Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

People with a cervix

342 replies

Globules · 28/02/2025 18:20

This has really annoyed me.

Official documentation from the NHS, aka the national medical professionals, should know that it's ONLY women who have a cervix.

What is this non sentence of all women and people with a cervix?

People with a cervix
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:57

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:55

It a family with no sons choosing a daughter to be a 'male' so she can escort her sisters, go to school, sometimes it's believed it'll encourage future babies to be born male. It's only pre puberty, adult women aren't able to identify our of their sex in Afghanistan, and it's not the girl who chooses it it's the parents.

So really that poster who mentioned "bacha posh" had no idea what they were talking about. A woman still can't identify out of being a woman in Afghanistan, and never could.

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:56

AnSolas · 28/02/2025 20:53

What is that?
Is it a man seen as a female or a woman been seen as a male?
And what rights and obligations attach?

It's a practice of disguising a female child as a son which affords them the freedom to play outside without chaperone, attend school etc. In most cases it ends with puberty but not always. There is an ethnographic researcher who wrote a beautiful book about the practice which included extensive records of women living as "uncles". Unfortunately, I can't quite recall the name of the book or the author right now.

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:55

AnSolas · 28/02/2025 20:53

What is that?
Is it a man seen as a female or a woman been seen as a male?
And what rights and obligations attach?

It a family with no sons choosing a daughter to be a 'male' so she can escort her sisters, go to school, sometimes it's believed it'll encourage future babies to be born male. It's only pre puberty, adult women aren't able to identify our of their sex in Afghanistan, and it's not the girl who chooses it it's the parents.

WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:54

These misogynist male trolls all call women the c word. They can't help but out themselves as the violent, hateful misogynist bigots they are. They're such a cliche.

AnSolas · 28/02/2025 20:53

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:40

There is actually a pretty established practice of "bacha posh" in Afghanistan.

What is that?
Is it a man seen as a female or a woman been seen as a male?
And what rights and obligations attach?

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:52

@MugsyBalonz why is it that on mens health stuff it says trans women but on women's health stuff it doesn't say trans men? Because trans men are women and even identifying as a man they're still seen as second class citizens so can just be reduced to sexual organs

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:52

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/02/2025 20:47

Of course - Afghanistan 🙄 That well known country renowned for women's rights and celebrated by every single clueless transactivist .

Funny how you didn't feel the need to comment on the original poster's mention of Afghanistan... Hmmm...

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:52

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:40

There is actually a pretty established practice of "bacha posh" in Afghanistan.

Which ends when the girl reached puberty/ marriageable age. No women in Afghanistan are escaping their biology.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Doing the heavy lifting for us. Should I put in a laughing emoji? Yes I will - 😂

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:49

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 20:45

Sorry @AccidentallyWesAnderson should have quoted selffellatingour.. or whatever your name is

Have a lie down.

AnSolas · 28/02/2025 20:48

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

Is the fad of pretend that biology is not real going to go away?
Will female bodies be grouped together for medical and relevant social intertactions and will male bodies be excluded?

Will women stop being accused of transphobia for pointing out biology is real?

Or will they be "rightly condemned" for that?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/02/2025 20:47

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:40

There is actually a pretty established practice of "bacha posh" in Afghanistan.

Of course - Afghanistan 🙄 That well known country renowned for women's rights and celebrated by every single clueless transactivist .

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 20:45

Sorry @AccidentallyWesAnderson should have quoted selffellatingour.. or whatever your name is

WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:45

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

Oh please!! Gay people didn't have words and definitions re-changed, society completely re-ordered around them, and weren't encouraged to sterilise themselves or chop body parts off them. This "it's Gay 2.0" has got to stop! Gay people never had anywhere NEAR the sheer overwhelming power that trans have.

That are not remotely comparable in any stratosphere!

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 20:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:42

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

This tired trope. Being same sex attracted didn’t have a negative effect on anyone else. People (mainly men) declaring themselves as the opposite sex has shown to have a detrimental effect, for a myriad of reasons.
It shouldn’t be difficult to understand but apparently it is.

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:42

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:36

We have just been reviewing access to our service by people from different ethnic communities and this is exactly how the whole process was structured - service statistics, statistics from the community, identifying underrepresented communities and inviting a patient panel to help us redesign our campaigns. A similar process was involved when I was a disability champion in another trust and we had people with disabilities involved in a hospital build project by including them in planning meetings with architects. Maybe there is a disparity among different hospitals but this is the experience I've had with similar projects.

Yes because no one has tried to obscure reality in data about ethnicity or disability have they? But there has been a concerted campaign to obscure data about sex, and to replace sex with gender. Such that there is no data which can be relied upon to structure or plan services.

And when there is a tension between people who want sex acknowledged and those who want gender identity to be used, it's only the people who want gender who are consulted. Look at the Fife employment tribunal - one transwoman wanted to use the women's changing room so he was allowed to and women weren't consulted and the woman who spoke up about it was suspended and accused of harassment. It's not the same.

MugsyBalonz · 28/02/2025 20:42

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:01

Yet the NHS doesn't say "men and people with a prostate", it just says "men".

Men are not required to pretend to be a subset of their one sex class. This isn't about inclusiveness, it's about subjugating women.

Yet the NHS does say men and trans women, it's right there on their website.

Here is a screenshot of it where it says "the prostate is a small gland found only in men and trans women.

People with a cervix
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 28/02/2025 20:41

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

What's interesting about your contributions to this thread, and those from others on the same lines, is how old-fashioned they seem now. The tide has turned, and within a few years people are going to be looking back at this strange phase and marvel at the collective insanity of it.

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:40

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

There is actually a pretty established practice of "bacha posh" in Afghanistan.

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:40

@BobbyBiscuits as someone said upthread, they would never dream of reducing men to their sexual organs but we're only women so hey ho who gives a shit 🤷

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2025 20:27

YANBU.

No religious/ideological language should be part of healthcare delivery.

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 28/02/2025 20:38

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 19:32

It’s probably aimed at people who don’t identify as a woman but have a cervix. So the they/them folk. I work with someone who is genetically female but is non binary so wouldn’t identify as a woman but has a cervix.

Correction: you work with someone who is genetically female and has adopted the very recently coined label 'non-binary'. She may not identify as being female but it's not something you can identify out of. She will remain female to the end of her days and she will always need healthcare from people who know how the patient's sex affects the way their body works.

BobbyBiscuits · 28/02/2025 20:37

@Devilsmommy In everything 'male body cancer' related from the NHS?! That is a bit offski.
Maybe it's quite telling. In that TM have more legitimacy than TW because it's an open secret that TW are just doing it for a sexual thrill and don't even think they're in the wrong body?!
Or I guess if it's for a penis, it's visible. Some women and lots of men don't even know what a cervix is?!
Gawd, I don't know now...

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:36

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:26

That's not how this happens.

For a start there is no 'clean' data for NHS bodies to check who is missing screenings and why. Mens are recorded as women, and vice versa, gender is recorded instead of sex, people are allowed to change their health records to reflect their wishes instead of biological fact. So statistical data which would answer that question doesn't exist, because the trans lobby have been so successful at getting NHS bodies to obscure fact in favour orfideology.

Secondly, the wording might have been approved but it won't have been by a representative panel. If it's anything like my employer (large NHS teaching hospital) it'll have been approved by the LGBTQIA+ group, and no one else will have been asked. There isn't a women's group so you couldn't ask them even if you wanted to. There will possibly have been checks to make sure it confirms to Stonewall's approved wording for their 'diversity' scheme which is very non diverse indeed, and not at all inclusive to women, people with English as an additional language, low literacy, or learning difficulties.

The people with 'lived experience ' of cervical smears are women. Every single person who's had one is female. So the (presumably) female people posting on this thread are the people with lived experience. And a lot are saying they don't want this.

We have just been reviewing access to our service by people from different ethnic communities and this is exactly how the whole process was structured - service statistics, statistics from the community, identifying underrepresented communities and inviting a patient panel to help us redesign our campaigns. A similar process was involved when I was a disability champion in another trust and we had people with disabilities involved in a hospital build project by including them in planning meetings with architects. Maybe there is a disparity among different hospitals but this is the experience I've had with similar projects.

Swipe left for the next trending thread