Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

I was hounded out of publishing - I was persona non grata for publishing Material Girls

86 replies

IwantToRetire · 09/03/2025 01:42

In September, I will appear as the claimant at an employment tribunal, in which Hachette is the respondent. I resigned in April 2024 because I had found it impossible, for various reasons, to do my job.

Over the next few years, this kind of abuse became routine. I was called a terf, a transphobe, a bigot, a far-right conspiracist, a vicious bully, a racist; accused of having been radicalised online as though I were an 18-year-old incel, not a fiftysomething female book publisher; and told I was widely despised by my colleagues and everyone in the industry. These posts would copy in my employers and various staff networks at Hachette. They came from all sorts of people in and around publishing, some anonymous, some not, some who had themselves complained about being bullied online, and some with tens of thousands of followers. One of my most persistent critics was a self-styled publishing commentator who continued to be platformed by the industry at the London Book Fair and was appointed as a judge for the British Book Awards. She was in addition an enthusiastic advocate for a group of young people in publishing who set up a social media account, The Young Refuseniks, which they used to advertise their curation of a “blocklist” — crucially different from a blacklist, you see — which identified all the “transphobes” in the industry, so that people could be kept “safe” from us (because of course, I was on the list). After they realised that blacklists, sorry, blocklists, are considered somewhat problematic, the whole thing disappeared, but not before it had garnered a great deal of support from many in the business.

In May 2021, three days before the publication of Material Girls, the Bookseller published an “open letter” from a group of anonymous people in the industry who claimed that “transphobia” was rife in publishing. The three-page document was titled “The Paradox of Tolerance”: “If we are tolerant but ill-informed, tolerant with no limit and no moral compass, then the intolerant destroy inclusivity and persecute minorities. To maintain a tolerant society that moves with new understanding and broadens its language to include rather than exclude, we must be intolerant of prejudice.”

Start of a much longer article at https://thecritic.co.uk/how-i-was-hounded-out-of-publishing/

How I was hounded out of publishing | Ursula Doyle | The Critic Magazine

“I am going to dissect every word of this toxic TERF-y trash fire and call out the sheer irresponsible cruelty of platforming a notorious bigot with a release like this. @Docstockk is a [sic] infamous…

https://thecritic.co.uk/how-i-was-hounded-out-of-publishing/

OP posts:
HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 09/03/2025 09:58

mrshoho · 09/03/2025 07:17

All the very best to Ursula in her upcoming tribunal. I'm in awe of how she stood up and spoke out in what was/is such hostile times in the publishing industry. I can only imagine what a lonely voice she must have been. It is truly shocking how so many sectors were captured and turned upside down with ridiculous policy.

Yes, couldn’t agree more. It’s hard to imagine what Ursula has suffered in simply doing her job and voicing very reasonable concerns. In contrast her publishing “colleagues” sound like a pack of rabid witch hunters.

I wish her every success 🌻

fanOfBen · 09/03/2025 09:36

Gardened (again). Interesting to read that a lot of what's going on right now is bundle preparation, after hearing about how particular NC is about bundle preparation! (Now someone's going to ask where that was and I don't remember... an article aimed mostly at lawyers, I think, about the practicalities of preparing a good bundle? Google does find me this:

https://etclaims.co.uk/2008/09/sedleys-laws-of-documents/

with a comment by her!)

Sedley's Laws of Documents - Employment Tribunal Claims

First Law: Documents may be assembled in any order, provided it is not chronological, numerical or alphabetical. Second Law: Documents shall in no circumstances be paginated continuously. Third Law: No two copies of any bundle shall have the same pagin...

https://etclaims.co.uk/2008/09/sedleys-laws-of-documents

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2025 08:53

Also Hachette, in 2020:

Yesterday morning at publishing house Hachette, several of those involved in Miss Rowling’s new children’s book, The Ickabog, are said to have staged their own rebellion during a heated meeting. One source said: ‘Staff in the children’s department at Hachette announced they were no longer prepared to work on the book.

They said they were opposed to her comments and wanted to show support for the trans lobby. These staff are all very “woke”, mainly in their twenties and early thirties, and apparently it is an issue they feel very strongly about.’

Another insider said: ‘It was a handful of staff, and they are entitled to their views. If they were being asked to edit a book on domestic abuse, and they were a survivor of domestic abuse, of course they would never be forced to work on it. But this is a children’s fairy tale. It is not the end of the world. They will all be having chats with their managers.’

Hachette is the parent company of Virago Press, a London-based company who publish women's writing and feminist books. Notable published authors include Maya Angelou, Beatrix Campbell and Angela Carter.

The first two chapters of The Ickabog, which were released online in May, had five million views in its first 24 hours, with visitors from more than 50 countries visiting The Ickabog website, Miss Rowling's representatives have said.
Last night Hachette issued a statement backing Miss Rowling’s right to express herself. It said: ‘We are proud to publish JK Rowling’s children’s fairy tale The Ickabog. Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of publishing. We fundamentally believe that everyone has the right to express their own thoughts and beliefs. That’s why we never comment on our authors’ personal views and we respect our employees’ right to hold a different view.

We will never make our employees work on a book whose content they find upsetting for personal reasons, but we draw a distinction between that and refusing to work on a book because they disagree with an author’s views outside their writing, which runs contrary to our belief in free speech.’

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8424029/JK-Rowling-publishers-revolt-Workers-publishing-house-Hachette-threaten-tools.html

mrshoho · 09/03/2025 07:17

All the very best to Ursula in her upcoming tribunal. I'm in awe of how she stood up and spoke out in what was/is such hostile times in the publishing industry. I can only imagine what a lonely voice she must have been. It is truly shocking how so many sectors were captured and turned upside down with ridiculous policy.

CarrieOnComplaining · 09/03/2025 07:15

If only the publisher in question have even one page of policy about their role and responsibility in the maintenance of free expression?

Without which all publishers are simply a marketing machine for the given rulers.

I wonder if Hachette do have any mission or vision statement or policy on free speech etc?

ShockedandStunnedRepeatedly · 09/03/2025 06:58

I’m horrified at how far this has gone in society, and horrified at how many women have enabled it.

SardinesOnGingerbread · 09/03/2025 06:56

Thanks, off to look for my shovel.

Currentquandry · 09/03/2025 06:54

Thank you for this. Have planted a seed.

BingBongSong · 09/03/2025 06:50

Thanks for the reminder, I've donated again.

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 09/03/2025 06:31

Just shocking. Thanks for bringing this to wider attention. Very happy to plant a couple of seeds.

AFLifeForLife · 09/03/2025 06:15

Pleased to see NC is representing Ursula Doyle.

Gorgeous day out there. Perfect for gardening.

Swipe left for the next trending thread