I have enough empathy for all those people’s livelihoods tied up in Gaiman projects alongside the women he hurt. It is a non sequitur to imply caring about one precludes caring about the other. Trying to setup such a claim is at worst intellectually dishonest, but at best maybe you struggle to see the whole landscape. The cause for this regrettable chain of events is Gaiman’s callousness and abuse not in fact the decision of these women to come forward or journalists to diligently research and publish what they found.
Whilst it is true that what Gaiman did has not yet met the rigorous burden of proof required for a criminal trial, and not one person has said he should see the inside of a prison cell without one. However based on damning words he himself has said it has very easily met the bar for on the balance of probability he has abused and behaved in a predatory manner towards multiple women.
Taking your points on board I’d be inclined to campaign for morality clauses being mandatory in contracts where this or that creative lead behaves in such a morally abhorrent manner that causes their reputation to cause a comic, tv show, musical or stage play to be cancelled, so anyone involved in production can bring a civil case forward (via their unions), to recover some financial compensation as remedy for wasting everyone’s time.
The notion that we should never speak truth to power for fear of collateral damage is nonsensicle.