Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Hahahaha!!!!

423 replies

DialSquare · 08/04/2025 14:57

I love JKR!

Hahahaha!!!!
OP posts:
NotmeMother · 02/06/2025 18:51

MissDoubleU · 08/04/2025 17:09

Being asexual isnt “I’ve hit the menopause and can’t be arsed with shagging any more.”

Some people go their entire lives with absolutely no desire, need or want to be sexual in any way. And that’s fine. They don’t need cured or corrected and the quote honestly disgusting responses from a lot of you here is exactly why they do need a day of visibility. Understanding that it’s okay to not want these things and no one - absolutely no one in the world should ever force it upon them. No one should feel the need to have sex just because society says it’s normal. Some people just aren’t wired that way and they remain so throughout their entire lives.

I don’t see why you need to be so offended by people different from you existing.

I think the point is that NO ONE (apart from your best girlfriend or maybe your mum) should know about your sex life particularly if you're NOT having one, therefore having fuck all to tell!

Stop living your life as if you're on a stage ffs.

Jeez, this makes me so bloody angry. There was a time when people didn't know about what and who you did in your bedroom and even a time (my gparents generation) when people didn't even know who you voted for because it was PRIVATE. Imagine that!?

UniReunion · 02/06/2025 18:50

GegenFanatiker · 02/06/2025 18:01

Oh dear. Let me see if I can simplify this for you; if a person commits sins against group A whilst simultaneously charitably supporting group B, they are not absolved of those sins. The one act does not invalidate the other.

Or, alarmingly, perhaps you think it does? 🤔

In this case, her battling against oppression on the basis of sex is seen as proof of her transphobia.

DialSquare · 02/06/2025 18:40

Annoyedone · 02/06/2025 18:32

What do you expect. It’s another German user name 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

Oh they never exceed my expectations. I just like pointing it out.

OP posts:
Annoyedone · 02/06/2025 18:32

DialSquare · 02/06/2025 18:05

I see that the low caliber of the standard TA still hasn’t got any higher. Oh well, maybe I’ll be proved wrong one day, but I won’t hold my breath.

What do you expect. It’s another German user name 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

JanesLittleGirl · 02/06/2025 18:25

teawamutu · 02/06/2025 18:17

Another wokescold with a vaguely German-sounding name. Interesting.

I think that the username must be sarcastic as it translates as "against fanatics".

teawamutu · 02/06/2025 18:17

Another wokescold with a vaguely German-sounding name. Interesting.

CassOle · 02/06/2025 18:14

It's a Birdy Rose design. I believe that it is available on a T-shirt. Carry your tambourine wherever you go. You never know when you might come across a sinner after all!

Helleofabore · 02/06/2025 18:10

CassOle · 02/06/2025 18:09

Has the 'repent' person found our little corner of the internet?

That is a gif of beauty! I wish there was a sound track that went with it.

CassOle · 02/06/2025 18:09

Has the 'repent' person found our little corner of the internet?

Hahahaha!!!!
Helleofabore · 02/06/2025 18:08

borntobequiet · 02/06/2025 18:06

Sins? Absolution?

This is becoming weirdly dogmatic (as well as rather nauseatingly condescending).

I know right? The hyperbole is literally dripping out of that post.

borntobequiet · 02/06/2025 18:06

GegenFanatiker · 02/06/2025 18:01

Oh dear. Let me see if I can simplify this for you; if a person commits sins against group A whilst simultaneously charitably supporting group B, they are not absolved of those sins. The one act does not invalidate the other.

Or, alarmingly, perhaps you think it does? 🤔

Sins? Absolution?

This is becoming weirdly dogmatic (as well as rather nauseatingly condescending).

DialSquare · 02/06/2025 18:05

I see that the low caliber of the standard TA still hasn’t got any higher. Oh well, maybe I’ll be proved wrong one day, but I won’t hold my breath.

OP posts:
GegenFanatiker · 02/06/2025 18:01

SinnerBoy · 02/06/2025 17:57

Oh dear, you are a bit silly, aren't you? She promotes women's and girl's rights and in all too many cases, that means taking a stand to keep men, who pose as women, out.

That's all. If that's transphobia, meh.

Oh dear. Let me see if I can simplify this for you; if a person commits sins against group A whilst simultaneously charitably supporting group B, they are not absolved of those sins. The one act does not invalidate the other.

Or, alarmingly, perhaps you think it does? 🤔

SinnerBoy · 02/06/2025 17:57

Oh dear, you are a bit silly, aren't you? She promotes women's and girl's rights and in all too many cases, that means taking a stand to keep men, who pose as women, out.

That's all. If that's transphobia, meh.

GegenFanatiker · 02/06/2025 17:53

ODFOx · 13/04/2025 23:04

She is a wit and fair enough she has a problem with India Willoughby but why did she go after the asexuals? In these days of ‘everyone needs a label’ they just wanted a day of recognition. I think she was unnecessarily harsh tbh.

Indeed. JKR is most definitely a divisive figure; representing on the one hand an almost deified status to her indoctrinated cult of transphobes, and an unnecessarily spiteful bully to everybody else 🙄

KnottyAuty · 14/04/2025 21:33

MidnightGloria · 14/04/2025 15:16

I'd be classed as asexual. Nobody asked me if I wanted a 'day of recognition'. I don't. Having to deal with awkward questions from well-meaning relatives about the fact that I'm a spinster is not oppression. Anyone who thinks it is seriously needs to study history.

The most bizarre forced teaming I've seen is trying to include asexual people in Pride parades. I can't think of many places I'd like to be less than a parade full of barely-clothed people celebrating their sexualities and assorted fetishes.

I'm not proud of being uninterested in sex. I'm not proud of being uninterested in football either. Neither is a big deal.

🎯

MidnightGloria · 14/04/2025 15:16

ODFOx · 13/04/2025 23:04

She is a wit and fair enough she has a problem with India Willoughby but why did she go after the asexuals? In these days of ‘everyone needs a label’ they just wanted a day of recognition. I think she was unnecessarily harsh tbh.

I'd be classed as asexual. Nobody asked me if I wanted a 'day of recognition'. I don't. Having to deal with awkward questions from well-meaning relatives about the fact that I'm a spinster is not oppression. Anyone who thinks it is seriously needs to study history.

The most bizarre forced teaming I've seen is trying to include asexual people in Pride parades. I can't think of many places I'd like to be less than a parade full of barely-clothed people celebrating their sexualities and assorted fetishes.

I'm not proud of being uninterested in sex. I'm not proud of being uninterested in football either. Neither is a big deal.

MassiveWordSalad · 14/04/2025 11:12

What do you expect, this is MUMSnet, we’re just into breeding, innit 🙄

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 14/04/2025 07:30

Bobbymoore123 · 14/04/2025 07:05

Why do you guys hate asexuals/asexuality so much?

Yawn.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 14/04/2025 07:29

Bobbymoore123 · 14/04/2025 07:05

Why do you guys hate asexuals/asexuality so much?

Nice try.

Bobbymoore123 · 14/04/2025 07:05

Why do you guys hate asexuals/asexuality so much?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 13/04/2025 23:11

ODFOx · 13/04/2025 23:04

She is a wit and fair enough she has a problem with India Willoughby but why did she go after the asexuals? In these days of ‘everyone needs a label’ they just wanted a day of recognition. I think she was unnecessarily harsh tbh.

Did she go after ‘the asexuals’ or did she go after those who think those that don’t feel any sexual feelings deserve their own day of visibility? There’s a difference, which has been covered if you’d read the whole thread.

ODFOx · 13/04/2025 23:04

She is a wit and fair enough she has a problem with India Willoughby but why did she go after the asexuals? In these days of ‘everyone needs a label’ they just wanted a day of recognition. I think she was unnecessarily harsh tbh.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 13/04/2025 22:44

@Waitwhat23 and @myplace I agree with you both, what I find alternately amusing/enraging is that if any one of these apologists/idealogues bothered to read anything about the history of women, they would know that we, as a sex class, don’t give in to injustice or misogyny, we never have. Unlike men, we don’t kill the people/men, who oppress us, we defy them, we educate them, we show them our strengths. Many women have been lost along the way, but we won’t stop fighting for our right to exist as women, for our right to safety and at the moment for our absolute right to say that men cannot be women.

They’ve tried calling us bigots, they’ve tried telling us to be kind, they’ve tried threatening to rape and kill us, and now they’re telling us we’re all Trump supporting, right wingers, and none of it will work, because even as delusional as some of them are, biological facts win every time.

myplace · 13/04/2025 21:56

There are some very patient people on this thread. And some people who are either persistently disingenuous, or persistently slightly dim. It’s not always easy to tell.

The victim positioning bewailing ‘the defacement of our flag’ and the ‘real hurt’ it causes … as opposed to the die in fire threats and the assaults and the harassment and process as punishment policing…

Makes me want to vomit when I see some usernames.