Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Bridget Philipson- TW should use toilets according to biological Sex.

340 replies

LizzieSiddal · 22/04/2025 08:19

On R4 at 7.50!!

She said she spoke on behalf of the government, they welcome the judgement and it is now clear, provision must be based on Biological Sex!

Apologies for posting then running (have an appt to get to). but didn’t see another thread on this.

(If you have the sounds App you should easily beable to go to 7.50 and listen)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
miraxxx · 22/04/2025 09:52

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:17

That's going to cause a bit of embarrassment when the people ordered out turn out to be women.

You think? Lol.

borntobequiet · 22/04/2025 09:49

Theeyeballsinthesky · 22/04/2025 09:45

but but but how did you cope with such literal violence???

my understanding is that the correct response is to immediately kick off hurling abuse at the person who said it whilst filming yourself doing so and then later to take to Tik tok doing a mad angry cry about your literal existence being erased

you mean you didn’t do that??

Edited

No, sorry.

But I did tease my ex about it for years.

BiologicalRobot · 22/04/2025 09:49

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:03

But it's a bit meaningless, isn't it? It's not as if anyone polices entry to the toilets. I suspect lots of TW who have quietly been using women's toilets for years without anyone noticing will just continue.

You are supposed to police yourself though. Unless you are a wrong 'un...

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 22/04/2025 09:48

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:03

But it's a bit meaningless, isn't it? It's not as if anyone polices entry to the toilets. I suspect lots of TW who have quietly been using women's toilets for years without anyone noticing will just continue.

There will always be a few that sneak in under the radar. The difference is that they know they shouldn't be there and they can now be challenged.

They will be less bold about it.

MimiGC · 22/04/2025 09:46

Phillipson was clear, but seemed reluctant to say out loud that trans women must use men’s toilets. She kept saying they must use the toilet matching their biological sex. I know it amounts to the same thing (except to the extremists who claim trans women ARE biological women because the hormones change their sex, or some such nonsense), but she clearly didn’t want to say it.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 22/04/2025 09:45

borntobequiet · 22/04/2025 09:29

My DD is tall and strong and used to do a job more often done by men. She wore jeans, heavy jumpers and wore a hat (she worked outside). On occasion she was mistaken, momentarily, for a man when she was in the ladies’. She laughed, they apologised. No problem, no fuss.

When I was younger I did a similar job and was often mistaken for a boy, including, when I first met him, by my children’s father. (In fact he threatened to deck me for laughing at him, but that’s another story).

It’s really not a big deal.

but but but how did you cope with such literal violence???

my understanding is that the correct response is to immediately kick off hurling abuse at the person who said it whilst filming yourself doing so and then later to take to Tik tok doing a mad angry cry about your literal existence being erased

you mean you didn’t do that??

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 22/04/2025 09:45

lifeturnsonadime · 22/04/2025 09:29

Yes indirect sex discrimination because it disadvantages female people.

Tim Hortons is a Canadian Company, which explains a lot, but I've seen that set up elsewhere too.

I think some letters need a -writing to CEO's.

Was a Canadian company. Bought by a big US company some years ago, much to the anger of many Canadians. But that won’t have changed their attitude to toilets any.

jodolun · 22/04/2025 09:43

@Coatsoff42 I keep wondering how this is going to affect Sandie's case. I heard the NHS were being urged to drop this last week in light of the ruling. Also under the ruling it seems that Dr Upton will have to change in the men's facility.

@Cailin66 I agree that access to women's spaces is very important to them, they don't care about or want unisex spaces at all because that provides no validation. Only access to women's single sex spaces does that.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/04/2025 09:39

Cailin66 · 22/04/2025 09:36

The talk of third spaces is nonsense. The trans men want to be allowed go into the ladies so giving them a third space won't make them happy.

You mean the trans women?

I think there needs to be public acknowledgement of the fact that it's OK for them not to be happy.

Signalbox · 22/04/2025 09:39

1apenny2apenny · 22/04/2025 08:47

Given all the comments made by the Labour Party before, during and since the election this is not enough.

I want an announcement from KS that they have heard this judgement and it will be made clear to all public and private bodies that they must adhere to the law. There’s been too much in the press over the past few days about many MPs not being happy and them regrouping and putting pressure on KS. To do what I’m not sure but you can bet that the TRAs are in over drive at the moment.

Lets not forget that they said a woman can have a penis, we haven’t heard that them admit they were wrong.

Yes if Labour hadn’t spent the last couple of years saying that the law was very clear with no need for it to be clarified that sex meant female/male (and did not include certificated men) then KS’s silence probably wouldn’t matter so much. It really suited Labour for the law to be widely misinterpreted and they knew that the confusion meant that service providers failed to exclude men from women’s spaces. Presumably KS is just waiting for PMQs to apologise.

ScribblingPixie · 22/04/2025 09:38

Coatsoff42 · 22/04/2025 09:33

Exactly, didn’t poor Sandie Pegg get reported for transphobia for just standing outside the changing room and waiting for Dr Upton to leave?
My BIL works with a trans man and stands outside while they change, he feels awful changing in front of them. If he was reported for transphobia he would be aghast.

It was brought up at the tribunal for sure - she said other women were waiting outside too. Thank goodness their rights to privacy are clear as a bell now.

Cailin66 · 22/04/2025 09:36

MarieDeGournay · 22/04/2025 08:32

Great. So no talk of expensive and disruptive provision of 'third spaces' for a tiny minority of the population, they are not needed, there are already spaces available for them: the ones designated for their biological sex.
As myplace says
Can we please just accept it and move on, or do we need more pissing and graffiti first?

The talk of third spaces is nonsense. The trans men want to be allowed go into the ladies so giving them a third space won't make them happy.

Keeptoiletssafe · 22/04/2025 09:35

How and who do I get my evidence to to make the most difference in government now?

I have written to loads of MPs and not one has written back.

Coatsoff42 · 22/04/2025 09:33

ScribblingPixie · 22/04/2025 09:30

Not at all. It's extremely important to be able to challenge or report someone hanging around a women's space - or simply spin around and exit pronto - without worrying that you might end up in trouble yourself.

Exactly, didn’t poor Sandie Pegg get reported for transphobia for just standing outside the changing room and waiting for Dr Upton to leave?
My BIL works with a trans man and stands outside while they change, he feels awful changing in front of them. If he was reported for transphobia he would be aghast.

ScribblingPixie · 22/04/2025 09:30

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:03

But it's a bit meaningless, isn't it? It's not as if anyone polices entry to the toilets. I suspect lots of TW who have quietly been using women's toilets for years without anyone noticing will just continue.

Not at all. It's extremely important to be able to challenge or report someone hanging around a women's space - or simply spin around and exit pronto - without worrying that you might end up in trouble yourself.

Kinsters · 22/04/2025 09:30

This is amazing! "I speak for the government...[trans women are not women]". I can hardly believe it. What a change this is. Well done to the women who have fought so long and hard and against such odds to achieve this change. I'm waiting eagerly for the house of commons statement. I hope the delay of a statement from KS is evidence that they are treating this seriously and have prepared a comprehensive and unarguable response. Maybe I need to go and buy some more prosecco!

borntobequiet · 22/04/2025 09:29

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:17

That's going to cause a bit of embarrassment when the people ordered out turn out to be women.

My DD is tall and strong and used to do a job more often done by men. She wore jeans, heavy jumpers and wore a hat (she worked outside). On occasion she was mistaken, momentarily, for a man when she was in the ladies’. She laughed, they apologised. No problem, no fuss.

When I was younger I did a similar job and was often mistaken for a boy, including, when I first met him, by my children’s father. (In fact he threatened to deck me for laughing at him, but that’s another story).

It’s really not a big deal.

lifeturnsonadime · 22/04/2025 09:29

senua · 22/04/2025 09:27

Tim Hortons: One that was just gents (only a urinal) plus a disabled / unisex.
If there is provision for men-only but not for women-only isn't that sex discrimination?

Yes indirect sex discrimination because it disadvantages female people.

Tim Hortons is a Canadian Company, which explains a lot, but I've seen that set up elsewhere too.

I think some letters need a -writing to CEO's.

ArabellaScott · 22/04/2025 09:29

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:03

But it's a bit meaningless, isn't it? It's not as if anyone polices entry to the toilets. I suspect lots of TW who have quietly been using women's toilets for years without anyone noticing will just continue.

As we have been told for years, predatory and abusive men will always ignore women's boundaries and/or seek to transgress them.

That will not change. But at least the law is clear.

Some people will break the law, yes.

senua · 22/04/2025 09:27

Tim Hortons: One that was just gents (only a urinal) plus a disabled / unisex.
If there is provision for men-only but not for women-only isn't that sex discrimination?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/04/2025 09:24

myplace · 22/04/2025 08:22

Thank goodness. I’m getting so cheesed off with the whole business. Can we please just accept it and move on, or do we need more pissing and graffiti first?

The more pissing and graffiti is, the quicker the general "be kind" public will understand exactly who they are pandering to.

PaleBlueMoonlight · 22/04/2025 09:22

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:17

That's going to cause a bit of embarrassment when the people ordered out turn out to be women.

A bit of embarrassment is fine. Men in women's spaces isn't.

TangenitalContrivance · 22/04/2025 09:22

Nominative · 22/04/2025 09:03

But it's a bit meaningless, isn't it? It's not as if anyone polices entry to the toilets. I suspect lots of TW who have quietly been using women's toilets for years without anyone noticing will just continue.

You mean they have been doing it, biological women felt awful and afraid to use the toilets and to stand up and say anything.

I'm sure you meant that.

Lovelysummerdays · 22/04/2025 09:21

Madcats · 22/04/2025 08:54

I heard Bridget gulp once, but she seemed pretty clear. It was a smart move to sneak these qns in before school breakfasts (but she seemed to be well briefed to expect to be quizzed).

I’m guessing that Wes is “too busy” to do any interviews for the foreseeable.

FWIW, I tend to avoid using cafe/pub loos, but I can’t think of many that aren’t marked male and female.

I work out and about so am often on the hunt for a loo. I come across gender neutral loos much more frequently these days so male / female sign on the door. I was in a Tim Hortons the other day for example and their loos were mostly unisex. One that was just gents ( only a urinal) plus a disabled / unisex. A lot of cafes only have one loo that is male/female/ disabled.

They’ve closed all the public toilets where I live so for me it’s mostly just supermarkets that have single sex toilets.

WorriedMutha · 22/04/2025 09:20

I'm sure some of them will @Nominative but they can be confronted and the buzz they get from being able to lord it over you has gone with their entitlement. A man can walk into a children's changing room or a breastfeeding rest room or a room with a 'staff only' sign. They can't be stopped without a risky physical confrontation but their entitlement has gone. Most will tow the line. Eddie Izzard has used the ladies loo but whilst he is still trying to forge a political career for himself, I expect he will be giving it a swerve. They are now going to have to learn to navigate the gents and the power balance has shifted.
We are seeing the death throes of this oppressive movement and I'm sure the strategic thinkers amongst them will be scheming but now that no debate has been seen off, they are going to have to change public opinion and so far they haven't demonstrated that they possess the skill set.

Swipe left for the next trending thread