Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Susan Evans is trying to get a Judical Review to set aside the registration by the CQC of Gender Plus Hormone Clinic

33 replies

ChristinaXYZ · 08/04/2024 21:58

Susan Evans is gardening in the usual place.

From her introduction:

"The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has registered Gender Plus Hormone Clinic to provide hormone treatments to 16 and 17-year-old children.

This paves the way for other private clinics to be registered, which would offer controversial medical treatments with lifelong consequences to vulnerable teenagers. The decision of the CQC to license a private clinic, creates a significant risk of a two tier approach, with less protection for those who seek help from the private sector. This further risks undermining the work of the Cass review for NHSE practice.

I want the court to set aside the registration by the CQC of Gender Plus Hormone Clinic to provide hormone treatment for teenagers. I also hope that this litigation will prevent the registration of other private clinics providing this controversial treatment. I want to ensure that those under 18 years old, do not suffer irreversible, lifelong harms both physical and psychological, from taking a controversial hormonal treatment which is not evidenced as safe or effective."

OP posts:
porridgecake · 08/04/2024 22:58

CranfordScones · 08/04/2024 22:36

I didn't realise this. If CQC senior management are so compromised in their thinking, what else are they getting wrong?

Just about everything. They are dreadful.

PaleBlueMoonlight · 08/04/2024 22:54

JRs are difficult to win, but this is worth doing. Have donated and will be interested to know the grounds.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 08/04/2024 22:49

Hopefully the CQC being signed up to a trans lobby group will work against them when they try to argue in court they're only acting in the interests of vulnerable children?

AutumnCrow · 08/04/2024 22:37

Bloody hell - I'm sick of the actual government not stepping in with these wildly unethical situations, especially given that it'll be well aware of what's in the final Cass report

CranfordScones · 08/04/2024 22:36

MrsOvertonsWindow · 08/04/2024 22:21

Thanks OP. The CQC is of course a Stonewall champion. An outrageous bias for an allegedly professional regulator to sign up to a lobby group that promotes the transitioning of children.

I didn't realise this. If CQC senior management are so compromised in their thinking, what else are they getting wrong?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 08/04/2024 22:21

Thanks OP. The CQC is of course a Stonewall champion. An outrageous bias for an allegedly professional regulator to sign up to a lobby group that promotes the transitioning of children.

fabricstash · 08/04/2024 22:17

Thanks

ChristinaXYZ · 08/04/2024 22:05

This is Sue Evans https://twitter.com/sueevansprotect who helped bring what was happening with puberty blockers to public attention.

https://twitter.com/sueevansprotect

OP posts: