Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Trans women ARE biological women"

832 replies

TangenitalContrivance · 18/04/2025 10:09

I see this argument and comment more and more the last few weeks and hugely over the last 3 days.

For example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1k1tliv/trans_women_are_biological_women/

This statement, and the comments underneath it absolutely baffle me.

The approach, one that I am sure will only work with a minority of the people who said TWAW, is to undermine the definition of words, yet again, and deliberately cloud the water when it comes to speaking clearly and using terms that everyone agrees with

I have seen it said in more places than Reddit however, and by respected people

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
FlowchartRequired · 23/04/2025 08:48

PatienceTried · 22/04/2025 22:06

But that’s like saying someone isn’t human because they have a disability. I’m assuming TRAs don’t want to be viewed as attacking people with a disability

Don't look for logic in their demands, it isn't there beyond 'you will validate my identity!'

TRAs have been known to berate and threaten disabled women who want single-sex intimate care. IIRC one such lady was called Henrietta Freeman and she was treated appallingly by a trans identified male person. I have read posts by TRAs that have said that having Down's Syndrome is no excuse for misgendering a trans identified person.

ThatCyanCat · 23/04/2025 07:47

Heggettypeg · 23/04/2025 04:08

That's such a daft argument, isn't it? Like trying to argue that we shouldn't provide disabled people with ramps, wheelchairs, talking books etc because it "reduces them to their disability" to acknowledge their needs.

All of their arguments are stupid. They don't know the difference between "categorised as" and "reduced to" and they think it's a winner to say that it's somehow dehumanising to acknowledge that humans come in two distinct sex categories, which sometimes matter. Obviously, they think it's fine to erase women entirely by claiming men are women, and reduce them to a feeling in a man's head or a collection of stereotypes.

Defining and naming a characteristic does not mean we are reducing everything to that one characteristic. In some contexts, some characteristics matter more than others.

And it totally falls apart when you see they never want third spaces. If they truly believed it was reductive and dehumanising to have spaces for men and women, they'd insist on a third space specifically for both. But they never do. They always want to keep the female space, purely to validate the men. So it's totally dehumanising to recognise women exist as a sex class, but totally necessary to keep women-specific spaces so that men can have them.

The stupidity, absurdity and ridiculousness is endless. I can't even call it sophistry because it really isn't smart enough.

Heggettypeg · 23/04/2025 04:08

Lyannaa · 22/04/2025 15:10

It’s so annoying. I’ve had women (allies of the trans communities) telling me that wanting female only spaces ‘reduces women to their genitalia’. It’s so disingenuous. People have got to the point where they will argue black is white in the pursuit of ‘being kind’.

I can’t imagine that many of these women have daughters.

That's such a daft argument, isn't it? Like trying to argue that we shouldn't provide disabled people with ramps, wheelchairs, talking books etc because it "reduces them to their disability" to acknowledge their needs.

TomPinch · 23/04/2025 03:46

Treaclewell · 20/04/2025 21:38

This is a bit of a diversion. I being of a religious persuasion used to go on a website where there were interesting discussions, but when this subject came up I felt uncomfortable. In a place where it was considered inappropriate to use insulting language, there was one sort of insult actively encouraged, TERF, and allied terms. I avoided such threads at first, but eventually dropped the place as people I had liked revealed their dark side. And I had discovered Mumsnet, and normal people. Oddly Mumsnetters being rude about religion doesn't affect me like that.
I have just paid a brief visit to see how they responded to the Supreme Court ruling. Fuming is a mild word. It was like being in a parallel universe, with absolutely no understanding of women - and a lot of contributers are women, so churches' historical gynophobia can't explain it. They will keep fighting to return to what they think of as the status quo. All the rights the trans have lost. Despite quoting the bits of the judgement which explained how trans are still protected.

One called this place Prosecco Stormfront! Really. Has she ever been here? With the Tunnocks and all.

I'm not going back there ever. I feel much more comfortable here.I needed to spill that or try to sleep with the hatred wasing over me.

Edited

Could that website be abbreviated as SOF?

ThatCyanCat · 22/04/2025 22:17

PatienceTried · 22/04/2025 22:06

But that’s like saying someone isn’t human because they have a disability. I’m assuming TRAs don’t want to be viewed as attacking people with a disability

They're fine with being viewed as people who regularly call to rape, murder, piss and shit on women, so I don't think that's going to trouble them too much.

PatienceTried · 22/04/2025 22:06

But that’s like saying someone isn’t human because they have a disability. I’m assuming TRAs don’t want to be viewed as attacking people with a disability

wastingtimeonhere · 22/04/2025 21:51

If 'woman' needs a definition, why does 'man' not need one too. What is the definition there?
Maybe the ability to not see something in front of their nose? 🤔

spannasaurus · 22/04/2025 21:14

PatienceTried · 22/04/2025 20:51

what nonsense could be the response to ‘sex is obviously binary because there’s no other way to produce babies’?

"So you think infertile women aren't really women"

PatienceTried · 22/04/2025 20:51

what nonsense could be the response to ‘sex is obviously binary because there’s no other way to produce babies’?

ThatCyanCat · 22/04/2025 17:42

Needspaceforlego · 22/04/2025 16:05

Is that why pee from a bitch kills the grass?
But dog pee doesn't?

Or at least someone once told me that. Never been a caine owner.

I don't know about dogs, but it would make sense.

BundleBoogie · 22/04/2025 17:32

needmoresheep · 22/04/2025 14:01

And male p*ss smells! No getting over that chaps

Yes. I’m wondering if all the women enthusiastically arguing for mixed sex facilities have terrible hygiene standards or just no sense of smell?

Faffertea · 22/04/2025 17:27

Fortunately my dog can’t get to the grass bit of our garden unless he’s let through so no brown patches.

Sometimes he cocks his leg, sometimes he squats to wee.

Maybe he’s non-bonery?

(I’ll get me coat)

Boston365 · 22/04/2025 17:02

TheHereticalOne · 22/04/2025 14:30

Welcome to the den of sin and wrongthink, you filthy heretic!

Have a teacake.

Thanks, just like Magdalen Burns rather be a heretic than a fucking liar!

They’re on babycentre now calling for all toilets to be made unisex as a way of circumventing the supreme court ruling, these handmaidens are absolute lunatics! 😵‍💫

BiologicalRobot · 22/04/2025 16:46

Neighbour has had 3 bitches over 15 years. Every Spring he's out there re-seeding all the brown patches. Perhaps BaronessE dog identifies as a bitch when weeing 😬

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 22/04/2025 16:08

Needspaceforlego · 22/04/2025 16:05

Is that why pee from a bitch kills the grass?
But dog pee doesn't?

Or at least someone once told me that. Never been a caine owner.

Looks at male dog then brown grass patches. I can confirm pee from male dogs kills grass.

Needspaceforlego · 22/04/2025 16:05

ThatCyanCat · 22/04/2025 14:21

It's great for compost, though. Female urine has more oestrogen in it than is good for compost but the nitrogen from the dudes is very welcome.

Is that why pee from a bitch kills the grass?
But dog pee doesn't?

Or at least someone once told me that. Never been a caine owner.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/04/2025 15:59

It’s just a stupid thought-terminating cliche.

Lyannaa · 22/04/2025 15:10

It’s so annoying. I’ve had women (allies of the trans communities) telling me that wanting female only spaces ‘reduces women to their genitalia’. It’s so disingenuous. People have got to the point where they will argue black is white in the pursuit of ‘being kind’.

I can’t imagine that many of these women have daughters.

TheHereticalOne · 22/04/2025 14:30

Boston365 · 22/04/2025 14:26

I just want to say this post has legitimately made me shed a tear, I’ve been on the WYOO board of another parenting forum for the last 2 days arguing for women’s sex based rights.

I’ve been called a bigot and a transphobe and as a lone voice it has taken its toll. No matter what logical and evidenced reasons I’ve put forward for my position they have been completely dismissed as being from transphobic sources or any crimes committed by M to F trans were actually just committed by CIS males.

It’s been nice to come on here and feel like I’m not going crazy. I’ve never doubted my position but god it’s been so depressing that all these women want to give away our daughters sex based rights with so little thought.

Welcome to the den of sin and wrongthink, you filthy heretic!

Have a teacake.

TheHereticalOne · 22/04/2025 14:28

Faffertea · 22/04/2025 11:36

For the millionth time…
Sex is binary (yes, even in medicine). There is no need to talk about chromosomal sex, endocrine sex etc etc. Humans are mammals whose reproductive systems develop embryologically along one of two pathways depending on whether they are going to be producers of small mobile gametes or large immobile gametes.
We inherit DNA from both parents. For convenience this is stored as chromosomes. From our mothers that will be an X chromosome. From our fathers an X or Y. The presence of absence of the Y instructs the route of embryological development from a bipotential gonad (can become either ovary or testes) to either Mullerian route (no Y, becomes ovary) or Wolffian route (Y present, becomes testes). Embryological development proceeds and after puberty sexual maturity is reached but the process starts at conception and the development of gonadal tissues, hormones, everything follows on from there.

For a small number of people there is an issue in the pathway. Perhaps part of the Y chromosome gets attached to an X chromosome during meiosis (cellular replication after fertilisation). Perhaps there is an extra chromosome or a missing chromosome. Perhaps there is a failure of gonadal tissue to form properly. Perhaps the hormone receptors or the enzymes that act on those hormones don’t act properly. All of those things mean that in a tiny number of cases sex is not as clear as xx/xy or hormones, and that is precisely why that is not how we categorise sex. It is about which gamete the body is designed to produce. Failure to be able to do so does not mean those people are some new type of human or new sex. It means there’s been an issue in the process and things have turned out differently. There are other conditions where this happens (other trisomies, non disjunction etc) but they happen on chromosomes not linked to sex so the features are different. We don’t say people with Down Syndrome, Edward Syndrome or Patau Syndrome are somehow a new type of human because to do so would be both offensive and absurd.
To make the same judgement on sex is also nonsensical and absurd but it’s been used that way because some people for a whole variety of reasons don’t want to be the sex they are and are unhappy that that can’t change so we get this bizarre discussion about chromosomal sex or hormonal sex as if these things exist separate from each other and have anything to do with what “gender” someone may or may not identify as.

Edited

Beautifully said!

Boston365 · 22/04/2025 14:26

I just want to say this post has legitimately made me shed a tear, I’ve been on the WYOO board of another parenting forum for the last 2 days arguing for women’s sex based rights.

I’ve been called a bigot and a transphobe and as a lone voice it has taken its toll. No matter what logical and evidenced reasons I’ve put forward for my position they have been completely dismissed as being from transphobic sources or any crimes committed by M to F trans were actually just committed by CIS males.

It’s been nice to come on here and feel like I’m not going crazy. I’ve never doubted my position but god it’s been so depressing that all these women want to give away our daughters sex based rights with so little thought.

Helleofabore · 22/04/2025 14:23

ThatCyanCat · 22/04/2025 14:21

It's great for compost, though. Female urine has more oestrogen in it than is good for compost but the nitrogen from the dudes is very welcome.

Everyday is a learning day on MN! That is a brilliant bit of information.

ThatCyanCat · 22/04/2025 14:21

needmoresheep · 22/04/2025 14:01

And male p*ss smells! No getting over that chaps

It's great for compost, though. Female urine has more oestrogen in it than is good for compost but the nitrogen from the dudes is very welcome.

Chersfrozenface · 22/04/2025 14:13

The boys' toilets were off the entrance lobby of my kids' primary school. You couldn't get in except by passing them.

Good grief, they stank, even with the door closed!

They weren't used by adult men, as there was a male staff toilet. And the vast majority of the boys would have been pre-pubescent. Yet still the toilets absolutely reeked.

needmoresheep · 22/04/2025 14:01

And male p*ss smells! No getting over that chaps