Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women's jail campaigners demand transmen offenders should be kept in female prisons *Title edited at OP's request*

241 replies

IwantToRetire · 27/09/2024 01:29

Women's jail campaigners are demanding that the growing number of trans male offenders should be kept in female jails.

Dr Kate Coleman, of Keep Prisons Single Sex, said that the instances of women identifying as men mid-sentence is a “growing problem”.

But she believes that such prisoners should be treated as women - and that moving them to men’s prisons or a special “trans unit” would be misguided and dangerous.

“Whilst the focus, rightly in my view, has been on the risks that males who identify as transgender pose to women in prison, the challenges of adequately and appropriately meeting the needs of females who identify as transgender must be addressed.

“These needs must be met within the female estate.

“I understand that females who identify as men are difficult to manage.

“But there is no quandary about where to house her. She is female and belongs in the female estate. She must be managed in a way that is continuous with the way in which all other female prisoners are managed. Housing her in the male estate is not even a question that should be asked.

“This is for her own safety and for her own benefit as it is in the female estate that she will be able to access the services and programmes that are necessary for her to progress.”

NB Only extracts, NOT the whole article which can be read in full at https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/womens-jail-campaigners-demand-trans-33750904

Women's jail campaigners demand trans men should be kept in female prisons

Keep Prisons Single Sex claims there are more and more women self identifying as men in women's jails - but male estate would be a danger to them

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/womens-jail-campaigners-demand-trans-33750904

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 22:24

BundleBoogie · 13/10/2025 22:18

You have got very very confused. Our genitalia is a result of our sex, it does not define our sex.

In the same way that putting bleach on my hair does not make me a natural blonde, cutting off a man’s penis does not make him a woman. Think John Wayne Bobbitt- he did not become a woman for the short time that Loretta had possession of his penis.

Biological sex is not immutable by any definition unless you have started making up incorrect definitions.

It’s not a tricky concept really.

So how do you define biological sex? And on what basis do you claim that everyone else ought to agree with your definition?

Still no-one seems to be able to answer this question.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 22:24

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 22:19

More gender fundamentalist absurdity. Observation is assignment. Observation assigns the child to a class.

To assign implies that there is an element of discretion. There isn't. No doctor or midwife has ever delivered a baby with a penis and said, "I think this one looks like a girl, don't you?"

It's almost as if the entire medical profession and all sane lay people agree that born with a penis = male = boy.

NotBadConsidering · 13/10/2025 22:23

Another Zombie thread bumped by a brand new poster spewing nonsense. Worth checking those things on any old thread.

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 22:19

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 21:51

No, we don't assign it, we observe it.

More gender fundamentalist absurdity. Observation is assignment. Observation assigns the child to a class.

BundleBoogie · 13/10/2025 22:18

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:31

Here's the problem. There are all kinds of ways of defining sex biologically but they are not all consistent with each other. Some, like karyotype, are unchangeable. Others, such as external genitalia, are clearly changeable. (And by the way, children are assigned sex on the basis of external genitalia. Yes, I know that's another concept the gender police want to censor, but all observations are assignments to some set,)

And none of these criteria are universal. So if you want to say biological sex is immutable according to your favourite definition,, you're welcome to do that. It's a free country. What I'm asking and which no-one seems able to answer is why everyone else should be required to use the same definition.

You have got very very confused. Our genitalia is a result of our sex, it does not define our sex.

In the same way that putting bleach on my hair does not make me a natural blonde, cutting off a man’s penis does not make him a woman. Think John Wayne Bobbitt- he did not become a woman for the short time that Loretta had possession of his penis.

Biological sex is not immutable by any definition unless you have started making up incorrect definitions.

It’s not a tricky concept really.

BundleBoogie · 13/10/2025 22:13

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:49

We assign the sex of children on the basis of exactly these secondary sexual characteristics. And no others.

No we don’t. My children had a sex from the moment of conception. This sex was observed both from scans and a chromosome test. Nobody ‘assigned’ anything.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 21:54

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:46

Because there are multiple definitions and they are all inconsistent. But you really don't want to understand that, do you?

No, there really aren't.

In almost 100% of the population all the signs are utterly consistent with each other, and the vanishingly rare cases where it's more complicated than that have got fuck all to do with trans people.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 21:51

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:49

We assign the sex of children on the basis of exactly these secondary sexual characteristics. And no others.

No, we don't assign it, we observe it.

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:49

NotAtMyAge · 13/10/2025 21:07

Sex is coded in every cell of the human body. if you were born male you will die male and your skeleton will be recognisable as male by future archaeologists. All that anyone can attempt to change are secondary sexual characteristics - in other words cosmetic changes.

We assign the sex of children on the basis of exactly these secondary sexual characteristics. And no others.

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:46

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 21:43

Why should anybody be required to use words according to their actual definition?

Why can't we all just use words to mean whatever we want them to mean?

It's not like we need to be able to communicate with each other or anything.

Because there are multiple definitions and they are all inconsistent. But you really don't want to understand that, do you?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 21:43

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:31

Here's the problem. There are all kinds of ways of defining sex biologically but they are not all consistent with each other. Some, like karyotype, are unchangeable. Others, such as external genitalia, are clearly changeable. (And by the way, children are assigned sex on the basis of external genitalia. Yes, I know that's another concept the gender police want to censor, but all observations are assignments to some set,)

And none of these criteria are universal. So if you want to say biological sex is immutable according to your favourite definition,, you're welcome to do that. It's a free country. What I'm asking and which no-one seems able to answer is why everyone else should be required to use the same definition.

Why should anybody be required to use words according to their actual definition?

Why can't we all just use words to mean whatever we want them to mean?

It's not like we need to be able to communicate with each other or anything.

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 21:31

Here's the problem. There are all kinds of ways of defining sex biologically but they are not all consistent with each other. Some, like karyotype, are unchangeable. Others, such as external genitalia, are clearly changeable. (And by the way, children are assigned sex on the basis of external genitalia. Yes, I know that's another concept the gender police want to censor, but all observations are assignments to some set,)

And none of these criteria are universal. So if you want to say biological sex is immutable according to your favourite definition,, you're welcome to do that. It's a free country. What I'm asking and which no-one seems able to answer is why everyone else should be required to use the same definition.

NotAtMyAge · 13/10/2025 21:12

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 16:54

So next time you cross the Atlantic you'll walk on the water, will you?

Scraping the bottom of the barrel there, pet. 😉 All humans can do is sit in a machine which will carry them through the air, rather than along the ground or across the sea. It's not flying as seen in the wonder of avian or insect flight, it's merely transportation.

NotAtMyAge · 13/10/2025 21:07

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 15:33

All other issues aside, what is the evidential basis for claiming that biological sex is unchangeable?

Edited

Sex is coded in every cell of the human body. if you were born male you will die male and your skeleton will be recognisable as male by future archaeologists. All that anyone can attempt to change are secondary sexual characteristics - in other words cosmetic changes.

Namelessnelly · 13/10/2025 20:34

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 17:01

And the onus is on you to explain exactly what you mean by biological sex.

Nope. You first.

Namelessnelly · 13/10/2025 20:32

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 15:33

All other issues aside, what is the evidential basis for claiming that biological sex is unchangeable?

Edited

Errr…… cos mammals can’t change sex. If they could, there’d be evidence.

GoldenGate · 13/10/2025 19:39

legalseagull · 27/09/2024 05:41

In my work I've represented a few female to male transmen staring down the barrel of prison sentences. They have ALL wanted to go to female prisons - they know the danger of male prisons and how they will be treated there. I can't see any biological female wanted to jump sides - I can't say the same for male to female - not because they're predatory (as is the worry on MN) but because they too believe they will be abused by male inmates because they present as female. I of course don't think they should be allowed in the female estate, but I sympathise with their difficulties and more needs to be done to help vulnerable prisoners.

A JP friend told me a transwoman would be sent to a male prison but would be segregated for their own safety. It reminded me of a programme not long ago inside a prison in Italy where transwomen are segregated from men and may have supervised interaction, but are nowhere near the female prisoners. That seems a fair balance.

I've only seen one (quite passable) transman even attempt to go to a male prison, who sensibly refused to house her.

LastTrainsEast · 13/10/2025 19:10

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 16:54

So next time you cross the Atlantic you'll walk on the water, will you?

Humans can't fly ((they can operate an aircraft which can)
Humans can't run faster than a speeding train ((they can operate an vehicle which can)
Humans can't make holes in steel (they can operate an electric drill which can)
Humans can't lift 2 tons ((they can operate an fork lift which can)

You may be thinking of Superman, but he isn't human and is also fictional which is appropriate in this case because so are the people who changed sex

Blackface is a crude disguise to make a white person look black but is not close to being realistic.

Gender-affirming surgery is a crude disguise to make a person look like the other sex, but is not close to being realistic.

IwantToRetire · 13/10/2025 18:25

Oh no! Another dead thread brought back to life by the usual whatabouterries.

Just because they do it doesn't mean anyone has to respond.

Let them start their own thread not insult the purpose of the thread to waste everyone's time.

Dont feed the trolls.

OP posts:
GargoylesofBeelzebub · 13/10/2025 18:21

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 15:33

All other issues aside, what is the evidential basis for claiming that biological sex is unchangeable?

Edited

How is it we know that clownfish have changed biological sex? Is it the lipstick? High heels? Or is it that they change from producing small gametes to large gametes or vice versa? Can humans do that?

titchy · 13/10/2025 18:06

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 16:55

And the difference is...

Errrr - the flying machine is a pretty massive difference.

titchy · 13/10/2025 18:04

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 16:45

I'm just waiting for someone to provide evidence for the claim that biological sex is unchangeable. It obviously depends on how one defines biological sex, which involves a political choice.

And by the way, according to millions of years of evolution, human beings can't fly either.

Confused Errrr hate to break it to you - but humans can’t fly. Have you arrived on the right planet?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/10/2025 17:56

Cassandrazone · 13/10/2025 16:57

Can anyone defend this claim without resorting to circular reasoning?

Yes.

Can anyone defend the view that trans women are women without resorting to circular reasoning?

Sandy483 · 13/10/2025 17:52

@Cassandrazone are you saying people have changed biological sex? Who exactly are those people? Oh and while you're at it who exactly is it that can fly? You seem very, very confused about reality.

Biological sex meaning - Biological sex refers to the biological and physiological attributes that typically classify a person as male, female, or intersex at birth. It is based on a combination of factors including chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive and other physical anatomy.

Transmen need to be in female estate for their own safety. They should not be given testosterone IMO for the safety of others.

PatrickBaitman · 13/10/2025 17:32

legalseagull · 27/09/2024 05:41

In my work I've represented a few female to male transmen staring down the barrel of prison sentences. They have ALL wanted to go to female prisons - they know the danger of male prisons and how they will be treated there. I can't see any biological female wanted to jump sides - I can't say the same for male to female - not because they're predatory (as is the worry on MN) but because they too believe they will be abused by male inmates because they present as female. I of course don't think they should be allowed in the female estate, but I sympathise with their difficulties and more needs to be done to help vulnerable prisoners.

What about these transmen’s feeling of validation and inclusion as men? This isn’t so important for trans people after all? Why are they scared of their 100% identical brethren?

It’s the same as in sports. Transwomen want to compete against women for fairness and inclusion. But many transmen athletes prefer staying in the female category, so inclusion/validation wasn’t so important after all.

But of course, I agree they must be in female prisons.

Just as transwomen must stay in male prisons. On reduxx.info you can see many examples of the deviants who really want to serve time in women prisons.

Swipe left for the next trending thread