Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

I regret voting Labour - they've let women down

164 replies

IwantToRetire · 18/03/2025 18:51

Polling shows that women are falling out of love with Labour - thanks to economic policies that will hit them the hardest and 'unforgivable' aid cuts

The latest polling from YouGov shows that women are falling out of love with Labour fast. In the first month of Starmer’s government, only a third (32 per cent) of women said they “disapproved of the Government’s record so far”; by mid-February that figure had more than doubled to 68 per cent.

Part-time and low-income jobs, which are disproportionately held by women, are predicted to be hardest hit by the rise in employers’ NI contributions. In the childcare and social care sectors the impact is expected to be particularly tough, with the effects of those changes being felt primarily by women too. Both sectors are major employers of female labour, and when costs rise or their services are shut down, it is women’s lives that are affected too.

High-net-worth women are also disappointed. The Saltus Wealth Index polls people holding more than £250,000 in investable assets. It revealed that women in this group were slightly more likely than men to have voted Labour in last summer’s election, and that Labour was still the most popular party for wealthy women – but of the 38 per cent who voted Labour in July, 68 per cent now regretted their decision.

From an article in the "i" https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/regret-voting-labour-women-3580582

Can also be read at https://archive.is/zXtxe

I regret voting Labour - they've let women down

Polling shows that women are falling out of love with Labour - thanks to economic policies that will hit them the hardest and 'unforgivable' aid cuts

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/regret-voting-labour-women-3580582

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Lark1ane · 19/03/2025 20:07

Who was it who said that you judge a society by how it treats it's most vulnerable?

I'm ashamed to have been a trade unionist and Labour supporter when I look at the calibre of the majority of their activists and policies these days.

The WFA shenanigans was a disgrace with the pensioner income threshold set far too low. Still we get the ostriches trying to justify it. Labour's own analysis published in 2017 warned that Conservative plans to cut the fuel allowance for ten million pensioners would increase excess deaths that Winter.

We will see how that pans out for Labour in 2025.

I suppose the chronically sick, and disabled, will have the Assisted Dying Bill to look forward to. These benefit changes do not ensure that those who need help are all safeguarded - despite the hollow promises. Mostly, it will be women and child carers left trying to cope at the continued expense of their own health and futures.

Labour's Cunning Plan seems to be to fix their alleged Black Hole by clawing back a few billion in benefits and long term care, and in the longer term, making available the means of seeing off those in despair who genuinely can't work.

reversegear · 19/03/2025 19:37

Men and women and my elderly mum, they are utterly fucking up this country’s and still wittering on about the last government.

I cant wrap my head around them cutting benefits, telling everyone to get jobs… but then they have screwed the employers who are now closing business.

Are they missing some brain cells, what jobs exactly are these people supposed to get.

IwantToRetire · 19/03/2025 19:33

Conclusion of longer statement:

“These benefit cuts could disproportionately impact disabled victim-survivors of domestic abuse by making it even more difficult for them to access the benefits necessary to work and be financially independent from the abuser. Disabled victim-survivors are nearly twice as likely to experience economic abuse compared to non-disabled women, and are nearly four times more likely to have a partner or ex-partner stop them, or try to stop them, accessing benefits that they or their children are entitled to .

“We recognise the financial challenges the Government faces, but scaling back existential support to Disabled people is not the answer. In fact, it directly contradicts the Government’s commitments to ensure that “those with the broadest shoulders will bear the heaviest burden”.
“As other organisations have suggested, there are feasible and fairer options for reform available to the Government that would help increase revenue to pay for the services and welfare desperately needed to address the cumulative impact of austerity, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the cost-of-living crisis on our public services and the most vulnerable in society.

“Oxfam’s latest inequality report showed that the total wealth of UK billionaires increased by £35m per day in 2024. Increasing taxes on the super-rich through a modest wealth tax – such as a 2% levy on assets over £10m – could generate an estimated £24bn a year, to invest in our public services and infrastructure and protect the wellbeing of our communities."

https://www.wbg.org.uk/article/wbg-response-to-government-changes-to-disability-benefit/

WBG response to Government Changes to Disability Benefit

We have responded to the Government's Plans to Reform the Disability Benefits

https://www.wbg.org.uk/article/wbg-response-to-government-changes-to-disability-benefit/

OP posts:
ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 18:38

My comment was not farcical, nor does my opinion relate to a view that 'boomers' had it easy.

Boomers are now paying more tax than Gen Z because pensioners have better incomes than ever. Whilst not rich, lots of pensioners have reasonable incomes and whilst £300 might be missed we can't afford to dole cash out to households on average, ordinary or comfortable incomes in that way anymore. Particularly if they are sitting on huge amounts of wealth - 25% of pensioners are millionaires. Most of my pensioner friends agree.

I do think it has hit pensioners who only earn a few thousand more than the basic pension though and indicated as much.

IwantToRetire · 19/03/2025 18:18

Just a response to various points.

Labour didn't "win". Starmer got fewer votes to become PM than Corbyn did each time he didn't win.

ie the Tories were such a shit show that traditional voters just didn turn out. (Just as Trump didn't "win", but nearly 8 million who had previously voted Democrate just didn't bother.)

I actually dont think the slant of the newspaper article is that good, as I think is trying to play even the middle class are suffering.

And I am not a Labour Party member, nor did I vote Labour, but would expect they would have a better idea about raising money needed from those who have more money to spare. But all they have done is go after those with the least.

It is despicable. And as for farcical comments like WFA was a waste of money is just the sort of tripe that the media misinformation machine pumps out about how boomers had it easy. eg everyone went to university for free. which is just bollocks as less the 20% went to university. And even if some rich pensioners didn't need the WFA it could have been deal with through taxes. The idea that anyone thinks because a few rich people might benefit therefore they should stop it in the cliff edge way is just the sort of reactionary lets squeese the little people so that the big fish can go on getting bigger.

And also given that there were long threads about this, and how it is biased in favour of letting the rich continue to opt out seems amazing anyone would come up with that dead duck explanation.

The issue is, why is this Government not making those who can afford to pay more tax, pay more tax. Why aren't they going after the multinational tax avoiders.

Its inexplicable.

But worse, shows that what politicians do know is that in the UK it seems you can get voters to believe it is their next door neighbour, or foreigner who are making their life harder, never that it is the decisions that politicans take.

And as someone who is happy to poke fun at young people, it is scandalous that they are cutting their benefit.

If there is a problem with too many people of whatever age being signed off for mental health issues, then look at those who are signing them off.

And I know I am repeating myself, but it is a stupid as saying there are too many people entering the country illegally (who it later turns out had a right to come here) when the problem is the UK seems unable or unwilling to do something as basic as having application centres in different countries.

Obvioulsy a big part of the problem is the type of people who go into politics, but also the media that turns everything into some silly pantomime or reality tv, and never deal with reality.

OP posts:
AllProperTeaIsTheft · 19/03/2025 17:48

I'm ashamed to say I voted for them. I dithered about spoiling my ballot paper, but in the end decided they might be the least worst option and hoped they'd prove to be better than I'd thought. I was wrong, unfortunately.

EasternStandard · 19/03/2025 17:47

ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 17:42

Yes, I have thanks.

The Winter Fuel Payment was a huge waste of money, paid to a lot of people who didn't need it. The poorest pensioners will still get it. Personally, I think the threshold for getting pensioners credit is too low, maybe it can be increased once the country is in a better state.

The benefits cuts are more of a mixed bag, some things I very much support, some that worry me more.Any party would be doing the same though.

Wiping out £9bn to claw back £6bn isn’t helping.

If they had avoided the former we’d likely not see the latter, not yet anyway.

That's down to anti growth policies.

ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 17:42

ElizaDolittle4321 · 19/03/2025 15:59

New benefit rules, heating subsidies, just for starters. You haven't been paying attention?

Yes, I have thanks.

The Winter Fuel Payment was a huge waste of money, paid to a lot of people who didn't need it. The poorest pensioners will still get it. Personally, I think the threshold for getting pensioners credit is too low, maybe it can be increased once the country is in a better state.

The benefits cuts are more of a mixed bag, some things I very much support, some that worry me more.Any party would be doing the same though.

ElizaDolittle4321 · 19/03/2025 15:59

ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 14:48

Sorry, which vital services have they cut?

And what have they done which is evil?

New benefit rules, heating subsidies, just for starters. You haven't been paying attention?

illinivich · 19/03/2025 15:26

SionnachRuadh · 19/03/2025 14:40

I'm not convinced that Starmer himself has a plan, or any guiding ideology. It's worth reading the new book Get In, by Patrick Maguire and Gabriel Pogrund, about his path to power. It's a weird book because you learn a lot about infighting and backstabbing within Labour, but at the end you're none the wiser as to what if anything Starmer actually believes. He seems to be a pure managerialist without any actual politics, and we just had that with Rishi.

Following on from that, the direction of the government will be determined by the people he has around him, and since Sue Gray was ousted, that overwhelmingly means disciples of the Dark Lord Blair.

So the best way of figuring out what the government is going to do is to look at the website of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, and assume that what the TBI is saying today will be government policy in six to nine months.

At the moment the TBI is pushing the idea that AI will unlock growth and make the NHS efficient. To which I say, big if true.

There are twitter accounts dedicated to reporting on tony blair speeches then timing when a government minister repeats his key points.

One of the lastest ones was wes streeting talking about self diagnosis of mental health issues.

I dont know if its because he refuses to leave, or that labour havent any good people, but blair seems to have a lot of sway from someone who isnt elected.

Lencten · 19/03/2025 15:05

At the moment the TBI is pushing the idea that AI will unlock growth and make the NHS efficient. To which I say, big if true.

I've seen Rory Stewart say same with no details.

I read about US hospital that did try it around treatment plans and found it exacerbate poor ethnic minoirty threatment and outcomes - it amplified an existing problem and left them open to lawsuits so they dropped it pretty fast.

I do think it could have a role in my family half battle is getting to and then getting past GP - to diagnostic tests or consultant waiting lists. Also witness some speclar inbuilt inefficiencies and shockingly poor commincation and data sharing as patient of NHS.

I've seen little in how they think it could be used - which make me wonder if it's just the latest buzz word and they have no idea what they are talking about.

TeenagersAngst · 19/03/2025 14:58

This government is totally incoherent. They want growth, so they tax businesses. Bonkers decision. They also want people off benefits into work, so they tax businesses which puts the brakes on business investment and employment opportunities. Another bonkers decision.

They want AI but they also want Net Zero. They can't have both, easily.

So what do they want? I wish I knew.

GLC789 · 19/03/2025 14:51

I didn't vote Labour, but I'm ever so gutted for all women...and the whole country tbh at the utter shait show that's happened so far.

Absolute joke of a party with a clown at the head of the table.

ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 14:48

ElizaDolittle4321 · 19/03/2025 14:30

Change is one thing, cutting vital services to the most vulnerable in the community is quite another. As I said, they out-toried the tories! Not even the tories were this bloody cruel and evil!

Sorry, which vital services have they cut?

And what have they done which is evil?

SionnachRuadh · 19/03/2025 14:40

I'm not convinced that Starmer himself has a plan, or any guiding ideology. It's worth reading the new book Get In, by Patrick Maguire and Gabriel Pogrund, about his path to power. It's a weird book because you learn a lot about infighting and backstabbing within Labour, but at the end you're none the wiser as to what if anything Starmer actually believes. He seems to be a pure managerialist without any actual politics, and we just had that with Rishi.

Following on from that, the direction of the government will be determined by the people he has around him, and since Sue Gray was ousted, that overwhelmingly means disciples of the Dark Lord Blair.

So the best way of figuring out what the government is going to do is to look at the website of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, and assume that what the TBI is saying today will be government policy in six to nine months.

At the moment the TBI is pushing the idea that AI will unlock growth and make the NHS efficient. To which I say, big if true.

ElizaDolittle4321 · 19/03/2025 14:30

ScholesPanda · 19/03/2025 12:15

I voted for Labour and whilst I have mixed views on their performance so far, I don't regret my decision.

Reading the article, it just sounds like any tax rise or cut to services is bad and a 'personal attack'. That doesn't seem sustainable to me, the country needed change.

Change is one thing, cutting vital services to the most vulnerable in the community is quite another. As I said, they out-toried the tories! Not even the tories were this bloody cruel and evil!

duc748 · 19/03/2025 14:08

Lencten · 19/03/2025 14:01

I suspect there is an element of no matter what party got into power they were going to have to do something about the vast welfare costs

I made that point on several poltical threads and posters didn't want to hear it.

We will be getting the unpopular stuff now far away from next election while they still have large majority that mainly votes with them.

I didn't vote for them despite the scolding on here - and I didn't vote Tory either. Nether looking great then or now TBH - so no idea what will happen next election.

That's about where I am. I wouldn't vote for Labour, but I wished them well in a difficult job, like PP. And something had to be done about the cost of PIP. But, as with the WFA, they are alienating their natural support. And I still don't trust them at all on gender.

Lencten · 19/03/2025 14:01

I suspect there is an element of no matter what party got into power they were going to have to do something about the vast welfare costs

I made that point on several poltical threads and posters didn't want to hear it.

We will be getting the unpopular stuff now far away from next election while they still have large majority that mainly votes with them.

I didn't vote for them despite the scolding on here - and I didn't vote Tory either. Nether looking great then or now TBH - so no idea what will happen next election.

AprilF00L · 19/03/2025 13:53

I think Labour truly despise women - they certainly are a women hating party.

lady69 · 19/03/2025 13:52

Lilifer · 19/03/2025 09:56

There is no "labour" or "conservative" nor has been for a long time. UK is governed by a Uniparty, two cheeks of the same arse, an illusion of choice at the polls every 5 years.

Exactly! Aka “the blob”.

moreorlessbutnotquite · 19/03/2025 13:46

Labour are keeping the red flag flying.

Just the wrong type of red flag 🚩

SionnachRuadh · 19/03/2025 13:28

Maybe things will look up, but at this point I think they've alienated everyone except for junior doctors and train drivers.

SionnachRuadh · 19/03/2025 13:26

I voted SDP, not because I agree with them on everything, but because they've got some good ideas and I wanted to encourage them.

As far as Labour goes, the really obvious thing is that they said very little about policy in their election campaign. It was all about competence and integrity. On integrity, let's just say Starmer banging on for years about standards in public office made a rod for his own government's back.

On competence, to listen to Reeves you'd have thought there were all these obvious buttons that could be pushed for economic growth, and the problem was that Jeremy Hunt was refusing to push them. I didn't believe that - there were serious problems that would be a challenge for any government.

I wasn't expecting much from Labour, but Jesus, I wasn't expecting them to make Rishi Sunak look like he was born under a lucky star.

Grammarnut · 19/03/2025 13:02

IwantToRetire · 19/03/2025 02:01

Every time I hear an announcement from Labour on the news I have a momentary doubt that maybe there was no election and the tories are still in power.

I accept financial problems need to be tackled, but why every time do they pick on those with the least money.

They are trying so hard not to be Corbyn that they seem quite unable to implement some sort of cut / tax hike to those with more money.

Or tackling all the international companies that use tax dodger to pay their fair share.

Apart from in the early days when they gave some of the more powerful unions pay increases everything is about making those at the bottom carry the load of the financial problems.

As well as, like the Tories implying that those getting aid or whatever are the problem implying somehow they are cheating the system.

When 9 times out of 10 (if not 10 out of 10) it is the system that is the problem.

Lets say they are right that too many people that dont really qualify are getting PiP (or whatever it is calle now) why are they then cutting the money people are getting instead of looking at the system that said they should get pip. (Although given the many stories about how bad the assessment process is I cant understand how any one can say too many people are getting it) So fix the system. Not punish those who didn't create and dont apply the system.

Just like the problem of asylum seekers. Those coming in boats are doing so because the UK under the Tories and still under Labour, has failed to set up application centres in different countries in Europe. ie there is no system to make applications so obviously people just try to get there. And as in fact the majority are then assessed as being genuine asylum seekers all they have done is saved money on setting up application centres, but paying out far more on temporary accommodation because what system there is in the UK is so slow, people who could be working and paying their way, just have to sit and wait.

And of course Labour and the tabloids dont mention that the real "migrant" problem is the number of people who come here to work based on accepted criteria because we dont have enough people with the right skills to fill the jobs on offer.

They could start a massive house building programme, which would create jobs and then provide much needed housing, instead of which they allow private companies to build houses that aren't the type that are needed, whilst spending zillions of £££s on temporary, over priced, shoddy private accommodation.

It is like they have been brain washed by the tories. Some how private companies will save the day.

They have been brain-washed by neo-liberal mantras such as 'private is more efficient' and 'less is more' etc. There are no longer any socialist parties in Western Europe, they all talk the same trickle-down, austerity mantras that have already shown they do not work.

anyolddinosaur · 19/03/2025 13:00

None of the main parties had any policies that seemed likely to promote growth. It's actually still early days to judge what Labour are trying to achieve - and in reality, not the fantasy world where some Labour voters live, they have little choice over cuts. Life was always going to get worse, whoever got in. Labour will suffer in any elections over the next couple of years.

All the parties knew there had to be cuts and they all lied because the British public do not vote for the truth.

I'm pleased they settled with doctors - for now - and that they are undoing the wasteful duplication with NHS England. They've stopped the waste of money on puberty blockers and Stonewall lost some of it's government funding. Making pensions passed on subject to inheritance tax is also encouraging people to spend or pass on money now, that's good for the economy. It was right to take the winter fuel allowance from the rich, although they took it from too many poor. They could have made it taxable and withdrawn completely from higher rate tax payers. Housebuilding plans, if achieved, will be another plus.

Reserving judgement on the benefit changes until I see how they are applied. I do know people who should be working and are not, or who choose to work less hours than they could. I also know people who can never work and should not be harassed over it. I suspect it will not deal with the former while harming the latter.

Swipe left for the next trending thread