Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A THREAD TO RECORD ALL THE APOLOGIES TO GC WOMEN SINCE THE SUPREME COURT RULING

231 replies

MarieDeGournay · 18/04/2025 16:44

Don't all rush at once!🙄

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
onwardsup4 · 19/04/2025 16:30

This photo made my year 😁

A THREAD TO RECORD ALL THE APOLOGIES TO GC WOMEN SINCE THE SUPREME COURT RULING
TheSecondMrsCampbellBlack · 19/04/2025 16:29

Great idea to have a list

I’ll add

John Lewis
M&S
Snag tights
Refuge (ffs)

KnottyAuty · 19/04/2025 16:23

PersephoneSmith · 19/04/2025 15:56

They no longer work at my organisation, effectively just a random Facebook ‘friend’ now.

Am I misunderstanding?
The person who abused you on Facebook has left but not before getting a disciplinary process started against you?

mrshoho · 19/04/2025 16:19

NotDarkGothicMama · 19/04/2025 15:51

It might be good to have a list of people and organisations who owe GC women an apology. Off the top of my head, in no particular order:

Organisations
The Labour Party
The Conservatives
The SNP
The Lib Dems
The Green Party
The NHS
The BBC
The Guardian
Stonewall
The Fawcett Society
The City of London Corporation
Amnesty International
Twitter/X
Girl Guides
Ocado (at least they've started)
Tesco
Sainsbury's
The Body Shop
Lush
Marks & Spencer
The YHA
The Caledonian Sleeper
Everyone Active
PureGym
ParkRun
The British Film Institute
Barclays
Lloyds Bank
NatWest
Citibank
HSBC

People
Keir Starmer
Ed Davies
Nicola Sturgeon
Dawn Butler
Ruth Hunt
Mhairi Black
Daniel Radcliffe
Emma Watson
Rupert Grint
Eddie Redmayne

And those whose cowardly capitulation to the TRAs helped hasten their downfall:
The Women's Equality Party
Nicola Sturgeon
Topshop

It's going to be a long list!

Various Police Forces
The Unions

PersephoneSmith · 19/04/2025 15:56

WarriorN · 19/04/2025 01:01

My god, so you’ve been abused?!

id start a complaint about them!

They no longer work at my organisation, effectively just a random Facebook ‘friend’ now.

NotDarkGothicMama · 19/04/2025 15:51

It might be good to have a list of people and organisations who owe GC women an apology. Off the top of my head, in no particular order:

Organisations
The Labour Party
The Conservatives
The SNP
The Lib Dems
The Green Party
The NHS
The BBC
The Guardian
Stonewall
The Fawcett Society
The City of London Corporation
Amnesty International
Twitter/X
Girl Guides
Ocado (at least they've started)
Tesco
Sainsbury's
The Body Shop
Lush
Marks & Spencer
The YHA
The Caledonian Sleeper
Everyone Active
PureGym
ParkRun
The British Film Institute
Barclays
Lloyds Bank
NatWest
Citibank
HSBC

People
Keir Starmer
Ed Davies
Nicola Sturgeon
Dawn Butler
Ruth Hunt
Mhairi Black
Daniel Radcliffe
Emma Watson
Rupert Grint
Eddie Redmayne

And those whose cowardly capitulation to the TRAs helped hasten their downfall:
The Women's Equality Party
Nicola Sturgeon
Topshop

KnottyAuty · 19/04/2025 15:41

Felinnefine · 19/04/2025 15:06

Omg. I’ve just listened to the 3minute pre brief. It is all there about Stonewall.

2021- this should definitely be part of the Netflix show.

We all knew this, us TERFS, GR’s. Whatever we’ve been called.

However, here it is about Stonewall published 4 years ago. Simon’s voice wasn’t enough. This wasn’t enough.

Urgh Ruth Hunt gloating about her private briefings with ministers. Tax payers money.

This is a huge scandal of our times. Can it be linked to the failure to address the child rape scandal by grooming gangs?

Probably. Let’s not offend people, misogyny rules. And a whole lot more. The whole thing stinks.

Edited

I was gripped. Great show and story well told.

No coincidence that it was 2 guys from Northern Ireland to do it - they’ve had to deal with much worse than some shrieking TRAs I’m sure

KnottyAuty · 19/04/2025 15:38

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:42

There was a fantastic series of podcasts on how stonewall effectively infiltrated and influenced government organisations and other employers with their, decidly wrong, interpretation of the equality act. I do think we need to learn from this and possibly have robust ways of dealing with “misinformation campaigns”. Kudos to those who stood strong but the government should of been standing up years ago to clarify the position.

If you enjoyed that - I did - then do write to them to ask for a follow up episode on the end to update with this week’s ruling? I.e. How can the BBC report without bias on the SC ruling? How will they deal with the inevitable Stonewall enquiries?

Waitwhat23 · 19/04/2025 15:32

You do have to laugh (bitterly) at trans organisations saying they haven't been listened to. During every stage of the GRR Bill, women's rights organisations and individuals who disagreed with self id were ignored. Reem Asalem (UN) wasn't invited to be involved until the last possible moment.

DrSpartacularsMagnificentOctopus · 19/04/2025 15:27

Chersfrozenface · 19/04/2025 15:22

It's quite clear that Stonewall and other trans advocate orgs didn't take this very seriously or they'd have applied to intervene. But they didn't. It's a bit late to complain now.

It couldn't possibly be that Stonewall and other trans advocate organisations thought they could leave the job to their catspaws/puppets the Scottish Government and Amnesty, could it?

I wouldn't be surprised if they thought they were so right that there was no need to intervene.

They somehow believed that their own made-up law really was law (aka they drank their own kool-aid).

Chersfrozenface · 19/04/2025 15:22

It's quite clear that Stonewall and other trans advocate orgs didn't take this very seriously or they'd have applied to intervene. But they didn't. It's a bit late to complain now.

It couldn't possibly be that Stonewall and other trans advocate organisations thought they could leave the job to their catspaws/puppets the Scottish Government and Amnesty, could it?

ElleWoods15 · 19/04/2025 15:21

Miaowzabella · 19/04/2025 15:17

I don't think you understand what the Supreme Court is or how it works.

I suspect you are similarly underinformed about biology and the nature of objective reality.

Not convinced you understand why the Supreme Court (and indeed the lower courts) accept interventions.

Except the UKSC didn’t this time- not from trans people looking to intervene. Only from Sex Matters, who it is not at all clear had anything to add to the discourse other than repeating FWS.

Miaowzabella · 19/04/2025 15:17

fieldsofflowers · 18/04/2025 17:35

considering there was no consultation of trans people by the uksc i rather think it’s that community owed the apology

I don't think you understand what the Supreme Court is or how it works.

I suspect you are similarly underinformed about biology and the nature of objective reality.

DrSpartacularsMagnificentOctopus · 19/04/2025 15:16

ElleWoods15 · 19/04/2025 13:19

Nope. The Supreme Court arbitrarily blocked the requested intervention by Victoria McLoud. And yet strangely allowed Sex Matters to intervene for no discernible reason.

Clearly their application to intervene wasn't good enough. That's on them for not getting decent legal representation (and in their profession you'd think they'd know who'd have been best among their colleagues).

It's quite clear that Stonewall and other trans advocate orgs didn't take this very seriously or they'd have applied to intervene. But they didn't. It's a bit late to complain now.

Felinnefine · 19/04/2025 15:06

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:50

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/search?q=nolan+stonewall

I do appreciate the irony of the series coming from the BBC itself a captured organisation but it’s really worth a listen.

Omg. I’ve just listened to the 3minute pre brief. It is all there about Stonewall.

2021- this should definitely be part of the Netflix show.

We all knew this, us TERFS, GR’s. Whatever we’ve been called.

However, here it is about Stonewall published 4 years ago. Simon’s voice wasn’t enough. This wasn’t enough.

Urgh Ruth Hunt gloating about her private briefings with ministers. Tax payers money.

This is a huge scandal of our times. Can it be linked to the failure to address the child rape scandal by grooming gangs?

Probably. Let’s not offend people, misogyny rules. And a whole lot more. The whole thing stinks.

Felinnefine · 19/04/2025 14:58

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:42

There was a fantastic series of podcasts on how stonewall effectively infiltrated and influenced government organisations and other employers with their, decidly wrong, interpretation of the equality act. I do think we need to learn from this and possibly have robust ways of dealing with “misinformation campaigns”. Kudos to those who stood strong but the government should of been standing up years ago to clarify the position.

Absolutely. The depressing fact is that it may need to be highlighted in mainstream media before the Labour government agree to undertake an investigation.

Thank you for the bbc podcast - I look forward to listening to it. I can’t actually believe they did it?!!

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 19/04/2025 14:54

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:50

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/search?q=nolan+stonewall

I do appreciate the irony of the series coming from the BBC itself a captured organisation but it’s really worth a listen.

Also, the BBC was the home of Hannah Barnes while she was doing her research into the Tavistock, so I do understand that sometimes even a captured institution can house uncaptured people.

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 19/04/2025 14:52

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:50

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/search?q=nolan+stonewall

I do appreciate the irony of the series coming from the BBC itself a captured organisation but it’s really worth a listen.

I appreciate your irony appreciation.

(also, thank you!)

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:50

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 19/04/2025 14:46

Ooo, what was the podcast, do you remember? Would like to listen to that.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/search?q=nolan+stonewall

I do appreciate the irony of the series coming from the BBC itself a captured organisation but it’s really worth a listen.

BBC blocks with Sounds written underneath in orange on a black background.

BBC Sounds - Search results for nolan stonewall

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/search?q=nolan+stonewall

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 19/04/2025 14:46

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:42

There was a fantastic series of podcasts on how stonewall effectively infiltrated and influenced government organisations and other employers with their, decidly wrong, interpretation of the equality act. I do think we need to learn from this and possibly have robust ways of dealing with “misinformation campaigns”. Kudos to those who stood strong but the government should of been standing up years ago to clarify the position.

Ooo, what was the podcast, do you remember? Would like to listen to that.

Lovelysummerdays · 19/04/2025 14:42

Felinnefine · 19/04/2025 12:16

I think you’re right. A Post Office style series. There will be millions of people who have no idea really, about the whole ‘fuss’.

It’s a great idea. One where fact IS stranger than fiction.

If you’re reading Netflix (BBC wouldn’t touch it, would they?), I volunteer to be a ‘TERF’.

There was a fantastic series of podcasts on how stonewall effectively infiltrated and influenced government organisations and other employers with their, decidly wrong, interpretation of the equality act. I do think we need to learn from this and possibly have robust ways of dealing with “misinformation campaigns”. Kudos to those who stood strong but the government should of been standing up years ago to clarify the position.

WarriorN · 19/04/2025 14:39

Men may be 49% of the population but I wouldn’t call that marginalised.

they can’t be discriminated against or harassed in law. So marginalised definitely isn’t the word.

Felinnefine · 19/04/2025 14:35

ArabellaScott · 19/04/2025 14:12

Hold the front page! A real genuine apology. Mark Smith, Herald.

archive.ph/FN89Q

Excellent.

KnottyAuty · 19/04/2025 14:34

crosstalk · 19/04/2025 14:16

@Nichebitch Most if not all GC people in the UK are not crowing - as I suspect would have been the case if the judgement had gone the other way - and the rights of this "marginalised group" (albeit one that has been centred by the NHS, Labour, LibDems, Greens, BBC, Guardian, C4News et al) have not changed, simply been spelled out.

I always thought that the term marginalised meant a person or group that is being treated insignificantly, pushed to the margins of society and rendered powerless.

I don't understand how the trans community can claim to be marginalised when they have the support of the nation governments, civil service, all public institutions, judiciary, police forces, local government, charities and many many private companies. It's just a nonsense claim - for example they are the only protected group which gets a specific equality policy written by every NHS Trust. Special extra protections. Surely you can only be marginalised without that level of protection? Once you have special protections in place you aren't marginalised any more?

WarriorN · 19/04/2025 14:29

TheSecondMrsCampbellBlack · 19/04/2025 13:00

What a great article!

has Ricky commented yet? OrDavecChapelle?

Ricky posted a post about the book he read the most as a teen; a biology text book, on the 16th

Swipe left for the next trending thread