Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Stonewall change definition of transphobia - questioning gender identity ok now

262 replies

fromorbit · 02/02/2025 18:23

Huge climb down. Looks like those pesky terf women were right all along AGAIN.

Saying that trans women are men is no longer "transphobic" according to Stonewall.

Dennis give good analysis and provides text:
1/ The gender borg have every right to be furious with @stonewalluk for sneakily ditching their belief in gender identity in their new definition of transphobia. Political transvestitism holds that men in dresses have soul-like female gender identities - Stonewall now denies this
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1885735444836388921.html

The reverse weasel move is an attempt to find a safe place to claim lost ground, but opens them up to attack from TA fanatics as well as looking more absurd to normal people. They staked everything on hating women and gay people and now want to retreat when it is unpopular.

Thread by @Jebadoo2 on Thread Reader App

@Jebadoo2: 1/ The gender borg have every right to be furious with @stonewalluk for sneakily ditching their belief in gender identity in their new definition of transphobia. Political transvestitism holds that men in...…

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1885735444836388921.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
RoyalCorgi · 02/02/2025 19:44

Stonewall have committed mass gendercide by dropping a whole bunch of terms.

Love "gendercide".

I'm disappointed they've dropped "bigender", which always made me think of the Big-Endians in Gulliver's Travels.

BeyondHumanKenDoll · 02/02/2025 19:31

It seems significant that Stonewall has dropped 'denying someone's gender identity' from the definition of transphobia.

After all, this is what IPSO, BBC and pretty much every journalist have slavishly stuck to, even to the ludicrous position of calling male murderers 'she'.

So if Stonewall has dropped this and it is no longer transphobic to correctly sex someone, then why are IPSO the BBC and all the rest still following an outdated position that even Stonewall has turned its back on?

Wemaybebetterstrangers · 02/02/2025 19:06

They’ve caused so much harm, to women, children and young people especially.

They should be held accountable. I wonder if someone has the capacity to/ resources to start making the links.

WarriorN · 02/02/2025 18:50

Lots of money to be made in the clean up process. 😕

WarriorN · 02/02/2025 18:49

They're all panicking

Read this thread....!

x.com/amayadeakins/status/1885455027629666574?s=46&t=A2fpFNgDRyXF2d6ye97wEA

/////
Hi, gender affirming care expert and @ wpath member here. I want to take time to remind everyone that the current #detrans rates are estimated to be+/-30 percent. This doesn't include those who #desist or continue to transition. This means that you those who detrans are valid and

Should receive support and treatment just like those who transition. I do not want anyone to be harmed by the practice of #GAC However this appears to be the case for some adolescents. I call on @ wpath leadership to develop detrans psychological And medical treatment protocols.

And it goes on in a similar fashion

JellySaurus · 02/02/2025 18:48

Oh dear, how will the Guardian cope with this? How will IPSO cope with this? They have been so invested in pretending that male rapists are women, on Stonewall's say-so.

Chersfrozenface · 02/02/2025 18:47

Ruthless elimination of:
gender-variant, genderless, nongender, third gender, bigender, neutrois

I remember seeing in Stonewall's list of Trans terms an admission that they couldn't define 'neutrois'. Wording that is long gone and which I didn't archive or screenshot (because I'm crap at that).

Msmoonpie · 02/02/2025 18:45

Must be due to all those wallets slamming shut.

Original poster
fromorbit · 02/02/2025 18:40

vandel · 02/02/2025 18:36

Their heads must be swimming. What's left of their raison d'etre now I wonder?

It is important to remember that Stonewall is a mix of true believers and people just interested in pay cheques. They will change their beliefs to whatever makes them cash. Cash which they take from our taxes:;

https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/stonewall_subsidy_2024

OP posts:
Wemaybebetterstrangers · 02/02/2025 18:38

They are pathetic aren’t they. Laughable. Trying to save their sinking ship. It was almost, predictable..

Original poster
fromorbit · 02/02/2025 18:36

Huge number of other redefinitions and alterations. Stonewall have committed mass gendercide by dropping a whole bunch of terms.

Ruthless elimination of:
gender-variant, genderless, nongender, third gender, bigender, neutrois

Thread on changes:
https://x.com/adammcarter/status/1885724978860970422

Stonewall change definition of transphobia - questioning gender identity ok now
OP posts:
vandel · 02/02/2025 18:36

Their heads must be swimming. What's left of their raison d'etre now I wonder?

Swipe left for the next trending thread