Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Stonewall change definition of transphobia - questioning gender identity ok now

262 replies

fromorbit · 02/02/2025 18:23

Huge climb down. Looks like those pesky terf women were right all along AGAIN.

Saying that trans women are men is no longer "transphobic" according to Stonewall.

Dennis give good analysis and provides text:
1/ The gender borg have every right to be furious with @stonewalluk for sneakily ditching their belief in gender identity in their new definition of transphobia. Political transvestitism holds that men in dresses have soul-like female gender identities - Stonewall now denies this
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1885735444836388921.html

The reverse weasel move is an attempt to find a safe place to claim lost ground, but opens them up to attack from TA fanatics as well as looking more absurd to normal people. They staked everything on hating women and gay people and now want to retreat when it is unpopular.

Thread by @Jebadoo2 on Thread Reader App

@Jebadoo2: 1/ The gender borg have every right to be furious with @stonewalluk for sneakily ditching their belief in gender identity in their new definition of transphobia. Political transvestitism holds that men in...…

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1885735444836388921.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
JanesLittleGirl · 03/02/2025 20:51

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 20:46

"“I may be cupioromantic, which means desiring a romantic relationship even though you don’t feel romantic attraction."

I misread that as 'cuprioromantic' and thought it was something to do with copper - most confused.

But no, it's 'cupio' related to 'cupere', to desire (hence 'cupidity' and of course 'Cupid').

Still think attracted to copper sounds interesting. After all, in legends dragons and dwarfs are very much attracted to gold.

Edited

You may be onto something here. Copper is in the same column as gold and silver in the periodic table.

Nothardtounderstand · 03/02/2025 20:51

I still found asexual on the list of terms just now.
I looked as I am the mother of an asexual daughter who is in her 20s and has known that she did not experience sexual attraction since her teens.

Do any of you making dismissive comments and jokes about asexuality actually know any asexual people or are you just making assumptions to fit with your views and have a go at Stonewall? I am going to guess the latter.

(I am a fairly regular poster on MN including occasionally on FWR, but I have posted about my DC in other contexts, so I am not using my regular name).

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 20:46

"“I may be cupioromantic, which means desiring a romantic relationship even though you don’t feel romantic attraction."

I misread that as 'cuprioromantic' and thought it was something to do with copper - most confused.

But no, it's 'cupio' related to 'cupere', to desire (hence 'cupidity' and of course 'Cupid').

Still think attracted to copper sounds interesting. After all, in legends dragons and dwarfs are very much attracted to gold.

MarieDeGournay · 03/02/2025 20:37

Wemaybebetterstrangers · 03/02/2025 20:31

"“I may be cupioromantic, which means desiring a romantic relationship even though you don’t feel romantic attraction."

I'm going to stop quoting stuff now. It's like shooting fish in a barrel🙄
(That's just a figure of speech, BTW in case there are any ichthyoromantics reading this..)

MarieDeGournay · 03/02/2025 20:21

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 16:44

There is an aromantic pride flag, as below.

So a romantic (pride) flag would be... Stripes in the opposite colours on the colour wheel? Anyone want a go?

I googled this flag [I know, I know, that's 3.5 minutes of my life I'll never get back!] and found out that it was designed in 2014 by somebody called Cameron Whimsy.

'The main color, green, was chosen as it is the opposite of red, which is most commonly associated with romantic love. The two shades of green represent the aromantic spectrum, white represents platonic love and friendship, and grey and black represent the different parts of the sexuality spectrum.'
Aromantic flag - Wikipedia

That doesn't make a lot of sense: 'two shades of green represent the aromantic spectrum' means what? But don't panic, Whimsy explains it further:

Whimsy described the meaning of the stripes in further detail:
green-light green - the aro-spectrum (and aromanticism itself represented by green because green belongs to us now hell yeah). this covers every identity under the aro umbrella - demi, grey, lith/akoi, wtf/quoiro, cupio etc. EVERYTHING. even ones that don’t have names yet.

white - basically the ‘platonic’ stripe - friendship/platonic and aesthetic attraction/queerplatonic relationships/family, the importance and validity of all non-romantic relationships and feelings and non-romantic forms of love etc. etc. etc. etc.

black-grey - the sexuality spectrum - acknowledging aro-aces, aromantic allosexuals, and everything in between because we are a diverse lot.[4]

So 'green belongs to us now hell yeah' ?- try saying that out loud in Dublin on March 17th😉

myplace · 03/02/2025 20:16

Heggettypeg · 03/02/2025 20:04

Yes, it seems as though the expected default is (to put it in old-fashioned terms) Lust without Love, and that feeling something for your sexual partner as a person is an optional extra that has to be spelled out rather than assumed. A very transactional view of sexual relations.

Quite a male outlook that, traditionally I think.

MarieDeGournay · 03/02/2025 20:11

myplace · 03/02/2025 18:12

So, if I like to date women- wine, dine, share a film and a box of chocolates- but shag men, what am I?

Come on, what flag do I get?

A red flag from me, myplace - after all that romancing, you go off and shag some bloke??🙄
😉

Heggettypeg · 03/02/2025 20:04

JellySaurus · 03/02/2025 16:52

Did you know some people who call themselves asexual do have and enjoy sex, but only with people they’re attracted to or have a connection with?

That's actually quite sad. And uncomfortable. Implies that the society around them expects them to have sex with whoever, regardless of how they feel about it. They seem to believe that"No. I'm not interested" is not enough, but that they have to excuse themselves with a label. Where does it come from? Why should people be expected to be sexually available?

Yes, it seems as though the expected default is (to put it in old-fashioned terms) Lust without Love, and that feeling something for your sexual partner as a person is an optional extra that has to be spelled out rather than assumed. A very transactional view of sexual relations.

debauchedsloth · 03/02/2025 19:53

I don't know wtf they're saying now. But it will be more mindfuckery nonsense which supports men encroaching on women's spaces and rights. I doubt very much they're listening to people outside their fanbase.

lcakethereforeIam · 03/02/2025 19:38

If there is it should be edged with lace.

zanahoria · 03/02/2025 19:24

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 16:44

There is an aromantic pride flag, as below.

So a romantic (pride) flag would be... Stripes in the opposite colours on the colour wheel? Anyone want a go?

Is there a New Romantic flag for fans of Duran Duran, Spandau Ballet and other 80s groups?

TWETMIRF · 03/02/2025 18:36

I am a big fan of the Roman Republic. The Empire was also good but prefer the Republic. Does that make me a Romansexual or Romangender? Pronouns SP/QR

lcakethereforeIam · 03/02/2025 18:32

Is Romantic Attraction the new all road lead to Rome? 🇮🇹

Wittow · 03/02/2025 18:14

Stonewall have a new chief executive, Simon Blake, who is very media savvy and well connected. (I have worked for same organisation as him in the past.)

I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up in politics.

myplace · 03/02/2025 18:13

God, I’ve been doing it all wrong. No wonder life has been dissatisfying.

I’ve been trying to combine romance and sex because I didn’t realise there was a flag for me…

myplace · 03/02/2025 18:12

So, if I like to date women- wine, dine, share a film and a box of chocolates- but shag men, what am I?

Come on, what flag do I get?

BonfireLady · 03/02/2025 18:11

Romance! you left out romance, BonfireLady!

I did... it was hurting my head too much so I ignored it 😂 but.....

So... there are really close platonic friendships, and there are sexless marriages, and those things have existed forever without adding up to a sexual orientation. Would it be very cynical of me to think Stonewall are trying to sneakily inflate the number of people falling under the rainbow umbrella?

Boom. This has to be it ⬆️⬆️

It's like non-binary all over again, in that we can all see a little bit of ourselves in what's described, ergo it must be all be true and only those that are bigoted and stuck in their dinosaur ways can't see it.

It still means that the "we need to educate ourselves" fits neatly in place because at a casual glance, it feels like knowledge that's just out of reach but accessible if you open your mind. This is basic Thetan level one stuff, if you will (the analogy being that to progress further you need to clear out the blocks in your mind to unlock the true you), accessible to all who currently do believe or who want to believe that we have a gendered soul. Obviously people are welcome to believe it - I just don't happen to do so, and I certainly don't want it in law, education, healthcare etc.

TwistedWonder · 03/02/2025 18:01

Well according to the SW definition I’m considered Demi sexual and come under the ACE spectrum which makes me part of the rainbow alphabet brigade rather than what I’d always considered myself a straight women who wasn’t into casual sex - who knew I’ve been one of the special ones all along?

Do I get an awareness week?

SionnachRuadh · 03/02/2025 17:40

I'm starting to have some sympathy for the old conservatives who used to complain about LGB activists taking historical or literary examples of people with close platonic same-sex friendships and reinterpreting them all as homosexual relationships. Which was sometimes and maybe often true, but kind of implied that people can't be close friends without wanting to shag each other.

Stonewall's 'romantic attraction' seems to be a similar thing. If I try to parse how this might apply in real life, it would probably be something like 'I don't actually want to go to bed with Liz, but I'd quite like to have a girlfriend type relationship with her'. So deriving from the ace stuff even if they aren't foregrounding that any more.

So... there are really close platonic friendships, and there are sexless marriages, and those things have existed forever without adding up to a sexual orientation. Would it be very cynical of me to think Stonewall are trying to sneakily inflate the number of people falling under the rainbow umbrella?

TwistedWonder · 03/02/2025 17:09

So are lesbians not wanting ‘girl dick’ no longer akin to racists now?

Hard to keep up with the rapid backtracking and descent back into common sense.

JellySaurus · 03/02/2025 16:52

Did you know some people who call themselves asexual do have and enjoy sex, but only with people they’re attracted to or have a connection with?

That's actually quite sad. And uncomfortable. Implies that the society around them expects them to have sex with whoever, regardless of how they feel about it. They seem to believe that"No. I'm not interested" is not enough, but that they have to excuse themselves with a label. Where does it come from? Why should people be expected to be sexually available?

JellySaurus · 03/02/2025 16:47

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 11:33

So far the only definition of 'romantic attraction' I have found is from Stonewall Scotland - 'Romantic attraction can be defined as a desire to have romantic contact or interaction with an individual.'

Not hugely helpful.

It seems to be a term associated with defining 'asexual' and 'aromantic'.

My best guess is not platonic but not sexual either. Lord knows what that might look like in real life.

They do like a circle definition 😂 Ab out as helpful as a woman is anyone who says he's a woman.

Chersfrozenface · 03/02/2025 16:44

MarieDeGournay · 03/02/2025 16:20

Romance! you left out romance, BonfireLady!

For some reason, BoeotianNightmare, Stonewall now defines homosexuality as
a romantic and/or sexual orientation towards someone of the same gender
[not sex, NB]
instead of the previous 'sexual orientation'

So far no-one has a clue why. Or what exactly a 'romantic orientation' is.
Watch out for a new version of the Progress flag, with the addition of a heart and a bunch of red roses😄

There is an aromantic pride flag, as below.

So a romantic (pride) flag would be... Stripes in the opposite colours on the colour wheel? Anyone want a go?

Stonewall change definition of transphobia - questioning  gender identity ok now
TWETMIRF · 03/02/2025 16:20

zanahoria · 03/02/2025 16:10

They could always go back to campaigning for gay rights

They can't sully themselves with helping gay people!

Swipe left for the next trending thread