Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

University of Sussex fined £585,000 by Office for Students

437 replies

OhBuggerandArse · 25/03/2025 21:34

The inquiry in the wake of Kathleen Stock's experience has finally been completed:

'An English university is set to be fined a record £585,000 over allegations it failed to uphold free speech and academic freedom, in a landmark ruling in the debate over student rights on campus. England’s higher education regulator found “significant and serious breaches” of free speech and governance issues at the University of Sussex, according to a draft press release seen by the Financial Times. The Office for Students press release, to be published on Wednesday, said policies intended to prevent abuse or harassment of certain groups on campus had created “a chilling effect” that might cause staff and students to “self-censor”.'

Sussex 'has reacted furiously...'

https://www.ft.com/content/d39f0db7-877a-4cf3-8c12-dd5581eecd0b?fbclid=IwY2xjawJP_1RleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHVWF1ZXM3cKbxGAvtKfecgeMyAXNae5933M9a3dru0zohKTe7Vk24foIeA_aem_HpdtsUQc6ipMGY9J5AGFWQ

England’s university regulator issues record fine in Sussex free speech case

Policies intended to prevent abuse or harassment of certain groups on campus had created ‘a chilling effect’, OfS says

https://www.ft.com/content/d39f0db7-877a-4cf3-8c12-dd5581eecd0b?fbclid=IwY2xjawJP_1RleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHVWF1ZXM3cKbxGAvtKfecgeMyAXNae5933M9a3dru0zohKTe7Vk24foIeA_aem_HpdtsUQc6ipMGY9J5AGFWQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
lcakethereforeIam · 25/03/2025 22:06

Does anyone know if they can appeal? The University doesn't seem in the least bit contrite

The university, ranked joint 26th out of 104 UK institutions in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2024, has reacted furiously. Sasha Roseneil, the university’s vice-chancellor, said the regulator had decreed “free speech absolutism as the fundamental principle” for universities.

She seems to be equating that GC 'beliefs' (sex is real, immutable and sometimes it matters) with the nastier types of speech

...added that the ruling made it now “virtually impossible for universities to prevent abuse, harassment or bullying, to protect groups subject to harmful propaganda, or to determine that stereotyped assumptions should not be relied upon in the university curriculum”.

The group they notably failed to protect, the one 'subject to harmful propaganda' is the one commonly labelled 'terfs' and 'transphobic'.

Can anyone explain what she means by 'stereotyped assumptions'...etc?

I admit I had no idea this investigation was happening. Doc Stock, by not commenting, is showing class. I hope she has a glass of something nice, though I imagine it's bittersweet.

SidewaysOtter · 25/03/2025 21:57

Good. Serves them bloody well right. Anyone reading how the “protests” were conducted by balaclava-clad students waving flares, and how posters of guns were put up on campus will understand how horrific this must have been for Stock.

Now, if only the spineless weasels that are UCU could be held responsible for their failure to support her, too.

Datun · 25/03/2025 21:52

Nameychangington · 25/03/2025 21:50

She added that the ruling made it now “virtually impossible for universities to prevent abuse, harassment or bullying

But Sussex didn't try to prevent the abuse, harassment or bullying of Dr Stock, did they? They sided with the cry bullies.

I'd like to see their workings. How
they justify that statement

strangeandfamiliar · 25/03/2025 21:52

Good news

Nameychangington · 25/03/2025 21:50

She added that the ruling made it now “virtually impossible for universities to prevent abuse, harassment or bullying

But Sussex didn't try to prevent the abuse, harassment or bullying of Dr Stock, did they? They sided with the cry bullies.

thenoisiesttermagant · 25/03/2025 21:46

Good. Can the office for students now please turn their attention to the OU? In particular their dreadful behaviour towards Jo P and apparent total lack of willingness to do anything to change despite a fairly resounding judgement against them.

Toptotoe · 25/03/2025 21:44

This is great news.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 25/03/2025 21:44

I believe hahahahahahaha - breathe- hahahahahaha is the correct response

couldn’t have happened to a nicer university the spineless weasels

SomewhereinSuberbia · 25/03/2025 21:43

That's good news, they deserve to be repremanded after their appauling treatment of Kathleen Stock, the lack of free speech in Universities is a National disgrace.

FlowchartRequired · 25/03/2025 21:38

Archive version: https://archive.ph/yHVnG

ElbowsUpRising · 25/03/2025 21:36

Can’t read the article sadly. Maybe they are furious, hopefully they can channel that energy into behaving better in the future.

Swipe left for the next trending thread