Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Maggie Chapman MSP slanders Supreme Court

283 replies

Seriestwo · 21/04/2025 13:54

Maggie Chapman has publicly accused the Supreme Court of transphobia. Any lawyers know if this is contempt of court?
x.com/gussiegrips/status/1914276708951171451?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
Datun · 29/04/2025 10:18

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:15

Proably this:

  1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 4 and 5 in private.
Show quote history

So that's it? She's to remain?

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:17

https://www.writetothem.com/

If you don't think this is a good decision and would like to see the Scot Parl debate it further, do write to your representatives to say so.

WriteToThem

WriteToThem is a website which provides an easy way to contact MPs, councillors and other elected representatives.

https://www.writetothem.com

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:15

So the committee has voted to not fire itself. Great stuff.

fromorbit · 29/04/2025 10:15

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:13

This should surely go to the wider Parliament. Its bollocks and it undermines public faith in the government.

Well we will hear more of this from Tories, Labour and Reform.

Be a useful way to attack the SNP and the Greens.

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:15

Datun · 29/04/2025 10:13

They've suspended the meeting for something, I'm not sure what. To beat each other up behind the bike sheds so they vote correctly?

Proably this:

  1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 4 and 5 in private.
Datun · 29/04/2025 10:15

Well she can't help herself, she will just keep banging on like this.

Do they get another crack of the whip down the line, if she continues to say the same sort of shit?

woollyhatter · 29/04/2025 10:14

FFS

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:13

This should surely go to the wider Parliament. Its bollocks and it undermines public faith in the government.

Datun · 29/04/2025 10:13

They've suspended the meeting for something, I'm not sure what. To beat each other up behind the bike sheds so they vote correctly?

fromorbit · 29/04/2025 10:13

The SNP backed her - motion lost.

Trump style politics wining again sadly.

Datun · 29/04/2025 10:12

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:12

Datun how did you get to voting already? I must have a lag!

Clairvoyance

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:12

Datun comes from the future ... or I'm living three minutes in the past.

Datun · 29/04/2025 10:12

Not Agreed

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:12

Datun how did you get to voting already? I must have a lag!

RedToothBrush · 29/04/2025 10:11

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:09

'I've been representing trans non binary constituents'

'I DO respect the rule of law and independence of the judiciary - I've never questioned the SC's constitutuional right to make this judgement'

How do you become this dumb?

No one is born this dumb.

Datun · 29/04/2025 10:11

Voting!

RedToothBrush · 29/04/2025 10:11

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:08

'I was the CEO of RCS - not true - I was COO'

Cos that makes a fucking different when the point is about a clear conflict of vested personal interest...

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:10

Maggie ....

'I've said what I wish to say'

fromorbit · 29/04/2025 10:10

Tess is asking her to apologise.

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:10

Final opportunity to apologise? - Tess White

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:09

'MC I will reflect and consider what people have said'

RedToothBrush · 29/04/2025 10:09

fromorbit · 29/04/2025 10:03

AMAZING! Yes do that that lets get all of Scotland watching Holyrood voting on whether laws are real.

Show quote history

This is terrifying on so many levels.

What could possibly go wrong here... ?

ArabellaScott · 29/04/2025 10:09

'I've been representing trans non binary constituents'

'I DO respect the rule of law and independence of the judiciary - I've never questioned the SC's constitutuional right to make this judgement'