nonconforming male who identifies as a man (not as a woman)? He would still have to go into the gents' even if admission to toilets was on the basis of gender identity. Should he also go to the ladies' to be safe? What about various other vulnerable groups? Young boys, elderly men who may be frail without being disabled, or ethnic minority males in an area where a white racist movement is strong - maybe they would all be safer in the ladies'? But it doesn't mean that's the answer!

Claim 2: That there is no use banning self-identified TW from the ladies' on the basis they might represent a risk, because genuinely dangerous males won't care whether they're allowed in or not.
This implies that the ladies' toilet is no safer than the gents', and therefore it completely contradicts the first point!

Claim 3: That having rules about who can and can't enter the toilets will lead to a surge in TM and others being wrongly accused of being in the wrong toilets.

But even under the EHRC's and Scottish government's understanding of the law, there were theoretical limitations on who could enter which toilets (in theory you would have needed a GRC). So there have always been rules about who can enter. Does anyone recall a huge problem of false accusations before 2010 or before 2004? If not, why should it start now?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Hoppinggreen · 24/04/2025 10:36

I believe Martina Navratilova said that her coach (a TW) could almost beat her in a match and he was very low ranked when he played as a man.
I used to be a competitive swimmer so am still very fast but by the time DS hit 10 he started to equal me and soon overtake me despite his stroke being crap and him only swimming on holiday.

JKRismyPatronus · 24/04/2025 09:24

This has some, errrm, 'interesting' arguments from the TRA side.

Apparently, JKR hangs out with Neonazis.

Women just need to try harder at sports.

Serena Williams could beat any man at tennis.

A NHS person saying they are uncomfortable with using the words pregnant women, as they have looked after lots of pregnant 9 year olds.🤔

🤦‍♀️

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/CldNDGzsg7Q?si=yOwYDnny6Xv2D2ES

Merrymouse · 24/04/2025 09:22

MrTiddlesTheCat · 24/04/2025 06:46

I just watched Politics Live from 22/4 where they were talking about this ruling. The transwoman lawyer said there's a very simple solution to the toilet issue. They said, keep the current seperate gender seperation and have a seperate single facility for people who, for what ever reason, want a more private space. IE Chuck women out of the women's so men are free to use them.

Certainly, not currently legal in schools, as per recent judgement.

If this person wants to campaign for a change in the law, that is certainly their right, but would be difficult given the unpopularity of mixed sex toilets.

MrTiddlesTheCat · 24/04/2025 06:46

I just watched Politics Live from 22/4 where they were talking about this ruling. The transwoman lawyer said there's a very simple solution to the toilet issue. They said, keep the current seperate gender seperation and have a seperate single facility for people who, for what ever reason, want a more private space. IE Chuck women out of the women's so men are free to use them.

Stepfordian · 24/04/2025 06:15

The strange argument I’m now seeing on Theads is that men will pretend to be trans men to access women’s same sex
spaces, so apparently us terfs have shot ourselves in the foot. I mean they might, but that doesn’t mean we open our spaces to actual men with woman-feelz, it means we can call for help if we see a man where he
Shouldn’t be, if he turns out to be a genuine trans man then I guess that’s the price you pay when you alter your body in such a way that people mistake you for a man.

BlueEyedBogWitch · 24/04/2025 04:04

ArabellaScott · 23/04/2025 14:50

It is possible that a man who is gender non conforming will meet hostility.

The solution to this does not ever include allowing that man to use women as human shields, or comforters, or passive validation tools.

Women are not to blame for men's prejudice, and it is not up to us to surrender our rights in order to appease, please, mollify, protect, validate, gratify, comfort, or excite men.

Honestly, I’d like to give this post a standing ovation.

sashh · 24/04/2025 03:55

I don't know your educational background, but at my school we learned about intersex and chromosomal variation not being tied exclusively to pubescent development in Biology when we were around 14. It was pretty fundamental science, to be honest.

Had you stayed in education for science A Levels you would have found out that half of what you were taught at GCSE wasn't true. A lot was simplified.

Blood comes in more groups than A B O and rhesus. Acceleration due to gravity isn't 10m/s^2 any more

Oh and who thinks 'chromosomal variation' has ANYTHING to do with pubescent development. Yes the changes that happen at puberty are dictated by whether you are male or female but chromosomal variation accounts for things like Down Syndrome. People with Down Syndrome go through puberty.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 23/04/2025 22:59

MarieDeGournay · 23/04/2025 17:35

TwoLoonsAndASprout
bashing random privates into each other until whoops!

Wasn't that the plot of a Carry On film?? Carry On Up the Chain of Command or something...😃

I think I almost prefer the overt misogyny of Carry On to the covert misogyny of the "be kind" people.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 23/04/2025 22:56

Wow! Just saw Financial Times Gillian Tett on Newsnight reacting to Rosie Duffield negatively. Obvious the FT is totally captured. I've heard this. And The Times. These guys have pretty much won the battle and the war against women in spite of the Supreme Court Ruling.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/04/2025 19:44

RedToothBrush · 23/04/2025 17:06

Anyone ever wonder how the human race survived until 2025?

Every day just recently. 🙄

yourhairiswinterfire · 23/04/2025 18:25

''Terfs are degrading women and reducing them to their body parts'', say the ideologues who have referred to women as: bodies with vaginas, ovary-havers, autistics with a cervix, womb-carriers, vulva-owners, menstruators/bleeders, black birthing bodies etc.

They pretend that calling us all of the above instead of simply 'women' is for the benefit of transmen*. So, ''we have to refer to all women as female body parts so we don't trigger transmen''. But at the same time ''we'll have to say 'chestfeeding' instead of 'breastfeeding', because referring to female body parts will trigger transmen''.

🤪

*when really they're just desperate to try and separate anything that only women can have/do from womanhood so that biological men can carry on pretending they're totes women too.

MarieDeGournay · 23/04/2025 17:35

TwoLoonsAndASprout
bashing random privates into each other until whoops!

Wasn't that the plot of a Carry On film?? Carry On Up the Chain of Command or something...😃

Merrymouse · 23/04/2025 17:25

Heggettypeg · 23/04/2025 17:23

Not to mention all the numerous other creatures who don't reproduce asexually and aren't hermaphrodites and have not yet had the benefit of a Supreme Court judgement to tell them which sex they are.

It’s a major problem in farming. No way to tell where lambs or calves come from. The best hypothesis is really big storks.

BezMills · 23/04/2025 17:25

CautiousLurker01 · 23/04/2025 09:13

Oops will see if I can get it deleted. Sorry @BezMills you popped up after my post so, being the narcissist I clearly am, though it was all about me 🤦🏽‍♀️

My bad, I could have been clearer to be fair. No worries!

Heggettypeg · 23/04/2025 17:23

RedToothBrush · 23/04/2025 17:06

Anyone ever wonder how the human race survived until 2025?

Not to mention all the numerous other creatures who don't reproduce asexually and aren't hermaphrodites and have not yet had the benefit of a Supreme Court judgement to tell them which sex they are.

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 23/04/2025 17:12

RedToothBrush · 23/04/2025 17:06

Anyone ever wonder how the human race survived until 2025?

It’s a mystery 🤷‍♀️

RedToothBrush · 23/04/2025 17:06

theilltemperedqueenofspacetime · 23/04/2025 16:56

Oh, come on now! It's completely impossible to sex humans. At least 0.018% of them have mixed or karyotype-incongruent sex characteristics, and humans are too stupid to work out what's going on or create pragmatic medical or social solutions.

The only answer is to scrap sex-discrimination law altogether, and base it entirely on what sex people say they are.

Anyone ever wonder how the human race survived until 2025?

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 23/04/2025 16:58

theilltemperedqueenofspacetime · 23/04/2025 16:56

Oh, come on now! It's completely impossible to sex humans. At least 0.018% of them have mixed or karyotype-incongruent sex characteristics, and humans are too stupid to work out what's going on or create pragmatic medical or social solutions.

The only answer is to scrap sex-discrimination law altogether, and base it entirely on what sex people say they are.

As I’ve said elsewhere, that’s why, for thousands of years, no human knew who to mate with - everyone just ran around bashing random privates into each other until whoops!

theilltemperedqueenofspacetime · 23/04/2025 16:56

HelenaWaiting · 23/04/2025 15:50

It is a scientific fact. There is no such thing as intersex. People with DSDs are either male or female. No human has ever changed sex.

Oh, come on now! It's completely impossible to sex humans. At least 0.018% of them have mixed or karyotype-incongruent sex characteristics, and humans are too stupid to work out what's going on or create pragmatic medical or social solutions.

The only answer is to scrap sex-discrimination law altogether, and base it entirely on what sex people say they are.

HelenaWaiting · 23/04/2025 15:50

MordantCarnival · 23/04/2025 06:22

"Gender ideology is built on a pack of lies and circular arguments."
- Circumfrences

I'm always baffled that a truly concerning number of people still think that xx to equal a woman and xy to equal a man is an exclusive default, and then go on to to erroneously cling to it as though it were scientific fact.

I don't know your educational background, but at my school we learned about intersex and chromosomal variation not being tied exclusively to pubescent development in Biology when we were around 14. It was pretty fundamental science, to be honest.

So, when you - and others like you - make statements like this I have to ask... how basic is your science, exactly?

"Claim 2: That there is no use banning self-identified TW from the ladies' on the basis they might represent a risk, because genuinely dangerous males won't care whether they're allowed in or not."
- Transdimensional

It's true that dangerous males will do precisely that, but the logical fallacy that this means women who were born as physical - physical, not biological (see intersex and chromosomal variation) - males will automatically present a risk.

As you rightly assert, dangerous men are not going to be deterred by a door bearing a sign of a person in a dress, but let's forego the bathroom entirely. If men intend to be predatory they need not use a woman's bathroom; they simply get a job in law enforcement, or work as a youth volunteer at a local church, or be your boss.

Let's be quite clear. This HC ruling has absolutely nothing to do with protecting women; you allowed yourselves to be led by bigots into alienating and scapegoating a vulnerable minority group who have done nothing to you and whose suffering you have neither the inclination or education to understand.

It is a scientific fact. There is no such thing as intersex. People with DSDs are either male or female. No human has ever changed sex.

YourAmplePlumPoster · 23/04/2025 15:50

Why are women being guilt tripped about so called male violence towards trans women in male facilities and don't have any right to be concerned about male violence towards them in their facilities?

Hoppinggreen · 23/04/2025 15:34

ColourlessGreenIdeasSleepFuriously · 23/04/2025 15:28

Nope. But I can understand why some TRAs are worried about it. Their problem is the blinkers they wear when it comes to the same problem afflicting women.

Its almost as if they recognise men might attack people in toilets

Greyskybluesky · 23/04/2025 15:32

mids2019 · 23/04/2025 15:16

A trans woman will use a cubicle in a male toilet. Unless you happen to have a man who is hell bent on beating up men in dress then this is not an issue and I think in reality this would be very rare.

Men in women's space is quite an obvious safeguarding issue (especially in a school) and I think most women would have an amount of fear in an intimate female space without mentioning basic dignity. Toilets should not be a venue for male affirmation of a fantasy.

Dual sex toilets may be a way forward but until then having single sex toilets is a right enshrined in law. I also think people trying to trivialize this by saying we are have trade wars and Russia to deal and we are talking about toilets are deliberately trying to erase the strength of women s feelings and therefore is misogynist.

I also think people trying to trivialize this by saying we are have trade wars and Russia to deal and we are talking about toilets are deliberately trying to erase the strength of women s feelings and therefore is misogynist.

Yes I agree. It's definitely one for this 'contradictory argument' thread!

TRAs: Stop getting worked up about toilets, you're all so obsessed with toilets, toilets are so trivial they're just a place to pee, focusing on toilets detracts from the real issues in the world, etc etc.
Also TRAs: We demand access to your toilets! TW cannot possibly go in the men's toilets! They risk their lives in there! Don't minimise our lived experience by telling us what toilets we can go in! Toilets are crucial to our identities and validation! We've always been in your toilets!

ColourlessGreenIdeasSleepFuriously · 23/04/2025 15:28

Nope. But I can understand why some TRAs are worried about it. Their problem is the blinkers they wear when it comes to the same problem afflicting women.

OldCrone · 23/04/2025 15:17

ColourlessGreenIdeasSleepFuriously · 23/04/2025 15:05

I've been assaulted too as stated upthread and don't have a problem with the euphemism but duly noted for those who do.

Men will be violent against other gender non conforming men. This is not a problem for women to sort out. There we agree.

Some men will be violent against other gender non conforming men. Most men don't go around attacking anyone (thankfully).

Is there any evidence of large-scale attacks on gender non conforming men? Where and when do these attacks take place? Is there any evidence that they are more likely to take place in toilets than in any other environment? Do you have some stats?