Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Politicians respond to the SC judgement

511 replies

ArabellaScott · 17/04/2025 10:59

A thread to gather politicians' responses to yesterday's Supreme Court judgement.

  1. Stella Creasy. She's rather unhelpfully posted a pdf, (and turned off replies), so archive below.

https://archive.ph/8T1Yl

https://x.com/stellacreasy/status/1912609872430133697

https://x.com/stellacreasy/status/1912609872430133697

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
45
Leafstamp · 28/04/2025 20:49

Archive of the X/Twitter post by Green Party in response to EHRC statement:

https://archive.ph/OD0N5

lcakethereforeIam · 28/04/2025 10:28

From the Times Sturgeon article posted upthread

The former first minister stonewalled questions on the legal ruling that the term woman is defined by biological sex, insisting that her views on gender identity are already on the record.

Oh The Times, you wag you.

Although Sturgeon by not answering is answering and in the most cowardly, beclowning and, possibly transphobic, way possible. I have more respect for 'come in through the' Foyer and Nadia 'left her wits at home', who will actually publicly speak nonsense and remain true to their beliefs, than the likes of Sturgeon. Then there are the human windsocks such as Starmer, Philipson, too many to list here.

TheOtherRaven · 28/04/2025 08:21

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 28/04/2025 08:02

This is going back to the ‘men will attack women anyway so allowing TIM’s access to single sex spaces doesn’t really make much difference’ argument, she’s just reinforcing that she thinks men’s needs are more important than women’s. Despicable.

'Men will attack men anyway so insisting TIMs use male spaces doesn't really make much difference'

For some reason I don't think she'd agree with that, or find it acceptably 'kind'.

It is really worrying how sexist and how slow of thinking so many of these people are.

LizzieSiddal · 28/04/2025 08:15

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 28/04/2025 08:02

This is going back to the ‘men will attack women anyway so allowing TIM’s access to single sex spaces doesn’t really make much difference’ argument, she’s just reinforcing that she thinks men’s needs are more important than women’s. Despicable.

Well if that really is their stance why bother with single sex spaces anyway? It’s all too much faff. They should be calling for mixed sex prisons, wards, sports, loos etc etc etc.

RedToothBrush · 28/04/2025 08:09

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 28/04/2025 08:02

This is going back to the ‘men will attack women anyway so allowing TIM’s access to single sex spaces doesn’t really make much difference’ argument, she’s just reinforcing that she thinks men’s needs are more important than women’s. Despicable.

That's what gets me.

They suddenly use recognition of abuse in the home whilst families have been told to affirm without question and if they don't they are bigoted.

It's appalling.

The twisting of the narrative to suit objectives whilst continuously failing to understand the issues seriously is totally self serving pish.

It's just more cake eating where trans women are always right and women are always wrong.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 28/04/2025 08:02

ArabellaScott · 28/04/2025 06:20

Roz Foyer of the STUC; 'I’m very clear that women do need to be protected in society from male violence, but the male violence most women experience happens in their homes, workplaces and communities and usually from men that they know.”'

So fuck any women who experience violence at the hands of strangers, or indeed transwomen, amirite Roz?

Plus, the SC judgement includes workplaces and communities and yes they may know the transwomen involved, so wtf is your point?!

This is going back to the ‘men will attack women anyway so allowing TIM’s access to single sex spaces doesn’t really make much difference’ argument, she’s just reinforcing that she thinks men’s needs are more important than women’s. Despicable.

Datun · 28/04/2025 08:02

KnottyAuty · 25/04/2025 07:12

Has anyone posted this yet? Wes Streeting on LBC. Trans issues and refreshing reasonableness from about 18mins. Phew!

That's very interesting. I've just listened to the bit 18 minutes on.

As suggested by a PP, it seems as though he's never really given women any thought. But because he did, indeed, decide to listen, he has finally seen their point of view.

It's a toss up whether you think that goes in the positive or negative pile.

I caught the tail end of the previous topic, and he was far more certain of himself than when he started to talk about the trans issue. Probably because, in this case, he's trying to please both sides. Which, as almost every woman here knows, simply isn't possible

He does agree that women need their own space. So that's a good thing. But he still thinks that transwomen are a sacred caste who need special treatment.

He still thinks they're the most marginalised, vulnerable, suicidal, harassed cohort. What about other vulnerable men? Old men, disabled men, men with learning difficulties? Do they all get a private room, Wes?

Don't you think hospitals are segregated on the basis of infection control and medical need? Not based on the patient's self image??

The argument doesn't make sense. You can't give every vulnerable patient their own room, so why this special cohort?

He seemed to think that the NHS were perfectly placed to do it, too. I'm sure a few TRAs will agree, but the rest of the NHS won't.

Plus, he still doesn't quite grasp that dedicated spaces isn't what they want. Although, I'm sure, in terms of a hospital setting, many of them will be willing to make an exception..

I did like him, though.

ArabellaScott · 28/04/2025 07:33

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgenpvzxddno

'"We have a ruling here that's basically saying trans women can no longer use female-only facilities.

"Does that mean trans men can no longer use male-only facilities? Will they be forced to use female facilities? Will trans women be forced to use men's facilities?'

Roz Foyer has short dark hair and holds a microphone up to her mouth while she speaks.

Single-sex spaces advice 'problematic', says STUC's Roz Foyer

Roz Foyer, head of the STUC, said she did not agree with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission guidance.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgenpvzxddno

OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 28/04/2025 07:22

ArabellaScott · 28/04/2025 06:20

Roz Foyer of the STUC; 'I’m very clear that women do need to be protected in society from male violence, but the male violence most women experience happens in their homes, workplaces and communities and usually from men that they know.”'

So fuck any women who experience violence at the hands of strangers, or indeed transwomen, amirite Roz?

Plus, the SC judgement includes workplaces and communities and yes they may know the transwomen involved, so wtf is your point?!

Does this mean that trans widows and their families might suddenly have some visibility rather than the usual comments?

Some how I doubt it...

ArabellaScott · 28/04/2025 06:58

Exactly. Foyer sounds like a total idiot.

OP posts:
Igneococcus · 28/04/2025 06:32

There's a real epidemic of people beclowning themselves publicly at the moment. Roz Foyer is just another victim of this.
What I find astonishing is that none of them seemed to have followed this discussion in any depth before, none seems to realize all these arguments have been debated over and over again.

ArabellaScott · 28/04/2025 06:20

Roz Foyer of the STUC; 'I’m very clear that women do need to be protected in society from male violence, but the male violence most women experience happens in their homes, workplaces and communities and usually from men that they know.”'

So fuck any women who experience violence at the hands of strangers, or indeed transwomen, amirite Roz?

Plus, the SC judgement includes workplaces and communities and yes they may know the transwomen involved, so wtf is your point?!

OP posts:
KnottyAuty · 28/04/2025 00:08

Times story - Keir Starmer used to date the KC who investigated Alison Bailey - "a judge who was once accused of being influenced by the trans lobby"

https://archive.is/n1fcb

RedToothBrush · 27/04/2025 18:16

GCAcademic · 27/04/2025 16:12

How odd. He wasn't at all concerned about men accessing women's spaces by saying they were trans women. He thought that was the correct place for them. Is it the words these men utter that is the problem? Only one of them is the magic word?

Isn't it just?

Does he think we don't see him?!

GCAcademic · 27/04/2025 16:12

spannasaurus · 27/04/2025 09:31

Ed Davey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg this morning was concerned that the judgement could mean that men will now say they are transmen to access womens single sex spaces.

How odd. He wasn't at all concerned about men accessing women's spaces by saying they were trans women. He thought that was the correct place for them. Is it the words these men utter that is the problem? Only one of them is the magic word?

SameyMcNameChange · 27/04/2025 14:05

JazzyJelly · 27/04/2025 13:42

I do know a couple of ladies who are 6ft. They're both still very clearly female.

Well quite. What I meant was the overlap of the groups ‘women who are over 6ft’ and ‘women who may be mistaken for being men’ would be a very small number of people.

RedToothBrush · 27/04/2025 13:57

spannasaurus · 27/04/2025 09:31

Ed Davey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg this morning was concerned that the judgement could mean that men will now say they are transmen to access womens single sex spaces.

Ed doesn't give a fuck about women.

He's not even pretending anymore.

JazzyJelly · 27/04/2025 13:42

I do know a couple of ladies who are 6ft. They're both still very clearly female.

BabaYagasHouse · 27/04/2025 10:02

spannasaurus · 27/04/2025 09:31

Ed Davey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg this morning was concerned that the judgement could mean that men will now say they are transmen to access womens single sex spaces.

This is so 'Victor, Victoria' - if anyone remembers the film.
Bonkers

Kucinghitam · 27/04/2025 10:02

20% of men are over 6 foot. Fewer than 1% of women are.

And somehow they're all friends with people on TRSOH Grin

Rummly · 27/04/2025 09:52

spannasaurus · 27/04/2025 09:31

Ed Davey on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg this morning was concerned that the judgement could mean that men will now say they are transmen to access womens single sex spaces.

That’s a superb example of this nonsense disappearing up its own backside. As a pp said, it’d be a man who claims to be a woman claiming to be a woman who claims to be a man. 😵‍💫

The ‘trans’ label is becoming more magical every day. A sort of ‘rights’-based Polyjuice Potion.

SameyMcNameChange · 27/04/2025 09:49

I will quite happily accept that ‘bad men’ may pretend to be transmen and this may cause problems. I think it causes far fewer problems than the other way round, which is obviously that bad men may pretend to be transwomen.

The first reason it is preferable is in the instance that someone is pretending to be a transman, it can be objectively proved or disproved that this person is male. If they are male, then they shouldn’t be there. The law is on the side of women.

Whereas if transwomen are allowed in the female spaces, a man pretending to be a transwoman is objectively no different to a transwoman, and so is ‘allowed’ to be there.

This is so obvious I don’t know why politicians are confused.

But even if it isn’t, let’s consider another point of view.

20% of men are over 6 foot. Fewer than 1% of women are.

So no man over 6 foot would get away with ‘pretending to be a transman’.

So at a stroke you have reduced the bad actors by 20%. And given their size, they pose over 20% of the risk of that group.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 27/04/2025 09:49

As if it wasn't way easier for a man to pretend to be a trans woman than to pretend to be a trans man

we were absolutely told that a man with a beard, in jeans and a t shirt was a transwoman if they said so and we couldn’t police appearance

nothing has changed, in theory suited and booted dh could get into the female toilets by saying he is a transwoman and now a transman (i understand that the guidence has covered this gotcha)

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 27/04/2025 09:46

Kucinghitam · 27/04/2025 09:35

It's quite astonishing* how many Righteous folx have suddenly remembered the existence of female persons-of-gender since the SC ruling.

*Not astonishing in the slightest.

Just watched this myself

all i get from dh at the moment is ‘are you yelling at the television again’ 😀

its this assumption as well, that transmen have not been in the female toilets…absolutely some have and it hasn’t been a problem

Swipe left for the next trending thread