Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Knickers to knackers

35 replies

FlirtsWithRhinos · 15/02/2025 15:21

I propose from this day forth, we retire the phrase "put on my big girl pants" in favour of "put on my no-nonsense nurse's knickers".

All those in favour say "aye!"

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
MRD16901872 · 22/03/2025 07:53

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

OverpricedCupcake · 17/02/2025 00:05

They always call them, "panties", too.
I don't know any woman who calls their underwear that, it's a creepy man name for them.
Bleeuurgh.
I always feel like I want to dip my head in bleach after talking about disgusting Dr Upton.

XXylophonic · 16/02/2025 15:52

TWETMIRF · 15/02/2025 17:29

I'm just grateful that he said pants and not panties. He's just the sort of creepy man that would use the term

I was thinking the same. The T on Reddit are always talking about panties 🤮🤢. I never hear real women using that word
Only creepy pervs and TW

MTCoffeePot · 16/02/2025 08:53

Wasn't Donald Trump told to 'put on his big boy pants' when he lost to Biden? Anyway, no women would say 'big girl pants' and it's a totally inappropriate term to be used in a courtroom.

CuriousAlien · 16/02/2025 08:49

DeanElderberry · 16/02/2025 07:47

afaik the phrase was originally American, 'put on your big boy pants' referred to pants in the American or Irish sense, so trousers not underwear, and was a colourful way of saying 'grow up'.

I think I'll stick with 'grow up', don't want to use any kind of undergarment language around these people.

Thanks. That makes it weirder that women would use it since there's no such female transition from shorts to trousers. (Though obviously phrases can evolve and the original meaning is lost and I've definitely heard people use it with toilet training as well.)

It also implies then that the person is maturing into an adult (man or woman) and is a kind of rite of passage. It only makes sense to me if said by a person who has already passed through the rite themselves.

Now I'm wondering, do some people think that membership of the group "women" can be conferred if someone does enough work to become a woman? (This is why a man might use the phrase big girls pants as if to say, that's it, I've done the work) Or very special people can be allowed to join the club? (Which is the model we used to have, thanks to psychiatrists deciding for us.)

And other people think they can just declare into this group. Seemingly at will. With magic words.

The problem I have with this is that if I don't perform "woman" and if I don't declare myself "woman" then I wouldn't be a woman. And since I don't perform "man" or declare myself "man" I'm not that either.

I wonder what I am? Why don't I have the special sparkly magics?

DeanElderberry · 16/02/2025 07:47

afaik the phrase was originally American, 'put on your big boy pants' referred to pants in the American or Irish sense, so trousers not underwear, and was a colourful way of saying 'grow up'.

I think I'll stick with 'grow up', don't want to use any kind of undergarment language around these people.

Helleofabore · 16/02/2025 07:28

ArabellaScott · 16/02/2025 07:11

He's 28. He's a qualified doctor. He's a man.

He is not and never was a girl. It was one of several instances where he carefully and deliberately appropriated women's things.

Another offensive appropriation was where he hypothesised about homophobes objecting to his marriage.

He's a straight, white, middle-class man.

The NHS has enabled this man to mock women. Edit - enabled, supported and encouraged.

Edited

This is a male person who feels he has the right to appropriate anything as long as it is ‘sincerely’ felt.

And by declaring womanhood, it has to be logical that homosexuality follows.

ArabellaScott · 16/02/2025 07:11

He's 28. He's a qualified doctor. He's a man.

He is not and never was a girl. It was one of several instances where he carefully and deliberately appropriated women's things.

Another offensive appropriation was where he hypothesised about homophobes objecting to his marriage.

He's a straight, white, middle-class man.

The NHS has enabled this man to mock women. Edit - enabled, supported and encouraged.

Datun · 16/02/2025 07:03

He'd been working on what to say. He must've known he'd be asked.

Why, if he was really was almost collapsing with upset and distress at seeing Sandie in the CR, and had to be helped to his car crying his eyes out, he'd go right back in there three days later?

He's not to know how unlikely it is that any woman would say that.

In a public situation.

In front of an audience.

To describe her 'bravery' in stripping off. In the wrong changing room.

It's a testament to quite how inappropriate it is that journalists are seizing on it with such glee,

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 15/02/2025 22:29

CuriousAlien · 15/02/2025 21:29

That is a really interesting phrase. It's not one I'd use. Doesn't it mean move on from nappies and start wearing pants? I know some women use it together or about themselves in a way that's useful for them but I can't help finding it odd. It's sort of like "grow a pair" or "man up" but really more like "take off the stabilisers". Something used for support is taken away and the person has to face up to reality. And take care of their own shit unaided...
I don't know what I'd replace it with. I just sort of say to myself "come on, it's time you stopped pissing about and took responsibility" which err doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.

Grow up?
Roll up your sleeves and get stuck in?
Step up to the plate?
Face the music?

Maybe no-nonsense nurse knickers is the way to go.

Crack on.

Unfortunately in context it definitely didn't mean face up to reality or take responsibility.

OverpricedCupcake · 15/02/2025 21:48

That phrase when he said it made me feel nauseous, imagining him in women's underwear.
Bleeeeeuuuurgh.

myplace · 15/02/2025 21:48

Gird your loins would have been the original phrase.
I’m going with nurses’ knickers because big girls’ pants now has been tainted by that simpering eejit

NotbloodyGivingupYet · 15/02/2025 21:44

No nonsense nurse knickers, eh!
I like it. What I've had rattling round my brain is -

It's time to be more Sandie.

CuriousAlien · 15/02/2025 21:31

But maybe there's something motherly about it. If I say it to myself with kindness.

Come on, it's time...

Not misogynistically or infantilising or appropriating.

CuriousAlien · 15/02/2025 21:29

That is a really interesting phrase. It's not one I'd use. Doesn't it mean move on from nappies and start wearing pants? I know some women use it together or about themselves in a way that's useful for them but I can't help finding it odd. It's sort of like "grow a pair" or "man up" but really more like "take off the stabilisers". Something used for support is taken away and the person has to face up to reality. And take care of their own shit unaided...
I don't know what I'd replace it with. I just sort of say to myself "come on, it's time you stopped pissing about and took responsibility" which err doesn't exactly roll off the tongue.

Grow up?
Roll up your sleeves and get stuck in?
Step up to the plate?
Face the music?

Maybe no-nonsense nurse knickers is the way to go.

Crack on.

ArabellaScott · 15/02/2025 21:24

FlirtsWithRhinos · 15/02/2025 19:14

I was about to say that I'm not sure Upton even understands how it feels to be offended. I get the distinct impression his experience of "transphobia" is framed by the positive feeling of having power over others and the negative feeling of anger when his power is not respected by those he sees as less powerful and therefore expects to capitulate to him.

And then I thought that's probably true of - apologies for slipping into Omnicausese here but it is relevant - Default White Men in general.

They may be "offended" when they are not treated with the respect they feel is their due, but they do not experience the crushing feeling of helplessness and disempowerment that women feel when faced with sexism (and I assume Black people faced with racism, and in previous years but maybe less so now, gay men faced with homophobia) when you are faced with someone who has the social power to define your reality for you and despite knowing they are wrong in their statement/belief/action there is nothing you can do to change what is happening because anything you do/say in oppposition is de facto delegitimised by the very fact it is you doing/saying it.

All that is wrapped up into what women mean when they say "this is offensive" and I really don't think men understand that. They think we mean what they would mean, which is more like "that's a personal insult that shows lack of respect"

Bingo.

toomanytrees · 15/02/2025 21:22

I don't think we should cede anything more, even phrases like "big girl pants". The more we cede, the more they colonize. There is nothing they won't coopt. They've invaded our spaces, mimicked our body parts, stolen our names. We're the ones losing our "existence", not them.

AlexandraLeaving · 15/02/2025 20:29

No-nonsense nurse knickers as opposed to delusional doctor drawers?

FlirtsWithRhinos · 15/02/2025 19:14

MrsOvertonsWindow · 15/02/2025 17:18

Fascinating discussion. I don't think Upton realises just how offensive the majority of the population found his comments and attitudes to women - let alone his claim that he's really a biological woman 😂
Having read countless press articles and the horrified comments from readers everywhere, he's done a massive service in highlighting the nature of demands transactivists make of women and girls: Full compliance, demure behaviour, instructions must be complied with and no boundaries are acceptable.
Doesn't take people long to realise that the NHS is essentially decriminalising flashing / indecent exposure and voyeurism.

I was about to say that I'm not sure Upton even understands how it feels to be offended. I get the distinct impression his experience of "transphobia" is framed by the positive feeling of having power over others and the negative feeling of anger when his power is not respected by those he sees as less powerful and therefore expects to capitulate to him.

And then I thought that's probably true of - apologies for slipping into Omnicausese here but it is relevant - Default White Men in general.

They may be "offended" when they are not treated with the respect they feel is their due, but they do not experience the crushing feeling of helplessness and disempowerment that women feel when faced with sexism (and I assume Black people faced with racism, and in previous years but maybe less so now, gay men faced with homophobia) when you are faced with someone who has the social power to define your reality for you and despite knowing they are wrong in their statement/belief/action there is nothing you can do to change what is happening because anything you do/say in oppposition is de facto delegitimised by the very fact it is you doing/saying it.

All that is wrapped up into what women mean when they say "this is offensive" and I really don't think men understand that. They think we mean what they would mean, which is more like "that's a personal insult that shows lack of respect"

OP posts:
HoldTheLine · 15/02/2025 18:47

I wonder how his mum felt about him using that expression, I hope she was listening in remotely as it was worse actually hearing it in use than reading it on paper. One of the few times I’ve been startled enough to gasp aloud.
I was in disbelief he was so arrogant enough to think it was acceptable and cocky enough to think he could get away it with. Pure trip to Malaga in plain sight and that was probably the thrill for him.

TWETMIRF · 15/02/2025 17:29

I'm just grateful that he said pants and not panties. He's just the sort of creepy man that would use the term

MrsOvertonsWindow · 15/02/2025 17:18

Fascinating discussion. I don't think Upton realises just how offensive the majority of the population found his comments and attitudes to women - let alone his claim that he's really a biological woman 😂
Having read countless press articles and the horrified comments from readers everywhere, he's done a massive service in highlighting the nature of demands transactivists make of women and girls: Full compliance, demure behaviour, instructions must be complied with and no boundaries are acceptable.
Doesn't take people long to realise that the NHS is essentially decriminalising flashing / indecent exposure and voyeurism.

WandaSiri · 15/02/2025 16:15

thirdfiddle · 15/02/2025 15:43

Personally, as an adult professional, I could not imagine making any unnecessary reference to underwear in a court of law. Particularly in a case where the unnecessary airing of underwear is a key component.

Deliberate needling of the claimant, or a trip to Malaga?

Deliberate needling of the claimant, or a trip to Malaga?

A twofer, methinks...

Hermyknee · 15/02/2025 15:59

He was trying to a be clever dick but the joke was on him. No woman would use that phrase in a court. He was keen to (over) associate himself with women’s underwear.
He isn't clever enough to realise that however in control and however powerful he thinks he is, when you say things like that they will get picked up on and judged on the accepted norms. People know he’s trying to incite and do it on purpose as he’s been calculated with his words so it just makes him look arrogant and male.

ArabellaScott · 15/02/2025 15:59

Context matters.

It's interesting how the phrase hits differently when used by a grown woman, and when used by a man, especially in a formal setting like that of a tribunal.

Swipe left for the next trending thread