Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

European Court of Human Rights

112 replies

HollieHock · 21/04/2025 09:27

Just head a TRA on LBC saying they are going to take the case there. Please tell me this is not going to start again.

OP posts:
MissElaineEous · 21/04/2025 09:43

Who keeps paying for the kimono’d one?

I mean after while, wouldn’t you cut your losses?

Theeyeballsinthesky · 21/04/2025 09:42

Fine. More than happy for them to exhaust every legal option

Harassedevictee · 21/04/2025 09:42

RMW has also suggested this could go to ECHR.

FKAT · 21/04/2025 09:39

I'm so bored of it now. Absolutely fed up to the back teeth of the 'tiny minority who just want to live their lives in quiet and peace.' I have so much better things to do with my life. Just fuck off.

popefully · 21/04/2025 09:38

Imagine if they had to actually provide the definition of "woman" that they wanted to use, and that was workable in law!

I really hope so, that would be the end of this all!

The SC judgement already alluded to the fact that any category must be clearly defined so as to know who it refers to.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/04/2025 09:38

I think this is more about keeping it going and not letting the angry people come to terms with it and move on.

AmateurNoun · 21/04/2025 09:37

I suppose the ECtHR could rule on whether it violates transwomens human rights (in particular the right to a private life under Article 8) to not be counted in the female quota on boards, but I don't personally think they would be that likely to win.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/04/2025 09:36

FKAT · 21/04/2025 09:35

That would be the surest way of guaranteeing a Reform landslide in 2029.

Edited

And that they will take us out of the ECHR.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/04/2025 09:36

It’s Jolyon who is tantalisingly suggesting it’s an option. Grifters gonna grift.

FKAT · 21/04/2025 09:35

That would be the surest way of guaranteeing a Reform landslide in 2029.

NotBadConsidering · 21/04/2025 09:34

🤞😑🤞please let it be Jolyon,🤞😑 🤞please let it be Jolyon… 🤞😑🤞

Seriously though, they’re just spouting off out of desperation. The European Court can’t rule what British Parliament intended.

ArchibaldBoyd · 21/04/2025 09:30

Will they though?
They don't have a coherent legal argument. They don't have a history of using competent lawyers, either.

Swipe left for the next trending thread