Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

People with a cervix

342 replies

Globules · 28/02/2025 18:20

This has really annoyed me.

Official documentation from the NHS, aka the national medical professionals, should know that it's ONLY women who have a cervix.

What is this non sentence of all women and people with a cervix?

People with a cervix
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:35

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now

Absolutely this! It's a first world social contagion for attention, that's all it is. It's the current generation's Goth. Except being goth didn't mean society was re-ordered around them.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:34

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Edited

Same, I hate when these ridiculous posts are deleted. They should remain for all to see.

Mrsttcno1 · 28/02/2025 20:34

BobbyBiscuits · 28/02/2025 20:10

@WillIEverBeOk I want NHS info about screening to reach everyone who might need it. That language ensures it does. You know full well that TM do not think of themselves as women. I know you don't agree with it but that's the way they are.

Edited

See this doesn’t really make sense to me. The NHS info about screening does reach everyone it needs to, everybody received an invite to come in for their smear test.

Are you honestly telling me that you think if they don’t include those words a 25+ year old adult, born and registered female, will receive a letter from the NHS to their personal address, with their full name on, GP practice, NHS number, inviting them to book their appointment and they’ll think “ah that’s not for me”? Genuinely?

PriOn1 · 28/02/2025 20:33

Happyhettie · 28/02/2025 20:20

Even if you think that trans men is a mental health issue, is it not still important that they still get the medical care they may need by being able to access a cervical screening test?

I totally appreciate that people have very differing views on trans BUT surely stopping people dying from this fucking awful disease is more important?

I’ve seen someone die a slow and painful death having developed cervical cancer.
She did not have a screening test. If she had, they would have picked it up.
By the time it was diagnosed, the cancerous cells were in her lymph nodes and despite the absolute best efforts and amazing ness of the NHS she died. She wasn’t even 40. Her little children don’t have their mother.

I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

I really hope this gets moved back to AIBU - we NEED to talk about cervical cancer and the screenings.

I don’t want to stop anyone getting appropriate health care, but I don’t really believe validating people in their untrue beliefs actually helps anyone.

So while I’m glad that the NHS has listened to women, to the extent of reinstating the word women in these messages, I personally can’t wait until the current situation comes to an end.

People have been sold the lie that they can be the opposite sex.

They’ve also been sold the lie that that the whole of society must pretend to accept the untruth, and never mention it which is never going to happen.

As a treatment, it is an out and out failure if it leaves people feeling so fragile every time they are faced with reality. This is obviously a learned response. They have been taught that they are fragile and can’t cope as a tool to try to push the narrative that we must all pander to them.

Personally, I don’t believe transitioning helps anyone. Learning to accept reality, even if you don’t like it much is the only way to genuine peace of mind,

So although I’m happy to see the word woman has made a comeback, I will be truly grateful when it is recognised that there is no need to mention “transmen” or “people with a cervix” because those with a mental health problem about accepting their sex are expected to deal with reality again.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:33

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

Unfortunately that’s not a choice. We are either male or female and remain so until we die, despite what we think about ourselves, hence why ideology has no place in healthcare.

WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:33

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Edited

That poster is a truly nasty piece of work. Clearly hates females and is bigoted.

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

decorativecushions · 28/02/2025 20:33

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 19:53

Hahahahhaaaaa

I don't personally find it funny that mentally ill people are supported into believing their delusions are true, but you do you!

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:32

eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

She must know she's a woman though.

Well surely she must otherwise she wouldn't be called a Trans Man. You can only be that if you're not an actual man. So everyone saying she might not know she's a woman, I call bullshit 🤨

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Kategreenaway · 28/02/2025 20:32

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

She doesn't actually have a choice

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:32

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

Sorry ‘they choose’!!

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

She must know she's a woman though.

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

DingDongAlong · 28/02/2025 20:30

I don't have any problem with the wording because it includes the term 'women' which is the huge majority of the target audience and an appropriately accurate term to use.

It seems fine to then add in another more generic term like 'people with a cervix' as a catch all for females who identify differently and need to know that cervical screening is also for them. Maybe it also gives an impression that staff at the clinic are expecting to see females who might present differently, which could also encourage participation without judgement.

At the end of the day, cervical screening is all about the early detection of cancer and ultimately saving lives, whether the person identifies as female or not.

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 20:28

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:24

Are you ok?

I'm good honey, are you 😂 ❤️

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:28

NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2025 20:27

YANBU.

No religious/ideological language should be part of healthcare delivery.

This for the inclusive people at the back.

eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 19:32

It’s probably aimed at people who don’t identify as a woman but have a cervix. So the they/them folk. I work with someone who is genetically female but is non binary so wouldn’t identify as a woman but has a cervix.

She must know she's a woman though.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

  1. Being gender critical isn't the same as racism. The reasons for sex segregation are biological, namely who can make whom pregnant.
  2. There are circumstances in which race is relevant in medicine. Sickle cell anaemia prevalence in Black people is one. Ignoring race when deciding who to screen for those conditions is as harmful as ignoring sex when deciding who to screen for cervical abnormalities.
  3. Being gender critical has been found to be worthy of respect in a democratic society. Racism hasn't.
NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2025 20:27

YANBU.

No religious/ideological language should be part of healthcare delivery.

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:26

Catza · 28/02/2025 19:53

How do you know? Do you even know how these guidances, advertisement and polices are written? First, there is statistical data which, I presume, shows that people are routinely missing screening appointments for a variety of reasons. Then, there is a patient panel who has input on how the screening campaign is worded. With any luck, this panel includes a representative sample. There was more than likely an LGBTQ+ person/people in the room making these decisions about what terms would make this information more accessible, inclusive and improve access to screening programme. Enter you with no lived experience and no statistical data claiming that "they know" or rather you know better what "these people with a mental illness" know and need. Don't you think this is a little...hmm..dehumanising?

That's not how this happens.

For a start there is no 'clean' data for NHS bodies to check who is missing screenings and why. Mens are recorded as women, and vice versa, gender is recorded instead of sex, people are allowed to change their health records to reflect their wishes instead of biological fact. So statistical data which would answer that question doesn't exist, because the trans lobby have been so successful at getting NHS bodies to obscure fact in favour orfideology.

Secondly, the wording might have been approved but it won't have been by a representative panel. If it's anything like my employer (large NHS teaching hospital) it'll have been approved by the LGBTQIA+ group, and no one else will have been asked. There isn't a women's group so you couldn't ask them even if you wanted to. There will possibly have been checks to make sure it confirms to Stonewall's approved wording for their 'diversity' scheme which is very non diverse indeed, and not at all inclusive to women, people with English as an additional language, low literacy, or learning difficulties.

The people with 'lived experience ' of cervical smears are women. Every single person who's had one is female. So the (presumably) female people posting on this thread are the people with lived experience. And a lot are saying they don't want this.

Kategreenaway · 28/02/2025 20:25

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 19:32

It’s probably aimed at people who don’t identify as a woman but have a cervix. So the they/them folk. I work with someone who is genetically female but is non binary so wouldn’t identify as a woman but has a cervix.

Please, someone make this shit stop

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:24

BobbyBiscuits · 28/02/2025 20:01

Would it seem more or less offensive if they said 'women and trans men'?
Because they should be included in it. Obviously they are a tiny percentage, but there's a chance a transman might be so caught up in believing they are male, that they wouldn't acknowledge a leaflet or instruction that only referred to 'women'.
The part that's aimed at me is completely reasonable. The other part is aimed at transmen so it's up to them to decide if that terminology is suitable or patronising or whatever.

I'm wondering how they would word a penile or prostate cancer awareness thing to include transwomen? Maybe they do say something similar/equivalent?

Edited

Nope, it just says MEN. Funny that isn't it🤨

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Are you ok?

AnSolas · 28/02/2025 20:23

Oldermum84 · 28/02/2025 19:36

I have no idea why people get annoyed by things like this. It's inclusive language. It's a good thing. And it's not just about included trans men it includes those who identify as non binary etc.

Because women had to fight to get the word woman used as the NHS and other biology related organisation removed the word woman

In the USA the term "Black birthing bodies" was used in medical papers about how doctors needed to see the birthing body as a whole human and not the a birthing bodys birthing process as seeing the whole human reduced the death rates of the birthing body during or as a result of the birthing process.

Black women died in labour at higher rates partly due to doctors attitudes to ignoring the woman at the center of the process.

In the UK the ideology will roll into law so that the law will be for the female body function so people who breed / bleed / have a cervical cancer risk.

Shmee1988 · 28/02/2025 20:22

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:01

I don't see how. The post says "women and people with a cervix". If something says "this tasty snack is safe for women and hamsters", I am unlikely to be offended by the sheer fact that hamsters were mentioned.
And since we advocate that transgender men are "actual women" then it would make more sense to hear directly from them if they find it offensive. That's all I am saying.

Again, I dont think she's actually bothered if the trans men find it offensive. The person who said its offensive is simply saying she finds it offensive to women, as a group. Whilst I understand the analogy of 'the hamster snack', it's not exactly the same thing.